| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Wraith428Apr 29, 2009 3:23:19 | So just created a gnoll warlock 11 level with the newest version of the character generator and the notes in the Class/Path/Destiny Features area are not wrapping around. They stay one line and run off the side where they cannot be read. Anyone else have this problem? Wraith428 |
| #2lomerell_dawnbringerApr 29, 2009 8:19:35 | So just created a gnoll warlock 11 level with the newest version of the character generator and the notes in the Class/Path/Destiny Features area are not wrapping around. They stay one line and run off the side where they cannot be read. Anyone else have this problem? Yes, indeed. This is a problem I reported some time ago, and no WOTC staff has responded to it or acknowledged the problem. There was nothing about it in the patch notes. There is a link to my post about it in my signature, including detailed attempts to work around the problem without success, and detailed reporting of what causes the problem and how to avoid it. Essentially, the problem occurs any time you have 10 or more features. As long as you have nine or less, you will be able to read them in detail. As soon as you cross over to ten, your features will stop text wrapping and will no longer be of any use on the character sheet. The only 100% workaround is not to have a high level character with many features. I first discovered this on a level 8 bard, BEFORE paragon path or epic destiny; it's no surprise that your level 11 warlock had this problem. This also occurs once you have 10 or more feats. Apparently WOTC wants our character sheets only to be useful at low levels. |
| #3Wraith428Apr 29, 2009 11:17:25 | That's a fairly major problem that really needs to be addressed. Very frustrating. Wraitih428 |
| #4lomerell_dawnbringerApr 29, 2009 11:26:56 | Yep! |
| #5nsibystanderApr 29, 2009 11:53:40 | What I ended up doing for my Sorcerer (since it gives absolutely no class feature info on the character sheets for Sorcerers) was make some custom powers that just had the class feature details. It works out decently as a workaround, though it would be really nice if this was fixed. |