| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1SaeviomagyJul 28, 2008 18:27:20 | wizards.com has a big "gleemax announcement" that basically comes down to this: these forums are offline in september. It surprises me that there's not a discussion thread already. So - here it is. Important Edit: Reading the blog post that comprises the body of the announcement - the forums aren't specifically mentioned. But the post does say that gleemax will be totally shut down. So maybe no need to panic yet, but also a need for some information to fill the gap. Very Important Edit: A post by randyb on his blog states "The forums are alive and well, and maintenance of them will actually get more resources thanks to this decision. (They will probably migrate off of gleemax.com and back to wizards.com, but that's the only change I expect.)" So no need to panic at all! |
| #2emwasickJul 28, 2008 18:36:44 | The announcement is here. Gleemax is getting the nuke, but it sounds like the forums will not be shut down. They may have a new URL, but that's about it. I expect the usual transition headache, of course ;) |
| #3ostrakonJul 28, 2008 18:39:51 | I didn't read it as them shutting down the forums. I think they're just getting rid of the blogging aspects, and some of the other Gleemax features. |
| #4Cpt_MichaJul 28, 2008 20:01:44 | The announcement is here. Gleemax is getting the nuke, but it sounds like the forums will not be shut down. They may have a new URL, but that's about it. I expect the usual transition headache, of course ;) I figured the forums were here to stay. This isn't Games Workshop after all :D |
| #5Cpt_MichaJul 28, 2008 20:10:15 | Double post... gotta love this forum... |
| #6Cpt_MichaJul 28, 2008 20:17:20 | triple post don't you just love this forum seriously. |
| #7lord_karsusJul 28, 2008 21:39:07 | -The Gleemax stuff...That failed miserably...Meh. |
| #8rictras_shardJul 28, 2008 23:16:46 | I figured the forums were here to stay. This isn't Games Workshop after all :D I figured the forums were here to stay. This isn't Games Workshop after all :D I didn't quite hear what you were saying. Could you tell me again? :P |
| #9Cpt_MichaJul 28, 2008 23:22:59 | I didn't quite hear what you were saying. Could you tell me again? :P Stupid infernal forums *L* |
| #10BelorinJul 28, 2008 23:55:24 | The correct strategy at this point is clear: we need to focus. We’re not going to abandon the vision, but we are going to put large chunks of it on the backburner until we prove that we can succeed at the most important pieces. Those pieces are Magic Online and D&D Insider. So they knew that they didn't have enough bandwidth for Gleemax, DDi and the forums and tried to make it work anyway? Bel |
| #11emwasickJul 29, 2008 1:29:44 | So they knew that they didn't have enough bandwidth for Gleemax, DDi and the forums and tried to make it work anyway? The section you quoted seems to say the opposite of that. At some point, it became clear that the range of proposed services was too ambitious. I don't read anything that says they knowingly bit off more than they could chew. |
| #12gabe1k_dupJul 29, 2008 8:29:22 | The Rules Compendium has also launched – it’s a searchable database that contains all the rules elements from all the 4th Edition books we publish. This coming from the Vice President of Digital Gaming. As far as I understood it was not a complete Rules compendium. |
| #13cart_sprinterJul 29, 2008 8:43:44 | This coming from the Vice President of Digital Gaming. As far as I understood it was not a complete Rules compendium. In the interview with Chris Youngs, posted early June, addresses this already. As you notice the statement that you quoted says rules elements, not rules. From the transcript of the interview that I provided (mid-June): GZ: This is the rules compendium. I bolded the parts that are important. As you can see rules elements refer to what is and can be found in the Rules Compendium, so there is nothing wrong with the statement you quoted. |
| #14gabe1k_dupJul 29, 2008 10:02:46 | I bolded the parts that are important. As you can see rules elements refer to what is and can be found in the Rules Compendium, so there is nothing wrong with the statement you quoted. Thank you for pointing that out to me. So I guess it has all the rules elements from the DMG and MM now, like he says? |
| #15dragomJul 29, 2008 10:08:51 | Thank you for pointing that out to me. Only one way to find out. |
| #16elondirJul 29, 2008 10:11:14 | Sorry to be a meanie but I totally saw this coming back when I found out how poorly they were marketing it, and when I saw the green text and in-character rambling. Okay, maybe it's just not my demographic, but overall it seemed kind of unprofessional. Hopefully this transition of resources will greatly improve the quality of DDI, especially in getting Dragon and Dungeon back up to their Paizo-era quality, and hopefully we'll still have a forum here. If you try to build a plastic model of a battleship all at once, you get leaning masts, guns that are all gooey, glue fingerprints on the hull, and it doesn't turn out well at all. But if you take your time, you can make it look wonderful. |