| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1nymrohdJul 02, 2008 7:17:21 | http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drtoc/365 Backdrop: Cormyr By Brian R. James Explore the nation of Cormyr, updated to reflect the post-Spellplague era of the Forgotten Realms. I guess someone will be happy. |
| #2KhaeliethJul 02, 2008 7:38:02 | That animé styled half elf illustration was dire. Hope that was Eberron. |
| #3nymrohdJul 02, 2008 7:40:53 | It's an artificer. Eberron art is great for Eberron. |
| #4suin_bahhar_02Jul 02, 2008 8:09:16 | I like that artist(William O'Conner)'s work a lot. And I disagree that its his style only fits ebberon. He did the best pic of Fflar ever and some stellar ones in the later FR 3.5 books. |
| #5nymrohdJul 02, 2008 8:44:25 | I like that artist(J. Williams)'s work a lot. And I disagree that its his style only fits ebberon. He did the best pic of Fflar ever and some stellar ones in the later FR 3.5 books. Oh I did not imply that the style only fits Eberron. Just that it fits Eberron great. |
| #6suin_bahhar_02Jul 02, 2008 8:51:37 | *nods and sheaths his sword* Reasonable. |
| #7GreenKnightJul 02, 2008 8:55:19 | Huh, so the Artificer is just a playtest version. Here I thought it'd be the full-fledged class. Oh well. |
| #8nymrohdJul 02, 2008 9:04:14 | I'd be happy with just the heroic tier tbh. Just give us enough to get us started. |
| #9rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 02, 2008 10:45:35 | I'm actually more interested in the ecology of the Dragonborn.![]() |
| #10lord_karsusJul 02, 2008 11:06:08 | -One thing that would be nice, would be if each setting got a different artist with their own style to reflect the "flavor" of the setting. I was just mentioning this concerning Planescape. |
| #11iakhovasJul 02, 2008 17:03:33 | Me! ![]() I guess someone will be happy. |
| #12TheriseJul 02, 2008 17:13:49 | http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drtoc/365 I'm logged in, but can only see the "table of contents" list. When are the actual articles coming? |
| #13BelorinJul 02, 2008 17:18:37 | I'm logged in, but can only see the "table of contents" list. When are the actual articles coming? Sometime this month!:D |
| #14Mr_MiscellanyJul 02, 2008 19:10:26 | I guess someone will be happy. :bounce: ![]() ![]() :invasion: ![]() That cover art is very old-school Shadowrun-ish. |
| #15markustay63Jul 02, 2008 19:34:06 | Agreed (it does look a bit SR... but I like it). Gratz Brian. ;) -One thing that would be nice, would be if each setting got a different artist with their own style to reflect the "flavor" of the setting. I was just mentioning this concerning Planescape. I don't see that happening, given their 'unification mantra', but I could be wrong (and hope so). I'm logged in, but can only see the "table of contents" list. When are the actual articles coming? The day after they start charging for it. :P |
| #16lord_karsusJul 02, 2008 21:01:07 | I don't see that happening, given their 'unification mantra', but I could be wrong (and hope so). -I know, I know...Someone linked an article to the guy who did the art for Planescape, and it reminded me of how unique his style was, and in turn, how that influenced Planescape, and made it very unique as well. Eberron has it's own "darker" style, and as such, darker art. It would do all campaign settings well to have their own art staff, to give all of the settings their own uniqueness in this age of uniformity. -But, such is wishful thinking... |
| #17merrikcaleJul 02, 2008 21:03:20 | I'm logged in, but can only see the "table of contents" list. When are the actual articles coming? as each article hits the site, the link to it goes up at the Table of Contents |
| #18GreenKnightJul 02, 2008 21:10:34 | The Artificer is already up. Just a playtest version, but pretty nice so far. |
| #19merrikcaleJul 02, 2008 21:13:39 | The Artificer is already up. Just a playtest version, but pretty nice so far. artificer? what are you a traitor? |
| #20GreenKnightJul 02, 2008 21:16:00 | Yes. :P That and I think it'd be cool for those who'd like to play a Lantanese Artificer. |
| #21lord_karsusJul 02, 2008 21:24:05 | artificer? what are you a traitor? Yes. :P -I...don't get it. |
| #22GreenKnightJul 02, 2008 21:25:17 | I.E. the Gnome Artificer Prestige Class. I always thought it'd be cool to have a full class version of that. Although I haven't really compared the two. |
| #23lord_karsusJul 02, 2008 21:32:15 | -I still feel as if I am missing relevant information that would make the conversation make more sense... |
| #24rauricJul 02, 2008 21:40:20 | The Artificer is a class from the 1st Eberron book. So Merrick called him a traitor (in jest). Then GK agreed, but likes the class to fill his need for playing a Lantanese "technomage". Anyway that sums up their discussion I belive. ;) |
| #25lord_karsusJul 02, 2008 21:41:32 | -Oh...Okay, I get it now. Thank you. |
| #26rauricJul 02, 2008 21:50:24 | Yep. It is not a bad class and can fit into FR, especially since magic is pretty much feared. I think that last part will be true but I am not 100% sure though. |
| #27merrikcaleJul 02, 2008 21:50:44 | sheesh...LK.....do you know what an artificer is?' And Rauric hit the nail on the head |
| #28lord_karsusJul 02, 2008 22:07:57 | -I know they're not in Cormyr, but they are appearing in DRAGON this month. |
| #29markustay63Jul 02, 2008 23:03:39 | You see, the conversation was about an 'Artificer', and the Netherease have a mental block that comes into effect whenever the Imaskari (who called theselves Artificers) are mentioned - they are completely unwilling to accept that their was an Empire of mages far superior to their own, and the slightest reference to them is like being hit with Befuddlment in their case. It very sad, and Lord Karsus can't help those few moments of weakness. ![]() ;) :P |
| #30JohnLynchJul 02, 2008 23:42:06 | artificer? what are you a traitor? I'm sure Karsus will be horrified to hear this (considering his thoughts on the swordmage appearing non-FR games), but I'm planning on allowing Artificers in any Forgotten Realms games I run. I don't see anything exclusively Eberron-ish about a Wizard that specialises in magical items. In fact it sounds like the Lesser Magic path from Midkemia. |
| #31StiggerJul 02, 2008 23:50:42 | Artificers are far too cool a class to pass up just because they're from Eberron... one of the best things about that setting actually. |
| #32markustay63Jul 02, 2008 23:54:04 | Actually, there was NEVER any reason not to mix stuff from different campaign worlds except for some silly pre-conceptions about 'correctness'. If I have to give 4e credit for anything, its the attempt to make everything work in every setting, and there's really no reason it shouldn't (and never was). Stig - if you like the Artificer, you should check-out some of the classes from Iron Kingdoms. :D |
| #33StiggerJul 02, 2008 23:59:36 | Been saying that for years, so you're preaching to the choir on the idea of mixing and matching across settings. I like it, I use it, damn the canon... which is why I love painting the Crown Wars as the beginning of the end of the Elves due to Gold Elves discovering they could indeed get away with murder, and being the very subtle bad guys in the corner sneaking up to stab you in the back... been throwing my players for one hell of a loop with that one. As for Iron Kingdoms, that's a medieval steam-tech sort of setting, right? If so, pass... don't really care to mix those genres much. Much prefer it in a Victorian sort of setting ala the Sons of Ether. |
| #34markustay63Jul 03, 2008 0:02:17 | I don't know - I sort of fell in love with the 'Tinker' class. Its like a 'poor man's' artificer. ![]() And Gun-mages are just SO cool. ![]() |
| #35StiggerJul 03, 2008 0:11:35 | Mage works just fine for me with stuff like that... Entropy, the sphere that lets you ricochet a bullet off of several surfaces to hit somebody smack dab in the arse as a fairly easy trick. That whole paradox thing could kind of suck though... :D |
| #36nymrohdJul 03, 2008 6:22:15 | Seems that 4E artificers ARE gun-mages. There is a focus on ranged weapon powers. Bah but I have vowed not to allow guns in my Eberron . . . |
| #37DiffanJul 03, 2008 7:19:27 | In my FR gestalt campaign I allowed one of my players to play a Warforged gestalt fighter/artificer. It was hilarious. He had magically implanted a dimensional space in his chest where his small robotic...droid (for lack of a better term) worked on creating magical stuff while the PC adventured. When an item was done, you'd hear a loud 'Ding!' which meant the item was done. He called it his Easy-Bake Oven. His name was BORCMM [Battery Operated Robotic Cybernetic Murder Machine] and he hailed from the island of defunct warforged known as Trident. Ah, good times........ back on topic....the artificer playtest looks good and i'll try it out when we play 4e again. Can't wait to tell my friend, lol. |
| #38lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 11:54:57 | -What is 'Gestalt'? I often hear the term used... |
| #39TheriseJul 03, 2008 12:12:54 | -What is 'Gestalt'? I often hear the term used... German word, means essentially "complete form" or "total pattern". Some people use it interchangably with "whole", or "big picture", though those aren't exactly correct. Gestalt defined. |
| #40lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 12:18:20 | -Now, how is that, in turn, applied to D&D? |
| #41GreenKnightJul 03, 2008 12:19:09 | Gestalt characters as described in the 3.5 DMG. |
| #42lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 12:20:39 | Gestalt characters as described in the 3.5 DMG. -Which is something I don't have. Geeze, it's like pulling teeth with you people! :P |
| #43GreenKnightJul 03, 2008 12:22:24 | Being that you're DMing a campaign, I figured your owning a DMG was pretty much a given. But anyway... Go HERE for the rules on gestalt characters. |
| #44lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 12:24:39 | Being that you're DMing a campaign, I figured your owning a DMG was pretty much a given. -I have the 3e DMG, not the 3.5e DMG. Go HERE for the rules on gestalt characters. -Geeze, thank you. :P -So, it's basically multiclassing at the same time. |
| #45nymrohdJul 03, 2008 12:30:13 | Before we get Cormyr we get Amn in July and Beyond. I very much hope the Cormyr article is better than the Amn snippet. |
| #46TheriseJul 03, 2008 12:35:25 | So, it's basically multiclassing at the same time. In a broken, power-bloating, monty haulish sort of way, yes. ;) And I'm pretty sure it's not in the DMG 3.5, but rather Unearthed Arcana 3.5. i r teh uburs wif my gestalt sorcerer/drood! phear mehs! spells n dragnfiers on u! lolzrs pwnd! ![]() |
| #47nymrohdJul 03, 2008 12:50:33 | Gestalt characters are a gift from 3E to munchkins. Stay away from them |
| #48StiggerJul 03, 2008 13:12:03 | Never could quite bring myself to pick up UA for some reason... |
| #49lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 13:12:18 | -Where do you find those? ![]() |
| #50TheriseJul 03, 2008 13:16:22 | -Where do you find those? http://www.planetsmilies.com/ ![]() |
| #51markustay63Jul 03, 2008 13:19:04 | -So, it's basically multiclassing at the same time. Yes - it's power-gamer's Wetdream. ![]() And I like my Harry Potter Smilies best - |
| #52TheriseJul 03, 2008 13:30:16 | Yes - it's power-gamer's Wetdream. OMG WANT. I have a spellscar, and I fight off... dementors from...uhm... the Far Realm! =Zoom Zooms!!!= |
| #53nymrohdJul 03, 2008 13:35:19 | Dementors are so much better as servants of Orcus, or maybe creatures from the Shadowfell. |
| #54StiggerJul 03, 2008 13:38:35 | Feywild might be an interesting origin for them... |
| #55DiffanJul 03, 2008 15:55:00 | Despite people's dislike of Gestalting, I think it's fun. You take on higher levels of monsters and gain xp quicker but there can be alot of flavor added as well. If you go here http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/classes/gestaltCharacters.htm .....fun way to campaign if your looking forward to play high-powered characters and fight off higher level monsters. |
| #56uzzyJul 03, 2008 15:56:03 | I wonder how much of the article will actually be pre-Sellplague. Or, in other words, useful. |
| #57iakhovasJul 03, 2008 18:19:55 | ![]() I wonder how much of the article will actually be pre-Sellplague. Or, in other words, useful. |
| #58lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 18:54:44 | -That's how the majority* feels, concerning that. *Of, at least, these boards |
| #59TheriseJul 03, 2008 18:58:19 | -That's how the majority* feels, concerning that. Don't bother, they're deaf to the horrific screams of the board. They don't care. |
| #60Mr_MiscellanyJul 03, 2008 19:09:02 | -That's how the majority* feels, concerning that. *Of, at least, these boards Says you, and you only. There's no good reason to believe that assumption, so please don't speak for anyone other than yourself. |
| #61lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 19:10:26 | Says you, and you only. -You do not seem to pay attention, then. ![]() |
| #62nymrohdJul 03, 2008 19:10:41 | Who knows there may be a silent majority of lurkers you don't know about LK. And there are at the very least some of us who find this in bad taste. |
| #63uzzyJul 03, 2008 19:11:26 | Heh, I just got a from the designer of the last WoTC product I'll purchase. That's kinda neat.Anyway, something on Cormyr in the era of the Steel Regent, about how she managed to keep the kingdom together in the face of so much upheaval would actually be quite useful. Shame WoTC didn't do anything about it for the last 8 years. |
| #64lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 19:16:23 | Who knows there may be a silent majority of lurkers you don't know about LK. -"Lurkers" aren't part of this Forgotten Realms community. One becomes part of it once you participate. Anyway, something on Cormyr in the era of the Steel Regent, about how she managed to keep the kingdom together in the face of so much upheaval would actually be quite useful. Shame WoTC didn't do anything about it for the last 8 years. -Alusair really got the shaft, I think. Poor Alusair. |
| #65uzzyJul 03, 2008 19:24:55 | That she did. Often, and enthusiastically. Ok. That was terrible. Even if she got the shaft in the Sellplague, or even after 1380 DR, I'd still like to know what she got up after Death of the Dragon, along with Calednei and everyone else. How one of the key nations in the Realms survived after such an event is of interest to me. |
| #66nymrohdJul 03, 2008 19:30:22 | Well we know how it survived. Azoun V was a brilliant ruler. And we will never get to know either him or Imbrar II. Seriously two of the most promising rulers in Faerun and we will never get to know them. Bleh |
| #67lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 19:30:23 | That she did. Often, and enthusiastically. -Personally speaking, I don't see Alusair being content to fade into the background and become a bureaucrat. I see her "riding off into the sunset" and "going out with a bang", so to speak. |
| #68nymrohdJul 03, 2008 19:31:53 | I'd expect that her young brother would at the very least keep her as a general. She was highly respected among the purple dragons, and she would be far more willing to act as a general than she was to act as a regent. |
| #69Mr_MiscellanyJul 03, 2008 19:33:57 | -You do not seem to pay attention, then. Oh I do, I do. I just don't equate repetition from a few people as any kind of majority or consensus. :P |
| #70lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 19:34:05 | I'd expect that her young brother would at the very least keep her as a general. She was highly respected among the purple dragons, and she would be far more willing to act as a general than she was to act as a regent. -I'd think that Azoun would be a little "smarter" than that. Sure, Alusair is his sister and all, but she had the taste of power once. One never knows...Not that I think Alusair would seriously consider such a thing, but...Again, one never knows... |
| #71merrikcaleJul 03, 2008 19:37:28 | Says you, and you only. He speaks for me. It seems fairly clear that the majority on this board is against the Spellplague |
| #72lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 19:39:35 | -Let's get back to Cormyr. |
| #73DiffanJul 03, 2008 19:47:39 | He speaks for me. And not for me. I'm going to embrace the Spellplague, FR4e, and the changes therein. And I for one am glad the changes are staying. But all of the anti-pro 4e stuff has me remembering lyrics from a Billy Joel song- " I once believed in causes too, had my pointless point of view and life went on no matter who was wrong or right." Fact of the matter is, the changes are going to stay reguardless and though people's points of views are important (to them at least), it's not really going to change a thing. Back on track, I'm really looking foward to how Cormyr has dealt with the Shades, Tilverton, and what areas are affected by changelands and earth motes |
| #74nymrohdJul 03, 2008 19:48:50 | -I'd think that Azoun would be a little "smarter" than that. Sure, Alusair is his sister and all, but she had the taste of power once. One never knows...Not that I think Alusair would seriously consider such a thing, but...Again, one never knows... Keep your friends close, and your relatives that may grab your thone closer. Read the Game of Thrones ![]() |
| #75lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 19:56:11 | Keep your friends close, and your relatives that may grab your thone closer. Read the Game of Thrones -Never read it. But, I'd think it a better idea to send such people "away". But, hey, what do I know? This is exactly what Napoleon used to his advantage, when he first took control of France. |
| #76nymrohdJul 03, 2008 20:15:54 | Yes, send them away so they can plot with disaffected nobles and raise armies to take your throne. It is easier to spy on someone when he is close by. |
| #77lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 20:48:15 | It is easier to spy on someone when he is close by. -It's also easier to seize the throne when they're close by. King Tutankhamun found that out firsthand. -Either way, it's a lose-lose situation. |
| #78nymrohdJul 03, 2008 20:49:10 | Yeah better to get her killed and incriminate someone who opposed you. |
| #79rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 03, 2008 22:50:30 | -I'd think that Azoun would be a little "smarter" than that. Sure, Alusair is his sister and all, but she had the taste of power once. One never knows...Not that I think Alusair would seriously consider such a thing, but...Again, one never knows... Azoun V is Alusair's nephew. ![]() |
| #80lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 23:00:30 | Azoun V is Alusair's nephew. -You're right, you're right. :embarrass -Beautiful and smart, folks. |
| #81rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 03, 2008 23:29:01 | -You're right, you're right. :embarrass :embarrass I was just pointing out an honest slip-up. ![]() |
| #82TheriseJul 03, 2008 23:38:16 | -Personally speaking, I don't see Alusair being content to fade into the background and become a bureaucrat. I see her "riding off into the sunset" and "going out with a bang", so to speak. I think she did, after being an advisor for quite a while. Seems like there was a snippet on what happened to her (post Death of the Dragon) printed in AGHotR, right? |
| #83merrikcaleJul 03, 2008 23:39:34 | -You're right, you're right. :embarrass are you talking about me again? |
| #84lord_karsusJul 03, 2008 23:50:20 | Please do not use this thread to debate where people should post. I think she did, after being an advisor for quite a while. Seems like there was a snippet on what happened to her (post Death of the Dragon) printed in AGHotR, right? -Which is why she'd I said she'd probably go riding into the sunset, following Neil Young's suggestion, "It's better to burn out, than to fade away...My, my, hey, hey..." are you talking about me again? -Shucks, how'd you know? :P |
| #85IluvrienJul 04, 2008 15:16:15 | Seems like there was a snippet on what happened to her (post Death of the Dragon) printed in AGHotR, right? After having finished Death of the Dragon and having caught the little about her in El's Daughter... is there anywhere that details more about Alusair apart from AGHotR? And yes, that is a pleading tone you can hear in my voice. There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth in this camp when I realised that this may well be the last we see of her in the novels. (grumblegrumblecentuaryjumpgrumblegrumble) |
| #86lord_karsusJul 04, 2008 15:22:43 | After having finished Death of the Dragon and having caught the little about her in El's Daughter... is there anywhere that details more about Alusair apart from AGHotR? And yes, that is a pleading tone you can hear in my voice. -She has assorted roles in assorted novels. The "strongest" portrayal is probably in the Return of the Archwizards trilogy. |
| #87IluvrienJul 04, 2008 21:46:04 | -She has assorted roles in assorted novels. The "strongest" portrayal is probably in the Return of the Archwizards trilogy. Thanks, Lord Karsus. I haven't picked that one up yet but as of 30 seconds ago I have an order in for The Summoning. I am looking forward to it, not least because I enjoyed elements of Beyond the High Road, Waterdeep and Death of the Dragon. Still, one good thing about having come to the novels and seeting relatively late... at least there is a backlog I can delight in before having to resign myself to the fact that most of my favourite characters have been "discontinued" (slaughtered). |
| #88lord_karsusJul 04, 2008 23:14:04 | Thanks, Lord Karsus. I haven't picked that one up yet but as of 30 seconds ago I have an order in for The Summoning. -Heh...I don't believe that Cormyr was actually featured until the second book in the series. But, you can't read Book II before Book I, so... |
| #89nymrohdJul 05, 2008 12:04:20 | They all are equally bad. |
| #90IluvrienJul 05, 2008 12:49:35 | They all are equally bad. Ah, well in which case, Nymrohd, I would consider it a matter for great gratitude if you would be so kind as to direct me, a novel reader, to a text where I might enjoy the actions and antics of the character known as the Steel Regent that isn't "bad"? |
| #91nymrohdJul 05, 2008 12:55:07 | I'd love to but I have not read most novels about Alusair. But I did find the Return of the Archwizards trilogy poor. |
| #92TheriseJul 05, 2008 12:55:27 | Ah, well in which case, Nymrohd, I would consider it a matter for great gratitude if you would be so kind as to direct me, a novel reader, to a text where I might enjoy the actions and antics of the character known as the Steel Regent that isn't "bad"? Personally, I really like the new series Ed Greenwood is writing (Knights of Myth Drannor series), and it has featured a very young Alusair getting involved in some side-plot adventures. It's very classic-style Greenwoodian writing, many different plots moving at the same time, so bear that in mind. But I liked it, and the parts with young Alusair were cute. ![]() I also thought the Return of the Archwizards series was pretty good. A little too much Netherese for my tastes, but the elves made up for it. ![]() |
| #93IluvrienJul 05, 2008 13:04:46 | Personally, I really like the new series Ed Greenwood is writing (Knights of Myth Drannor series), and it has featured a very young Alusair getting involved in some side-plot adventures. It's very classic-style Greenwoodian writing, many different plots moving at the same time, so bear that in mind. But I liked it, and the parts with young Alusair were cute. I will indeed Therise, especially since I already own the first two books and am at the point of beating down Ed's door in person to secure the third ;) . Amazon says August 5th, I honestly can't wait. I agree with you, the moments with the young Alusair were enjoyable. I liken it to the putting together of a jigsaw when you have no idea how big it will be, what the final design will look like... but at least the placement of each piece is an enjoyable experience. I was just mildly peeved to find it that the final thing might be smaller than I had hoped and have pieces missing... but then that is just me. Thank you, however, for making a constructive comment on the subject. |
| #94TheriseJul 05, 2008 13:08:29 | I will indeed Therise, especially since I already own the first two books and am at the point of beating down Ed's door in person to secure the third ;) . Amazon says August 5th, I honestly can't wait. No problem, I wish there were more things out there that featured Alusair. |
| #95IluvrienJul 05, 2008 13:12:32 | No problem, I wish there were more things out there that featured Alusair. As do I, but it would seem that wishing on a star only works in Disney movies. ...of course, now I am wading through CK to see if I can't track down a "Novel by character" guide. Taking a chance with a novel and discovering a few paragraphs, unlooked for, about a character I enjoy is a most delicious surprise though, so maybe I shouldn't. I am in two minds. |
| #96nymrohdJul 05, 2008 13:14:13 | It would be a better idea to make a post there. They can point you to the right direction quite fast. |
| #97lord_karsusJul 05, 2008 13:17:16 | -I'm trying to think...I don't really think there is anything else novel-wise, that features her. |
| #98merrikcaleJul 05, 2008 22:56:52 | was she in Murder in Cormyr? I can't for the life of me remember anything about that book |
| #99IluvrienJul 06, 2008 6:50:18 | It would be a better idea to make a post there. They can point you to the right direction quite fast. Thank you for your suggestion, Nymrohd. I registered last night during the forum "trouble". I will likely continue searching for a bit before wading in with a new query. Not least because I can think of few things less enjoyable, in these places, than to have a first post in any forum replied to with a scathing castigation along the lines of "Well obviously you haven't done your homework." My crushing sense of newbie-ism sometimes assists my survival instincts. Not that you would have any reason to be interested in that at all, I am sure ;) . -I'm trying to think...I don't really think there is anything else novel-wise, that features her. In this one case, sir, I hope you will permit me to thank you for the effort you have put into your suggestions... and forgive me for hoping that you are wrong, in that I hope there are novels that have temporarily slipped your mind. Your wording suggests other material might be found that isn't in novels? was she in Murder in Cormyr? I can't for the life of me remember anything about that book Well, a few moment's checking has suggested to me that it is, at least, in the right time period (I think). So I will pick it up anyway and count her presence, if it occurs, as a bonus! Thanks for the suggestion MerrikCale. :D |
| #100nymrohdJul 06, 2008 7:21:49 | Nah the Candlekeep people are friendly with people who like the Realms. Just don't mention anything about liking 4E FR or they will burn you at the stake. |
| #101IluvrienJul 06, 2008 7:32:49 | Nah the Candlekeep people are friendly with people who like the Realms. Just don't mention anything about liking 4E FR or they will burn you at the stake. Indeed, the posts I have read so far would seem to suggest so. However, there is a world of difference between acknowledging friendliness and taking advantage of it by not using the tools freely available to you. As it happens I haven't found the guide I am looking for, as yet, but I shall keep looking! As for the latter point, well, that really isn't a problem. As a FR setting novel reader and not, as yet, a FR setting game player my feelings about the Realms in the 4th Edition... shall we say, tend more towards the saturnine than sanguine? [EDIT: Grammar monkeys do vex me!] |
| #102TheriseJul 06, 2008 10:23:16 | ... in that I hope there are novels that have temporarily slipped your mind. Your wording suggests other material might be found that isn't in novels? There are some very brief snippets on what happens to Alusair in A Grand History of the Realms (which many of us abbreviate down to AGHotR), although that reference book is more of a timeline with bits-n-pieces lore put in here and there. I think there was also something posted on the Countdown to the Realms (?) about Imperial Cormyr (the Cormyr of the future setting for 4E Realms), saying something about Alusair having some strife over politics with her nephew when he's a young man, and she effectively rides off into the sunset. Edit: after looking through the campaign countdown to the realms things online, I think most of what I talked about above is in AGHotR. |
| #103lord_karsusJul 06, 2008 11:19:27 | In this one case, sir, I hope you will permit me to thank you for the effort you have put into your suggestions... and forgive me for hoping that you are wrong, in that I hope there are novels that have temporarily slipped your mind. -It does happen, from time to time. -A ha! A younger Alusair had a somewhat minor role in Crusade! ![]() Your wording suggests other material might be found that isn't in novels? -Well, sure. Sourcebooks. |
| #104Mr_MiscellanyJul 06, 2008 12:58:33 | Nah the Candlekeep people are friendly with people who like the Realms. Just don't mention anything about liking 4E FR or they will burn you at the stake. They aren't that bad at all. If they were, they wouldn't play host to numerous Forgotten Realms authors and designers. It'd be nice if we could get this Forum back up to Candlekeep's standards. |
| #105ORC_NashiraJul 06, 2008 14:48:03 | Please keep posts on topic and play nice! |
| #106rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 06, 2008 19:37:28 | After having finished Death of the Dragon and having caught the little about her in El's Daughter... is there anywhere that details more about Alusair apart from AGHotR? And yes, that is a pleading tone you can hear in my voice. If you search through Ed's Answers on Candlekeep.com, you can probably find a bit more about her besides what was published in the novels and sourcebooks. ![]() |
| #107rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 06, 2008 19:40:40 | As do I, but it would seem that wishing on a star only works in Disney movies. Yeah, most of the time it's a pointless exercise. ![]() |
| #108rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 06, 2008 19:54:46 | Nah the Candlekeep people are friendly with people who like the Realms. Just don't mention anything about liking 4E FR or they will burn you at the stake. Not true. Candlekeep is edition neutral, as per the website administrators. |
| #109merrikcaleJul 06, 2008 19:58:53 | Not true. Candlekeep is edition neutral, as per the website administrators. True, but there is an overall negative vibe towards the 4-gotten realms. Though it doesn't get as argumentative there as it does here |
| #110lord_karsusJul 06, 2008 21:03:18 | Not true. Candlekeep is edition neutral, as per the website administrators. -As is this Forgotten Realms section. True, but there is an overall negative vibe towards the 4-gotten realms. Though it doesn't get as argumentative there as it does here -The beauty of self-moderation. I was just discussing this with someone. -So, Cormyr... |
| #111rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 06, 2008 22:49:24 | -The beauty of self-moderation. I was just discussing this with someone. Yeah. ;) I know it's off-topic, but I wanted to say something. I think it's certainly accurate to say most people on Candlekeep dislike the new changes to the Realms. However, we are also a friendly bunch on the whole, and we won't flame or ostracize people who like the 4E Realms and want to ask questions about it. |
| #112IluvrienJul 07, 2008 7:17:23 | If you search through Ed's Answers on Candlekeep.com, you can probably find a bit more about her besides what was published in the novels and sourcebooks. I have just found these. So much more material! Thankyou for pointing me in their direction. This should keep me more than amused until The Summoning and Murder in Cormyr arrive. (*peers at letter box with interest*) Yeah, most of the time it's a pointless exercise. Ah, so I should drop brightly coloured letters on buildings until I get my way instead? Superb ;) ... and yes, wishing really gets you all of nowhere. |
| #113merrikcaleJul 08, 2008 10:14:39 | let me know what you think of Murder in Cormyr |
| #114TheriseJul 08, 2008 10:28:24 | Ah, so I should drop brightly coloured letters on buildings until I get my way instead? Superb ;) ... and yes, wishing really gets you all of nowhere. People forget that in addition to wishing and hoping, one requires choreography and back-up singers. And a fantastic dress. Then things work out fine. ;) |
| #115lord_karsusJul 08, 2008 11:06:52 | let me know what you think of Murder in Cormyr -I've never read it, either. |
| #116StiggerJul 08, 2008 13:41:58 | I don't look that great in dresses unfortunately... I wonder if a skirt and fishnet shirt with combat boots would be enough to get away it. I can manage the dancing and back-up singers just fine at least, so that's an upside. :D |
| #117rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 08, 2008 18:27:39 | I have just found these. So much more material! Thankyou for pointing me in their direction. You're welcome. ![]() |
| #118naexJul 09, 2008 1:57:07 | Alusair has a bit part (very minor) in the old Curse of the Azure Bonds game, from the time she was running loose in the realms and her father was trying to find her and reign her in. The only books that she is actually a central character are the Cormyr series. |
| #119IluvrienJul 09, 2008 17:51:43 | -I've never read it, either. My copy arrived this afternoon (blooming fast considering I only ordered it 48 hours ago from a second-hand dealer)... I will report further when I have read more than the 10 pages or so before I ended up in hospital. No... nothing to do with the book ;) . |
| #120lord_karsusJul 09, 2008 17:55:45 | -Won't ask, then. |
| #121merrikcaleJul 10, 2008 11:42:52 | My copy arrived this afternoon (blooming fast considering I only ordered it 48 hours ago from a second-hand dealer)... good luck |
| #122lord_karsusJul 11, 2008 21:28:13 | -Yes. Be sure to let us know how it is. |
| #123IluvrienJul 12, 2008 15:21:47 | Well, I finished Murder in Cormyr. I have to say, I found it most… singular. For future reference, MerrikCale, Alusair is not in it. In fact, nobody I have ever heard of before is, to any noticeable degree. That may not entirely a bad thing. The book is a departure in many ways. Anyway, my thoughts (and I stress these are purely my own thoughts), my apologies for the overlong post: 1) It is narrated in the first person by a young man (well, 1/8th Halfling) in indentured service to an ex-War Wizard. Up until now I am fair sure I have only seen short stories told in this way, not novels. It grants it an immediacy to the action but for some reason it is hindered by the choice of language. It strikes me as be a little too “of its time”. I hadn’t realised before but, the manner of speech in the other books I have read is, to a significant degree, timeless. By this I mean to suggest that while reading novels as Spellfire, or El : The Making of a Mage or Elfshadow I get no feeling that they are dated. With MiC I do. 2) As previously mentioned the setting is unfamiliar, as are the people. I did check, after the fact, on what Volo’s Cormyr had to say on the subject. In the, less that 1 page, on ghars it details the local smith, the manner of milling… and a passage that is placed, almost verbatim, into the novel text (pg 183 para 3 in Volo to the last para on pg 27 in MiC). Having spent a fair amount of time reading about Cormyr, either in a recognisable place or with recognisable people, now doing so with neither presented a fresh perspective from the back end of agrarian Cormyr that was interesting if not illuminating. A query that arose in my mind had to do with a feeling of disconnection from the wider world, and thus, timing. Apart from mentioning Azoun and Vangerdahast this novel could take place anywhen. Although that may be intentional. 3) The writing style was not as discursive and humorous as Ed nor as incisive and moving as Elaine. It had good and bad points of its own. I believe it could be considered (possibly charitably) to hold its own amongst the other offerings from other authors. 4) The mystery. It felt to me that the mystery was a (not very well) hidden mechanic for the personal growth of the narrator (see next point). That isn’t to say that the mystery was badly constructed The flow was acceptable and the “clues” were sufficiently obscure to prevent me from knowing “who did it” five pages in. I did, however, guess the perpetrator before the end… although that might have come of having read and seen too much Agatha Christie and knowing generally how these things may be structured. 5) The characters. This would, of course, be my main and only major gripe. Admittedly the book is only 247 pages long (hardback) but it felt like it introduced a fair number of people only to have them fill specific roles and then evaporate. The only exception seemed to be the narrator. Case in point, the adventuress Kendra, who had enough of a spark to sound interesting but we never really got to know. I would have liked to have seen more of her but that task may well have been hindered by the first person narrative style. In summary. Was it worth reading? Did it tell me anything about Cormyr I didn’t already know? Most importantly, did I enjoy it? Yes, yes and yes… to differing degrees. I would recommend people read this. I might counsel that a copy be borrowed from a friend or local library before the choice to actually purchase it was made… to give you the chance to make up your own mind! I hope all of this was of interest to... well... somebody. ;) |
| #124lord_karsusJul 12, 2008 15:51:32 | -Interesting. |
| #125IluvrienJul 12, 2008 16:15:17 | -Interesting. Actually, I noticed after I posted it that it was more Book Review than Considered Thoughts. Entirely too lengthy and probably contains material that has been gone over a dozen times already. ![]() |
| #126rinonalyrna_fathomlinJul 12, 2008 23:17:11 | Thanks for sharing your thoughts.![]() |
| #127naexJul 13, 2008 18:10:04 | 1) It is narrated in the first person by a young man (well, 1/8th Halfling) in indentured service to an ex-War Wizard. Up until now I am fair sure I have only seen short stories told in this way, not novels. The best novel I have found narrated in 1st person is Michael Stackpole's "I, Jedi". Not only in first person, but it actually modifies another earlier Star Wars novel, adding the main character into an existing story. Well written and lots of fun. |
| #128lord_karsusJul 14, 2008 0:45:26 | -Anything with Corran Horn is good. One of my top five Force users. |
| #129Mr_MiscellanyJul 14, 2008 2:00:31 | I'm wondering what the heck happened to Tilverton. Is all of the Stonelands one big gloomy shadow-covered mess? |
| #130StiggerJul 14, 2008 2:21:37 | Weren't they rebuilding that last we knew, next to the big shadow pit thing? I'd imagine they'd have finished rebuilding it by now... probably even became a rallying point for resisting the Shades I'd imagine. |
| #131Mr_MiscellanyJul 14, 2008 2:30:40 | Unless I missed something in a novel, there are currently no efforts to rebuild around Tilverton. The Dungeon Magazine adventure "The Door From Everywhere" talks about Tilverton, but only inasmuch as it describes the Purple Dragon garrisons who watch over the ruins to keep interlopers and adventurers away and also to keep watch for terrible things that might come out of the ruins. The adventure goes so far as to advise DMs that any character who makes it past the Purple Dragons and enters the shadowy void at the ruin's edge is lost forever. If my memory serves, it even says to have the player tear up their character sheet and start over. Harsh! Anywho, Ed has mentioned over at Candlekeep that the Crown is working hard to get people to resettle in the North Eastern part of Cormyr, but not so far as Tilverton (as I understand it). |
| #132StiggerJul 14, 2008 2:33:17 | I thought GHotR mentioned something about it... at least an attempt at it. Gotta go look now or its gonna bug me. Yeah, it does, page 154, column 1 under Greengrass mentions a new town a few miles away. |
| #133lord_karsusJul 14, 2008 10:34:53 | Unless I missed something in a novel, there are currently no efforts to rebuild around Tilverton. -Tilverton was indeed rebuilt. In the future, of course. |
| #134Mr_MiscellanyJul 14, 2008 18:33:14 | -Tilverton was indeed rebuilt. In the future, of course. I don't recall reading anything about it (yet). {edit} Just read Stigger's post. |
| #135TheriseJul 14, 2008 18:38:20 | I don't recall reading anything about it (yet). I think it's also in the Realms of Shadow anthology, no? One of those compiled short stories books. |
| #136nymrohdJul 14, 2008 18:53:44 | It is certainly in GHotR. I have it right next to me. And apparently it is called New Tilverton. |
| #137lord_karsusJul 14, 2008 19:30:14 | I think it's also in the Realms of Shadow anthology, no? One of those compiled short stories books. -There's a story about a knight and a squire (I believe) exploring the ruins of Tilverton, but not about rebuilding Tilverton. |