| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1jedi123Oct 31, 2009 11:54:39 | I've been reading some of the newer Eberron novels (The Dragonic Prophecies in particular), and have noticed the Syberis marks are still being used in the fluff. We have no rules support for this, so I was wondering if there is any word or interest in syberis marks. Also what have you guys been doing to represent them, or have you? I'm having a player use the storm sorcerer build to represent a syberis mark of storm.None others have come up as of yet, |
| #2HellcowOct 31, 2009 13:00:06 | I'm having a player use the storm sorcerer build to represent a syberis mark of storm.None others have come up as of yet, I think this is a good approach - I'm a fan of changing class fluff to serve the story. |
| #3jedi123Oct 31, 2009 14:02:28 | Are there any plans for a dragon article or such about syberis marks |
| #4sareloNov 01, 2009 19:28:19 |
I have a character in my current campaign that did exactly what you described above and it worked beautifully. I haven't explored it a ton beyond that simply because nobody really feels compelled to try and drop another Sib Mark into a game that already has one. It seems that there are a rare few classes that would make the transition as well as the Storm Sorcerer/Mark of Storm but with a little creativity I am sure you can come up with a few different options. Swordmages seem to fit extremely well with Orien Swordsmen, as well. Assuming you pick the right powers to suit the flavor your shooting for and, like Hellcow suggested, butcher what you need to to make the flavor fit. My groups opinion typically follows the "When all is said and done as long as you're not messing with numbers that have been put in place to create game balance who cares?" line of thought and it's been good to us thus far. Anywho...good luck, sir!
|
| #5jedi123Nov 02, 2009 14:32:37 |
Thats usually my take, the fluff is suggestion,and can be bent on a character by character basis |