| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1LordDreadmanOct 30, 2009 12:59:46 | Hey Gamer Nation, Just wanted to give you a laugh today! Take a look at the content calandar on the 16th of November "Warlord Pacts!" Nice. "Your tactical genius is a result of consulting with devil commanders in the deepest levels of hell." ... Sounds about right. Jared |
| #2MarandahirOct 31, 2009 0:43:34 | Wasn't there a Class Acts: Warlord already on this very subject (getting tactical genius from devils)? |
| #3DungeoneeringOct 31, 2009 22:51:44 | Hey, maybe it just means that now Warlords can, like, sign treaties and make alliances. Could be a daily power. "Hey guys, so I talked to these Warforged and they're just going to less us pass. Oh, and they're taking the gnome." |
| #4Janx_14Oct 31, 2009 23:58:10 |
Sounds overpowered to me, for it to be balanced, the gnome shouldn't be warned that he's about to be taken. |
| #5ranadielNov 01, 2009 4:33:07 |
But what would Warforged want with a Gnome though? Now were it to be Gnolls, I could certainly see that working... |
| #6azazyllNov 01, 2009 9:12:53 |
I think we all learned with the preview hint for BoVD never to ask what someone wants to do with a gnome |
| #7thescalesoffateNov 01, 2009 20:31:36 |
I didn't! ENLIGHTEN ME |
| #8azazyllNov 02, 2009 0:03:14 | The long term hint for the BoVD before we knew what it was (a sourcebook for all things evil and unholy, with the short lived "mature content" label), it was said that the book could be loosely related to the gnomish kama sutra
*shudder* |
| #9thescalesoffateNov 02, 2009 3:11:56 | Lawl
|
| #10undraveNov 02, 2009 23:11:45 |
lol wouldn't be so bad now considering how the 4e female Gnomes look XD |
| #11DuskweaverNov 03, 2009 2:30:39 | wouldn't be so bad now considering how the 4e female Gnomes look XD Only if you can get past the fact that they're the size of a four-year-old child... |
| #12thescalesoffateNov 03, 2009 3:49:31 | |
| #13undraveNov 03, 2009 9:47:54 | wouldn't be so bad now considering how the 4e female Gnomes look XD They're like Erfworlder, small but with the proportions of grown women :p
|
| #14satoriNov 03, 2009 10:48:26 |
|
| #15thescalesoffateNov 03, 2009 15:42:55 | C-C-C-COMBO? |
| #16drnickNov 03, 2009 16:01:29 | Wow. This went south fast.
And I loved every minute of it. |
| #17MarandahirNov 03, 2009 19:53:39 | Okay. On to topic:
Assuming this is about Warlock Pacts, rather than Warlord Pacts, do you think it will be an all new pact, or an article discussing the various pacts, and providing new material for them? Do you think it will focus on fluff about the pacts, or about new powers, feats, implements, etc associated with the pacts? What about being like the Essentials articles, but focusing just on the build options (in that case, the actual Warlock Essentials article would feature the builds spoken of in the Monster Manual rather than the actual pacts themselves? That wouldn't follow suit with the Wizard Essentials, however). What do you think?
|
| #18drnickNov 04, 2009 16:06:00 | I kind of hope it's not new pacts. I think there is still room for the existing pacts to get more power love and adding on more pacts will only make this more difficult. |
| #19ZanderKreeganNov 04, 2009 16:07:37 | Honestly, I hope they do not add in more pacts. I want fluff on the existing pacts, as well as more crunch in the form of feats and powers. I'd also like them to add a new at-will choice for each pact, but that's wishing on a star. |
| #20drnickNov 04, 2009 16:11:32 | That is a fantastic idea. |
| #21Jack_SkellingtonNov 06, 2009 3:13:31 | Hopefully, they'll not introduce a new pact. I think the article will be concieved as a guide to the existing pacts (something like "How to sell your soul", that explain how a mere human could contact supernatural powers and sell them part of his soul), a "strategy guide" with new powers and new feats. But, if there should be a new pact, I hope fore some Abyss-bound pact. I think that in 4E the devils have largely outshined the demons, and that's not very correct. |
| #22ShroomyNov 06, 2009 13:27:33 | Here's a description of the article from the Issue 381 ToC: Performing the Pact By Jeff Morgenroth and Arnie Frank What if your warlock's pact patron is more than just an afterthought on your character sheet? What if your warlock actually knew the name and goals of the entity who gave him or her this arcane power? Learn about these consequences, and several sample patrons, here! This sounds more like a role-playing centric article, though they're may be some feats and/or powers specific to the sample patrons. |
| #23MarandahirNov 06, 2009 13:54:29 | That's what I thought and hoped.
It'll be more like the a multitude of the sections at the end of the "Court of the Stars" series of articles, only for all types of Warlock pacts. We make get more flesh on certain Vestiges, probably less on the Stars, since they already got a whole article to them, but perhaps a bit, a little on various other Archfey, some chief Devils, and what I'm looking forward to the most, what the Dark Powers are that Darklocks derive from. |
| #24HazeRavenheartNov 07, 2009 9:52:55 | Ask and you shall recieve. www.wizards.com/dnd/downloads/dragon/381... |
| #25thescalesoffateNov 07, 2009 15:50:10 | Oooh. That's good stuff. |
| #26MarandahirNov 07, 2009 19:22:02 | Interesting. This poses entities that aren't just "Great Powers" as defined in previous works, but could be lesser pact-granters as well. Or else things that aren't quite as the pacts defined. Interesting, to say the least. |
| #27asmodeusloreNov 09, 2009 13:07:45 |
Finally got this issue fixed. Thanks for the patience, and for your sharp eyes on catching this. Enjoy folks! |