| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1lord_karsusMay 18, 2009 10:58:15 | -Here are the numbers (threads per day) for the past week. It might mean nothing now, but in the future, the data might be needed: |
| #2AvonRekaesMay 18, 2009 13:53:38 | Why was this data taken? To see if we deserve our own forums? It'll probably go up again once the EPG and ECG are released. |
| #3skrapsanMay 19, 2009 0:13:51 | Why was this data taken? To see if we deserve our own forums? It'll probably go up again once the EPG and ECG are released. Its quite self explanatory you see, Karsus is Master of the Obvious and therefor is pointing out that there is low traffic on a forum based on a 4e forum dedicated to a setting that has not yet been released in 4e. |
| #4rauricMay 19, 2009 6:46:34 | I think he did it because the EB books are going to be realeased soon and the two EB forums might see some more traffic. The numbers he listed will most likely increase and if this is the case then people that check those numbers may deem it worthy that the EB stuff get another forum. I am fine with 2 EB forums though. Splitting up into a thrid or more forums may just spread things out too much and people may miss out on good discussions. Even on the net people are lazy and might not check a third or fourth EB forum but stick with the two they knew for a while. This seems silly but so are internet posters. :D |
| #5lord_karsusMay 19, 2009 8:20:52 | Its quite self explanatory you see, Karsus is Master of the Obvious -The Eberron section isn't 4e specific, just like none of the settings sections are edition specific. |
| #6lord_karsusMay 26, 2009 9:29:05 | -Here are the numbers for this week: |
| #7lord_karsusJun 01, 2009 9:33:04 | -Here are the numbers for this week: |
| #8JohnLynchJun 01, 2009 18:35:17 | -Here are the numbers for this week: |
| #9lord_karsusJun 08, 2009 10:32:09 | -Here are the numbers for this week: |