| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1sillyrobotApr 23, 2008 6:27:07 | http://www.thegamerdome.com/, a blog, has information from the GAMA trade show. One item caught my eye:
|
| #2ascottbayApr 23, 2008 12:26:09 | I'm hoping that means R&D will playtest and/or screen submissions heavily before "producing" the content. Otherwise it seems a bit silly to have that submissions page and related documents available to the public, although one could take a cynical stance on the matter. |
| #3ArtifactApr 23, 2008 12:43:56 | I'm having trouble accepting this. I can't help but believe the blogger has the facts wrong. As I understand it, Dragon has always survived on the contributions of both staffers and freelance contributors. Why change now? Content is already 100% official (at least that's what the covers stated for the last several years). I'm not sure how "RPGA legal" the content is however. According to the D&D main page, freelance contributions seem to be a part of the equation, because they explicity ask: "Want to write for Dragon or Dungeon magazines? We’re always on the lookout for new writers. Check out our writer’s guidelines and send us your idea. Before you submit your complete article, use the submission process described here to send us a pitch. We’ll look over your proposal, and if we’re interested, we’ll let you know within 60 days." If this is true however, much of the talent pool for the magazine is evaporated, as into thin air. Its nice (for me) to finally get confirmation on the price of the D&DI. From the blog: "They confirmed the price point for DDI subscriptions: $14.95 monthly, $12.95 a month if you buy 3 months at a time, or $9.95 a month if you subscribe for a full year. They’re also going to be implementing one-shot usage fees for convention games and occasional in-store events." Apparently, individual issues can be bought; I hope this to be the one-shot usage fee that's mentioned. $14.95 is a bit high for a single issue; $9.95 is more than enough (less would be nice ;)). |
| #4WolfStar76Apr 23, 2008 12:49:57 | Between this and the "only three books per campaign setting EVER" thing, the blogger in question strikes me as quite misinformed. When I see confirmation of these "facts" from something/someone more official I'll worry. |
| #5KentinalApr 23, 2008 15:17:28 | As I have mentioned in another place, staff only writing means Edward Greenwood would not be published. This strikes me as unlikely. |
| #6theoinodaemonApr 24, 2008 15:00:24 | I doubt this is true. If it is then that's excellent news. It virtually assures the continued success of Kobold Quarterly and Pathfinder. |
| #7oldgamer75Apr 25, 2008 18:36:47 | I doubt this is true. If it is then that's excellent news. It virtually assures the continued success of Kobold Quarterly and Pathfinder. I, too, disbelieve this. If by some amazing chance it were true, I'm afraid I would very quickly lose interest in the e-zines. Too small a talent pool in WOTC R&D. By far. ![]() |
| #8PaulonApr 25, 2008 22:55:55 | Since Keith Baker has said he's working on new Eberron content for the e-zines, it's safe to say it's not going to be totally in shop. He's a freelancer, not an employee. |
| #9the_ubbergeekApr 26, 2008 1:10:20 | Cynical.. NO talents in house? really? |
| #10zyneteApr 26, 2008 3:56:24 | Cynical.. NO talents in house? really? Who said there are no talents in house? |
| #11KentinalApr 26, 2008 20:20:34 | I do not believe any said there was no talent in house, though opinions have been to something like in house talent would provide less of value to the D&D gaming community, due to a smaller talent pool being used. |
| #12JetstreamApr 27, 2008 0:29:36 | Wasn't there an article on WotC"s page a while back asking for contributions to DDI content? I seem to recall such a thing. |
| #13ascottbayApr 27, 2008 16:59:34 | Do you mean this link? The D&D welcome page links to it at the bottom, above the legal info and Site Map, and below Sage Advice. It currently says, "... we are no longer accepting submissions... that make use of 3.5 mechanics. After 4th Edition releases this June, we will again be reviewing submissions..." |
| #14gamer_zer0Apr 28, 2008 14:15:39 | Heyas, Obviously, no magazine like Dragon or Dungeon could survive without the support of the RPG community. I am gonna check in with the editorial team and try and get a statement of their submission philosophy and post it here. Thanks! -Mike |
| #15ArtifactApr 28, 2008 14:44:40 | Heyas, Thanks, Mike . I was a bit shaken by this "news" so this is comforting to hear.I'm still assuming the blogger had the facts wrong but it will be nice to have confirmation of the submission guidelines, in either case. |
| #16MirtekApr 28, 2008 15:00:19 | That also means everything published will be RPGA legal. Interesting, because everything that WotC released as a rule supplement is not RPGA legal. So either they're exaggerating or we'll see a 180° change in RPGA policy |
| #17gamer_zer0Apr 28, 2008 16:16:30 | Thanks, Mike Here's a quote from ther world famous Chris Youngs himself: "Regarding our submission policy, the blogger is incorrect. As our first 4th Edition issue will show, we’re still going to be accepting submissions from the community. We’ll have updated submission guidelines up around the time of the launch." Obviously the entire team is extremly busy making preparations for the 4E launch, but please let me know if you folks have anymore questions and I'll try and corner someone else in the WotC kitchen with a spork and make them spill the beans. =) -Mike |
| #18WolfStar76Apr 28, 2008 21:25:04 | Interesting, because everything that WotC released as a rule supplement is not RPGA legal. So either they're exaggerating or we'll see a 180° change in RPGA policy It *has* been said elsewhere (I believe it was at DDXP) that the content of Dungeon and Dragon magazines will go into the Rules Database - thereby making it official. |
| #19JohnLynchApr 29, 2008 0:42:10 | It *has* been said elsewhere (I believe it was at DDXP) that the content of Dungeon and Dragon magazines will go into the Rules Database - thereby making it official. Isn't everything going in the Rules Database though (including rules from the Eberron books)? |
| #20MirtekApr 29, 2008 3:39:53 | It *has* been said elsewhere (I believe it was at DDXP) that the content of Dungeon and Dragon magazines will go into the Rules Database - thereby making it official. Which doesn't really matter because much of the official stuff is not RPGA legal. So I wonder if this hints at a change in RPGA policy and that in the new campaign everything official will be RPGA legal. ![]() At the moment there is a long list of official content from official WotC products which is not RPGA legal (even many core rule stuff from the PHB is still banned in RPGA) |
| #21ultimatecaliburApr 29, 2008 3:51:58 | What could be true is that R&D maybe reviewing/developing/balancing any mechanic based ideas. |
| #22WolfStar76Apr 29, 2008 5:56:28 | Which doesn't really matter because much of the official stuff is not RPGA legal. Isn't everything going in the Rules Database though (including rules from the Eberron books)? Agreed. I wasn't trying to say what will/won't be RPGA-legal, but instead point to what will/won't be "official" and therefore options for the RPGA to consider. |
| #23WolfStar76Apr 29, 2008 6:10:10 | . . . and then this morning I found this in my mailbox as part of the LFR mailing list:All content from Dragon and Dungeon is being generated |
| #24MirtekApr 29, 2008 11:30:58 | Agreed. I wasn't trying to say what will/won't be RPGA-legal, but instead point to what will/won't be "official" and therefore options for the RPGA to consider. Actually that's also nothing really new. Paizo's mags were 100% official too (even says this on the cover) and stuff from them has become RPGA legal (the regional feats for Oerth regions for example) |
| #25Shemeska_the_MarauderMay 21, 2008 19:23:10 | Heyas, Mike, Politely saying so, it would have been nice for them to at least sent out form letters/emails for all those prior 3.5 submissions that tons of folks, myself included, sent in when they initially asked for queries months back. It doesn't exactly inspire freelancers to spend the time to come up with ideas to pitch when absolutely no reply is forthcoming (nor any reply to multiple questions over the next three months in the face of that). I had the opportunity to contribute a nice number of articles in the last year that Dragon and Dungeon were actual magazines, and I'd been looking forward to doing the same with the online version (articles about certain IP can't be done for any 3rd party folks, ie Planescape stuff for instance). I'd even been asked to submit a full version of one 3.5 article that was a leftover from the Paizo slush pile... and then no reply at all after that point. Communication really needs to improve or else WotC seriously risks a massively shallow writing pool for anything in the online magazines, because a lot of folks will just assume it's a lost cause that's only being done in-house or by the select few already cleared to work on 4e material. It may not mean a gigantic amount to me now, since my day job takes up most of my time (and I've done some freelancing for Paizo to fill what time I'd devote otherwise), but you guys need to do something different or you're not going to get the same interest from non-staff writers, and you'll potentially cripple the introduction of new folks into the writing pool by removing a nice avenue to getting your name out there and getting cool stuff published. Mind you, if you ever need something on Planescape or its associated topical areas, I'd be keen to know and contribute. |