| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Joseph_SilverJan 19, 2009 22:09:43 | One of my biggest complaints about 4E is that the sorcerer was not included in the PHB. The sorcerer was my favorite class in 3.5, and I didn't like how the warlock was included in the sorcerer's place. But with all the power creep going on, I think not having the sorcerer in the PHB might be a blessing in disguise. If the pattern of power creep continues, the sorcerer in the PHB2 should be slightly more powerful and/or more balanced than the PHB's wizard. And what luck! Eberron 4E will be released this year, so I'll be able to start Living Eberron with a sorcerer! Oh joy! Power creep isn't so bad as long as it benefits ME. I'm self-centered that way. |
| #2undraveJan 19, 2009 22:20:56 | What power creep? |
| #3Dark_StrykeJan 19, 2009 22:43:19 | What power creep? Indeed. Maybe he means Martial Power? Though, even if he did, I'm not sure how that translates to "Sorcerer = Wizard but better" ![]() |
| #4undraveJan 19, 2009 23:32:00 | Even there the only things I could find somewhat Power Creep-y are a few Fighter related options and feats. I was working on a ressourceful Warlord (that didn't go the thrown weapon route) and I found myself going for PHB powers more often than not, to my regret. |
| #5Marcus_MajarraJan 20, 2009 0:02:49 | One of my biggest complaints about 4E is that the sorcerer was not included in the PHB. The sorcerer was my favorite class in 3.5, and I didn't like how the warlock was included in the sorcerer's place. Living Eberron? Is this a turn of phrase or is there actually a Living Campaign for Eberron starting out? |
| #6vaalingrade_ashland_02Jan 20, 2009 0:12:27 | I can't see how there's been much of any power creep aside form Eladrin being better than you*. If your'e thinking AV, you're sadly mistaken and read too many posts by number guys. *you being the general you, which was the main theme of MP. |