| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1mysticbelmontDec 26, 2011 17:27:43 | I would love for some WoW or Diablo content to make it's way to 4e. |
| #2KalnaurDec 26, 2011 19:17:37 | I would love for some WoW or Diablo content to make it's way to 4e. From what I understand, it was actually White Wolf publishing licensed content for d20 Warcraft to be used with 3.5edition D&D. So technically, Blizzard never touched WotC. ;) What content were you hoping would make its way into the game? |
| #3Scottevil912Dec 26, 2011 19:59:25 | I would love for some WoW or Diablo content to make it's way to 4e. World of Warcraft was White Wolf under the guise of Sword and Sorcery Diablo was published by TSR (though I believe it was owned by WotC at that point) It's not to hard to make most of the stuff that exists in those games, but I could see how someone might want the talent tree done in place of the feats system (it would make selection faster for those who feel the need to scan all the books and don't have the option of character builder) |
| #4Mad_JackDec 26, 2011 20:02:11 | The Homebrew board contains a fair number of what I'm told are pretty good translations of the WoW races... |
| #5bone_nagaDec 27, 2011 19:24:11 | I wouldn't mind seeing a 4e conversion of Diablo, at least the monsters. |
| #6The_JesterDec 27, 2011 21:35:55 | Blizzard: big company worth hundreds of millions. Wizards of the Coast: medium-small company worth hundreds of, well, hundreds. What's in it for Blizzard? What do they get out of it? WotC gets to use the much more popular and recognisable Warcraft brand, but what does Blizzard get other than books that might sell barely enough to cut even? |
| #7KruskDec 28, 2011 10:03:27 | What's in it for Blizzard? What do they get out of it? Good will, exposure, and new fans. What do they lose? Nothing. All they have to do is say "Sure go ahead and do this" and if its decent they introduce WOW to those table top people who don't play WOW. If it is awful, they can simply say "We liscensed that out to an outside company. If we do something like this in the future we will keep it in house." |
| #8The_JesterDec 28, 2011 10:25:35 | What's in it for Blizzard? What do they get out of it? Because there are just thousands of tabletop players out there that haven't heard of Warcraft? It's not likely going to net Blizzard more sales and accounts: every tabletop player who wants to play WoW already does. They're giving control of a part of their brand to a company that can likely only pay a little, locking in the rights and preventing Blizzard from doing it themselves. And what's in t for WotC other than the ability to put out books that directly compete with their core RPG line? |
| #9beastsouleyesDec 28, 2011 10:43:02 | ^ This guy has a point! |
| #10bone_nagaDec 28, 2011 18:43:07 | Well it was somehow worthwhile to publish Diablo under 2e and 3e. And even though it wasn't through WotC, it was apparently worthwhile to publish WoW under 3e. So what's the problem now? |
| #11incenjucarDec 29, 2011 5:19:06 | The 2E days were before WoW, and the 3E books didn't give WotC any special rights like a collaberation would. If Blizzard was going to make an RPG, they'd likely use their own rules to do so, as with Dragon Age. |
| #12old_dogDec 30, 2011 4:26:00 | Blizzard has their new Titan MMO slated for a Q4 2013 release. WoW is winding down and there is no reason for them to produce a 4e version since the 3e version is still available. |
| #13pluisjenDec 30, 2011 4:30:21 | Blizzard has their new Titan MMO slated for a Q4 2013 release. WoW is winding down and there is no reason for them to produce a 4e version since the 3e version is still available. A new Blizzard MMO, interesting. Although according to a google search it's going to be a "casual MMO". I wonder if that's worth my time ![]() |