| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1gamer_zer0Apr 09, 2008 18:43:22 | The RPG forums are a place for the discussion of any all all RPG related topics that are not specific to D&D or Star Wars. This will include dicussion of rpg design, open rpgs, etc. I'd love to see some proposals on how these forums could be structured. |
| #2WebsterApr 09, 2008 23:23:04 | Will these be under Gleemax, or alongside the D&D boards? |
| #3trappedsliderApr 10, 2008 0:48:49 | Would they replace all of the d20 boards not counting d20 modern's boards? |
| #4WebsterApr 10, 2008 1:05:04 | You can have very broad topics for the boards. RPG Mechanics- to discuss the various game mechanics/rules of different systems RPG Plots/Settings- to discuss game settings/plots RPG Characters- to discuss game characters, character generation and other character issues. |
| #5gamer_zer0Apr 10, 2008 1:15:50 | We'll be having sections such as: RPG Board Games and Miniatures D&D Axis and Allies And so on. WotC brands will have pages that are skinned with the brand (D&D, A&A, etc). The other forums (RPG, TCG, BG&M, etc) will be Gleemax skinned. (Remember that this won't affect those with custom settings) RPG should include everything that isn't a WotC brand. d20 and d20 modern will be covered under RPG for now. When more d20 products are released by WotC we'll look into creating their own forums at that time. If you have any questions about what should be included under here, let me know. Examples appreciated. (i.e. should Astrid's Parlor be included here? Answer: No, it's a D&D forum) |
| #6gamer_zer0Apr 10, 2008 10:08:14 | Would they replace all of the d20 boards not counting d20 modern's boards? d20 can have as many forums as traffic can support. |
| #7trappedsliderApr 10, 2008 19:27:42 | We'll be having sections such as: Empaished mine: So,when did D20 modern stop being a WotC brand? |
| #8gamer_zer0Apr 10, 2008 20:00:28 | Empaished mine: I'm not exactly sure when our last d20 Modern product was released, but we generally move forums to the legacy area 1 year after the last release. In this case, it seems better for the health of the forums to include them in the RPG section rather than to make them legacy. |
| #9autumn_sereneApr 10, 2008 21:41:29 | I'm pretty confused by this and the definitions. Very much not sure what you mean by "not a WotC brand" and the answer to that question already asked didn't clear it up for me. As far as I can see, all of the examples are WotC brands. Also, I think there will be a ton of confusion about an "RPG" area. D&D is an RPG and by having the two groups separate all kinds of questions come up. I think it goes back to a comment I made about the d20 boards- there are umbrellas of definitions and I feel like they are getting very muddled right now. Top level: RPGs Underneath that: d20 Rule System and then other rule systems Underneath that: Each individual game: D&D, d20 modern, Planescape, etc. Under that: D&D Settings- Forgotten Realms, Eberron, etc. As the VCL for the d20 Design and d20 Modern boards, I hope I will be able to have a say (through the community) in how these areas will be organized. I've created a thread already about the redesign of the d20 design boards here. I also still think that maybe there is some confusion about the intent of d20 Design boards. They can combine a few boards, but do serve a pretty specific purpose and host the single most trafficked board on the entire site. |
| #10gamer_zer0Apr 10, 2008 22:02:33 | The RPG area will contain all the RPG forums. D&D and Star Wars will have links from the RPG area to their own area. It'll look like this: RPG - All RPG Forums - Link to D&D - Link to Star Wars D&D - All D&D RPG Forums - Link to RPG Star Wars - All Star Wars RPG Forums - Link to RPG |
| #11trappedsliderApr 10, 2008 23:47:00 | WotC brands will have pages that are skinned with the brand (D&D, A&A, etc). The other forums (RPG, TCG, BG&M, etc) will be Gleemax skinned. (Remember that this won't affect those with custom settings) then could you clarify this statement along iwth the above one General RPG Category - Discussion for RPGs from other companies, homebrewed, or other. Includes forums on anything not WotC specific. (Autumn_Serene seems to have a good handle on this) |
| #12gamer_zer0Apr 11, 2008 7:33:48 | then could you clarify this statement along iwth the above one The process is constantly evolving, so when in doubt, always follow the most recent update. |
| #13autumn_sereneApr 11, 2008 8:42:15 | Ok then, I think I'm getting a clearer picture. The d20 boards, as well as some others, are meant to have content that could apply to any of WotC's RPG games, so I like that they are separate. Come to them to optimize your character from Eberron or Star Wars. Flesh out the personality of your Urban Arcana character or make a new BBEG based on your favorite horror movie for your Ravenloft game. That being said, there are some boards spread out over other areas right now that would fit that definition. So, to think outside the box and at the risk of being controversial, I propose the following draft layout: Other RPGs
|
| #14ZherogApr 11, 2008 9:12:55 | That looks pretty good to me, Autumn. Although I'll continue to say that I don't see the need for separate off-topic forums; the Rec Room is just fine for all that traffic. |
| #15seTinyApr 11, 2008 9:15:34 | I like Autumn's proposal, though a direct link to the "Diversity in Gaming" to the D&D and StarWars boards might be a good a addition as well. |
| #42autumn_sereneApr 23, 2008 13:16:20 | Since this thread is specifically for the Other RPG section of the boards, I'd like to focus on that. It ties with D&D, obviously, but there is already a thread about the organization of the D&D boards here.
Not quite sure why you changed up this area. It may seem minor to a non-regular, but the boards themselves and their location really make a difference. For example, Theoretical Optimization is just a branch from CharOp- putting it in a different section doesn't make too much sense. You've also deleted almost the entirety of what is now the d20 System boards... definitely not feeling that. I'd really like to keep as close to my original suggestion as possible. Here's a slightly updated version based on comments: Other RPGs
Couple other questions though-- where are those related links actually being housed? RPGA? |
| #43ZherogApr 23, 2008 13:51:55 | [G0 said these would go under Gleemax, but my feeling is, if there is any chance they are on the regular boards, since these boards are about gaming and WotC games, they should go right here) I thought Mike has said Astrid's will be remaining under D&D, even if it makes sense to everybody else to expand it out... |
| #44wrecanApr 23, 2008 14:15:21 | Not quite sure why you changed up this area. To me, RPG Enhancement is for things intended ot enhance the playing experience. Rules discussions, optimization and development belong there. RPG Experiment should be stuff that pushes the envelope. Theoretical optimization, technological additions to the game and house rules belong there. I'm just not a fan of the myriad of little genre-related forums we've now got. I don't think they'll ever see increased traffic, and I find the names of the forums confusing and not inviting. I think Digital Gaming and Media should be combined into a single technology forum. They don't have the volume needed to keep them separate. Theoretical Optimization is just a branch from CharOp- putting it in a different section doesn't make too much sense. I think it makes perfect sense. Optimization is for playable optimized characters. Theoretical is for seeing how far you can push things for the pure fun of pushing things. You've also deleted almost the entirety of what is now the d20 System boards... definitely not feeling that. In my opinion, they don't have (and won't get) the traffic to justify their continued existence. Couple other questions though-- where are those related links actually being housed? RPGA?
|
| #45seTinyApr 23, 2008 14:53:17 |
What about adding: Games: Message Boards |
| #82wrecanApr 29, 2008 14:11:50 | Actually, it should be "and not". And good idea about the legal advice. |
| #83ZherogApr 29, 2008 14:56:22 | [forum=810]Well, it seems any further discussion of forum layout is moot[/forum]. Glad to know our opinions and expertise actually matter... ![]() |
| #84trappedsliderApr 29, 2008 15:11:56 | [forum=810]Well, it seems any further discussion of forum layout is moot[/forum]. ![]() ,well atleast the old ones still exist for now..... |
| #85seTinyApr 29, 2008 16:29:04 | There are new threads in the linked that seem to suggest that wrecan's suggestion about the Char Dev (Workshop & Dev) and Char op (forum by itself) is going to be the new format. |