| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1kalthandrixJun 24, 2005 12:57:40 | Final Version
|
| #2ruhl-than_sageJun 24, 2005 17:49:54 | On top of this, the psiologist is allowed to only own four items (permanent, charged, or single-use) that have been crafted, enhanced, or in any way created using arcane or divine magic. This rule seems unwieldy, and ill defined. What constitues ownership? Does an item not count toward this total if it is merely lent to the Psiologist? Why four items and not five or three? Are items that might allow a saving throw to their user treated the same way as spells, or is a way to kind of side-step that rule? Can a character just carry around single use items and have a friend carry extra for them which can be given to the psiologist right after he uses them? What are the consequences for having too many magic items? If they don't know that it's a magic item does it count? What if an item is both magic and psionic? I think its great to note their general distain and avoidance of magic items (especially considering psionic alternatives are readily available in most DS campaigns), but having a specific limit on the number they can carry is pretty problematic. Your requirements for the class definately get my approval :D , The list of class skills seems a little sparce though. Perhaps thats not really a problem I dunno? The Will: At first level, the psiologist gains the two extra power points, as if he had gained the psionic talent feat. Then at second level and continuing on at every even level, he gains more power points just like selecting the psionic talent feat multiple times. So at second level, the psiologist gains three power points, four at 4th level, 5 at 6th level, ect. I like the mechanic behind this ability because it rewards you for sticking with the Prestige Class, but I have a question and a suggestion. Is this ability merely like the psionic talent feat or does it build off of that feat if the character already has it? If not, it would be esier to keep track of if you just listed the number of bonus power points after the entry on the chart. If the psiologist has no psionic discipline (i.e. they were a psychic warrior, they chose one at this level to apply the benefits of this ability. Why not have the psychic warrior choose a discipline for this tro apply to? The powers that a pyschic warrior gets are still divided up by discipline at the top of their descriptions. |
| #3kalthandrixJun 24, 2005 23:22:57 | This rule seems unwieldy, and ill defined. What constitues ownership? Does an item not count toward this total if it is merely lent to the Psiologist? Why four items and not five or three? Are items that might allow a saving throw to their user treated the same way as spells, or is a way to kind of side-step that rule? Can a character just carry around single use items and have a friend carry extra for them which can be given to the psiologist right after he uses them? What are the consequences for having too many magic items? I knew this was an area that needed to be closely defined, but I had not did it yet b/c I completed writing this at 11:30pm the night before and thought I would get some feed back first before making the final version. The reason for 4 items is 1) carry over from the # limit from 2e and 2) I thought too many more than that would make the fact that they dislike magical items look like fake. The 4 item limit applies to, as I posted inthe discription permenant, charged, or single use items in any combination as long as the total does not exceed 4. I planned on using the definition of ownership like it is stated in the BoED for the Vow of Poverty feat. Your requirements for the class definately get my approval :D , The list of class skills seems a little sparce though. Perhaps thats not really a problem I dunno? I have thought of adding more skills- any you think would be good. Maybe litercy or intimidate? I like the mechanic behind this ability(edit- he is talking about the Will class feature) because it rewards you for sticking with the Prestige Class, but I have a question and a suggestion. Is this ability merely like the psionic talent feat or does it build off of that feat if the character already has it? If not, it would be esier to keep track of if you just listed the number of bonus power points after the entry on the chart. The Will feature is just like the feat- stacking with the psionic talent feat if the character takes it. Why not have the psychic warrior choose a discipline for this tro apply to? The powers that a pyschic warrior gets are still divided up by discipline at the top of their descriptions. I guess I do not understand what you are saying. I state in the discription that the psychic warriors DO select a psionic devotion because up to that point they do not have one. |
| #4lyricJun 25, 2005 3:33:16 | I like it, its simply, tasteful, and asside from the points mentioned, well laid out. Ever thought of redesigning the Crystalite Psionicist from 2e? I've always loved the idea of a psionicist who uses a crystal as a focus for his powers. |
| #5kalthandrixJun 25, 2005 7:19:01 | I like it, its simply, tasteful, and asside from the points mentioned, well laid out. What book is it from- I have most everything except for a few of the Dragon mags. with the DS material. It must be in one of those because I do not remember the kit- but I could be wrong. There was a Crystal 'something' PrC that was in the Mind's Eye material from the D&D website that if you have not, I would suggest that you looks at it. It has a pretty high cool factor. Thanks for the compliments BTW. :D |
| #6travis_uiJun 28, 2005 12:37:17 | I just noticed that in the description of the ability "The Way" you state that the benefit is gained at third level and every three levels thereafter, but in the progression illustrated below that it shows "The Way" at third level and every two levels thereafter. I assume that was an editing error? |
| #7ruhl-than_sageJun 28, 2005 15:18:53 | I knew this was an area that needed to be closely defined, but I had not did it yet b/c I completed writing this at 11:30pm the night before and thought I would get some feed back first before making the final version. Right on , I understand.The reason for 4 items is 1) carry over from the # limit from 2e and 2) I thought too many more than that would make the fact that they dislike magical items look like fake. The 4 item limit applies to, as I posted inthe discription permenant, charged, or single use items in any combination as long as the total does not exceed 4. I planned on using the definition of ownership like it is stated in the BoED for the Vow of Poverty feat. While that does answer quite a few of the questions you have just inadvertantly backed yourself into a hole . The Vow of Poverty feat is not (as far as I know) OGC content and thusly cannot be plagurized for the pupose of your PrC. You'll have to write it wholesale, explaining how it works in your own terms to avoid copyright infringement.I have thought of adding more skills- any you think would be good. Maybe litercy or intimidate? Intimidate seems appropriate, but I was actually thinking about allowing them to continue to have access to their Discipline specific skills as Class skills. Perhaps that could be written in to the master discipline description or noted in the skill list. The reason being that they end up mastering their choosen discipline, so they should be well versed with the skills that ordinarily come with the discipline. The Will feature is just like the feat- stacking with the psionic talent feat if the character takes it. Sounds good , you should note that in the descriptionI guess I do not understand what you are saying. I state in the discription that the psychic warriors DO select a psionic devotion because up to that point they do not have one. opps, I guess I misread that. |
| #8kalthandrixJun 28, 2005 20:39:46 | Just updated the PrC in my original post. I made a few changes, mostly taking out the Master Discipline III and replacing it with something simular, but more rewarding for those who stick with it class for 10 levels. I have also taken several of your suggestions and I humbly give you my thanks for the feedback that you provided. If you like the class, tell Jon to add it to the next update to the PrC's for Athas. If you don't like it well, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() !!!!!Hahahah, just kidding. I had fun putting this together and hope someone else will get some use from it too. |
| #9jon_oracle_of_athasJun 29, 2005 3:10:29 | Send it to [email]jon@athas.org[/email] subject line "Prestige Class suggestion" |
| #10PennarinJun 29, 2005 7:41:28 | This particular PrC will be fun to see as part of Appendix II, as two very different Psiologist PrCs now exist, one by Kalthandrix, the other by Methvezem. So I can imagine Jon will be able to create an hybrid with the best features from both classes. |
| #11methvezemJun 29, 2005 8:00:16 | As Pennarin pointed out, I did a PrC based on the psiologist last year, quite different from yours, which is quite good btw. You can read about it here:psiologist PrC. Feel free to comment it. Both prestige classes could be available if we change the name of one or the other ;) . |
| #12kalthandrixJun 29, 2005 8:13:39 | As Pennarin pointed out, I did a PrC based on the psiologist last year, quite different from yours, which is quite good btw. I have to agree with Pennarin- the two versions of the PrC are REALLY different. Methvenzem- I like your version and can see why you went the way you did . Your version is much more school/acedemicly focused and while I mentioned the psiologists training at psionic schools I did not add anything for it in the class features.I think that both would be great additions to the Appendix II, instead of chopping the two up to make a single hybrid version. Appendix I was really lacking in psionicist PrC's so as I said, both would be handy. |
| #13methvezemJun 29, 2005 8:25:19 | I think that both would be great additions to the Appendix II, instead of chopping the two up to make a single hybrid version. Appendix I was really lacking in psionicist PrC's so as I said, both would be handy. I so agree with you. I'll think about a new name like academician, academist or something else. If anyone has an idea, let me know. |
| #14flipJun 29, 2005 8:25:35 | Master Dicipline seems pretty powerful. Since metamagic and augmenting work off a limit of not costing more than your highest level power, it does more than just allow you to manifest more often, it also allows you to push past the ordinary damage cap for your level. So, a psion/9, psiologist/5 (14th level) can deal damage as a 16th level character, by simply using those saved points to augment the power. This actually is signifigant. So, I'm pondering wether or not the Magical Aversion restriction counterbalaces this. In DS(1|2) this restriction was a big deal, because AD&D2 psionic items were exceedingly rare. Now, it depends on how your DM adjusts the percentage chances on a random treasure table. (Quick and dirty: d20 1-11 roll in the XPH, 12-20 roll in the DMG. Gives a slightly higher than 50% chance for finding psionic items. Doesn't allow that potions are probably just as common. I said it was dirty.) Just something to consider. |
| #15kalthandrixJun 29, 2005 8:57:46 | Master Discipline seems pretty powerful. Since metamagic and augmenting work off a limit of not costing more than your highest level power, it does more than just allow you to manifest more often, it also allows you to push past the ordinary damage cap for your level. There is a feat, and I could be wrong about the spelling of the name, Elemental Admixture, allows a wizard to deal damage twice- once for each element at their total damage cap, making a fire/lightning ball that deals 10d6 fire and 10d6 electrical damage for. There are also psionic items that allow a psionicist to lower the cost of their powers as well, allowing them to exceed the level cap that you point out. The Master Discipline shows the psiologist's extreme focus on their chosen psionic discipline. Another point to remember, as a mitigating factor, that this PrC effectively disallows the character from multi-classing in all spell-casting classes (i.e., no advanced being progression). So, I'm pondering wither or not the Magical Aversion restriction counterbalances this. In DS (1|2) this restriction was a big deal, because AD&D2 psionic items were exceedingly rare. Now, it depends on how your DM adjusts the percentage chances on a random treasure table. (Quick and dirty: d20 1-11 roll in the XPH, 12-20 roll in the DMG. Gives a slightly higher than 50% chance for finding psionic items. Doesn't allow that potions are probably just as common. I said it was dirty.) The magical aversion carries some pretty heavy penalties. Players who take this class would most likely like the flavor and restrictions that are imposed by taking up the mantel of a psiologist. Another point is that all treasure is discretionary, meaning that the Dm has the ultimate power when choosing what items to allow within their campaigns. IMO this feature is a great DM tool and provides some great role-playing dynamics. Any feature can be abused if the DM allows it. All that said, I am not saying that this Pr is perfect and will entertain any good recommendations. |
| #16flipJun 29, 2005 9:30:15 | There is a feat, and I could be wrong about the spelling of the name, Elemental Admixture, allows a wizard to deal damage twice- once for each element at their total damage cap, making a fire/lightning ball that deals 10d6 fire and 10d6 electrical damage for. There are also psionic items that allow a psionicist to lower the cost of their powers as well, allowing them to exceed the level cap that you point out. I'll look that up when I get home. I don't remember admixture being a feat that doubled the damage potential, just that it let the damage be of more than one elemental type... The Master Discipline shows the psiologist's extreme focus on their chosen psionic discipline. Another point to remember, as a mitigating factor, that this PrC effectively disallows the character from multi-classing in all spell-casting classes (i.e., no advanced being progression). I recognize the purpose of the ability. Inability to take other prestige classes should not be considered balancing factors for any particular prestige class. Dragons and such have to be balanced just as much as everything else does. PrCs should stand up on their own reasonably well. The magical aversion carries some pretty heavy penalties. Players who take this class would most likely like the flavor and restrictions that are imposed by taking up the mantel of a psiologist. Right, and my point was that I was musing about whether or not it was really anything more than flavor ... but I was forgetting about the need to save against even friendly spells. Which is *definately* a disadvantage ... |
| #17kalthandrixJun 29, 2005 11:10:11 | I recognize the purpose of the ability. I want to clairify my point. This class does not allow any cross classing with any class that has the ability to cast arcane or divine magic (core classes and PrC's), doing so causes the PC to lose all psiologist special class features instantly- I will include this point in the PrC. Just owning above the alloted 4 magic items could result in losing almost all benefits from this PrC permenantly. -Added additional wording in the requirements section to detail what happens if the character ever takes levels in a spell casting class. |
| #18PennarinJun 29, 2005 11:33:15 | I really don't like the Magical Aversion ability, not that I'd mix magic and psionics with someone who took this PrC, but IMO one does not need to have an aversion to anything to succeed at something else. The only aversion I see that works is the XPH's anti-psionic feats. |
| #19flipJun 29, 2005 14:05:22 | I want to clairify my point. This class does not allow any cross classing with any class that has the ability to cast arcane or divine magic (core classes and PrC's), doing so causes the PC to lose all psiologist special class features instantly- I will include this point in the PrC. Just owning above the alloted 4 magic items could result in losing almost all benefits from this PrC permenantly. Again, nearly a non-restriction. If you're taking a class like this, you're focusing on psionics anyway. If you wanted spellcaster levels, you'd be taking levels in the Cerebremancer class, instead of burning levels on a focused class that only benefits one aspect. Spellcasters and Manifesters in D&D generally suffer from mutliclassing. Sometimes signifigantly so. Heck, they even suffer from level adjustments (unless the race has some seriously signifigant abilities or adjustments to the spellcaster's primary ability score, it's almost never worth it, from a straight min/max perspective). Cutting off multiclassing options is fluff, not balance. Don't get me wrong, as flavor, it's good, and I'm definately not arguing that it be taken away. However, as a character, I can operate completely normally under these restrictions, without suffering from them. There are likely enough psionic items that the cap of 4 won't cripple me in the slightest. The only thing that does come out as a restriction that actually has to be dealt with is the requirement to make a save even against buff spells. That is a true restriction, and one that affects the balance of the class. There are ways for a psion to heal himself, but none quite as effective as a cleric ... |
| #20kalthandrixJun 29, 2005 14:26:48 | Again, nearly a non-restriction. If you're taking a class like this, you're focusing on psionics anyway. If you wanted spellcaster levels, you'd be taking levels in the Cerebremancer class, instead of burning levels on a focused class that only benefits one aspect. Touche! I understand everything that you have pointed out, but I guess I do not see it in the same manner as you do- I guess my perspective is slightly jaded due to my vested interest in the material that I have made. I would love any suggestions you have, if you feel as though the benefits are not properly balanced. I have thought to make the Master of the Way a benefit that has daily use limits, but I do like my original concept of the power. For all of you Epic junkies out there, I have been considering the Epic progression of this PrC, but have not felt too emotional about any of the progression methods I have considered yet. I would love suggestion for this application as well. Thanks :D |
| #21ruhl-than_sageJun 29, 2005 21:59:34 | For all of you Epic junkies out there, I have been considering the Epic progression of this PrC, but have not felt too emotional about any of the progression methods I have considered yet. I would love suggestion for this application as well. An Epic progression would be very appropriate for this PrC . I'm normally not very interested in things Epic, but this PrC could easily be standard fair for members of the Order.Lookin Good :D , you do still need to rewrite this section if it can build off of the the feat like you said previously. The Will: At first level, the psiologist gains the two extra power points, as if he had gained the psionic talent feat. Then at second level and continuing on at every even level, he gains more power points just like selecting the psionic talent feat multiple times. So at second level, the psiologist gains three extra power points, four at 4th level, five at 6th level, ect. |
| #22kalthandrixJun 30, 2005 7:23:55 | An Epic progression would be very appropriate for this PrC I agree Sage, the psiologist and also the metamind PrC's would be prime canditates for members of the Order. I have slightly changed the wording for the Will special class feature and I believe that it now is clear that the benefits of the Will and the psionic talent feat stack with one another. I feel bad d/c I have sent Jon this file twice and now need to send it again (sorry Jon, I promise to not do that again when sending material in the future;) ). So the version at the beginning of this thread is the FINAL version of the PrC. Thanks a lot for all of the suggestions and feedback. I hope that some of you will use this in your games too. |
| #23jon_oracle_of_athasJun 30, 2005 8:41:48 | It's better that you send me the file multiple times than not sending any updates, but preferably wait until you have received plenty of feedback before sending me future prestige classes. To all of you: At the time being I only mark the prestige class e-mails with "Read Later" since my focus is on other projects than Prestige Class Appendix Vol. 2, and generally I don't have time to provide feedback on prestige class suggestions sent to me. Think of it like this - time is a limited resource. If I was going to spend time commenting on all the prestige classes and other things people send my way, that time would be spent on writing feedback, rather than be put to use on other projects - such as Dregoth Ascending, delaying said projects. As a guideline, try to stick as close to the format in Prestige Class Appendix Vol. 1 as you can and take the time to look up common phrases and ability descriptions in precedent sources. Stick as close to D&D Core Book terminology and wording as you can. That makes my work easier and makes your writeups look more professional. |
| #24woobyluvSep 10, 2005 1:06:39 | I want to clairify my point. This class does not allow any cross classing with any class that has the ability to cast arcane or divine magic (core classes and PrC's), doing so causes the PC to lose all psiologist special class features instantly- I will include this point in the PrC. Just owning above the alloted 4 magic items could result in losing almost all benefits from this PrC permenantly. It seems to me to make more sense that knowingly possessing any magic item should result in a loss of the PrC abilities. If the character really has an aversion to magic of any kind then deliberate ownership of any magic item would not sit well with the character. I would allow an exception if the item also possessed psionic power at no penalty. I feel this would have a more meaningful impact on the character. Going so far as to say permanently losing the benefits of the class may be a bit much, however maybe a fellow psiologist could use a Psionic version of Atonement to purge the character of magic's taint. Just a thought ![]() |
| #25kalthandrixSep 10, 2005 6:59:17 | Thanks foryou thoughts. This PrC comes from the Will and the Way kit called by the same name. I kept the same item restrictions, at least for the number of items, as the original kit. At this stage, I do not believe I will be making any changes to this PrC, but thank you for reading it over. I would suggest that you try ou this PrC and I think that if you use it you will see that the restrictions, as is, are more then adequate. :D |