Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 kev777 Aug 23, 2010 12:04:33	Are we to assume that any city not on the FR map was destroyed by the spell plaque? If you take Damara for example, that would mean that over 90% of the cities are no longer in existence.   Hopefully, this is only a result of the very poor map of the FR.    If it is then it is such a shame that more time wasn't spent on the forgotten realms map.
#2 The_Silversword Aug 23, 2010 12:09:30	Are we to assume that any city not on the FR map was destroyed by the spell plaque? If you take Damara for example, that would mean that over 90% of the cities are no longer in existence.   Hopefully, this is only a result of the very poor map of the FR.    If it is then it is such a shame that more time wasn't spent on the forgotten realms map.   Actually we are to assume that if they do not specifically say that something is destroyed, that its still there, so just because they left it off the map doesnt mean its gone. I agree, they could of added in more places on the Map, I guess they just wanted to focus on the major areas, so smaller towns, like Elventree just didnt make the cut.
#3 Jorunhast Aug 23, 2010 15:16:20	Are we to assume that any city not on the FR map was destroyed by the spell plaque? If you take Damara for example, that would mean that over 90% of the cities are no longer in existence.   Hopefully, this is only a result of the very poor map of the FR.    If it is then it is such a shame that more time wasn't spent on the forgotten realms map. In another post, you mentioned seeing the new map of Vaasa.  It also included a small part of northwestern Damara.  If you take that map, rather than the poor quality map in the FRCG, it doesn't look like any of the Damaran cities in that region are gone.  They might be different, but don't appear to be gone. That said, it's only a small part of Damara that's shown.  Who knows, really?  Vaasa has had some drastic changes, so why not Damara?