| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1extropymineDec 20, 2009 23:19:43 | Sorry if this has been asked and answered, but searches turned up nothing. What is the best way in the Character Builder to place an item in a Bag of Holding or Haversack? Using "edit item," it's not possible to reduce an item's weight to zero. Plus, items thusly edited would not be indicated on the character sheet as being in the Bag/Sack. I've also noticed that Bags and Sacks incorrectly affect the encumbrance value as shown on the character sheet. It'd be great if some sort of fuctionality were built into the Builder in the future to allow it. Thanks! |
| #2CailteDec 21, 2009 9:04:20 | There is no way to amend the probelm, you also cannot put things on your mount either... |
| #3dm_ravenDec 22, 2009 17:07:07 | Thanks for the post. Character Builder doesn't currently support the placement of items in different locations. It only tracks item amounts, item abilities, and certain item effects on your character. (plus item costs, requirements, ect...) |
| #4Kaviyd3Dec 23, 2009 1:51:27 | Maybe you should create a "Nodwick" character -- a character whose sole purpose is to carry gear that is not meant to encumber your real PCs (because it is on a mount or in a bag of holding, etc.). One advantage of this approach is that these items do not affect your primary character in any way (as the character actually needs to wear or wield items for them to affect his stats) -- but you have cards for them that you can print out and pass around as needed. |
| #5muttooDec 29, 2009 22:39:16 | I reduced the weight of things to 1 until my PC was no longer encumbered. (I put the correct weights in the notes.) This causes my PC to be "houseruled in LFR", but that message only shows in the Character Builder, not on the printed sheets. |
| #6VaultDwellerJan 01, 2010 10:38:00 | This would be a great feature to have added. |
| #7DragonsWrathJan 01, 2010 11:21:24 | community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/758...OK, I realize the production team probably many important things to do, but the absurdly minimilistic equipment management 'feature' is REALLY starting to drive me insane. ![]() |