Screw this.

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

lycanthromancer

Aug 29, 2009 2:09:42

Screw this forum, and screw WotC (and the dumbarse, useless company they outsourced to). It's glitchy, functionless eye-vomit.


 


You can catch up with me at www.giantitp.com or www.brilliantgameologists.com in their forums.


 


Thank you, WotC, for driving me away from your website.

#2

teshen

Aug 29, 2009 15:26:20

Screw this forum, and screw WotC (and the dumbarse, useless company they outsourced to). It's glitchy, functionless eye-vomit.

. . .


Thank you, WotC, for driving me away from your website.



Actually... I agree. It's functionally is horrible and it forces certain elements that casual gamers may or may not have an interest in.

I think I'm done here, too.

#3

calronmoonflower

Aug 29, 2009 22:19:16

I think they went with functionality first and now working on the rest,
So try again after a time and see if the looks have improved.

#4

sinfire_titan

Aug 30, 2009 9:01:10


I think they went with functionality first and now working on the rest,
So try again after a time and see if the looks have improved.




They've got to change this entire board in order to convience me to stay. Even Gleemax managed to be readable.

#5

fatalis_902

Aug 30, 2009 20:54:56

I got used to Gleemax.  I missed the old one, but I got used to it.  This is just awful.  I'm also moving to BG and GiantITP, kthxbai.


 


And what's with this insert video crap?!

#6

turalisj

Aug 31, 2009 0:17:20

 I'm with lycan on this... The white forum skin makes my eyes bleed, I can't find any threads I've posted in, my sig is gone completly, and the whole boards looks like someone tried, and failed, to copy off of myspace and other such sites.

#7

justinpizza

Aug 31, 2009 0:20:41

I used to check daily, but now it feels like a chore to read this forum.  /agree.

#8

turalisj

Aug 31, 2009 2:10:23

 Same There just doesn't seem to be any reason now.

#9

yellowdingo

Aug 31, 2009 2:17:06

A few suggestions:


  • Keep the image hosting, but loose the Avatars.

  • Keep the Blogs but loose the Message Boards.

What does that create? Mass blogging where you need to go check out other members blogs for articles to reply to and conversations to participate in. Check my Blogs and leave a few messages.


 


Sean

#10

Slagger_the_Chuul

Aug 31, 2009 4:52:05

Apart from the rather eye-straining white, they could use some more support on posting and on exactly what they mean by being able to use HTML (it doesn't allow just anything; at least the old boards covered a lot of what was possible with their help).


And the rubbish smilies need to go.  They look utterly terrible compared to the old ones.

#11

LivingShadow

Aug 31, 2009 6:07:34

I took the time to salvage most of the old ones.760a5002cf894b673ffbf9a351476998.gif?v=783


Feel free to use them

#12

dark_psion

Aug 31, 2009 14:15:30

Anyone else getting script errors with every click of your mouse?


 

#13

dark_psion

Aug 31, 2009 14:17:40


Screw this forum, and screw WotC (and the dumbarse, useless company they outsourced to). It's glitchy, functionless eye-vomit.


 


You can catch up with me at www.giantitp.com or www.brilliantgameologists.com in their forums.


 


Thank you, WotC, for driving me away from your website.




 


Come over to Paizo's message boards, we're working on Pathfinder Psionics with Dreamscarred Press.

#14

tenno_seremel

Aug 31, 2009 14:54:00
Well, white background isn't that bad. However usability is currently somewhat lacking (small font size for starters...).
#15

lycanthromancer

Aug 31, 2009 16:21:34



Screw this forum, and screw WotC (and the dumbarse, useless company they outsourced to). It's glitchy, functionless eye-vomit.


 


You can catch up with me at www.giantitp.com or www.brilliantgameologists.com in their forums.


 


Thank you, WotC, for driving me away from your website.




 


Come over to Paizo's message boards, we're working on Pathfinder Psionics with Dreamscarred Press.




I've already done a psionics revision. Though I guess there should be more than simply powers that need revised. Feats, items, etc.

Anyway, I'm not that impressed with Pathfinder.

#16

Omnirahk_half-Rahkshi

Sep 01, 2009 16:41:51

Agreed.  It's looking like I'll only check the forums weekly rather than a couple times a day.  Beyond the aesthetic problems, I can no longer keep an eye on topics of interest by looking for a checkmark saying I posted there, I can't toggle up between forums (instead, I'm going back to Dungeons & Dragons --> What's a Player to Do? when I'm done with psionics, rather than going Psionics --> What's a Player to Do? directly.  And when I sign in, it takes me home rather than to where I last left off.  I hate to tell you this, WotC, but this wasn't an upgrade.   This was a downgrade.   You've tried to make this site function as both a forum and something like Facebook, and instead you've created something in between the two, able to function as neither.


EDIT: Also, I find myself going back to old topics of mine to remove the coding for bullets, because it didn't work right anymore.  But when I edit, line breaks I've placed vanish.  And I was only using ENTER for that.

#17

thakowsaizmu

Sep 01, 2009 16:59:03

Yup, I agree here. This is really lame. I can't find things, I have no clue how to navigate half of this eyebloodfest, and yeah, pretty much what has already been said. Rabble rabble!


...I want my sig back

#18

nephlite

Sep 01, 2009 18:20:42

You can add your sig back.


Hit Preferences at the top of forum. Then write back your sig.

#19

sinfire_titan

Sep 01, 2009 19:15:19


Come over to Paizo's message boards, we're working on Pathfinder Psionics with Dreamscarred Press.




 


Paizo is worse than this. Both BG and GiantITP are variants of the VBulliten 6 forums WotC used before it became Gleemax. BG is for the more optimization-oriented, and GiantITP is for Home Brewers or people who prefer lower amounts of optimization (not that they don't have optimizers, they just tend to only speak up every so often).

#20

thakowsaizmu

Sep 01, 2009 22:55:13


You can add your sig back.


Hit Preferences at the top of forum. Then write back your sig.




I already stated in a different thread to your sig responce that it was long and much quoted. I cannot just retype my cookies, there was too much text.

#21

ravinray

Sep 02, 2009 7:47:36

One of the positives that I saw here is that tables are now supported using good ol' HTML tags. At least there's some good news. But the e-mail informing me of a reply to a thread leads to the main community page instead of the thread itself.

#22

Slagger_the_Chuul

Sep 02, 2009 9:26:26

I already stated in a different thread to your sig responce that it was long and much quoted. I cannot just retype my cookies, there was too much text.

I just dug mine off a cached page from the old forums.  It's a shame about the lack of spoiler blocks, though; cluttering up pages with a really long signature is something I'd rather not do, despite the usefulness of the ZMR.

One of the positives that I saw here is that tables are now supported using good ol' HTML tags. At least there's some good news.

They could use a description somewhere of exactly what works, though.
#23

nobodez_here

Sep 04, 2009 18:59:09

Heck, I just want my subscribed forums back. I could quickly browse from one area of interest to another. Now I not only have to find all my subscribed threads, but I have to go fairly deep into the forums before I can even access them. Too much social networking, not enough community.

#24

calronmoonflower

Sep 04, 2009 20:29:07

One of the positives that I saw here is that tables are now supported using good ol' HTML tags. At least there's some good news.

They could use a description somewhere of exactly what works, though.



The wiki has a list: Formatting Text
#25

Slagger_the_Chuul

Sep 04, 2009 22:51:20


One of the positives that I saw here is that tables are now supported using good ol' HTML tags. At least there's some good news.

They could use a description somewhere of exactly what works, though.



The wiki has a list: Formatting Text



I kind of meant linked as actual help, rather than tucked away somewhere, though I guess the forums are still new.  Not much love on the spoiler block front, though.  Those were useful.

#26

LivingShadow

Sep 06, 2009 6:48:50

It isn't possible to do spoilers manually using HTML, the forum doesn't render it properly.


This is the code I was attempting to use and the end result.


#27

orc_clayben

Sep 14, 2009 1:44:55

I have moved this thread at VCL request.  Smile

#28

calronmoonflower

Sep 14, 2009 2:59:10

Well that's an odd bug!

#29

kratch

Sep 14, 2009 5:17:24


Not much love on the spoiler block front, though.  Those were useful.




They mentioned in a thread (that doesn't exist now :/) that they were looking into how/if they could reimplementt [SBlock]

 


And yeah. Looks like living shadow's code may have broke the thread.

#30

lokiare

Sep 14, 2009 15:13:18



You can add your sig back.


Hit Preferences at the top of forum. Then write back your sig.




I already stated in a different thread to your sig responce that it was long and much quoted. I cannot just retype my cookies, there was too much text.




Look up one of your posts using google, and click the cached page. It should look like the old forum and you should be able to copy and paste your sig in there.


Also as to this site. I agree its very badly done. I however can't get my official D&D news and products from anywhere else, so I am stuck here. I love D&D, but I hate what WotC has become.

#31

WotC_Michelle

Sep 15, 2009 15:20:21


It isn't possible to do spoilers manually using HTML, the forum doesn't render it properly.


This is the code I was attempting to use and the end result.