Glitching like Crazy?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

markustay63

Aug 12, 2008 15:05:20
Anyone else having problems with the WotC forums?!

I'm having all sorts of bugginess right now.
#2

goblin_pride

Aug 12, 2008 15:07:36
When it's up it's fine, maybe a bit slow loading. But the boards keep going down for maintenance at odd times.
#3

Iluvrien

Aug 12, 2008 15:09:52
I am with you on that one MT... in between bouts of "unexpected maintenance" (CRASH) I am getting slow loading, database errors and server timeouts.. I have been for the last 12 hours. What the merry heck is going on?
#4

alediran

Aug 12, 2008 15:13:20
I have them too. As an IT developer I always wonder at the quality of the personal they have.
#5

Belorin

Aug 12, 2008 15:16:23
I can't access any page beyond the first of any thread.

Bel
#6

entombmentofamachine

Aug 12, 2008 15:27:43
Am I the only one getting this stupid message? Fix your site! Everytime I click on a page beyond 3-5, it gives me this retarded response.
#7

18DELTA

Aug 12, 2008 16:02:09
-The Death Throws of Gleemax! LOL!!! This site has been driving me crazy today.


18DELTA ;)
#8

xhereticx

Aug 12, 2008 16:45:40
All the time, the old site certainly didn't have 2 maintinance checks EVERY DAY
#9

18DELTA

Aug 12, 2008 17:38:53
-You are not the only one. It was driving me crazy this afternoon. ;)


18DELTA :P
#10

meldread

Aug 12, 2008 17:48:32
Yes, I swear... I have never seen so many problems on a website before - there are websites run by inexperienced people who manage to run a more stable website.
#11

Iluvrien

Aug 12, 2008 17:52:45
I just noticed the new "forums will be down" notice... I see that there us a going down time.. but not one for when it comes back up. Unlike the others posted before.

Um... How long are they going to be down for?
#12

markustay63

Aug 12, 2008 18:59:32
At least I can read my own thread now - LOL.

My problem was I couldn't read any thread I posted in (but ONLY after I posted in it today), so once I created this thread I couldn't read it.

Kind of defeated the whole purpose, know what I mean?

At least it seems to be back to normal, which isn't all that great, but at least its working.
#13

red_wizard

Aug 12, 2008 19:02:51
I was going to bring this up some time ago. It frustrates me to no end, the in-oppertune time they choose to cease working. I have had a number of posts left in limbo, as the site craps out as I send it through.

-RW
#14

18DELTA

Aug 12, 2008 19:05:26
-Is anybody else getting a grey background? It is better than the Gleemax Green. LOL!


18DELTA
#15

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Aug 12, 2008 19:06:11
Anyone else having problems with this hunk of digital crap know as the WotC forums?!

Yes, yes, and yes!
#16

markustay63

Aug 12, 2008 19:07:59
I have learned the hard way - more so at CK and Paizo, believe it or not - to ALWAYS ctrl+C everything on the page before I hit send.

This way, when the server times out, or crashes, or just gets hungry and eats my post, I drop it into Notepad and post it when things are back to normal (which is usually immediately, when I try a second time).

Its still gets me once in awhile, though, when I forget to Copy first...
#17

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Aug 12, 2008 19:10:35
Sometimes I'll even copy smallish posts.
#18

markustay63

Aug 12, 2008 19:37:32
Someone showed a copy of the 4e FRCG to the server...

It has been very ill ever since.
#19

merrikcale

Aug 12, 2008 21:14:52
Someone showed a copy of the 4e FRCG to the server...

It has been very ill ever since.

Nice
#20

meldread

Aug 12, 2008 23:34:05
I always copy posts, but the problem on these forums is ridiculous. I mean seriously, I have never seen something this bad. And let us not forget that the place has been bugging out for awhile now. I do not see why anyone over at WotC has not found a way to fix this stuff already.

Come on, WotC! Pull it together!
#21

markustay63

Aug 13, 2008 0:09:40
Ummmm... The guy they had in charge has left the building.

Its going to take them awhile to sort out whatever mess he had created for them over the last year.

I'm not one to usually defend WoTC, but this is something they didn't foresee - that NO-ONE could have foreseen.
#22

Ra-Tiel

Aug 13, 2008 2:06:37
I have them too. As an IT developer I always wonder at the quality of the personal they have.

As an IT developer you should know that you have three options when making software respectively offering a service: "good, cheap, on time - choose two of these".

And considering we all know that the forums never have been a high priority for the WotC suits (need I remind you on the search issues from years ago?) we should be glad to have somewhat working forums at all, especially since maintaining forums and a database of this size is all but trivial.

But I'm sure you'd rather have something like ENworld where you had to pay for search. I'm sure there would be no outcry of nerd rage if WotC would make us pay for their forum service.
#23

meldread

Aug 13, 2008 6:50:38
I'm sure there would be no outcry of nerd rage if WotC would make us pay for their forum service.

I actually wouldn't be shocked if WotC hasn't already considered it as part of the DDI.

MarkusTay63-

I'm not sure what you are talking about as your post is pretty vague, unless it's what Goldomark posted.

If that's the case... why would they only have one guy working on a project as massive as what they had planned for Gleemax? Seriously, that is just asking for failure.
#24

markustay63

Aug 13, 2008 7:18:12
I really don't feel this is an appropriate topic for forum discussion, and thats why I was beng vague.

Yes, that was the guy I was talking about.

In my corporate experience, as little as it is, usually the guy in charge of a dept. is the only one who really knows whats going on in the dept. We do not have all the details, but an individual that spent MOST of his time stalking his estaranged wife probably wasn't 'minding the fort' all too well, if you catch my drift.

What happened last week was a VERY unfortunate and sad end to a series of on-going events, and we really don't know just how much he had the rest of the company 'snowballed' for the past year.

I didn't post this topic to complain about Gleemax, the DDi, or the Forums - I just wanted to know if anyone else was experiencing the weirdness I was.

I'm going to have this topic closed now.
#25

alediran

Aug 13, 2008 10:31:49
As an IT developer you should know that you have three options when making software respectively offering a service: "good, cheap, on time - choose two of these".

And considering we all know that the forums never have been a high priority for the WotC suits (need I remind you on the search issues from years ago?) we should be glad to have somewhat working forums at all, especially since maintaining forums and a database of this size is all but trivial.

But I'm sure you'd rather have something like ENworld where you had to pay for search. I'm sure there would be no outcry of nerd rage if WotC would make us pay for their forum service.

For me cheap is never an option, and on time is not the first, that means I always strive to make good software first and on time second.
#26

sfdragon

Aug 13, 2008 11:16:12
Am I the only one getting this stupid message? Fix your site! Everytime I click on a page beyond 3-5, it gives me this retarded response.

It suffer the tri-fold curse of extreme stupidity.




it was giving me some issues to the other day
#27

Ra-Tiel

Aug 13, 2008 14:41:29
For me cheap is never an option, and on time is not the first, that means I always strive to make good software first and on time second.

Tough luck when your client doesn't grant you enough resources (time and money) to do that.

For a very good example on how the client can cut short the developers, take a look at the lousy ending of Knights of the Old Republic 2.

Lucas Arts wanted to put the game out before x-mas, and therefore the developers didn't have enough time to finish the game as planned, being forced to instead place a cut short ending (which is painfully obvious in the game).

What a developer wants to do, and what he is actually able and allowed to do withing the client's or contract's definitions are very often two very different things.
#28

alediran

Aug 13, 2008 14:44:51
That's why I never work cheaply. I pride myself in the product quality, it's my personal signature.

The only company I worked for that gave me less than minimum required equipement for the job was forced to find another one to do the job after I quited.
#29

red_wizard

Aug 13, 2008 14:49:43
I pride myself on product quality aswell, but that's not always plausible when working under someone. If the budget isn't there, and the time is paramount, the final result is going to suffer.

-RW
#30

meldread

Aug 13, 2008 22:35:01
I have to definitely second Ra-Tiel on KotR2. In my opinion it had the potential to be an even better game than the first - I loved it. However, as I got closer and closer to the ending the whole game seemed to just collapse around itself and things stopped making sense. What started out as an awesome experience quickly turned to disappointment.

That's a bit off topic, but oh well. :P

Realms connection: Kreia totally worshiped Shar. :P
#31

markustay63

Aug 13, 2008 22:37:58
I requested this topic be closed this morning, but I guess my request was ignored.

It doesn't seem to serve any purpose now that the forums are back to normal.

LK, if you're around, please have this puppy locked.
#32

lord_karsus

Aug 15, 2008 20:09:35
LK, if you're around, please have this puppy locked.

-I put in the order to have it merged and moved the day you created it. Something's wrong, since nothing is being processed. I don't know.