Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 Zireael Nov 02, 2009 10:16:05	I have a question: Let's have a following situation: drow -------------  glabrezu (demon)                |         draegloth (half-fiend) ----------- drow                                                 |                                  drow half-fiend --------------- drow                                                                |                                                                 ?   What comes last in the little tree? Or if the mate happens to be another half-fiend? I need your input... same thing can be with regards to elf-human mating or whatever...
#2 The_Silversword Nov 02, 2009 10:32:18	I think the resulting offspring would either be a Drow or Half-Fiend. Really its up to you, I mean this is fantasy genetics we're talkin about not real life science, so just make it up. I like crazy mixed up bloodlines myself, I ever mention the time I played A half Halfling/ half Beholder? Good times! My brother had a character who was 1/2 Human, 1/4 Elven and 1/4 Demon, He just refered to himslef as Half-Human if anybody asked. In 4e terms I would put him down as a Tiefling. They ought to make up more bloodline feats for situations like this, like an Elven Bloodline or Demon or Dragon or what ever. I miss Half-Dragons in 4e (Dragonborn dont count).
#3 suin_bahhar_02 Nov 03, 2009 4:42:26	3.5 mechanics wise it could be a cambion or tiefling. The former because drow blood is partly demonic itself. But a tiefling is much more likely. A drowlike feyri is another possibility but this would require some racial templating skill to make.
#4 LordManshoon Nov 04, 2009 9:17:15	I didn't even think draegloth could have... intimate relations... the image is pretty yucky, thinking of Jeggred.  Not that sex with a glabrezu is any better.  Nasty and horrifying, all in the same package. I believe it's only been said that they're born sterile, not that they can't actually engage in lustmaking. There just won't be any... result of such a union.
#5 lord_karsus Dec 15, 2009 21:01:36	I didn't even think draegloth could have... intimate relations... the image is pretty yucky, thinking of Jeggred.  Not that sex with a glabrezu is any better.  Nasty and horrifying, all in the same package -Nothing would come of it, being as they're sexless. They really don't have very well defined sexes. They have genders and personalities that manifest as either 'male', or 'female', but not necessarily any...stuff. -As to the chart, given that both Drow blood and Fiendish blood is dominant, I'd say that, D&D mechanically, you have either a plain old Drow, or a Tiefling. Personalitywise, or whatever you want to call it, it'd be a lot easier to combine the two- a Drow who has a few Demonic quirks, or a Tiefling who has a bunch of Drow quirks. I prefer the former, myself...
#6 merrikcale Dec 15, 2009 21:06:08	-Nothing would come of it, being as they're sexless. They really don't have very well defined sexes. They have genders and personalities that manifest as either 'male', or 'female', but not necessarily any...stuff. What "stuff"?
#7 lord_karsus Dec 15, 2009 21:07:18	-Nothing would come of it, being as they're sexless. They really don't have very well defined sexes. They have genders and personalities that manifest as either 'male', or 'female', but not necessarily any...stuff. What "stuff"? -Their junk. Or, Mr. medical lawyer, gonads. Make you happy?
#8 merrikcale Dec 15, 2009 21:09:34	-Nothing would come of it, being as they're sexless. They really don't have very well defined sexes. They have genders and personalities that manifest as either 'male', or 'female', but not necessarily any...stuff. What "stuff"? -Their junk. Or, Mr. medical lawyer, gonads. Make you happy? he he he yeah he he he