| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Elton74Nov 04, 2008 12:01:00 | I thought this idea was a good idea. Writing short stories to help your players become immersed into the world. Who first suggested it? |
| #2skrap-sanNov 05, 2008 15:08:15 | Who first suggested it? I think this is a bit like asking "who was the first person to invent the toast?" I'm pretty sure that plenty of people have had that idea seperatly. But by all means, its a great idea if you have the time. It will most likely help your players get into the game. And on a secondary note, what has this to do with Eberron? |
| #3eehamburgNov 05, 2008 16:49:32 | I think that it is easier to answer this question ... Which came first, the chicken or the egg? |
| #4goblin_prideNov 05, 2008 20:57:19 | Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The Egg. Egg-laying preceded feathers in evolution. As to the fiction question: Wouldn't you say that the first published campaign setting be considered writing fiction so that the players can become immersed in the campaign world? |
| #5oidNov 06, 2008 18:11:06 | that's a very important part of character creation with my group. alot of the time a character may be thrown out if a good story can't be crafted around it.(sometimes we're lazy:embarrass ) but, i find usin' stories helps a whole lot in role playin'. so, yeah. it's a great idea, it fits you group. |
| #6OgiwanNov 07, 2008 11:56:00 | Well, I've used "pages" from the Sharn Inquisitive or the Korrenberg Chronicle to immerse my players in the world, provide plot hooks, and the like. |
| #7eehamburgNov 07, 2008 14:18:13 | The Egg. Egg-laying preceded feathers in evolution. But something had to lay the egg ... |
| #8skrap-sanNov 07, 2008 15:12:13 | But something had to lay the egg ... Yeah but did that egg laying thing have feathers, if it did not then i don't think we can call it a chicken. |
| #9GiloNov 07, 2008 18:42:36 | Yeah but did that egg laying thing have feathers, if it did not then i don't think we can call it a chicken. Dragons lay eggs (and they don't have feathers) - we know they where there first ![]() |
| #10skrap-sanNov 08, 2008 0:47:47 | Dragons lay eggs (and they don't have feathers) - we know they where there first So the question is really, "who came first the dragon or the egg?" I actually think that would be the Eberron equivalent of "chicken and the egg" in our world. Never had I thought that a random thread of silly could give new insight into "serious" matters... |
| #11GiloNov 08, 2008 3:01:03 | So the question is really, "who came first the dragon or the egg?" I actually think that would be the Eberron equivalent of "chicken and the egg" in our world. Never had I thought that a random thread of silly could give new insight into "serious" matters... On the other hand - Couatl have feathers. ![]() |
| #12goblin_prideNov 08, 2008 7:04:22 | On the other hand - Couatl have feathers. Yeah, but they don't taste like chicken. |
| #13skrap-sanNov 08, 2008 8:42:21 | Yeah, but they don't taste like chicken. I've heard that snake tastes like chicken, and since Quatl's basically are snakes with wings and feathers... So maybe they came first? |
| #14eehamburgNov 08, 2008 15:05:18 | Yeah, but they don't taste like chicken. And just how do you know that? Have you ever eaten one? Has any of us? Therefore, it could taste just like chicken and therefore it can still fall within the whole chicken and the egg thing. So there. |
| #15Elton74Nov 09, 2008 9:07:13 | What comes first. Thought or action? |
| #16GiloNov 09, 2008 9:29:05 | What comes first. Thought or action? Thought is a free-action (for some its a standard-action) it can come before or after any other action. but if I have to choose I'll say Egg. ![]() |
| #17goblin_prideNov 09, 2008 20:19:32 | Thought is a free-action (for some its a standard-action) it can come before or after any other action. Isn't thought a full-round action for a fighter? |
| #18PJammaGodNov 10, 2008 3:29:42 | Does it provoke an opportunity attack if I think for myself? Or can I aid another and think for them? |
| #19GiloNov 10, 2008 3:39:36 | Does it provoke an opportunity attack if I think for myself? Or can I aid another and think for them? Thinking of someone in range can provoke an attack of opportunity, and yes you can aid another and think for them - but then they will get -2 to thinking on their own until the start of their next character. |
| #20PJammaGodNov 15, 2008 6:27:02 | Would it be possible to take Skill Focus: Self to offset the penalty? |
| #21GiloNov 15, 2008 11:08:37 | Would it be possible to take Skill Focus: Self to offset the penalty? Yes, but it's better to take the Rogue multiclass feat which gets you trained in Self. |
| #22OgiwanNov 16, 2008 14:31:20 | Don't Bards, Paladins, and Warlords/Marshalls also get that? |
| #23PJammaGodNov 16, 2008 23:27:19 | Yes, but it's better to take the Rogue multiclass feat which gets you trained in Self. (lol you win that round Gilo!) Actually Paladins instead are trained in self-sacrificing emo self. They can only use self-skills when it makes them look heroic. |