| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1vaalingrade_ashland_02Oct 28, 2008 16:52:57 | It wasn't censored a week ago and it certainly isn't a word that needs to be censored. They get away with it on daytime television for crying out loud. |
| #2RUMPLESTIXOct 28, 2008 17:00:17 | It wasn't censored a week ago and it certainly isn't a word that needs to be censored. They get away with it on daytime television for crying out loud. Does that mean the censor 'GD' or the phrase you are representing with the letters? ![]() |
| #3zammmOct 28, 2008 17:03:23 | I'm guessing he's talking about the word 'deitycurse', only with synonyms. |
| #4wight_chocolateOct 28, 2008 18:21:58 | *******. Yep, he means "goshdarn". |
| #5awesome_dudeOct 28, 2008 18:30:24 | I always write it "god damn." That seems to work, but I agree with the OP's sentiment. |
| #6crimson_lancerOct 28, 2008 22:13:30 | Is it really that important to you, Vaal? ![]() |
| #7emwasickOct 29, 2008 2:35:17 | Is it really that important to you, Vaal? You better ******* believe it is. |
| #8vaalingrade_ashland_02Oct 29, 2008 10:44:39 | Is it really that important to you, Vaal? Yes, yes it is. |
| #9ArtifactOct 29, 2008 10:54:24 | I only use 'em if I need to put a bit of *snap* into the post, but as long as I'm free to say "damn" and "hell", I'm okay. Don't recall ever having a need for GD. One curse that does serve me well though is "Father Mocker"; you'd be surprised how often that one fits my mood ;). |
| #10umbralknightOct 29, 2008 17:11:47 | Surely there must be more meaningful things for the ORCs to spend time addressing, yes? |
| #11awesome_dudeOct 29, 2008 17:29:42 | Surely there must be more meaningful things for the ORCs to spend time addressing, yes? Probably. This isn't part of their job description, though. |
| #12crimson_lancerOct 29, 2008 17:35:10 | Well, that's just sad. :$ |
| #13vaalingrade_ashland_02Oct 29, 2008 21:39:48 | Surely there must be more meaningful things for the ORCs to spend time addressing, yes? Which is the point. They shouldn't have wasted good time that should have been spent permabanning filtering words. |
| #14umbralknightOct 30, 2008 2:14:58 | Which is the point. They shouldn't have wasted good time that should have been spent permabanning filtering words. Well gee, ok, but its done now. Live with it. I find it highly unlikely that it is somehow an intrinsic part of the way you conduct discourse. If it is that would be most distressing. |
| #15vaalingrade_ashland_02Oct 30, 2008 7:34:18 | It was stupid to do it and they should undo it. |
| #16fenrir7139Oct 30, 2008 7:49:32 | It does seem a little ridiculous to me, but whatever. If I can say "God Damn", I don't really care if ******* is blocked out, seeing as I can still get my point across with just a space bar stroke. Plus, to get the feeling of GD without spaces, you could just go: "Gawdamn!" or something similar. (Besides, its not even a word; I usually run my posts through IE Spell-Checker, and Un-Spaced GD was wrong! If Bill Gates decrees it, we must obey! :P) |
| #17ZherogOct 30, 2008 8:57:40 | Did Customer Service do this, or did Community Management add that to the filter? By blaming the WizOs (I refuse to use the new, stupid name) you could be barking up the wrong tree. |
| #18ORC_ChaosOct 31, 2008 1:04:43 | If you'd like to make a suggestion for the forums, you can send it through the Email Us tab at Customer Service. |
| #19pigknightNov 10, 2008 14:40:40 | Jebus Kristy peoples. Goshdangit! Can't we just goodydarnit get along? |
| #20TectuktitlayNov 10, 2008 20:15:16 | Jebus Kristy peoples. Goshdangit! Can't we just goodydarnit get along? Hey now! Don't you ing use proxy words for damn curse words. Don't you know, only the intent matters?!?!? Saying "goshdarnit" is EXACTLY the same as saying damnit. *mutters* So many bleedin' folks don't read their bleedin' Bible....'cause knowing is half the battle. |
| #21warlawkNov 10, 2008 21:27:56 | I only use 'em if I need to put a bit of *snap* into the post, but as long as I'm free to say "damn" and "hell", I'm okay. "No no sweety, I didn't just yell Mother ****** in front of the kids, I was... uhhhhh, praising Brother Tucker, patron saint of shocks and burns!" Heh, luckily my wife is worse about cutting loose in front of the kids than I am so I have a little slack if I do something painful :P |
| #22zeratulcraftNov 10, 2008 22:32:07 | And there's only one soap opera I ever saw with Unicorns in it. |
| #23knights_discipleNov 11, 2008 0:41:44 | I'd discuss this with you, but then the thread would get locked, at the least. |
| #24MrCelsiusNov 11, 2008 13:47:50 | Perhaps if you used "accursed" instead "god damned*", the censor might not blow a gasket. Shouldn't it be hyphenated? God-damned? |
| #25stardrifterNov 12, 2008 10:30:28 | They're censoring that now? wow (not the game, just wow) By the way, why, on american tv, do they always censor the 'hole' part of the extended version of A hole when it's the other part of the word that's vulgar? Always confuses me. |
| #26stardrifterNov 12, 2008 10:38:57 | Is that true?? *shakes head, looks puzzled* |
| #27zombie_babiesNov 12, 2008 10:40:38 | 'Fraid so. |
| #28stardrifterNov 12, 2008 11:55:01 | that's... really odd. |
| #29solikNov 12, 2008 13:26:22 | Everyone knows "gorram" is a much better word anyways. |
| #30awesome_dudeNov 12, 2008 13:27:17 | Everyone knows "gorram" is a much better word anyways. No. No it isn't. |
| #31CoarseDragonNov 12, 2008 19:24:16 | I don't much care but I would like to know in what context can that phrase be used and still be acceptable within the bounds of the CoC paragraph below? Do not use, post, distribute or link to obscene, pornographic, sexually explicit, graphically or gratuitously violent, derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive, hateful or discriminatory language or content. This includes "masking" language by using alternative characters/spelling/spacing to get around profanity filters or claims of profanity filter "testing." |
| #32awesome_dudeNov 13, 2008 7:00:42 | I don't much care but I would like to know in what context can that phrase be used and still be acceptable within the bounds of the CoC paragraph below? Example: "I god damn agree." |
| #33goblin_prideNov 13, 2008 10:35:18 | I don't much care but I would like to know in what context can that phrase be used and still be acceptable within the bounds of the CoC paragraph below? Wouldn't enforcement of that be left to a moderator of some sort? Wait, what am I thinking, they're too busy snuffing out all traces of religious or political discussion from the Off-Topic forum to enforce the CoC. |
| #34WebsterNov 13, 2008 21:10:54 | Wouldn't enforcement of that be left to a moderator of some sort? I think you're confusing the two groups of moderators- VCL handle the off topic stuff, ORCs enforce the CoC. |
| #35goblin_prideNov 14, 2008 16:20:10 | I think you're confusing the two groups of moderators- VCL handle the off topic stuff, ORCs enforce the CoC. So VCLs just keep posts on-topic? They don't enforce the CoC? |
| #36mudbunnyNov 26, 2008 9:41:27 | So VCLs just keep posts on-topic? They don't enforce the CoC? The only technique available to VCLs for the enforcement of the CoC is the same as every other user on these boards: The Report This Post button found next to each post. And VCLs who report posts aren't given any favourite treatment or anything like that. Our reports are treated the same as everybody else and given the same priority and consideration. |
| #37goblin_prideDec 04, 2008 23:51:06 | Example: "I god damn agree." That sentence is horrible. Grammatically it makes no sense. It should read "I agree, god damn it", "God damn it, I agree", or even "I, God damned, agree". If you're going to pepper your language with expletives, the least you could do is use them in the right place and tense. For the record, I was sixteen when my father got out of the navy. I swear like a sailor because of genetics as well as surroundings. |
| #38goblin_prideDec 08, 2008 3:27:16 | And besides, one shouldn't take ones God's name in vain... Buggery wholesomeness, don't go turning the whole thing religious, that's banned. I was pointing out that if they're gonna curse, do it right. |
| #39zombie_babiesDec 08, 2008 9:15:10 | Understood! My pleasure, goddammit. ;) |
| #40awesome_dudeDec 08, 2008 11:57:24 | That sentence is horrible. Grammatically it makes no sense. It should read "I agree, god damn it", "God damn it, I agree", or even "I, God damned, agree". If you're going to pepper your language with expletives, the least you could do is use them in the right place and tense. It is the best sentence ever. Deal with it. |
| #41ulic_qel-dromaDec 08, 2008 13:42:25 | This whole thing is ridiculous. It's Wotc's website, if they don't want you saying that then don't say it. Problem solved. |
| #42awesome_dudeDec 08, 2008 19:04:16 | I can say Note the large picture of the ***** in the Wikipedia article. (Yes, this post was written for the explicit purpose of demonstrating how arbitrary and stupid WotC's censorship policy is.) |
| #43tired_hungry_dolgrimDec 08, 2008 21:44:01 | I would not be shocked or offended by the word . I was however a little surprised by the picture of the ***** in the Wiki article. I mean, god damn, did they have to make it so large and in-your-face? It was half the width of the god damn wiki page! Oh, so I can say 'god damn'? What the hell is this god damn thread about then? Wait, did I just offend someone? If so I appologize; I meant '*******'. ![]() |
| #44vaalingrade_ashland_02Dec 08, 2008 23:29:57 | I wonder if we still have to rooster our crossbows. |
| #45awesome_dudeDec 09, 2008 6:33:58 | I would not be shocked or offended by the word . I was however a little surprised by the picture of the ***** in the Wiki article. I mean, god damn, did they have to make it so large and in-your-face? It was half the width of the god damn wiki page! It's also about usefulness in a conversation. Example: "The human ***** is made up of three columns of tissue: two corpora cavernosa lie next to each other on the dorsal side and one corpus spongiosum lies between them on the ventral side." vs. See my point? |
| #46ORC_NashiraDec 09, 2008 9:47:59 | I've removed content from this thread pleas review the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code of Conduct here: http://forums.gleemax.com/community_coc.php Let's keep posts polite, respectful of others and on topic. Please avoid masking. |
| #47royalblueeyesDec 09, 2008 9:56:20 | I wonder if we still have to rooster our crossbows. I didn't immediately get this. For those who didn't, think about it. It fits my example perfectly. |
| #48vaalingrade_ashland_02Dec 09, 2008 12:57:50 | I'm stunned that in a thread over how stupid it is to have a word censored, we get posts removed for masking. |
| #49zeratulcraftDec 09, 2008 13:58:27 | I'm stunned that in a thread over how stupid it is to have a word censored, we get posts removed for masking. Same rules for the whole site, it's not that amazing. |
| #50rinonalyrna_fathomlinDec 09, 2008 14:22:26 | And the rule against masking swear words is nothing new, either. |
| #51msatranDec 09, 2008 16:53:05 | My point is that we can bleep out our own swear words. I mean, come on, folks. You're all supposed to know the rules. If they want to censor stuff, then fine, but that means that we have a responsibility to put in the buzzing sound ourselves, be it a bunch of asterisks, or a bleepity bleeping series of bleeping bleeps! I'm actually kind of appalled that staff chooses to assume that people will be A) irresponsible and B) stupid in that we can't understand that some things are offensive to people. There are a lot of words you can't say on television. Perhaps these folks should just Xerox George Carlin's 500 word list and bleep them all out. |
| #52vaalingrade_ashland_02Dec 09, 2008 17:22:32 | And the rule against masking swear words is nothing new, either. The point is context. *sigh* one of the many problems around here. |
| #53rinonalyrna_fathomlinDec 09, 2008 18:01:19 | The point is context. Excuse me? All I did was state a point of fact. |
| #54ORC_ChaosDec 09, 2008 19:09:18 | I’ve removed content from this thread because Inappropriate Content is a violation of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code of Conduct here: http://forums.gleemax.com/community_coc.php |
| #55erevis_cale_dupDec 09, 2008 20:15:36 | Dark and Empty....:D |
| #56orc_tuhtethDec 10, 2008 10:44:38 | Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, and/or a new thread or threads created in its place. |