| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1banpaiSep 26, 2008 1:29:38 | New one is up : http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drrl/20080926 |
| #2trobonSep 26, 2008 2:00:52 | Pretty good article. I liked reading about the area and have high hopes that future Realmslore articles will continue to give good information on the realms as they exist now. |
| #3JohnLynchSep 26, 2008 2:04:09 | Great article. I feel like I could actually map this place out and I think I could have a lot of fun getting my players to journey here. Its almost completely generic though, and could easily be slotted into almost any D&D setting (with the exception of Eberron of course). I don't say this as a bad thing, simply an observation ![]() |
| #4trobonSep 26, 2008 2:06:19 | . I feel like I could actually map this place out This was actually the part I liked the most out of the whole article. I thought the descriptions of the areas were good, but I was surprised by how the descriptions included a fairly good idea of where the areas where in comparison to one another. |
| #5mbrandSep 26, 2008 2:13:07 | I had deep reservations about Talos being Gruumsh. It bothered me to no end, really, and I had given considerable thought to retconning that out of my own FR game. However, the additional information provided plus some suggestion of consequence gives me hope that there will be more insights like this to come. I liked the article enough that I am not going to rez Talos. A complete 180! Well done. This was a pleasant reminder of why I loved the Realms of Yore: the "fluffy" lore. If more info such as this comes, I'll be a happy camper. |
| #6gomeztooSep 26, 2008 4:05:34 | Does anybody know what the black diamond is? I don't have the FRCG so I have no idea if it is in there. It could have done with some extra explanation. And one thing I would have liked to see: a divine channeling feat for Auril clerics. It could have gone in the Auril sidebox. |
| #7DreamStalkerSep 26, 2008 6:08:45 | They are not making feats for Evil characters. Auril is not a valid player character faith under the current 4E design method. |
| #8mystrasdanceSep 26, 2008 7:27:19 | what really gets me is how Auril is increasing her power by absorbing people from other faiths. Though this is a long time practice of many Gods in Faerun Shar in particular(at least it falls in her portfolio) it tends to make me wonder if anyone in the Realms truely knows who they worship. I pray to Aerdie Faenya but Talos or Silvanus or some other stinkin god picks up lord! |
| #9jiggawha_dupSep 26, 2008 7:30:35 | Does anybody know what the black diamond is? I don't have the FRCG so I have no idea if it is in there. It could have done with some extra explanation. It's in Monster Mythology, possibly the creation of the Dark God, it's was dug out by dwarves, it corrupted Titania's sister who later became the Queen of Air and Darkness, it destroyed Ladinion, primordial fey realm |
| #10jiggawha_dupSep 26, 2008 7:43:44 | liked the article, it is based on a lot of previous lore and that's rare in 4e Auril becoming Queen of Air and Darkness was a surprise, in my cosmology Auril always was of fey origin, but the Ladinion myth was different wished it had 10 pages Artus Cimber, maybe he doesn't serve Auril, but wearing the ring made him an exarch, and he isn't aware of it, tragic hero type |
| #11oluevaraSep 26, 2008 8:06:10 | who moved Ulutiu from underneath the great glacier? I hope Auril used union labor. A few too many retcons and unexplained 180s for me, though any realmslore is a good thing. |
| #12zananSep 26, 2008 8:07:47 | Why was there need to turn her from Neutral Evil to Chaotic Evil? |
| #1318DELTASep 26, 2008 9:39:16 | -Great article BRJ! ;) Why was there need to turn her from Neutral Evil to Chaotic Evil? -4E has no Neutral Evil Alignment. 18DELTA ![]() |
| #14gomeztooSep 26, 2008 10:24:44 | They are not making feats for Evil characters. Auril is not a valid player character faith under the current 4E design method. The DMG leaves that up to the DM, really. And you can be unaligned and worship Auril. Even then, it could be used as a basics for a NPC priest. |
| #15lord_karsusSep 26, 2008 10:41:46 | -Having read it, it's much better than much of the information in the actual WotC books, which, really, is not a surprise. Fan-made things tend to always be better (well, not always. Most of the time) than official things. |
| #16suin_bahhar_02Sep 26, 2008 11:05:21 | Auril used to allow even lawful neutral clerics, wich the Palace of Eternal Ice in Luskan used to produce quite a few off (I played one of those a few months online). Love the new lore though... I need more planar vistas like those! |
| #17red_wizardSep 26, 2008 11:22:20 | Is it just me, or does that image speak more to Ebberon than FR. Right down to the flying ship being modeled off of theirs. -RW |
| #18angelus_obscuraSep 26, 2008 12:58:56 | I'm still miffed over the picture of an elemental-bound airship (Eberron) in a Realmslore article. But whatever. I guess it's supposed to foster the whole "generic, can be used anywhere" feel of the new edition. -_-;; |
| #19hvulpesSep 26, 2008 13:17:10 | Auril used to allow even lawful neutral clerics, wich the Palace of Eternal Ice in Luskan used to produce quite a few off (I played one of those a few months online). Technically she would be served by Evil, Chaotic Evil (Majority) and Unaligned (who might even be mostly benine). Unaligned Clerics can serve any god, or that's what the PHB says. |
| #20burningtiger_dupSep 26, 2008 13:38:36 | I'm still miffed over the picture of an elemental-bound airship (Eberron) in a Realmslore article. But whatever. I guess it's supposed to foster the whole "generic, can be used anywhere" feel of the new edition. -_-;; It may look like an Eberron airship, but he did mention "astraljammers" in the article. :D For those who didn't notice it's on the 3rd page (listed as page 29) under the first heading (The Nest). |
| #21gomeztooSep 26, 2008 14:08:01 | It's probably a Halruaan skyship, likely from the Company of Five. |
| #22MirtekSep 26, 2008 14:58:54 | Since FR had flying ships long before Eberron was even created I don't mind the ship |
| #23zananSep 26, 2008 15:25:07 | -4E has no Neutral Evil Alignment. Ah yes. How silly of me to forget that rub ... So the personification of winter being evil and chaotic at that makes more sense? Evil maybe, but chaotic? Had she been turn to neutral with a nasty streak, it would have served all a bit better. Sometimes I dispair on these subtle changes. Well, coming to think of it, some are not that subtle ... |
| #24burningtiger_dupSep 26, 2008 15:37:18 | Apparently she's chaotic evil because she has Storms as part of her portfolio now. It might also have to do with her being retconned as the fey Queen of Air and Darkness. |
| #25lord_tirianSep 26, 2008 16:01:45 | Since FR had flying ships long before Eberron was even created I don't mind the ship Also: It has sails. Which is so Spelljammer-y and so not Eberron-y. Cheers, LT. |
| #26rinonalyrna_fathomlinSep 26, 2008 18:53:34 | This is one article that at times rubbed me the wrong way. I don't care for Artus Cimber as an exarch of Auril, Auril as Chaotic Evil or (apparently) having subsumed the faith of Aerdrie Faenya (among a few other deities). I also came out not entirely clear on where the Deep Wilds are, or what they are (is it a realm on the Astral Sea?). Did I miss something? ![]() |
| #27rinonalyrna_fathomlinSep 26, 2008 18:59:38 | -4E has no Neutral Evil Alignment. "Evil" in 4E takes the place of the old Neutral Evil alignment, not "Chaotic Evil". For example, Shar used to be Neutral Evil, now she's simply "Evil". |
| #28jiggawha_dupSep 26, 2008 19:02:49 | Deep Wilds are a divine realm in the Astral Sea, it's quite different than the old Astral Plane |
| #29rinonalyrna_fathomlinSep 26, 2008 19:03:46 | That's what I meant (obviously).![]() |
| #30zananSep 27, 2008 3:23:04 | Wonder why Corellon did not care about Aerdrie's fate. He's quick to pop up at the end of the LP III series, late, of course. As has been said, Nature deities could easily been given the Neutral / Unaligned tag, something explained a bit more in the text. Sure, Auril has a nasty streak, but Chaotic Evil? ... Well, you can't help to get frustrated with the incursions of the rules system into the setting. It really is a shame. |
| #31mystrasdanceSep 27, 2008 4:10:21 | Wonder why Corellon did not care about Aerdrie's fate. He's quick to pop up at the end of the LP III series, late, of course. Because she isnt actually an elven goddes but a great big stinking air elemental! I'm so gonna cry why wizards why did u not think b4 u wrote this garbage....u had a valid out, she was part of Angarragh! You kept her! and so easily could have stuck the 3 there but u instead made them HUMAN or ELEMENTALS bah! |
| #32jiggawha_dupSep 27, 2008 4:19:11 | That's what I meant (obviously). it seemed you're confused As has been said, Nature deities could easily been given the Neutral / Unaligned tag, something explained a bit more in the text. Sure, Auril has a nasty streak, but Chaotic Evil? ... Well, you can't help to get frustrated with the incursions of the rules system into the setting. It really is a shame. CE isn't nastier than NE, and doesn't necessarily mean mindless destruction, that depends on the person as one of the Furies chaotic is maybe more suitable tough I liked the old alignment, didn't imagine her as all evil |
| #33TheriseSep 27, 2008 21:33:28 | Is it just me, or does that image speak more to Ebberon than FR. Right down to the flying ship being modeled off of theirs You're absolutely correct, it felt exactly like Eberron. It was interesting, but I don't want the feel of Eberron creeping into the Realms. But then, I didn't want all that Far Realms alienist junk and aberration explosion either - and since Cordell led the authorship of FRCG it doesn't really matter. |
| #34marius4Sep 27, 2008 23:59:58 | Hey, where was this thread an hour ago?? I thought it was weird that I was creating the "first" thread on an online update. :P Haha!For my part, I really liked this article. I thought the stories and locations provided were great. It was also just well-written and fun to read. I would love similar articles for other deities. The avariel and the Queen of Air and Darkness tie-ins both surprised me. I'm glad to see that Auril (and by extension all of the lesser gods) isn't just slumming it around the cosmos with nothing to do. My one worry was giving Umberlee a "Blood Sea." It struck me as very DragonLance.....a la Zeboim, the Blood Sea of Istar, and the Maelstrom. I hope they don't go too far in creating direct parallels between worlds for the sake of uber-easy portability. I don't think it's necessary beyond the basic mechanics of keywords and planes. Other than that, the article sets a fairly pleasant standard and gives an idea of how the medium will work for presenting in-depth lore. WotC should consider letting us individually choose which DDI articles we want bound in book form at the end of each year as sort of a Print-On-Demand thing. That would be nice. |
| #35zananSep 28, 2008 3:25:11 | CE isn't nastier than NE, and doesn't necessarily mean mindless destruction, that depends on the person IMHO CE is worse than NE, especially if you go by D&D alignment descriptions. Anyway, I have no problem with "the Furies" being wild and all, but making them primarily Unaligned and give them a decent description which adds a nasty streak (in Auril's case) would have done the trick. Blizzards, tornadoes, thunderstorms are not evil or mean. As it is, "by alignment default" Auril will send her powers and servants out to slay and dominate and gain new territories because that's "in her blood". This is one point where WotC could have asked how the changes could have been done, but instead we are left with definite facts that do not always sit well, not least with the old lore. |
| #36aldarethSep 28, 2008 3:39:43 | i think CE ist under 4th edition the right choice, auril is evil, she wants to destroy all warmth and illusion of love as she see it as weakness. and she is chaotic, as are the weather, the storms and so on...her temper flickers and is unpredictable, so she is clearly not unaligned. |
| #37quale_Sep 28, 2008 7:57:25 | IMHO CE is worse than NE, especially if you go by D&D alignment descriptions. imho no cause that would be unfair and out of balance, no matter how they described it, the difference is in the means of how the evil manifests CE has levels, from the ultimate depravity of Graz'zt to people like Jarlaxle or some deluded Anarchists, also with NE where you have beings like baernaloths described as the ultimate evil, unhindered by chaos and law, to some selfish Cormyrian farmer Anyway, I have no problem with "the Furies" being wild and all, but making them primarily Unaligned and give them a decent description which adds a nasty streak (in Auril's case) would have done the trick. Blizzards, tornadoes, thunderstorms are not evil or mean. As it is, "by alignment default" Auril will send her powers and servants out to slay and dominate and gain new territories because that's "in her blood". This is one point where WotC could have asked how the changes could have been done, but instead we are left with definite facts that do not always sit well, not least with the old lore. if she's unaligned with a nasty streak would that mean that she has a kind streak too? but she's incapable of being kind to me alignment is something very relative, and I think they hardly defined her character with CE |
| #38zananSep 28, 2008 8:30:51 | Just in case, Jarlaxle is NE ![]() |
| #39rinonalyrna_fathomlinSep 28, 2008 20:16:45 | as one of the Furies chaotic is maybe more suitable Eh, Auril was a "God of Fury" in previous editions, and still NE. |
| #40rinonalyrna_fathomlinSep 28, 2008 20:18:49 | My one worry was giving Umberlee a "Blood Sea." It struck me as very DragonLance.....a la Zeboim, the Blood Sea of Istar, and the Maelstrom. I hope they don't go too far in creating direct parallels between worlds for the sake of uber-easy portability. I don't think it's necessary beyond the basic mechanics of keywords and planes. To be fair, "The Blood Sea" as Umberlee's Realm (IIRC) is not new and has been around in previous editions (I know it was around in 2E). |
| #41rinonalyrna_fathomlinSep 28, 2008 20:21:57 | CE has levels, from the ultimate depravity of Graz'zt to people like Jarlaxle or some deluded Anarchists, also with NE where you have beings like baernaloths described as the ultimate evil, unhindered by chaos and law, to some selfish Cormyrian farmer Jarlaxle was NE in previous editions, "evil" in 4E, not "chaotic evil" (which kind of proves my point again). if she's unaligned with a nasty streak would that mean that she has a kind streak too? No, "unaligned" does not have to imply that at all. |
| #42rauricSep 29, 2008 10:14:19 | Eh, Auril was a "God of Fury" in previous editions, and still NE. Since it looks like she took up some of Talos/Grummsh's stuff (Storms) perhaps she did a little alignment shift. It seems like she is the current god of Storms and such. I would make her Unaligned I think in my campaign, but since I really don't use alignement... |
| #43rinonalyrna_fathomlinSep 29, 2008 19:42:32 | Since it looks like she took up some of Talos/Grummsh's stuff (Storms) perhaps she did a little alignment shift. Yes, that's possible. |
| #44KnoJun 19, 2009 8:49:57 | Congrats on the article, spurs imagination. Two questions, sorry about the necromancy. The locations mentioned in the article, are they new or there is more information in previous lore. Will there be avariel 4e stats? |
| #45iakhovasJun 19, 2009 9:22:53 | Hello Kno. There was very little prior lore on Auril's realm available previously, so nearly all of the locations mentioned in the article are new. I'm not aware of any plans to stat avariel in 4E, sorry. |
| #46KnoJun 19, 2009 10:53:55 | Thanks for responding. There are many hooks in the article, so many things you can do. It seems there's a problem with flying in 4e for pc's. |
| #47zananJun 20, 2009 7:38:57 | She appears as a haughty winged faerie ... When did she grow wings and became a faerie? ... Then again, while someone can surely explain this with all the massive chopping and changing in the 4E FR godly and not-so-godly realms, a 4E-only customer will not care. |
| #48AegeriJun 20, 2009 8:17:00 | Thanks for responding. There are many hooks in the article, so many things you can do. It seems there's a problem with flying in 4e for pc's. Flying is restricted for PCs as it unbalances the game and they have deliberately made sure certain abilities start to occur in different tiers. The nearest I can think of to genuine at-will PC flight is the Scion of Arkhosia paragon path for Dragonborn (which does in fact grant at-will flight at level 12). By epic tier everyone can fly just about though. |
| #49iakhovasJun 20, 2009 10:39:30 | When did she grow wings and became a faerie? The lore describing Auril's fey origin is a new revelation. As a deity, however, Auril can appear as anything she desires. Long before humans started venerating the Frostmaiden, she was known as Aurilandür, the Frost Sprite Queen, a (mostly) benevolent winter fey with a seat on the Court of Stars. She was latter corrupted by a malign artifact, warred with her sister the Summer Queen, and was banished from the Feywild. Thereafter her name was stricken and she was referred to only as the Queen of Air and Darkness. At this time she garnered a human following and joined Talos-who-was-Gruumsh as one of the Gods of Fury. With the aid of Silvanus, the dark artifact’s hold over Auril was shattered during the Stormstar Requiem, and the Aurilandür of old has once again begun to peak through Auril’s icy, malevolent veneer. |
| #50markustay63Jun 20, 2009 11:05:06 | I like her being a corrupted Fey, but I'm not too keen on her being the same as the Queen of Air and Darkness, whom I've already used differently in my Realms. That would make Auril Titania's sister. ![]() I picture Auril very much like the White Witch from Narnia, and considering Ed's penchant of borrowing from that wonderful classic, I think I may be on the right track there. The movie-version was very Fey-like, though - much more so then the picture I got in my head when I first read the series - so it fits with your interpretation. ![]() |
| #51quale1Jun 20, 2009 11:40:16 | Jarlaxle was NE in previous editions, "evil" in 4E, not "chaotic evil" (which kind of proves my point again). what point, he's partially CE ----- so if all gods associated with seasons have some kind of fey origin, Chauntea (summer), Auril (winter), Mielikki (autumn), does the same apply to Lathander (spring) ? |
| #52KnoJun 20, 2009 17:24:45 | No. |
| #53old_sageJun 20, 2009 20:37:56 | The lore describing Auril's fey origin is a new revelation. As a deity, however, Auril can appear as anything she desires. Very interesting Brian. Especially since I once made Auril an aspect of the concept of 'Old Man Winter' from Bryon Wishchstadt's Faeries. Good stuff! |
| #54quale1Jun 22, 2009 13:43:46 | I did something similar, Auril killed Old Man Winter. |
| #55KnoJun 23, 2009 10:40:34 | Who's the Sand Man then? |
| #56markustay63Jun 23, 2009 11:28:16 | 'Sandmen' are the outsiders native to the Plane of dreams, ostensibly under the command of Untamo. The are the equivalent of Celestials or Fiends on their home plane, and enforce the need for sleep upon all beings. Here is a map of my 'Realm of Dreams' (Fantasia). Note that with the advent of 4e's Feywild, that Faerie co-exists in both the Feywild and the Plane of Dreams - it is a demi-plane with major connections to those two, and intermittant connections to just about every Prime Material World in existance. |
| #57old_sageJun 23, 2009 19:15:04 | 'Sandmen' are the outsiders native to the Plane of dreams, ostensibly under the command of Untamo. The are the equivalent of Celestials or Fiends on their home plane, and enforce the need for sleep upon all beings. This does remind me very much of the time I tried to incorporate the Endless into my PLANESCAPE campaigns. |
| #58lord_karsusJun 24, 2009 11:30:00 | Who's the Sand Man then? -Mariano Rivera. |
| #59quale1Jun 24, 2009 12:54:39 | who? |
| #60KnoJun 24, 2009 14:13:43 | 'Sandmen' are the outsiders native to the Plane of dreams, ostensibly under the command of Untamo. The are the equivalent of Celestials or Fiends on their home plane, and enforce the need for sleep upon all beings. - Where would you put the quori? |
| #61markustay63Jun 24, 2009 22:14:22 | I would probably place them in my Night Terror Realm (formerly known as the Shadow World - I have to account for 4e's changes once again). Originally I had imagined something akin to the 'Fear Lords' living there, but Quori would work as well. I could stick them in Nocturnia, but that Realm was taken directly from the Ravenloft boxed set (Nightmare Lands)... and I doubt the Nightmare Court would be willing to share. |
| #62quale1Jun 25, 2009 4:37:16 | you forgot the diaboli, interesting land of dreams MT, why did you divide it in that way, some kind of symbolism, sacred geometry? I turned the quori into fey, cause I'm sick of aberrations there is indeed the Sand Man in Faeries, in the place called the Deep Sands of Time the names from Faeries like Father Time, Green Man, Old Man Winter sounded generic, I translated them into celtic languages and the Sand Man to Altxeringa, the Dreamtime |
| #63KnoJun 27, 2009 13:21:42 | Isn't that Aboriginal? |
| #64markustay63Jun 27, 2009 15:21:58 | I have the Diaboli - they are a nightmare version of the Satyrs in Faerie. ![]() They live in the land of dreams (Somnabula) - truly horrific versions (the Satyrs of WoW) live in the Nightmare Realm. ![]() I, too, use a Shamanistic/Animism version, combining various cultures and folklore and using Aboriginal 'Dreamtime' as well. I've never gotten to actually use it in play, though - its just a model of how things work for my own benefit. No sybolism meant, aside from the "law of Three", which is already fairly pervasie in D&D. Law - Neutrality - Chaos Good - Neutral - Evil 3x3= Nine alignments; there are also nine hells, nine schools, etc... I just like the whole 'Holy Trinity' aspect of having everything revolve around threes. And circles are just so.... well-rounded. :D |
| #65old_sageJun 27, 2009 20:04:19 | Isn't that Aboriginal? No. Altxeringa is an altogether different conception. It has little to do with the Australian Aboriginal mythological structure. |