| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1tenebriousJul 23, 2009 13:34:20 | I have been playing since 1979 and I think that 4e is the worst version of D&D. Our group has decided to just play 3e for the rest of our lives. |
| #2EnclaveJul 23, 2009 13:35:54 | There's always a few people who fear change. I myself skipped 3.X and stuck with 2nd ed. 4th ed though hooked me. |
| #3sallaJul 23, 2009 13:36:15 | I have been playing since 1979 and I think that 4e is the worst version of D&D. Have fun. |
| #4theomnipotentscoJul 23, 2009 13:39:28 | Silly me, I thought that this harkened more back to the wargaming roots of D&D with some very open role-playing possibilities. I'd rather play Dungeons and Dragons than Tables and Tables. I don't care that I can't collect a sample of cave moss because I didn't put 13 points into "Gathering Cave Moss". I don't care that table 187 subsection 2 says that the rate of pregnancy in female drow is much higher when they mate with a dwarf. I'm here to play a game. |
| #5tenebriousJul 23, 2009 13:43:04 | In my opinion, 4e has gone the way of WOW. Instead of thinking and imagining 4e is only missing a mouse to click away hack and slashing. |
| #6sallaJul 23, 2009 13:44:23 | In my opinion, 4e has gone the way of WOW. They say opinions can't be wrong, but you just disproved that. The WOW fallacy has been disproven time and again. You've either never played 4e, or never played WOW. |
| #7doppelgangerJul 23, 2009 13:45:10 | In my opinion, 4e has gone the way of WOW. Why are you posting this stuff in Future Releases? Maybe General Discussion is better for you purposes? |
| #8tenebriousJul 23, 2009 13:47:34 | Why are you posting this stuff in Future Releases? Maybe General Discussion is better for you purposes? You're right, this should be in general discussion. I thought it was a bit funny to ask for a Future Release to be back to the good old days. |
| #9Crimson_ConcertoJul 23, 2009 13:48:39 | In my opinion, 4e has gone the way of WOW. You mean how WoW has copied D&D, put it on a computer monitor, and taken away the role-playing? :P Really, you're speaking nonsense. If you don't like the system, then play 3.5, but nothing about 4E has changed since 3.5 from a role-playing perspective. You could use 3.5 to play a hack-'n'-slash game, you can use 4E to play a hack-'n'-slash game, you can use 3.5 to hardcore role-play, and you can use 4E to hardcore role-play. If you think otherwise, then you are objectively wrong. |
| #10tenebriousJul 23, 2009 13:51:16 | They say opinions can't be wrong, but you just disproved that. The WOW fallacy has been disproven time and again. You've either never played 4e, or never played WOW. My problem is that we still have our characters in the campaign from 20+ years ago and currently own 111 books. 4e scraps the majority of this. |
| #11tenebriousJul 23, 2009 13:52:38 | thanks for all the replies. |
| #12Crimson_ConcertoJul 23, 2009 13:53:34 | My problem is that we still have our characters in the campaign from 20+ years ago and currently own 111 books. Incorrect. 4E didn't scrap any of that. You're still free to play those character and to play 3.5 if you'd like to, so do. 4E isn't stopping you. It's just a new system is all. It's not like WotC is going to break into your house and burn all of your previous edition books if you try to play with them. |
| #13doppelgangerJul 23, 2009 13:54:26 | My problem is that we still have our characters in the campaign from 20+ years ago and currently own 111 books. That's only about 5 1/2 books a year. What's wrong with keeping your average up? :D |
| #14tenebriousJul 23, 2009 13:56:03 | Incorrect. 4E didn't scrap any of that. You're still free to play those character and to play 3.5 if you'd like to, so do. 4E isn't stopping you. It's just a new system is all. It's not like WotC is going to break into your house and burn all of your previous edition books if you try to play with them. Hence, why I wrote "Our group has decided to just play 3e for the rest of our lives." |
| #15tenebriousJul 23, 2009 13:57:14 | That's only about 5 1/2 books a year. What's wrong with keeping your average up? :D I know! :-) And our DM is a Neurologist, geez, you would think he could afford to buy some more books. |
| #16Crimson_ConcertoJul 23, 2009 13:58:11 | Hence, why I wrote "Our group has decided to just play 3e for the rest of our lives." Which is exactly my point. You yourself have proven that 4E hasn't scrapped anything. You can still play previous editions if you want to and you do so you are. Problem is where? |
| #17williamhm75Jul 23, 2009 14:05:17 | As far as Im concerned 4e is the best version yet its open ended and powers allow for a lot of individual flavouring as well as different characters. Im loving it a lot more than 3e where the rules managed to get in the way of role playing 9/10 |
| #18Vyvyan_Basterd_02Jul 23, 2009 14:06:05 | No please don't go! [/sarcasm]To each his own. Hope you're not holding your breath on WotC going back to 3E. And unless you have a terminal disease that gives you under a decade to live I wouldn't claim to play 3E for the rest of your lives. Maybe you'll like 5E. |
| #19arohkthedarkJul 23, 2009 14:08:47 | http://coreygilmore.com/uploads/2007/08/beating_a_dead_horse.jpg |