| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1JhariiJun 07, 2011 14:23:12 | PlayNeverwinter.com has been revealed. A great sign that Cryptic is still moving forward. |
| #2sfdragonJun 07, 2011 17:19:39 | how nice..... still is it going to be worth my cold hard cash?? daggerdale doesnt seem to be. |
| #3JhariiJun 07, 2011 17:25:53 | how nice..... still is it going to be worth my cold hard cash?? Yeah, Daggerdale is rather abyssmal (My apologies to all other things abyssmal). We'll see if it pans out. The Foundry looks cool. Hopefully they give us more information and bigger screen shots on it. |
| #4sfdragonJun 07, 2011 19:02:30 | its also multiplayer... I dont have that kind of time and I also dont like pay to paly games either. so far all I can say is not worth the money |
| #5JhariiJun 07, 2011 19:14:36 | Well then it's good that I didn't suggest that you, or anyone else, buy it (not that it's released yet, anyhow). ![]() |
| #6sir_blackheart666Jun 07, 2011 19:16:39 | i cant wait to try it.......just wish they make a game set in the D&D world |
| #7SamrinJun 07, 2011 20:33:26 | its also multiplayer... I dont have that kind of time and I also dont like pay to paly games either. Noone ever said anything about p2p. It isn't an mmorpg. It's more like the original neverwinter was. |
| #8SamrinJun 07, 2011 20:33:55 | i cant wait to try it.......just wish they make a game set in the D&D world It's set in Forgotten Realms. Or do you mean PoL? It wouldn't be Neverwinter then. :P |
| #9sir_blackheart666Jun 07, 2011 21:09:16 | i cant wait to try it.......just wish they make a game set in the D&D world i know its set in forgotten realms. get how i said "the" D&D world, that would be PoL but i just call it the D&D world.....and i also said 'a game" not this game be set in the D&D world :D |
| #10Fallen_Star_02Jun 07, 2011 21:17:20 | its also multiplayer... I dont have that kind of time and I also dont like pay to paly games either. Read the FAQ. It doesn't say it's subscription play but it suggests they might go that route. |
| #11JhariiJun 07, 2011 21:26:34 | its also multiplayer... I dont have that kind of time and I also dont like pay to paly games either. If stating that a pricing model has not been decided as of yet equates to suggesting that they might go that route, then yes, they suggested it. But no, they haven't suggested any pricing model. It is rather doubtful that they do, unless they offer a premium service for hosting professional and/or community modules on high performance servers. |
| #12JhariiJun 07, 2011 21:37:48 | pc.ign.com/articles/117/1172727p1.html More stuff. |
| #13LitigationJun 07, 2011 23:44:02 | Sewer levels???!! As if I needed any more reasons to avoid this game. |
| #14Damon_TorJun 08, 2011 3:02:40 | Sewer levels???!! I don't mind that there are sewer levels, but they say that's where the majority of the game takes place. These are the same guys that designed the CoH sewer levels: no thanks. I'm not convinced the existence of this site means the game is actually going to come out. When I see a site that has either Cryptic but not Atari, or Atari but not Cryptic, I'll believe it's really happening. |
| #15SamrinJun 08, 2011 4:03:26 | its also multiplayer... I dont have that kind of time and I also dont like pay to paly games either. It doesn't suggest anything. It says there is no pricing set yet. That probably refers more to what the game itself will cost. There will be no monthly fee, as it isn't an mmo. If there are, it will probably be for rental of dedicated servers or something. |
| #16JhariiJun 08, 2011 4:22:39 | Sewer levels???!! The success of the game will have nothing to do with adventures provided by Cryptic. Instead, its success will be defined by the power and usability of the tools that the community will be able to create modules with. |
| #17Fallen_Star_02Jun 08, 2011 11:12:33 | Are they going to completely skip on a single-player campaign ? |
| #18SamrinJun 08, 2011 14:30:43 | Are they going to completely skip on a single-player campaign ? I sure hope so. I enjoy co-op in these types of games much more. RPG's are less fun alone, imo. |
| #19KalnaurJun 08, 2011 15:54:22 | Are they going to completely skip on a single-player campaign ? Whereas I'm the kind of person that plays MMOGs alone. I hope they don't skip out on single player. Then again if they do, I can ignore the game. |
| #20ah_stormbringerJun 08, 2011 16:08:49 | I am hoping for a single player mode but unless it looks amazing I will not be getting it. |
| #21NyronusJun 08, 2011 22:33:49 | pc.ign.com/dor/objects/84411/neverwinter... I'm sorry, but I can't take a Twenty Foot high spider colored like a clown and covered in skulls seriously. Its like something Bozo's twelve year old kid would draw if he was trying to be scary. Either that or any kid who just watched IT, but that's another story. |
| #22JhariiJun 08, 2011 22:46:11 | Sure, if you just want to focus on the spider (which could very easily be reskinned before live)... but the skeletal archer is damn impressive, as is his surroundings. pc.ign.com/dor/objects/84411/neverwinter... This is awfully impressive, too. pc.ign.com/dor/objects/84411/neverwinter... |
| #23lokiareJun 08, 2011 23:10:57 | Sure, if you just want to focus on the spider (which could very easily be reskinned before live)... but the skeletal archer is damn impressive, as is his surroundings. Yeah, the real question though is it from a FMV or actual in game graphics... |
| #24JhariiJun 08, 2011 23:39:57 | I didn't realize that there was a question. Just trying to enjoy the scenic ride. ![]() |
| #25lokiareJun 09, 2011 3:32:11 | I didn't realize that there was a question. Just trying to enjoy the scenic ride. Well they can make anything look good in an FMV. Its created on a supercomputer over the course of months for a short 30 minute video or whatever... The actual game play though has to work on modern hardware of personal computers... |
| #26JhariiJun 09, 2011 5:28:23 | I didn't realize that there was a question. Just trying to enjoy the scenic ride. Yeah, most people know the difference between video and actual game play, even though no one appears to be claiming that it was one or the other to begin with. It's been that way for years and years and years. But thanks for that lesson nonetheless. |
| #27sfdragonJun 09, 2011 16:11:45 | if it doesnt have single palyer, Im skipping out. |
| #28lokiareJun 09, 2011 19:41:52 | I didn't realize that there was a question. Just trying to enjoy the scenic ride. From your statement it sounded like you didn't realize the difference. Most of what we see in video game commercials is FMV material that they want to showcase, rather than actual gameplay which is why I'm wary of videos that don't explicitely label FMV and in-game material... |
| #29JhariiJun 09, 2011 19:47:16 | From your statement it sounded like you didn't realize the difference. Most of what we see in video game commercials is FMV material that they want to showcase, rather than actual gameplay which is why I'm wary of videos that don't explicitely label FMV and in-game material... From my statement, the only real accurate determination that can be made is that I like the artwork from the shots I provided. I never even came close to implying that they were game play shots or that I was trying to distinguish anything. If I didn't know the difference, I would have asked. You guessed, and guessed incorrectly. No big deal. |
| #30JhariiJun 09, 2011 19:54:51 | That... I can't debate. |