| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Duke5150Sep 25, 2008 6:28:49 | K, so now that I am updating my files and hoarding them on my zipdrive key thingy thang I need to get the levels of the SK's and because this is the place with all the wonderful DS fanatical experts, its a perfect place to gain the information for as few cp as possible. ( I live in the warrens, give me a break!) So I'll post what I have, and you can correct me with the right levels. Tyr- Kalak level 21 defiler dragon Nibenary- Nibenay the shadow king level 24 defiler dragon Gulg- Lalali-Puy (Oba) level 23 defiler dragon Urik- Hamanu the lion king level 24 defiler dragon Balic- Andropinis level 22 defiler dragon Draj- Tectuktitlay level 23 defiler dragon Raam- Abalach-Re level 22 defiler dragon Ur Draxa- Borys level 30 defiler dragon (Dragon of tyr) New Guistenal- Dregoth level 29 defiler dragon Eldaarich - Daskinor level ?? defiler dragon Kurn- Oronis level ?? avangion Thanks for any and all replies. (when my game starts, kalak will still be alive, so hes important.) |
| #2jonplaywuSep 25, 2008 13:05:26 | 4e or 3e? Tyr- Kalak level 21 defiler dragon Nibenary- Nibenay the shadow king level 24 defiler dragon Gulg- Lalali-Puy (Oba) level 23 defiler dragon Urik- Hamanu the lion king level 24 defiler dragon Balic- Andropinis level 22 defiler dragon Draj- Tectuktitlay level 23 defiler dragon Raam- Abalach-Re level 22 defiler dragon Ur Draxa- Borys level 30 defiler dragon (Dragon of tyr) New Guistenal- Dregoth level 29 defiler undead-dragon Eldaarich - Daskinor level ?? defiler dragon Kurn- Oronis level 25th avangion |
| #3KamelionSep 25, 2008 13:35:05 | In 2e, Daskinor was a 22nd level dragon and Oronis was a 24th level avangion. Their 3e levels are in the recent Chapter 7 "Life on Athas" release from athas.org. |
| #4Duke5150Sep 25, 2008 19:08:16 | Hey kam, what released pdf are those two levels in for the 3e stats? also yes, I am looking for the 3e levels, not the 4e. thanks! |
| #5Duke5150Sep 25, 2008 19:09:44 | 4e or 3e? So I was correct on the tableland SK's levels? Thanks for Oronis's levels btw! and yes, I'm looking for the 3e levels, not 4e. |
| #6phoenix_mSep 25, 2008 23:20:47 | Hey kam, what released pdf are those two levels in for the 3e stats? Here's the link for the PDF http://www.athas.org/products/ds3/documents/81 |
| #7Duke5150Sep 26, 2008 3:16:17 | Cool thanks, never saw that download before. I thought I had all the pdf releases from athas.org.... Question. How do you figure out what stage a dragon is when compared to its level? Can a level 1 dragon be a stage 10 dragon, a level 10 dragon can be a stage 1 dragon? I dont understand how it works. Also thank you for the 3e levels, I had forgotten the difference. Any chance anyone has premade stats for the other SK's for 3e from athas.org? I need levels for Andropinis ,Tectuktitlay ,Abalach-Re ,Kalak and Borys. Thanks for any and all replies. [edit] Holy crap! Talk about higher level npcs! Hamanu is a 35th level npc now and nibenay is level 32. Thats awesome! And of course Dregoth's levels are very impressive at 38. (one of the first real offical npc's I'v ever seen at such a high level.) |
| #8KamelionSep 26, 2008 3:46:11 | Cool thanks, never saw that download before. I thought I had all the pdf releases from athas.org.... Dragon "level" describes what level the character has in the Athasian Dragon prestige class. Dragon "stage" describes how many defiler metamorphosis spells the character has cast. You have to be at least a stage I dragon to take a level in the prestige class. The prestige class develops certain dragon abilities and spell-casting, while the defiler metamorphosis spells advance the physical transformation of the character into a fully-fledged dragon. See Legends of Athas from athas.org for full details on the class and the spells. Also thank you for the 3e levels, I had forgotten the difference. Any chance anyone has premade stats for the other SK's for 3e from athas.org? Here is the full list of 2e levels for the Sorcerer-Kings (taken from Dragon Kings and Beyond the Prism Pentad: Abalach-Re - 21st level dragon Andropinis - 21st level dragon Borys - 30th level dragon Daskinor - 22nd level dragon Dregoth - 29th level dragon Hamanu - 23rd level dragon (increased from 21st level over time) Kalak - 21st level dragon Lalali-Puy - 23rd level dragon (increased from 21st over time) Oronis - 24th level avangion Nibenay - 24th level dragon (increased from 23rd over time) Tectuktitlay - 22nd level dragon In 3e "stages", every level above 20th translates to one stage, so Nibenay is therefore a stage IV dragon in addition to his 3e class levels. As for 3e levels for the other sorcerer-kings, there were a few versions floating around the DS boards - I'm not sure where they are now, since the merge and unmerge of the forums, though. We did some early versions of the sorcerer-kings' levels a while back - most of these have been revised in the recent releases, but the proposed levels for Andropinis were: wizard 9 / psion (nomad) 10 / arch defiler 5 / cerebremancer 5 / athasian dragon 3 / shadow wizard 2. As Andropinis was a 21st level dragon in 2e, he would be stage I in 3e, but you might want to advance that or give him levels in shadow shifter to reflect his time in the Black. I don't have 3e levels for the others handy, though - sorry. |
| #9Duke5150Sep 26, 2008 4:17:10 | Dragon "level" describes what level the character has in the Athasian Dragon prestige class. Dragon "stage" describes how many defiler metamorphosis spells the character has cast. You have to be at least a stage I dragon to take a level in the prestige class. The prestige class develops certain dragon abilities and spell-casting, while the defiler metamorphosis spells advance the physical transformation of the character into a fully-fledged dragon. See Legends of Athas from athas.org for full details on the class and the spells. Awesome, thank you very much, that helps tons! |
| #10Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 7:21:29 | Ok, I just finished Rise and Fall of a Dragon King, decided to re read the few ds novels after years of them making sure my book shelf doesn't blow away in the wind. My questions are below. It states King Kalak was Not a champion forged by dark lens. It also states he was immortal, and Dregoth was immortal before he even became a champion. Whats the common reasoning behind this and ideas on why Dregoth and kalak were immortal Before becoming a champion (or in kalaks case, gaining immortality without being a champion) Another question. Is the guardian of urik a spirit of the land manifested in the Lion king (avatar) image to easily take over and protect urik with less adjustment pains for the people? (easy to trust and believe in if they think its the same old hamanu) PS: After re reading the novel after all these years I still really enjoyed it. Finished the Cerulean storm last night. And of course loved it all over again. Especially when tectuktitlay got smashed like a roach. LOL@ the draj king. |
| #11KamelionSep 28, 2008 8:17:46 | Ok, I just finished Rise and Fall of a Dragon King, decided to re read the few ds novels after years of them making sure my book shelf doesn't blow away in the wind. Can of worms, there, Duke Rise and Fall of a Dragon King occupies an interesting place in DS canon. It was written at a time when TSR's books department and gaming department weren't communicating very well with each other, so its author Lynn Abbey had to devise certain elements herself, with the result that certain parts of the book don't strictly match previously established material. However, her books are also very well written and capture the DS feel better than many other DS novels, despite the alterations they make to the setting. So the willingness of fans to accept her changes is more divided than you might otherwise expect.If you look at Part X of this post you'll see a list of "Dark Sun contradictions" - there is some discussion of the above in there. The short answer is that Lynn Abbey thought it would be cool and so changed the backstory. A few years ago, one of our members (the inestimable Nytcrawlr) got in touch with Lynn Abbey and she graciously gave him her notes on the DS novels she wrote, along with permission to pass them on to the larger DS community. They're a 45-page pdf, but if you drop me an email through my profile, I'll send you a copy. Fascinating read, and you can see first-hand where her lines of reasoning came from for making these changes. Some you'll agree with, some you'll disagree with, but whatever the case it makes for a great insight into her writing and the various layers of the setting. Another question. Is the guardian of urik a spirit of the land manifested in the Lion king (avatar) image to easily take over and protect urik with less adjustment pains for the people? (easy to trust and believe in if they think its the same old hamanu) Yes, that's how I read it. |
| #12PennarinSep 28, 2008 8:20:25 | It states King Kalak was Not a champion forged by dark lens. It also states he was immortal, and Dregoth was immortal before he even became a champion. Whats the common reasoning behind this and ideas on why Dregoth and kalak were immortal Before becoming a champion (or in kalaks case, gaining immortality without being a champion) Dregoth is also described as previously immortal, IIRC, also in the City by the Silt Sea supplement. Rajaat made him even more powerful by rewarding him with Championhood. Kalak's immortality, and his lack of the Champion template, is all Abbey's idea, to explain why so many SKs despise Kalak. They were forced to work with him by Rajaat. You'll notice he never appears in Rise and Fall as a character...the other Champions don't involve him. Another question. Is the guardian of urik a spirit of the land manifested in the Lion king (avatar) image to easily take over and protect urik with less adjustment pains for the people? (easy to trust and believe in if they think its the same old hamanu) Yes. |
| #13Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 9:34:00 | Thanks for the answers folks. One other question. I also read on the contridiction link under the dark lens being destroyed or not. I understand that in the cerulean storm, tithian requests to be freed before they "destroy" the lens by throwing it in the lava. That is just Tithian's own worry and not really fact as he probably doesn't know how to destroy he lens. But in Rise and fall of a DK they talk about "shards" these shards may or may not hold a remnant of the dead or trapped SK's life force or memory. The SK of raam is presented as giving Hamanu a message, and he makes meantion of another two possible shards from draj and balic. But I believe at the end of the novel when the dragon of urik dives down he buries the bones of rajaat within the stone but leaves the lens above in the higher layer of lava. And I believe it does make meantion of the lens. So that would mean its not destroyed. Are the shards NOT a part of the dark lens? The lens still remains intact as I suspect deep within the lava? Or am I wrong and the lens shattered? Thanks and sorry for such a long winded question. |
| #14KamelionSep 28, 2008 9:44:49 | Thanks for the answers folks. One other question. I haven't readt RaFoaDK in a few years, and I'm afraid I don't remember the shards you're referring to. Sorry! As for the Lens, though, I always understood that it was not destroyed, but merely buried in the lava and warded by Sadira (and inadvertently protected by Tithian and the Storm). This is supported by game material that describes the Lens as being intact but buried. |
| #15Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 10:06:45 | Sweet thanks! I would hate for the lens to break. Especially since its such a seriously unique artifact. In the novel fall of a dragon king, hamanu says (in his opinion and best knowledge) that rajaat didn't create the dark lens, so I would hate to have to fix it, or create a new one. That would be a storyline nightmare. Rajaat also told hamanu not to worry about how it was created or where it came from. So that leads me to believe rajaat either didn't know himself or he simply did not want anyone other than himself to know anything about his "secret weapon" beyond its uses to his cause. Which leads me to believe that the lens should be very hard to destroy. (watch its something like submerge it in salt water for 24 hours or something like that. lol!) One last comment: I think it was very cool how Hamanu was the last champion and he was "special". He drew energy for his spell directly from Borys in the novel( on top of borys soldiers). Makes him out to be a sort of Champion slayer for when the cleansing war rapped up and it was time to eliminate the humans and the SK's. He also drained sadira of her sunmagic and rendered her unable to cast spells (for a 24 hour duration i believe). Top that with his immunity to the scourge (and his hidden bonuses against those who use the scourge) and hes one bad mofo. Even more so than his already god like warrior-ness. Heck he might even be immune to all "rajaat blood" weapons used by the other SK's. |
| #16PennarinSep 28, 2008 10:07:11 | The Cerulean Storm is turning the pool of lava containing the Lens into soldified lava...obsidian. Thus the Lens is now bigger and more powerful than ever, and Rajaat's bones are encased into it. Rajaat is thus able to split off shards of this extended Lens - chunks of obsidian - and send them the Champions' way to punish them. Who is bringing these shards from Ur-Draxa to the Tablelands is a mystery, though. The shards carry some of the might of Rajaat, and his wrath. If this continues, one day the shards will contain more power than even a Champion, and an encounter with such a shard will result in certain death for any of them. |
| #17PennarinSep 28, 2008 10:14:23 | In the novel fall of a dragon king, hamanu says (in his opinion and best knowledge) that rajaat didn't create the dark lens, so I would hate to have to fix it, or create a new one. That would be a storyline nightmare. Rajaat also told hamanu not to worry about how it was created or where it came from. So that leads me to believe rajaat either didn't know himself or he simply did not want anyone other than himself to know anything about his "secret weapon" beyond its uses to his cause. Which leads me to believe that the lens should be very hard to destroy. (watch its something like submerge it in salt water for 24 hours or something like that. lol!) The idea that Hamanu has a vision of things which differed from others' is a middleway fans have found to reconcile the discripencies of Rise and Fall with the rest of the novels. In the context of the novel, unless Hamanu was lied to, all he recalls is excatly as it is. One last comment: I think it was very cool how Hamanu was the last champion and he was "special". He drew energy for his spell directly from Borys in the novel( on top of borys soldiers). Makes him out to be a sort of Champion slayer for when the cleansing war rapped up and it was time to eliminate the humans and the SK's. He also drained sadira of her sunmagic and rendered her unable to cast spells (for a 24 hour duration i believe). Top that with his immunity to the scourge (and his hidden bonuses against those who use the scourge) and hes one bad mofo. Even more so than his already god like warrior-ness. Heck he might even be immune to all "rajaat blood" weapons used by the other SK's. Yes, Abbey was the only author able to accuratly depict the power of a Champion. It's thus very difficult to put such power into game terms. |
| #18Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 10:16:25 | The Cerulean Storm is turning the pool of lava containing the Lens into soldified lava...obsidian. Thus the Lens is now bigger and more powerful than ever, and Rajaat's bones are encased into it. Oh. Do you think the shards can be used to amplify spells as the lens does? Only to a lesser degree? Instead of x100 like the lens normally does a shard would only be like x10? I also like the theory of the shards becoming "mail bombs" that could kill a SK. Pretty cool. If someone could channel and empower spells through a shard, it would make a great weapon that the SK's would fear. They can't use it but their foes can, sort of thing. Neat to think about! I would guess the shadowfolk (shadowlings) are probably the ones moving the shards. |
| #19Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 10:19:38 | In the novel fall of a dragon king, hamanu says (in his opinion and best knowledge) that rajaat didn't create the dark lens, so I would hate to have to fix it, or create a new one. That would be a storyline nightmare. Rajaat also told hamanu not to worry about how it was created or where it came from. So that leads me to believe rajaat either didn't know himself or he simply did not want anyone other than himself to know anything about his "secret weapon" beyond its uses to his cause. Which leads me to believe that the lens should be very hard to destroy. (watch its something like submerge it in salt water for 24 hours or something like that. lol!) to the first part: So hamanu's ability to drain SK's should be considered fooie and not canon? And his knowledge of the lens is also fooie? To the bottom part: Yea she certainly made Hamanu seem every bit as godly as his people think he is. |
| #20PennarinSep 28, 2008 10:20:39 | The shards are not Lens material, but they no longer are regular obsidian either. Hamanu comments on that. The shards are a bit like the orbs he himself uses to empower his spells...and a bit like his own bones which are slowly turning into obsidian. Call it "advanced" obsidian. It does nothing special though, like all other obsidian it can just amplify stuff other people do. I think it would have no special value to someone like Hamanu. Good chance the shards are secreted away through the Black by the Shadow Giants. Yes. |
| #21Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 10:23:15 | Ok, so the shards are not from the original lens (the heart) but are taken from the outerlayers of the newly melded hardened lava. Now I get it. |
| #22PennarinSep 28, 2008 10:33:43 | There is no indication a dragon cannot drain another dragon, that part is not in question or even about what she was talking about. Abbey referred to a kind of "super defiling", the kind of mega life draining perhaps (this is never described) only Rajaat uses. With this, Hamanu is able to drain Borys in a way Borys never experienced before and thought impossible in the first place, and Borys realises that none of his powers and abilities - Champion, wizard, psion, etc - can stop it. Thus, Hamanu could effectively kill all Champions this way. |
| #23Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 10:37:54 | There is no indication a dragon cannot drain another dragon, that part is not in question or even about what she was talking about. Abbey referred to a kind of "super defiling", the kind of mega life draining perhaps (this is never described) only Rajaat uses. With this Hamanu's able to drain Borys in such a way Borys never experienced before, and Borys realises that none of his powers and abilities - Champion, wizard, psion, etc - can stop it. Thus, Hamanu could effectively kill all Champions this way. Awesome, thanks! Manu has all the cheat codes. lol. |
| #24PennarinSep 28, 2008 10:48:38 | Awesome, thanks! Manu has all the cheat codes. lol. It's easy to fall in love with Abbey's Hamanu. Incredibly smart (and also stupid, like real people), powerful, able to do virtually anything - like a god - and yet insanely conflicted and troubled. A kind of variant take on the modern vampire, I would say, minus the cheesiness. And of course, Abbey's superior and beautiful prose. |
| #25Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 22:22:17 | It's easy to fall in love with Abbey's Hamanu. Incredibly smart (and also stupid, like real people), powerful, able to do virtually anything - like a god - and yet insanely conflicted and troubled. A kind of variant take on the modern vampire, I would say, minus the cheesiness. And of course, Abbey's superior and beautiful prose. Yup, But I see all the SK's in that sort of light. They are god like on athas, and after reading their 3e levels, they are incredibly powerful characters without a doubt. The thing about Abbeys Hamanu is you have seen his cruel warrior side many times, but in this novel you get to see something kind of unique. His humanity. You get to see him as something other than an immortal champion, a flawed human who gained powers he really did not want. In many settings and novels we get to see the "reluctant hero" type of character. the hero who did not want adventure or glory or riches. But was put in a situation that left them no choice but to become the hero. Hamanu fits that role in abbeys novel. He really didnt want what he got, but he had no choice. At first he just wished to avenge his people, then rajaat got a hold of him and he has no choice but to become a champion. And it seems he never wanted to become a dragon and hates rajaat for what he has become. But he loves his city so he did what he needed too, to protect his people and his city. You also get to see his ""caring" side. Which is very rare for Any athasian story. I mean I laughed when pavek and manu embraced each other as friends. But it was still a nice moment. If abbey would of had all the background info at the time of writing the novel I bet everyone would have loved it completely. For me, I can overlook mistakes as I'v seen many in the novels of other settings. It happens, no big deal. But its still a really good read (for me). Plus I'v always like Hamanu the most out of all the monarchs. (considering I was a Urikite for many years) Hamanu is a cruel, heartless, evil SOB and I like that about him, but at the same time I like how abbey handled him, gives a different view on how the SK's could be in those special situations and with their favorite servants. |
| #26Duke5150Sep 28, 2008 22:25:53 | The end of rise and fall and the lens. Ok, had to look at it again. It says the dragon of urik after diving into the lava again swims down, smashes the obsidian orb, collects the shards and leaves the lens for the mortals. He then swims into the stone. The essence (bones) of rajaat end up in the stone with the dragon, but the lens itself is still under the lava so someone could retrieve it if they wanted to. So I wonder how that would affect rajaat. |
| #27ZardnaarOct 01, 2008 0:34:36 | The end of rise and fall and the lens. No one really knows and the ending is one of the more controversial parts of the novel. It was also one of the last DS products, was the last DS novel, and was probably the best DS novel. Its also last original DS material that was set in FY 15 which is the furtherest th timeline has been advanced until Paizo's version of Darksun which advanced the timeline to FY300 or so. Hamanu and Pavek as protrayed by Abbey are more interesting than the heroes of the Prism Pentad which are a collection of stereotypes. Hamanu is still an evil SOB but it gives him goals beyond being a psychopath which is more or less how the other SK's are portrayed. |
| #28Duke5150Oct 01, 2008 0:59:10 | No one really knows and the ending is one of the more controversial parts of the novel. It was also one of the last DS products, was the last DS novel, and was probably the best DS novel. Its also last original DS material that was set in FY 15 which is the furtherest th timeline has been advanced until Paizo's version of Darksun which advanced the timeline to FY300 or so. So how would you affect rajaat using the knowledge that his bones are buried in stone below the obsidian? What effects would you employ? I also agree, of the few DS novels I own (6 total) Rise and fall is my favorite with cerulean storm trailing on its heels. As for the heroes of the pp series. I really like them. After reading realms and dragonlance for so long its refreshing to read about less than honorable heroes. I mean the treatment tithian gets at the hands of rikus and the others shows without a doubt that though they are heroes, they are not nice people. lol. I would like to know more about the other SK's, a better insight into who they were before the war. But I think the added info on manu is helpful and needed as he was the "special edition" of the champions. So he should get alittle more attention. Although I do only have 6 novels so I know I have not even scratched the surface of whats known. Hopefully the new novels (if we do get new novels) will shed some light into nibenay, the oba and dregoth. Oh and Rajaat, I want a novel series all about rajaat and his progression through his life. |
| #29ZardnaarOct 01, 2008 1:13:15 | So how would you affect rajaat using the knowledge that his bones are buried in stone below the obsidian? What effects would you employ? I've been thinking about doing a short story on the Oba and a combat scene in it with a powerful Druid/Preserver (see Arcane Hierophant PrC in Races of the Wild). I wouldn't worry about Rajaat at all. In the DS games I DM I avoid Rajaat like the plague. I'm quite stingy about what information I give my players. Some of them have read the Prism Pentad and the Pavek novels but they know sod all about Rajaat, Dregoth, and the land beyond the Tyr region. They've barely glimpsed the map from the revised boxed set and know virtually nothing about Ur Draxa, Kurn, Saragar, Thamasku although they have thumbed through Dragon Kings and have seen the cover from my Mindlords of the Last Sea book. The last DS game I ran was set in FY1015. They got a shock when I described the Rviver Agis under the elven bridge in Tyr, and raised eyebrows when they found out Sadira was a Sorcerer Queen. I also neglected to mention the date and one of them got suspicious and bribed a Templar to find out the dat for him. They got quite the shock when they found out I had advanced the timeline over 1000 years from the previous Darksun Campaign some of them had played in. I am thinking about adding a "Cult of Rajaat" into the game though which would limit their involvement with Rajaat. |
| #30Duke5150Oct 01, 2008 8:30:52 | I did something similar yet different. IMG I have an organization that seeks out people with knowledge of rajaat and kills them, destroying their minds completely if not their entire being. The SK's are the secret masters of this organization and absolutely will not allow information of rajaat to be gathered by anyone outside the "approved circle". Common rumors are never paid any attention to, but any truth concerning rajaat draws the attention of the organization and their wrath. The last thing the SK's want are people knowing about rajaat and trying to free him. The SK's also hope to prevent another "tithian" effect. And stop at nothing to destroy anyone rajaat contacts. I make info on rajaat hard to come by, but not impossible to get. Druids, wizards, psions and templars are the most common to know stories of the war bringer. Bards are also a good lead when searching for info. The name Rajaat means nothing 90% of the time in my games as his name is not generally known. War Bringer, The Fallen God and the First Sorcerer are his known names. But Rajaat isn't something I ignore. Rajaat is constantly planning and plotting and trying to become free, he is a major plot device and can provide everything from small quests to major global campaigns, all of which almost never shed any light into who he is or if he is even behind it. The only real groups dedicated to rajaat are always secret and very hard to discover that they are infact worshippers or followers of raj. Some ancient temples dedicated to the fallen god exist, but all of which are underground or deep in forests disguised as part of nature. And a small band of warlords know of the cleansing war and its purpose and are continuing it in secret. Slaying every race other than halflings. But they are killing EVERY race aside from halflings because they do not know the details. The dark lens (aka heart of the fallen god) is the most sought after and divine artifact for these groups. They believe it is the actual heart of their god. My other question was just to gauge how others would play the effects of rajaats bones in stone under the obsidian if they were to use it at all. |
| #31cnahumckOct 04, 2008 10:45:59 | I would like to know more about the other SK's, a better insight into who they were before the war. But I think the added info on manu is helpful and needed as he was the "special edition" of the champions. So he should get alittle more attention. Although I do only have 6 novels so I know I have not even scratched the surface of whats known. I don't know about the other SK's, but this is what I wrote for Egendo of Carsys, the Butcher of Dwarves that Borys replaced. You can find it in Faces of the Forgotten North on athas.org Egendo was born during the Time of Magic to a noble clan in Carsys, on the shores of the Sunrise Sea. Although Carsys’ residents considered their city the heart of the human "heartland" after the fall of Tanys, the other great cities of the former Tanysh Empire generally took turns dominating and looting each other. By the Time of Magic, Carsys suffered from disarray, mismanagement and corruption on a grand scale. Egendo and his younger, inseparable brother Tristero were taught from a young age that all great accomplishments required "sacrifice." Their elders drove this harsh lesson home repeatedly, and the brothers grew up watching their city leaders sacrifice their people to amass power. Sorry for the length |
| #32Duke5150Oct 04, 2008 11:07:23 | Great read! So what would be the date of Egendo's release? That way I know when I can use him. |
| #33cnahumckOct 04, 2008 11:26:57 | The date of that release is still up in the air, but it is after the Death of Borys. I like to think it happened during the events of Dregoth Ascending, when the ties to the elemental planes were unraveling. So... FY 12 |
| #34Duke5150Oct 04, 2008 22:56:46 | awesome thanks, and for the sake of trying can you provide levels in the 3.5 ruleset for him? defiler x/ psion x/ arch defiler x / cerebremancer x/ athasian dragon x ???? and how should I play his weakened state in game terms and what would be his first order of buisness once freed? thanks! |
| #35cnahumckOct 05, 2008 9:56:46 | Check out FFN in my sig. He is in there. His weakened state is how he is. I have an Enhanced version, which is how I would have him be after about a year of being released. There, he is just nasty. |