| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1PsionxJun 08, 2008 3:03:36 | Remove the thread rating system. Too many people give a thread 1 or 5 stars simply whether it agrees with their views and not on how good it is. I know this firsthand because I do it. |
| #2wrecanJun 08, 2008 6:39:47 | Oddly enough, I agree with PsionX's first two sentences wholeheartedly. |
| #3Seeker95Jun 08, 2008 7:33:59 | I agree with his third sentence too. I have no reason to doubt him. ![]() |
| #4PsionxJun 08, 2008 18:28:55 | I agree with his third sentence too. ![]() |
| #5hellmuteJun 08, 2008 18:56:24 | Not to sound dumb, but what thread rating system? |
| #6PsionxJun 08, 2008 21:50:08 | When you enter a thread right under the first new reply button is a bar that says: View First Unread..Thread..Tools..Search this Thread..Rate Thread..Display Modes Rate thread allows you to submit a rating from 1 to 5 stars. People use it to bash threads rather than actually rate them. I do it all the time, and knowing is half the battle... ![]() Doesn't have that option here though. So to clarify, remove it from the general discussion forums. |
| #7maltrokJun 12, 2008 13:27:27 | So, If I have this right; you use the rating system not to contribute to a thread, but simply to bash a thread because you personally disagree with the poster's opinion? |
| #8mudbunnyJun 12, 2008 13:34:07 | Re: Maltrok replying to PsionX. snicker |
| #9lord_karsusJun 14, 2008 18:35:16 | -Heh, at least he's honest. ![]() -That said, I agree. Personally speaking, I don't think I've ever used the feature. It seems very extraneous, so why things are being shuffled around, save the data space, and just take it out, why not? |
| #10thecasualoblivionJun 14, 2008 19:27:54 | I would think the feature gets a lot more legitimate mileage in forums that aren't named "Edition Warz" er... D&D General. |
| #11hellmuteJun 14, 2008 19:44:34 | I doubt it. Seems like to just be a popularity contest in any form. Frequent posters in one forum will vote higher for their friends and lower for newcomers. Stupid concept to even have unless there was something that actaully displays the highest ranking threads. |
| #12lord_karsusJun 14, 2008 21:43:50 | I would think the feature gets a lot more legitimate mileage in forums that aren't named "Edition Warz" er... D&D General. -In most of the other sections, that have nothing to do with "Edition Warz", the idea is still mostly useless. |
| #13thecasualoblivionJun 14, 2008 21:49:19 | -In most of the other sections, that have nothing to do with "Edition Warz", the idea is still mostly useless. If it is simply useless, what is the issue? The point of this thread is whether or not this is a problem. |
| #14sebbyJun 14, 2008 22:00:58 | It's not a problem, this rating system. But it does not work as intended. Personally, I use it to object to, or approve of, the mere existance of a thread. In the first case, it's just my non-CoC-violating way of saying: "This thread is made of stupid". Also, 1 to 5 stars? What's up with that? Who ever gives 2, 3 or 4 stars? That said, I'm indifferent to its staying or going. I never decide to read a thread or not based on the rating. |
| #15lord_karsusJun 14, 2008 22:05:02 | If it is simply useless, what is the issue? The point of this thread is whether or not this is a problem. -No, the point is the OP suggesting that it be removed, and the conversation that followed, which entailed others giving evidence and experience supporting the OP's views, for the most part. ;) |