| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1ograxFeb 01, 2009 21:43:49 | Is there anything else coming out for the realms this year? I checked Amazon.com but all I could find were Eberron and normal sourcebooks. I found alot of FR novels too just no adventures or sourcebooks. |
| #2MattDrozFeb 01, 2009 22:20:35 | Is there anything else coming out for the realms this year? Each setting is getting only a Campaign Guide, Player's Handbook and an Adventure book. |
| #3StiggerFeb 01, 2009 23:48:50 | Indeed... there's the possibility that WotC might reverse that decision, but I wouldn't hold my breath over it if the DDI support seen thus far was any indication. |
| #4JohnLynchFeb 02, 2009 2:09:22 | Each setting is getting only a Campaign Guide, Player's Handbook and an Adventure book. WotC has said that if the sales are good enough to support an additional setting-specific book. Based on the lack of news for an FR book, it would appear the number of people who bought the FR products aren't substantially larger then those who have bought the non-FR 4th edition D&D books so it makes no financial sense for WotC to produce further FR books. |
| #5DiffanFeb 02, 2009 6:47:29 | What I think we can hope for is a collection of Realms-related DDI articles in print that people may want to buy. I for one am not going to spend money on DDI but would purchase that sort of collection. |
| #6BluenoseFeb 02, 2009 7:12:44 | What I think we can hope for is a collection of Realms-related DDI articles in print that people may want to buy. I for one am not going to spend money on DDI but would purchase that sort of collection. There's a Dragon Magazine annual in the schedule for September 2009. It's been speculated that it may have an FR section. |
| #7kerym_ammathFeb 02, 2009 7:53:53 | As of this morning WotC has commited to produce at least an article or adventure a month for FR and Eberron. I am assuming one each. The first one is a City backdrop for FR. They are also encouraging fan submissions. Thing will be getting interesting.:D |
| #8rauricFeb 02, 2009 7:55:30 | As of this morning WotC has commited to produce at least an article or adventure a month for FR and Eberron. I am assuming one each. The first one is a City backdrop for FR. They are also encouraging fan submissions. Thing will be getting interesting.:D This is what I asked them for so that is cool. Where did you see this? |
| #9kerym_ammathFeb 02, 2009 7:59:40 | This is what I asked them for so that is cool. Where did you see this? Started a new thread for it, check it out. |
| #10IluvrienFeb 02, 2009 7:59:41 | This is what I asked them for so that is cool. Where did you see this? Bill Slavicsek's "Ampersand" today. I am just wondering what the heck took them so long. |
| #11kerym_ammathFeb 02, 2009 8:03:40 | Bill Slavicsek's "Ampersand" today. I am just wondering what the heck took them so long. A heavy print schedule with labor cuts, probably resulted in a logjam. Throw in the holidays, and a continued heavy print schedule, and well it was on the to do list just not on the "this is going to be late if we don't kick it in the rear" list. At least we finally have a commitment. |
| #12lord_karsusFeb 02, 2009 9:59:19 | -As has been mentioned, via D&D sourcebooks, all of them that are dealing with the Forgotten Realms (The FRCG/FRPG) have already been printed. Any information on the setting will now be given via novels, or by online DRAGON/DDI articles, which you need to sign up to get access to. |
| #13MattDrozFeb 02, 2009 10:29:02 | WotC has said that if the sales are good enough to support an additional setting-specific book. I had not heard the 'if' clause to any previously released statement. Was this in a new announcement? |
| #14lord_karsusFeb 02, 2009 10:59:15 | -Rich Baker has made the allusion to the possibility of WotC printing more actual Forgotten Realms-specific physical sourcebooks, in theory. |
| #15MattDrozFeb 02, 2009 12:58:40 | My thanks, LK! |
| #16markustay63Feb 04, 2009 10:54:42 | In the past, when a company no longer had any plans to produce sourcebooks for a setting, it was considered a Dead Setting. And I could go on and on about how one should not invest in a 'dead setting', but they have plans to produce further material in the DDI... Oh yessssss... they have planssesss..... ![]() |
| #17faraerFeb 04, 2009 13:20:57 | In the past, when a company no longer had any plans to produce sourcebooks for a setting, it was considered a Dead Setting. That idea, though, is simple nonsense, nothing more than the melodramatic confusion of an imaginary world with its associated publishing line. Imaginative creations, even contrived and compromised ones, aren't subject to death. |
| #18markustay63Feb 04, 2009 15:23:46 | Tell that to all those poor Ba%tchs that died in Imagination Land. ![]() |
| #19addle-cove-anarchistFeb 04, 2009 15:28:19 | who? batrachis it's good as dead |
| #20lord_karsusFeb 18, 2009 9:20:06 | That idea, though, is simple nonsense, nothing more than the melodramatic confusion of an imaginary world with its associated publishing line. Imaginative creations, even contrived and compromised ones, aren't subject to death. -In the business sense as it's being used here, sure things are. |