Post Count

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Seeker95

Mar 01, 2010 7:08:36
In previous iterations of the Boards, post count was not visible in the threads. You had to go to a person's profile to see it.  I'd prefer to see this reinstated.

Why? Because it irks me a little bit that my 23,000+ post count dropped to below 5,700 with the new Boards and there doesn't seem to be any reason for it.  You see, post count is unimportant to me until someone else makes it important. Listing post counts in everybody's posts makes it important. I would like my post count listing to reflect my post count.

Yeah, it's selfish, and in the grand scheme of things not important at all. Except to me.

tl/dr:
Can we either get post counts corrected, or hide them completely?
#2

dropthembones

Mar 05, 2010 7:09:12
You know what I hate? That this is my 4th account because WotC has lost my other ones. I have talked to them about it and have only gotten a "We are unable to help" speech. I have been on the boards since 2005. Total I should have over 10k in posts.
#3

Seeker95

Mar 05, 2010 13:44:46
That would suck. Truly. I suspect the problem is not one that Customer Service can actually help with, but Tech should be able to. Have you tried sending an email to Mark Jindra or Trevor directly?
#4

lhockee

Mar 05, 2010 14:08:17
I say remove Post Count and Date Joined all together. Neither adds anything to the validity of any-ones arguments or discussions. Neither does either add to the level of "respect" some online participants feel accompanies a high "post count" or "I joined before this site even existed!" Some people, as the saying goes, should be shot.
#5

zombie_babies

Mar 05, 2010 15:10:55
But some of us like to keep track of exactly how much time we've wasted.  You know, for accounting purposes.  April 15th is rapidly approaching after all. 
#6

Seeker95

Mar 05, 2010 19:01:13
If we are going to display post count, I would like to have my correct count back. I was 6th in total post count for active members when the system changed over, and somehow lost about 75% of my count. Yes, it's selfish. But not harmfully selfish.
#7

calronmoonflower

Mar 05, 2010 19:13:26
Because it irks me a little bit that my 23,000+ post count dropped to below 5,700 with the new Boards and there doesn't seem to be any reason for it. 

I know the reason. Archived posts where not transfered to the new forum and as such are not counted.
#8

Seeker95

Mar 06, 2010 7:46:15
Let's bring back the archives then!
(Although I'm still in favor of not having post counts displayed at all.)
#9

Cpt_Micha

Mar 06, 2010 11:17:54
I wonder how much my post count was skewed by the forum change.

I actually kind of like the post counts. It gives me a decent excuse for an Over 9000 joke when a poster hit's that Dubious Honor of post count.
#10

Dargurd

Mar 07, 2010 8:12:44
I kind of like having a post count there. It reminds me of how little i have contributed to the boards considering how long ive been hanging around them...

Note to self: become a more active member of the WOTC forums !
#11

lhockee

Mar 07, 2010 12:24:49
It gives me a decent excuse for an Over 9000 joke when a poster hit's that Dubious Honor of post count.



No! Bad Micha, bad! Back away from the joke slowly, with your hands away from the keyboard, and no one need get hurt...
#12

Cpt_Micha

Mar 07, 2010 23:38:19
I'll make sure to crack it when you get the Dubious Honor, buddy :-p

#13

EscherEnigma

Mar 08, 2010 12:22:37
Neither adds anything to the validity of any-ones arguments or discussions. Neither does either add to the level of "respect" some online participants feel accompanies a high "post count" or "I joined before this site even existed!"


Spoken like someone with a recent join date and a low post count.  :p

#14

scipio

Mar 08, 2010 16:03:23
Neither adds anything to the validity of any-ones arguments or discussions. Neither does either add to the level of "respect" some online participants feel accompanies a high "post count" or "I joined before this site even existed!"


Spoken like someone with a recent join date and a low post count.  :p



I agree with Lhockee.  A high post count or a join date from way back in the day doesn't necessarily mean anything by itself.  And before anyone mentions it, yes I know my post count isn't anywhere near the likes of Seeker or yourself, although I have been on here for several years now.
#15

zombie_babies

Mar 09, 2010 8:51:06
If it doesn't mean anything, it doesn't mean anything.  And you're right, it doesn't mean anything.  Which means that there's nothing wrong with displaying it.  If it doesn't mean anything, what can it do?
#16

Seeker95

Mar 09, 2010 10:15:39
If it doesn't mean anything, it doesn't mean anything.  And you're right, it doesn't mean anything.  Which means that there's nothing wrong with displaying it.  If it doesn't mean anything, what can it do?

But it does mean something once it is displayed. It may mean different things to different people, and it may mean nothing to some people, but it does mean something.
  • Some may ascribe to it a level of respect. Others, a derision of "you have no life".

  • To some it shows "this guy managed to post that much without getting banned" and to others it may say "this guy knows how to toe the line".

  • To some, it says "so few posts in so much time means this person speaks only when it is important. To others, the same ratio may say "lurker".

  • To some, it is simply an opportunity to say congrats when a milestone is crossed.


For me, it shows my level of participation over the 9 years I have been on the Boards. Having it drop from over 23,000 to under 6,000 because the admins didn't count the archived posts is frustrating. It feels similar to not having the grades count toward GPA when transfering credits from one college to another.

It's posted, so post it accurately.
#17

zombie_babies

Mar 09, 2010 10:27:54
Nothin' to argue with there.  ;)
#18

lhockee

Mar 09, 2010 10:41:38
Spoken like someone with a recent join date and a low post count.  :p



And that's why we like you, EE, always tellin' it like it is!
#19

Cpt_Micha

Mar 09, 2010 20:05:48


And that's why we like you, EE, always tellin' it like it is!



Don't worry buddy, you are just 6,551 posts away.
#20

lhockee

Mar 10, 2010 10:32:09
I better get to work then eh? Wouldn't want to have a low rep now would I?
#21

zombie_babies

Mar 10, 2010 11:59:21
something I missed cuz I wasn't listening



Wha?  Sorry buddy, I don't pay attention to people with fewer than 5k posts. 
#22

scipio

Mar 10, 2010 13:18:15
something I missed cuz I wasn't listening



Wha?  Sorry buddy, I don't pay attention to people with fewer than 5k posts. 


What? no special consideration for those of us who don't post a ton but have been around since the Pleistocene era? :P
#23

lhockee

Mar 10, 2010 15:53:45
Oh, maybe instead of removing Post Count, we glorify it? How about anyone with, say, 5k Post Counts automatically adds a +1 Bonus to any argument they make, allowing them to negate a lesser forum member's argument, 'cause they have more posts. And a 10k PC adds +2, and so on and so forth. This way those with high PC get something useful out of their invested time, and all the other peons? They can be ignored like the forum dribble they are.

I have a lot of work to catch up on though, I don't want to be a peon!
#24

zombie_babies

Mar 10, 2010 16:08:27
If no one of consequence (at least 5k posts) is gonna comment, we may as well close this, no? 
#25

lhockee

Mar 10, 2010 16:13:14

#26

scipio

Mar 10, 2010 16:33:47



That's ok Lhockee, I was one of those 5k+ posters before the transition to the new forums.  I got hit with a demotion to peon. Tongue out
#27

lhockee

Mar 11, 2010 11:49:36
Somehow, just knowing that, makes me feel a whole lot better. ;)
#28

Ryltar_Swordsong

Mar 11, 2010 20:07:03
Post counts don't matter. I used to have 6000+ posts, then they changed the forums a couple times and it dropped to 2500+ posts. Then they made the latest change, and now I apparently have only posted 160 time in almost 9 years on the boards. Years ago they made post counts visible only in profiles to cut down on the elitism and flamewars. I say go back to that. It's what you post, not how much you post.
#29

Seeker95

Mar 12, 2010 6:36:38
Years ago they made post counts visible only in profiles to cut down on the elitism and flamewars. I say go back to that.

This would be my preference as well. But if they are going to display them, then display them accurately.

#30

tsukinousagi

Mar 12, 2010 10:54:03
I rather despise post counts being visible ever.

Too often it's no better than an epenis.

Post count isn't as bad as forum rep that some places use though. Rep is the ultimate bad idea.

Join date is ok, lets a person know if you can be assumed to be familiar with the forum. But it has limitations as clearly some are older members than their join date indicates for various reasons.

I'm glad we appear to have no 'labels' as they too are just dreadful epenis options. People end up posting just to get rid of a newbie label.
#31

zahkaryii

Mar 12, 2010 10:54:20
Years ago they made post counts visible only in profiles to cut down on the elitism and flamewars. I say go back to that.

This would be my preference as well.



I agree as well, post counts add very little to anything. Though I personally care not about how "accurate" a post count I have, so I have no opinion on that matter.
#32

Seeker95

Mar 12, 2010 11:11:13
Too often it's no better than an epenis.

It has been said that those who despise epenises do so because their epenis is inadequate.

#33

zombie_babies

Mar 12, 2010 12:26:25
It has been said that those who despise epenises do so because their epenis is inadequate.



Yar!

Does my post count scare you? 
#34

Seeker95

Mar 12, 2010 13:15:57
Does my post count scare you?

It is three times larger than adequate.

#35

generalhenry

Mar 12, 2010 13:19:02
01 join date and 'scribe'

You don't need a post count to project authority :p 
#36

generalhenry

Mar 12, 2010 13:20:38
Post counts don't matter. I used to have 6000+ posts, then they changed the forums a couple times and it dropped to 2500+ posts. Then they made the latest change, and now I apparently have only posted 160 time in almost 9 years on the boards. Years ago they made post counts visible only in profiles to cut down on the elitism and flamewars. I say go back to that. It's what you post, not how much you post.

01 join date + uncon cup does the trick fine
#37

zombie_babies

Mar 12, 2010 14:15:36
It is three times larger than adequate.



Yeah.  I got nothin' to say, really.  I just got a whole lot of nothin' to say.  ;)
#38

lhockee

Mar 12, 2010 14:42:46
You're the best at having nothing to say, Z_B, and letting us know by saying it. Really.
#39

Mr_Miscellany

Mar 13, 2010 15:21:17
Hrm could we get them to add in banned accounts too? I'd be over 10,000 posts, I'm sure.
#40

tsukinousagi

Mar 13, 2010 20:45:45
Too often it's no better than an epenis.

It has been said that those who despise epenises do so because their epenis is inadequate.




well an epenis doesn't mean anything to a woman of course.

And I have never felt artificial reputations to be meriting much.

I'd much rather be recognized as meaningful based on my name if anything.
#41

lhockee

Mar 14, 2010 13:18:38
I'd much rather be recognized as meaningful based on my name if anything.



Heh, ain't that the truth? Some people though? They have weird names. {teasing}
#42

dropthembones

Mar 14, 2010 14:39:36
That would suck. Truly. I suspect the problem is not one that Customer Service can actually help with, but Tech should be able to. Have you tried sending an email to Mark Jindra or Trevor directly?

I cannot remember the actual talk I had with them, but I can try that...I would love to have my original name back again. Can you send me their email's if you have them.

#43

Seeker95

Mar 14, 2010 21:30:32
Trevor is on the Boards as WotC_Trevor. You can PM him.
Same for Mark Jindra: WotC_Mark
#44

dropthembones

Mar 14, 2010 21:37:33
Thanks for the info...I am gonna try that out.