Mystra...?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

projectonestar

Sep 15, 2010 10:42:59
Could anybody please point me towards where I can find out more about the death of Midnight/Mystra, Cyric's involvement and anybody else that might be involved?

Also, I read in these here forums around a year ago, people talking about how Mystra's sentient being may very-well be locked in some type of wand/cudgel/club/staff? Anybody know anything about this?

Any help would be great. Thanks so much!
#2

sfdragon

Sep 15, 2010 10:48:27
I could point you in that direction but i'd be lyiing.


there is no novel on thesubject, what you read is nothing more than speculation
#3

projectonestar

Sep 15, 2010 10:52:01
I see. Well, in the FRCG they do mention that Cyric killed Mystra. I thought it may have come from a novel.

The sentient weapon is all fictitious then, eh? I love the idea, personally. (I am using that as my paragon main quest for my home game, but shhhh, don't tell my players.) lol

Thanks, dragon.
#4

eriksdb

Sep 15, 2010 14:56:22
You might check out Thomas M. Reid's Empyrean Odyssey. It contains some info on the whole divine cataclysm.

Cheers
#5

Jorunhast

Sep 15, 2010 15:11:06
Yes, Empyrean Odyssey is the place where it has Mystra's death "revealed" in 4E.  Other books talk a little bit about the aftermath, but truthfully very little.

However, it's written such that it's all sort of off-page, then interpreted through a sort of vision.  It's not at all the "we saw it all happen" kind of thing in the old Gods-war Avatar novels of the Time of Troubles.

So honestly, although the current game system materials all say Mystra's dead, there's a gigantic amount of room to play with what "really" happened.  At least for now, nothing more has been revealed.  Greenwood's new series, starting with Elminster Must Die! could, possibly, shed more light on what happened.

#6

projectonestar

Sep 15, 2010 16:06:34
@jorunhast i really want to read the new elminster series but ive never read any of his stuff yet. think i could drop in on this series and not be too, like wayyy too far off?
 
#7

sfdragon

Sep 15, 2010 16:35:12
You might check out Thomas M. Reid's Empyrean Odyssey. It contains some info on the whole divine cataclysm. Cheers




The Esteamed Mr. Reid also had posated somewhere here in the HATE threads of that scene that it was a vission of what happened and may not be the whole truth.... okay not those words exactly, but pretty much.

I'd do a search for a link, but I'd sooner have Fox at Twilight beat me up....
#8

kaelenselunel

Sep 15, 2010 17:02:58
I've always been surprised when I hear from people that didn't take it as a vision, lol. It seemed pretty clear to me in my reading of the books *shrugs* Oh well, though
#9

Jorunhast

Sep 16, 2010 3:17:21
@jorunhast i really want to read the new elminster series but ive never read any of his stuff yet. think i could drop in on this series and not be too, like wayyy too far off?
 


Absolutely, I don't see why not.  Jump right in!  The new Elminster story starts in 4E, after all the changes have happened in the setting.  Plus, although I haven't started this particular novel yet, Greenwood always (at least to me) writes in a LOT of detail that will get things arranged nicely for the reader.  His writing style isn't what everyone is used to (lots of Realms-speak), but I've always loved his books.  And I've heard good things about it, and that people love the epilogue in particular for some juicy details that are a bit of a cliffhanger for the next book.
#10

Jorunhast

Sep 16, 2010 3:22:28
I've always been surprised when I hear from people that didn't take it as a vision, lol. It seemed pretty clear to me in my reading of the books *shrugs* Oh well, though


That's funny... in Reid's book, I definitely knew it was a vision.  They had it all set up so that what's-her-name (and the others, I won't name them so as not to spoil it) were visiting the visionary area of Savras to get some forehand knowledge.  And then it turned out to be a big deal that, well... again, I won't spoil it for those who want to read it.

But I will say, I was very glad that the gods were distant the whole time, and not interacting 1:1 with mortals.  At least not obviously.  Better to keep the gods mysterious, powerful and somewhat ephemeral, even on their own planes.
#11

projectonestar

Sep 16, 2010 10:43:46
Thanks again. Here's a link to the Empyrean Odyssey if anybody cares to check it out. I'm also glad that I could jump right into this new Elminster series straight away. I've always wanted to read Elminster books, but just didn't want to trodge through them all this far out of it.

Anyhow, thanks again!
#12

MR._T

Sep 16, 2010 14:16:25
Mystra has "died" a few times in the FR literature. Start with the Avatar trilogy for the first go around (2E I think), then follow it up with the Empyrean Odyssey trilogy for round two (3E I think).

Both are fun reads...  Smile
#13

Elton74

Sep 18, 2010 9:36:23
I still think someone could discover Mystra in the shower in a couple of years.
#14

Elton74

Sep 19, 2010 20:55:22
How many Soap Operas do you watch?
s**** Laughing
#15

Dragon9

Sep 19, 2010 22:41:51
I hope she stays dead.



+1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

All hail Shar! 



-1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
#16

sfdragon

Sep 19, 2010 23:17:35
Lord Bane will spear your LAdy Shar... and the world will see her fall...
#17

Nai_Calus

Sep 20, 2010 6:16:20
Only if she's really ugly. Hanali Celanil on the other hand...
#18

Stigger

Sep 20, 2010 8:41:02
is way too skinny and needs to eat a few porkchops.  All Hail Sune!
#19

suin_bahhar_02

Sep 20, 2010 10:38:34
I think the wet T-Shirt award goes to Beshaba.

Beshaba_p92.jpg
#20

sfdragon

Sep 20, 2010 14:32:54
By Selune's twin moons.....
#21

The_Silversword

Sep 21, 2010 4:43:11
Mystra has "died" a few times in the FR literature. Start with the Avatar trilogy for the first go around (2E I think), then follow it up with the Empyrean Odyssey trilogy for round two (3E I think).

Both are fun reads...  Smile



Lets not leave out Mystryl, and the Netheril Trilogy.
#22

Dragon9

Sep 21, 2010 22:29:51
I think the wet T-Shirt award goes to Beshaba.



Only because they couldn't publish an appropriate picture for Sharess without needing to slap an adults only label on the book.  ;)
#23

The_Silversword

Sep 22, 2010 3:45:34
I think the wet T-Shirt award goes to Beshaba.



Only because they couldn't publish an appropriate picture for Sharess without needing to slap an adults only label on the book.  ;)


I would think that the goddess of nothingness and emptyness would be flat as a board.



Youre thinking of Shar, Sharess is the goddess of cats and sensuality. I guess shes hot, if youre into girls with 6 boobs! HAHAHAHAHA!

Actually Eilistraee should win, but she dont ever wear wet t-shirts, or anything for that matter.

#24

Nai_Calus

Sep 22, 2010 4:00:10

>> Implying that someone with six boobs isn't hot


The only problem would be not having six arms to take full advantage of that.


Also, everyone knows Corellon would win a wet t-shirt contest.

#25

The_Silversword

Sep 22, 2010 4:19:48

>> Implying that someone with six boobs isn't hot


The only problem would be not having six arms to take full advantage of that.


Also, everyone knows Corellon would win a wet t-shirt contest.




HAHAHAHAHA! Good one Nai!

except for the Corellon bit, I could of done with out that mental picutre!
#26

Jorunhast

Sep 22, 2010 11:21:04
The only problem would be not having six arms to take full advantage of that.

Also, everyone knows Corellon would win a wet t-shirt contest.



Are you suggesting that Corellon is fat now, and has man-boobs?


EEWWWW!!!


 

#27

Nai_Calus

Sep 22, 2010 14:03:22
No, Corellon is as slim and beautiful as ever. Just, y'know, he/she's both male *and* female. And the female part's pretty smokin'.
#28

MR._T

Sep 22, 2010 14:31:10
Mystra has "died" a few times in the FR literature. Start with the Avatar trilogy for the first go around (2E I think), then follow it up with the Empyrean Odyssey trilogy for round two (3E I think).

Both are fun reads...  



Lets not leave out Mystryl, and the Netheril Trilogy.




I didn't include that trilogy because Karsus didn't actually kill Mystryl, just stole her power for a hot minute. However, that is also a great read and one of my favorites.
#29

Jorunhast

Sep 22, 2010 14:39:15
No, Corellon is as slim and beautiful as ever. Just, y'know, he/she's both male *and* female. And the female part's pretty smokin'.


Lady parts plus man parts at the same time isn't beautiful, it's gross.  Sorry, no contest winner there.


#30

Iluvrien

Sep 22, 2010 15:19:11
All I can say on the subject can be summarised by a quote from one of her daughters:

"Oh, Mother Mystra, come back to us."

and I agree, bring back Mystra 2.0. Not even Alassra deserves this end!
#31

Nai_Calus

Sep 22, 2010 23:07:22
No, Corellon is as slim and beautiful as ever. Just, y'know, he/she's both male *and* female. And the female part's pretty smokin'.


Lady parts plus man parts at the same time isn't beautiful, it's gross.  Sorry, no contest winner there.




 


Depends on your tastes. Me, I'm also an elven god, so, well. ;)



#32

Dragon9

Sep 23, 2010 7:17:09
All I can say on the subject can be summarised by a quote from one of her daughters:

"Oh, Mother Mystra, come back to us."

and I agree, bring back Mystra 2.0. Not even Alassra deserves this end!



Wouldn't this actually be Mystra v. 10? 
#33

Iluvrien

Sep 23, 2010 7:24:48
Wouldn't this actually be Mystra v. 10? 



Nope. The original Mystra (the one after Mystrl), who got herself smoten by Helm (in possibly the dumbest narrative moment I have ever seen), who empowered El and the Sisters and had a far more neutral take on the use of Magic in the Realms.

...who can hopefully be reborn from a fragment of her divine essence stored in someone (Alassra, I am almost certainly looking at you).

...and yes, I know you were probably (hopefully) being facetious.



#34

Dragon9

Sep 25, 2010 1:51:08
...and yes, I know you were probably (hopefully) being facetious.



Yes, I was being sarcastic.    She has died and had some other mortal rise to her position more than should happen.  She certainly comes off as rather... incompetent is the best word I can find.

I remember reading something, a Dungeon writer's guidelines or submission guidelines in general for D&D, where the said they didn't want to see any more FR plot pitches involving blowing up the moon.  They should have been as concerned about the turnover rate of Mystra as well.  ;)
#35

sfdragon

Sep 25, 2010 7:44:56
Midnight/mystra was incompentent......Mystra was not
#36

Iluvrien

Sep 25, 2010 11:31:20
Midnight/mystra was incompentent......Mystra was not



That's pretty much the long and short of it...

... I wonder how many of the current crop of Mystra-haters hated her back when she actually was Mystra, rather than being the Midnight-Mystra.
#37

Jorunhast

Sep 25, 2010 12:03:52
Who among the ascended gods of the ToT actually turned out to be competent?

Midnight-Mystra was initially written as a lovesick idiot who denied other gods magic based on her whimsy toward good rather than neutrality.  Declared incompetent at a Gods' trial, she has since managed not only to get killed on her own plane, but has led her daughters and all the rest of her Chosen either to insanity or near-complete ruin.

Cyric has consistently been manipulated and helped in massive ways by other gods, starting with Mask-as-a-sword, then he went insane by his own hand... lost a major portion of his power to a dead soul, read his own book of lies by mistake, and ultimately was shown being manipulated by Shar into killing Midnight-Mystra which reulted in imprisonment.

Kelemvor retained Myrkul's Wall, despite his claims toward "fairness" in judging the dead (remember how he treated Adon?), and eventually was declared Incompetent at a Gods' trial by his fellow deities.

#38

suin_bahhar_02

Sep 25, 2010 12:29:55
Being fledgling dieties it makes alot of sense they would be stumbling with their newfound existance. Getting phenomenal cosmic power without understanding it fully and stepping into the game of deciet and manipulation that dieties play makes it logical that such vurnerable new dieties would risk immediate destruction. It's only the divine supra-conscience and the contigencies it has planned for their ascended mortals that keep the company of the Lynx from being immediately sundered by rival dieties during the ToT.

Of the three Kel seems to have matured into his new role the fastest, with Cyric still clearly showing his infantile state as a god well into the 15th century Realms despite his greater god status granted by his portfolio's. In my view Midnight/Mystra was changing at a very high pace before the Spellplague hit, and despite her clear favor for Good aligned clergy was learning how to deal with the more selfish or evil parts of the Art.
 
#39

The_Silversword

Sep 25, 2010 14:46:15
Who among the ascended gods of the ToT actually turned out to be competent?

Kelemvor retained Myrkul's Wall, despite his claims toward "fairness" in judging the dead (remember how he treated Adon?), and eventually was declared Incompetent at a Gods' trial by his fellow deities.




Well to fair to Kel, he did rejudge all those souls in the Wall, and any way he didnt actually ascend to godhood, until like 10 years after the Time of Troubles.

And you already know what I think of Cyric, so im not even gonna go there!
#40

Dragon9

Sep 26, 2010 22:41:39
Midnight/mystra was incompentent......Mystra was not



Sure she was.  She died.  They all died.  No one dies as much as Mystra.  If Ao came to me and asked me to become the new god of Magic I would tell him to take a hike, or to just kill me now because if he forced me to be the god of magic I would be dead soon anyway.

(and much of the Mstra hate -- my personal dislike for her anyway -- isn't because of the ToT, it's all forms of her because of the Mary Sue-ness of her and her Chosen.)
#41

Jorunhast

Sep 26, 2010 22:46:58
Midnight/mystra was incompentent......Mystra was not



Sure she was.  She died.  They all died.  No one dies as much as Mystra.  If Ao came to me and asked me to become the new god of Magic I would tell him to take a hike, or to just kill me now because if he forced me to be the god of magic I would be dead soon anyway.

(and much of the Mstra hate -- my personal dislike for her anyway -- isn't because of the ToT, it's all forms of her because of the Mary Sue-ness of her and her Chosen.)


Blame the novel authors, they wrote her that way.
#42

sfdragon

Sep 26, 2010 23:56:40
better mary sue than Bane's boy toy
#43

Iluvrien

Sep 27, 2010 3:02:50
(and much of the Mstra hate -- my personal dislike for her anyway -- isn't because of the ToT, it's all forms of her because of the Mary Sue-ness of her and her Chosen.)



All forms? Exactly how much of Mystryl did we see?

The suggestion is that the Chosen didn't exist at all until the Original Mystra era, i.e. post-Netheril. I can certainly understand some annoyance at the way some of them were portrayed... but I can also point out that if we are looking for Mary Sue-ness then the Chosen aren't the only targets by a long shot.

Show
All hail Elminster Must Die and the hopeful return of the Original Mystra!
#44

sfdragon

Sep 27, 2010 12:39:13
amen praise the art, and lets bow before the true lady of mysteries.....

(I'd prefer the original over the stiff necked  Midnight)
#45

Iluvrien

Sep 27, 2010 15:02:58
(I'd prefer the original over the stiff necked  Midnight)



Show
You and me both, and I suspect there would be fewer complaints about her coming back than Midnight.
#46

Stigger

Sep 27, 2010 17:41:29
better mary sue than Bane's boy toy


QFT
#47

Jorunhast

Sep 27, 2010 18:17:24
...The suggestion is that the Chosen didn't exist at all until the Original Mystra era, i.e. post-Netheril. I can certainly understand some annoyance at the way some of them were portrayed... but I can also point out that if we are looking for Mary Sue-ness then the Chosen aren't the only targets by a long shot...


QFT - emphasis mine.  Honestly, most of the protagonists in recent novels have a lot of Mary Sue blood in their veins.


#48

The_Silversword

Sep 27, 2010 23:59:22
Well the orginal Mystra was once mortal, and her essence/godlyness/whatever you want to call it was passed on to Midnight, also a mortal, so if Mystra does return, my guess it will be another mortal raised up to godhood, personally I think it will be the Srinshee. Not sure about Mystryl, I mean whos to say that the Mystryl that died during Karsus's Folly was the orginal one? Perhaps she was once mortal as well. But any way that seems to be the way of it in the Realms, mortals rising up to take the place of a god/goddess.
#49

Dragon9

Sep 28, 2010 7:08:18
#50

sfdragon

Sep 28, 2010 7:46:57
Well the orginal Mystra was once mortal, and her essence/godlyness/whatever you want to call it was passed on to Midnight, also a mortal, so if Mystra does return, my guess it will be another mortal raised up to godhood, personally I think it will be the Srinshee. Not sure about Mystryl, I mean whos to say that the Mystryl that died during Karsus's Folly was the orginal one? Perhaps she was once mortal as well. But any way that seems to be the way of it in the Realms, mortals rising up to take the place of a god/goddess.





no the original Mystra was a creation of Mystryl.....and we don't know if she was mortal.

but the 3.x one from the TOT was mortal.... and she sux
#51

The_Silversword

Sep 28, 2010 11:55:43
Well the orginal Mystra was once mortal, and her essence/godlyness/whatever you want to call it was passed on to Midnight, also a mortal, so if Mystra does return, my guess it will be another mortal raised up to godhood, personally I think it will be the Srinshee. Not sure about Mystryl, I mean whos to say that the Mystryl that died during Karsus's Folly was the orginal one? Perhaps she was once mortal as well. But any way that seems to be the way of it in the Realms, mortals rising up to take the place of a god/goddess.





no the original Mystra was a creation of Mystryl.....and we don't know if she was mortal.

but the 3.x one from the TOT was mortal.... and she sux



Ed has stated that she was once mortal, and anything Ed says is considered canon, unless TSR/WotC puts out a source book that counters what Ed says, as far as I know there is no such sourcebook, So Eds comments on the subject should be taken as canon. There was a post on this on Candlekeep, I believe in the ask Ed thread, I'll see if I can russle it up.
#52

Iluvrien

Sep 28, 2010 13:31:45
That would be good. I was thinking she "arose" from nothingness in the moment of Mystryl's suicide.

I would look for the answer myself but even finding the YEAR it was from (without having seen it before) sounds like a tall order...

...unless you are using the Sage's "So Saith Ed" archives? (The PDFs are lovely)
#53

Jorunhast

Sep 28, 2010 17:03:31
I she comes back and a mortal becomes Mystra, it will be one of the  Sisters. Hopefully the black sultry one. The Realms need more black goddesses. And no one will be able to say they hate her, because we will be able to say that they are racist if they do!

Quilé Mystra coming in a 5th edition soon!


Qilué was beheaded and her soul was destroyed by the Crescent Blade, while Eilistraee's avatar was possessing her (which is also why Eilistraee is also dead).

If anything, I suspect the Simbul might be the "one", assuming they would bring Mystra back.  But I'm not so sure.

Personally, I'd prefer to see the original Mystryl re-incorporate on her own, slowly, without Midnight or any other mortal ascending.


#54

ceridlocke

Sep 28, 2010 19:04:55
That would be good. I was thinking she "arose" from nothingness in the moment of Mystryl's suicide.

I would look for the answer myself but even finding the YEAR it was from (without having seen it before) sounds like a tall order...

...unless you are using the Sage's "So Saith Ed" archives? (The PDFs are lovely)




Wasn't she created during the confrontation between Selune and Shar before Toril and the rest of creation was even a glimmer in anyones eye?

The original Mystryl that is
#55

sfdragon

Sep 28, 2010 20:32:51
that is correct, Mystryl was indead.

it is her successor the netherese Mystra we were talking about.

I think Silversword may be confused..... but then I don't go reading through Candlekeep's masssive long 167 + pagethreads.


and the search engine for it is pathetic
#56

Nai_Calus

Sep 28, 2010 22:35:52
 
Qilué was beheaded and her soul was destroyed by the Crescent Blade, while Eilistraee's avatar was possessing her (which is also why Eilistraee is also dead). 


Yeah, about that. Cavatina got beheaded by it too. We see her on the Fugue Plane getting dragged off to Arvandor at the end of the book.


That's a rather big hole, there. Large enough to drive, if not a truck, then at least a certain silver-haired 9' tall goddess through.


Also Selvetarm. Can you say 'corrupted artifact'? I knew you could. What do corrupted artifacts tend to do? Not work quite like they're supposed to.


So:


Vhaeraun is faking it. (Off-screen death and an alleged 'corpse' shown to us by *Lolth* that doesn't behave like gods' corpses are supposed to? Please.)
Selvetarm is too.
So's Eilistraee.
Orcus came back from getting his name erased, Kiaransalee can too.


Clearly, nobody actually died during Lady Penitent.

#57

Nai_Calus

Sep 28, 2010 22:36:32
And Candlekeep has the worst search engine and worst forum interface ever.
#58

Jorunhast

Sep 29, 2010 0:25:08
Yeah, about that. Cavatina got beheaded by it too. We see her on the Fugue Plane getting dragged off to Arvandor at the end of the book.

That's a rather big hole, there. Large enough to drive, if not a truck, then at least a certain silver-haired 9' tall goddess through.


Also Selvetarm. Can you say 'corrupted artifact'? I knew you could. What do corrupted artifacts tend to do? Not work quite like they're supposed to.


So:


Vhaeraun is faking it. (Off-screen death and an alleged 'corpse' shown to us by *Lolth* that doesn't behave like gods' corpses are supposed to? Please.)
Selvetarm is too.
So's Eilistraee.
Orcus came back from getting his name erased, Kiaransalee can too.


Clearly, nobody actually died during Lady Penitent.



Doubtful that any deity still "alive" would hide to such an extent that all their former worshippers believe that they are dead.

But I will agree that there was some room for interpretation of exactly what happened in the final pages of the Lady Penitent series.  Probably not nearly as much as what you're suggesting, however.

I could buy the idea that Eilistraee survived as a fey spirit, giving up her status as a deity.  Her death, or at least her stepping down from power, is what theoretically removed Wendonai's taint from the drow.

But Vhaeraun and Selvetarm surviving?  Can't see that happening.


#59

The_Silversword

Sep 29, 2010 1:11:47
That would be good. I was thinking she "arose" from nothingness in the moment of Mystryl's suicide.

I would look for the answer myself but even finding the YEAR it was from (without having seen it before) sounds like a tall order...

...unless you are using the Sage's "So Saith Ed" archives? (The PDFs are lovely)



Yes, ive been going through "SoSaith Ed" archives and copying things down from those that strike my interest, that way its not nearly as many pages to deal with, still got somewhere around 219 pages of notes here, and im not even half way through the archive yet! But any way, looking through my notes I found it! Of course im not sure what the orginal question was, or when it was posted, Its on page 193 of my notes so im guessin its around part 10 of the "So Saith Ed" archives, for any one who wants to look it up themselves, But any way, with out further ado, here is what I was talking about, From Ed's own words:

"In the case of Mystryl, she sacrificed herself, not foreseeing that she'd be reborn. She had no Chosen or preselected mortal vessel, and did not know or intend that she'd "live on." She simply did what she believed she had to do, to end a threat to the world she loved.

However, the circumstances of her passing prevented other deities from snaring her divine power, and largely prevented its dispersal, and it "fell like a dying star" to earth (or so the priests of Mystra say) to at random strike and "go into" a mindless, drooling mortal woman and infuse her with Mystryl's divinity, so that she became Mystra. (Of course, clergy of Mystra speak of the woman being present and selected as "divine fate" and not random at all, but this is one of the Holy Mysteries of the Lady of Mysteries that only high-ranking clergy are allowed to discuss in detail; lay worshippers and non-believers won't get much more out of a priest of Mystra than this: "When Mystryl made the ultimate and most holy sacrifice that defended Toril itself, that which was best of her fell to earth, and struck a mortal woman, and went into her, and Mystryl was reborn as Mystra, as she was fated to do, that we may all have magic that serves us and not the howling chaos of wild magic spellstorms."


We don't know anything about the mortal woman who became Mystra other than these things: she was young, she was "mindless" (for reasons unknown; it may have been a birth defect or a later affliction), she was a poor rural unknown somewhere in the northern, western Heartlands being cared for by kin, and she was changed in looks and stature by Mystryl's "going in" to her. I'd say more, but NDAs forbid."

So theres some definite unreliable narration going on there, or so the priests of Mystra say, but I think its pretty clear that Ed sees her as once being mortal.
One of the novels does contradict part of what Ed has stated here, IN one of the Netheril Trilogy books, I cant remember now if it was the 2nd one or the 3rd one, but it has Mystra in it before she took over as goddess of magic and her and Mystryl have an exchange that makes it pretty clear that both of them realize what is about to happen, of course theres a simple explanation for that, Time Travel! Mystryl was the goddess of Chronomancy after all, and Time Travel does feature pretty predominantly in those books, thats how the heroes of the story end up meeting up with Karsus.

#60

The_Silversword

Sep 29, 2010 1:18:13
 
I think Silversword may be confused.....



Im always confused when talking to you, HAHA!
#61

Iluvrien

Sep 29, 2010 2:03:44
We don't know anything about the mortal woman who became Mystra other than these things: she was young, she was "mindless" (for reasons unknown; it may have been a birth defect or a later affliction), she was a poor rural unknown somewhere in the northern, western Heartlands being cared for by kin, and she was changed in looks and stature by Mystryl's "going in" to her. I'd say more, but NDAs forbid."



Thanks for this, Silversword. I had never seen it before!

One thing strikes me as interesting, that it was within a "mindless" woman that the essence of Mystryl took up residence. It would seem to suggest that there was no pre-existing personality, no alignment, no personal leanings that would conflict with the nature of the goddess it inherited.

Maybe this was the problem with Midnight. Having already grown to full stature in mind and body, the blending of Mystra's essence with her own fundamentally changed the nature of the Lady of Mysteries.

Magic itself, much as the original Mystra (Mystra, not Mystryl) was, is neutral and favours no one over another. It is only when a pre-existing personality is mixed with it that problems occur.

Mystra was, through her fusion with an effectively empty representative of humanity, imbued with the capacity for human emotions (her love for Elminster seems to have been real enough and was certainly strong enough) without the baggage of having already formed prejudices. The perfect vessel, effectively.

Now I wish, more than ever, that they would bring this Mystra back.
#62

ywhtptgtfo

Sep 29, 2010 2:20:11
Not sure about Mystryl, I mean whos to say that the Mystryl that died during Karsus's Folly was the orginal one? Perhaps she was once mortal as well.

Seems like no one caught the slip (a sign of this place's diminishing population of old hardcores). Anyway, she's almost definitely the original. Just check the Netheril source book.

#63

The_Silversword

Sep 29, 2010 4:31:57
Not sure about Mystryl, I mean whos to say that the Mystryl that died during Karsus's Folly was the orginal one? Perhaps she was once mortal as well.

Seems like no one caught the slip (a sign of this place's diminishing population of old hardcores). Anyway, she's almost definitely the original. Just check the Netheril source book.




Yeah, I notice how you say "almost definitely" Ha!
#64

eriksdb

Sep 29, 2010 10:43:02
Not sure about Mystryl, I mean whos to say that the Mystryl that died during Karsus's Folly was the orginal one? Perhaps she was once mortal as well.

Seems like no one caught the slip (a sign of this place's diminishing population of old hardcores). Anyway, she's almost definitely the original. Just check the Netheril source book.




Yeah, I notice how you say "almost definitely" Ha!

Well, as far as mortals/we know (i.e. according to the canon we have), the Netherese Mystryl was the original Mystryl. She then *did* perish in Karsus's Folly and reincarnated herself as Mystra.

Who's to know, however, that Ed didn't originally plan on the Netherese Mystryl having been a second version of Mystryl, and it just hasn't been revealed yet for some reason?

Cheers


P.S. Many apologies for offering the canon answer but being a cryptic villain about it. It's the Sharran in me. [:D]
#65

Jorunhast

Sep 29, 2010 11:08:22
Well, as far as mortals/we know (i.e. according to the canon we have), the Netherese Mystryl was the original Mystryl. She then *did* perish in Karsus's Folly and reincarnated herself as Mystra. Who's to know, however, that Ed didn't originally plan on the Netherese Mystryl having been a second version of Mystryl, and it just hasn't been revealed yet for some reason? Cheers P.S. Many apologies for offering the canon answer but being a cryptic villain about it. It's the Sharran in me. [:D]


Another thing to consider, if we are talking about the era of 4E, how common would knowledge of Mystra (in any incarnation) actually be?  Seems like 100 years after Mystra's death, only the very long-lived or specialist sages would know details like this about Mystra/Mystryl.  100+ years is a long time, and "old information" tends to diminish greatly as far as any group's cultural knowledge.  And detailed information about dead gods, that's only really useful to sages and students of old lore.

Personally, I think quite a lot of common people would say, "Mystra who?" these days, maybe followed by a "oh wait, wasn't she a goddess that died or something?" unless they've spent some time researching the Spellplague or happened to be a still-living remnant from the prior era themselves.
#66

eriksdb

Sep 29, 2010 11:22:35
This is a great point, JH.

In one of the games that I'm in, which is ostensibly set in 1479, everyone seems to know all about Mystra and the Spellplague. I figure that's a product of it being a new *big-thing* at the table (so it's sort of meta-knowledge), but I find myself constantly questioning whether people would know anything about said goddess.

As this is a bunch of stuff about my game that might otherwise clutter the thread, I think I'll post it on my blog.

Cheers
#67

Jorunhast

Sep 29, 2010 12:17:12
Thanks, Eric.  I like to think of it this way:  what do we remember from 100 years ago?  Here are a few big cultural events, some of them with world-wide influence:

  • President McKinley was assassinated 1901

  • Henry Ford created Ford Motor Company 1903

  • Oklahoma becomes 47th state 1907

  • the Model T car is presented by ford motors 1908

  • the NAACP was founded 1909(national association for the advancement of colored people)

  • Woodrow Wilson is elected 1912

  • Titanic sinks 1912

  • WW1 begins 1914

  • Panama Canal opens 1914

  • 19th amendment was ratified guaranteeing that women can vote 1920


Now, most of us here have huge benefits in terms of potentially knowing about historical events.  We've been to school, many of us have attended college, and we have the advantage of immediate information retrieval available to us through the internet if we want to study anything.  We are quite literally living in the Information Age.

But of the list above, my personal "oh yeah" moments were the Titanic (and I wouldn't have been able to say what year it sank) and World War 1 (of which I remember only a few key battles and such).  And WWI had a gigantic impact for the entire world in almost every way: economics, population, inventions, technology, family dymanics, womens' history, everything really.

Now, consider that in the Realms most people (including adventurers) would not have attended any schools unless their families are very wealthy.  If you're lucky enough to live in a big city at the pinnacle of cultural, technological, and magical innovation, then jobs in the Realms usually stem from very specific apprenticeships or training guilds, which focus very narrowly on the profession in question.  Away from cities, you're likely to be a farmer, laborer, or some type of serf.  Most Realmsians live in a medieval or renaissance age depending on their location and their wealth.

Considering knowledge of Mystra/Mystryl, we personally have the advantage of meta-knowledge and it's also very new to us as Realms consumers.  That 100-year jump and the after-effects of the Spellplague are big in our minds because they're both so world-changing.  But in a way, our meta-knowledge puts us in a difficult position because it's very hard to pretend that "all this stuff" was 100 years ago.  But most Realmsians would put it in the back of their cultural consciousness, so to speak.  At least, that's how I like to think of it.




#68

eriksdb

Sep 29, 2010 12:46:24
Well put. I suspect that most people in the Realms remember the Spellplague and its spark (Mystra's death) in a similar way that people in our world who don't use wikipedia or the interwebs remember WW1 and its own spark (the death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand).

It's a little different, obviously, as the legacy of the Spellplague still reaches into their lives in probably a more obvious way than WWI affects us: they see spellscarred people and hear stories of patches of spellplague. It's maybe more like a more recent war like WWII or Vietnam in that respect, where we can see the legacy of the war more clearly.

Plus, there are religious traditions associated with Mystra, though they would mostly have died out over the last hundred years without her. I can't think of a good real-world parallel for today, but it would probably be like knowing your great-grandparents followed a faith that is now out of fashion but still has some iconography around for you to see.

It should also be noted, however, that what they *remember* isn't necessarily accurate. The way the Spellplague went down varies depending on who's telling the story.

Cheers
#69

suin_bahhar_02

Sep 29, 2010 12:57:54
Agreed on all fronts. I would go even further and say that even scholars and "voices of the divine" would have a hard time recollecting all the information about the diecide or the Spellplague, and they would encounter scant bits and pieces of the total puzzle but few would have the incentive to go searching for the whole picture. Perhaps Sharrans or Cyricist know about Mystra still but not many other clergies would have enough legends to remember Mystra by.

Certain areas could differ strongly from the norm. Sites with physical reminders of Mystra such as her chapels, shrines and stone statues that have survived in recognisable shapes, could remind only the few interested locals that there used to be a "goddes of the weave". Adventurers who are specialised in religious tombrobbing are likely in the know about signs of such legends as well (but it would not be an easy history check).
#70

eriksdb

Sep 29, 2010 13:23:10
Totally!

I suspect professional tomb-robbers (i.e. adventurers) are also well aware that temples and holy sites dedicated to this mythical "goddess of the weave" ("weave? what weave?") are also pretty well warded, either by intact magic or by magic tainted by the spellplague, and know well enough to steer clear.

I was also going to add, springboarding off SB there, that the Realms went through a mini-dark ages in the wake of the Spellplague (what with the demise of all those mages, repositories of lore that they were), and it seems like they're still kind of recovering, being a little rougher around the edges than we're used to.

Seems like a good place for adventurers to me. []

Cheers
#71

JudgeDookie

Sep 29, 2010 13:40:55
I always love me some Suin_B. One of the more intelligent fellows making a mark on this board. I'm in agreement.

E.D.B.--don't kill me for fantasasing about killing you. I would never really do it, but I was on pharmuecueticals at the time and Bejebuz tried to infiltrate me. Your kool. I love you and stuff. Just need to get exorcised or some such .

Maybe...sort of...yeah.
#72

Jorunhast

Sep 29, 2010 13:43:17
I don't know if this is different enough to warrant another thread, I'll let you all decide...

With respect to wizards and their apprenticeships / schooling, what would they know of Mystra and the Weave?  Apart from a few tidbits of legends from the past, what would current mages teach their students about Mystra?  Practically, she's dead, and instructors may focus entirely on current magical theory and immediate use.

Given that magic is now more ubiquitous (freely available with training?) in Faerun and not tied to the worship of any deity, would some mage schools teach that "in the past, Mystra's weave governed magic, but it was more a method of control" or even "Mystra's weave was a lie."

And given the fear of current spellplague regions, especially those that twist flesh and may kill or leave dangerous spellscars, is magic still viewed as the dangerous thing that it was right after Mystra's murder?  Prior to her murder, magic was fairly widely used and appreciated.  Now, it might be considered highly destructive and untrustworthy (from a cultural standpoint, not a practical one for those who are trained).

I can imagine all sorts of ways this might go.  Historically, Mystra could be viewed as a jealous goddess even though she had her Chosen promote magical works.  She might be viewed as a deity that prevented the full exploration of magical power, and that raw magic (although dangerous) has unlimited potential.

Consider warlocks, known to make pacts with demons and other dark powers.  At least you know what you're getting there.  But with a mage, all that spellscarry stuff and the dipping into raw magic might be looked at in the same way we'd view someone who played with dynamite or nitroglycerine.  Someday, with no warning whatsoever, it might explode in your face and leave a gods-know-what kind of magical spellscar.  People might distrust warlocks, but mages?  Good gods, get me the heck away from him!


#73

JudgeDookie

Sep 29, 2010 13:55:56
Ultimately, it is up to Wizards...which, sort of sucks.

Anyway, you can say this is all sort of Mystra's plan--let the world bitch, then beg when consequences come.

Personally, I''m up for the latter.
#74

eriksdb

Sep 29, 2010 15:11:44
Missed you too, JD. I'm glad to see you're (maybe?) clean and sober. Er, relatively.

Cheers
#75

sfdragon

Sep 29, 2010 15:36:56
yeah JD is back.......


mystra always has a plan...... but really I still prefered the first mystra( not mystryl) much more fun to like.



#76

suin_bahhar_02

Sep 29, 2010 16:30:18
Sweet Bejeebuz, Dookie, been a long time! Its still pretty slow over here, you know how it went downhill, but a determined few like me refuse to totally abandon this place. The boards are desperate for some action. I know you'll provide plenty.
#77

JudgeDookie

Sep 29, 2010 17:56:58
Missed you too, JD. I'm glad to see you're (maybe?) clean and sober. Er, relatively.

Cheers



Eh,. Pay attention fool--I already told you I am off my pharma...though, they were a bit interesting--maybe.

Not reallly.

No.


---

SF how you doing, my man? Porked a squirrel lately?

---

Sweet Bejeebuz, Dookie, been a long time! Its still pretty slow over here, you know how it went downhill, but a determined few like me refuse to totally abandon this place. The boards are desperate for some action. I know you'll provide plenty.



You go boy. Inform me when you toss on the cheerleader outfit.

I don't wan't to watch.

#78

sfdragon

Sep 29, 2010 18:10:49
CAn't complain, I left the spam club out of boredom.

and you, how are you doing?
#79

eriksdb

Sep 29, 2010 18:11:19
Eh,. Pay attention fool--I already told you I am off my pharma...though, they were a bit interesting--maybe.

Not reallly.

No.

Same old JD.

Cheers

#80

JudgeDookie

Sep 29, 2010 18:36:46
You say "cheers" one more time, then I am spanking you. And you don't want my hot hand on your ass. ;(
#81

suin_bahhar_02

Sep 29, 2010 19:32:10
Regrettably we dont have cheerleaders over here in Europe. You need to send me your collections of cheerleader outfits. :P
#82

The_Silversword

Sep 30, 2010 3:58:58
Uhm...

You know I was just thinking, man this thread has just gotten too serious, if only some one would change the subject to doin squirrel cheerleaders. Haha!

But back to the subject at hand, you all bring up a good point about player knowledge vs. character knowledge. This isnt really a problem in my current Realms game, most of the players are new to the Realms, so they have no idea who Mystra even is any way. I got 1 guy whos been into the Realms as long as I have, he plays a Wizard, so I think it would make sense for his character to know something about Mystra, reading all those old musty spellbooks and all. Theres another guy who knows the Realms from Drizzt novels. He wants desperatly to head up north so he can become a Rider of Nesme. I have to keep remininding him that his character doesnt even know where that is, and any way why would his character even want to? I just cant see a Drow Revenant Warden, who worships Silvanus, to be going ok im going north to fulfil my life long dream of becoming a Rider of Nesme. But he keeps trying to work that in some how, like his character is at the tavern trying to pick up information about Nesme, and I have to remind him, why would you be going out of your way to get information on a place youve never even heard of? Well I guess maybe his character might of heard of it, but in the Heartlands id imagine that most tales involve the Harpers or War Wizards of Cormyr, but noooo hes just got to be a Rider of Nesme. Yeah metagaming players can be a bitch.

But any way, back on the subject of Mystryl at one time possibly being mortal, I just want to point out that I never said that I thought she was, or that  I think its a good idea, im just sayin, who knows really? I mean Mystryl was "born" a very long time ago, long before the rise of Netheril, alot of things could of happened in that time, Im sure she went through lots of different transformations in that time period. Shes ussually depicted as being a human goddess, but there werent any human spellcasters at that time, probably not even any humans! Perhaps she was orginally worshipped by the Sarrukh or some of the other Creator Races. Im sure they would of seen her as one of their own, and whose to say she wasnt? So when humans began gaining more dominace over the world, maybe she changed as well, becoming more human, maybe even merging with a human, I mean who knows right? This is all prehistory, anything could of happened!
#83

JudgeDookie

Sep 30, 2010 22:11:26
Regrettably we dont have cheerleaders over here in Europe. You need to send me your collections of cheerleader outfits. :P



Visit Victorias Secret. Evidently, posting images here got more ridiculous as well.

Swordboy, did I miss something (probably--didn't read much of the thread) or did you get googly-moogly on me?
#84

The_Silversword

Oct 01, 2010 1:28:22
Yeah you probably did miss something, and yes im gettin all googly-moogly! It happens sometimes. Naw I just felt the need to post on the subject of metagaming, even though my post had little to do with Mystra.
And the part about Mystryl at one time possibly being mortal, was more or less a response to any one who thought I was almost definitely wrong about that. It just seems like Mystra, and maybe all the gods need a mortal component or something. Maybe Mystryl was never mortal at all, but she was essentially "dead" until her essence merged with a mortal and Mystra was born, and then when Mystra "died" during the ToT, her essence was again merged with a mortal, this time Ariel Manx aka Midnight, I mean if her essence was still around why did she need a new mortal form or avatar or vessel or what ever you want to call it? Maybe Ao decreed it that way, that the goddess of magic must be part mortal or something so to better understand them, and to serve them?
My guess is that for Mystra to actually return shell need a new mortal host, IM also guessin that it will be the Srinshee, I believe she held more of Mystra's power than any of the other Chosen, more so than even Elminster, or the Seven Sisters.
So yeah, im goin all googly-moogly.

By the way, nice to see you around again JD, believe it or not ive actually missed you!
#85

JudgeDookie

Oct 01, 2010 8:20:59
Googly-moogly and mushy-gushy are two different things, ya dip. Don't you dare get mushy-gushy on me.

I don't agree--nor have seen anything pertaining to the fact that gods need a mortal aspect to exist. Gods existed before mortals were ever created. In the case of Mystryl/Mystra, it was more of a safety net thing (at least during the ToT). And I still believe The Chosen will serve that purpose again--with El' being the guy holding the power until he can properly release her essence and bring her back.
#86

The_Silversword

Oct 01, 2010 12:24:50
I dunno, but Im having a hard time thinking of any gods of the Realms who werent at one time or another mortal, aside from Selune, Shar, and Ao. I mean couldnt Ao have just reinstated Mystra without using a mortal? Like he did with Torm, of course Torm was once mortal as well. You know it could be that im just putting too much thought into this and the mortal thing was just because thats the way the writers wanted it.
#87

JudgeDookie

Oct 01, 2010 18:56:35
Wizards would be taking a drastic turn if they incorporated something like that. And you would have a lot more 'splainin' to do, Ricky.

I don't recall so many mortals being escalated to divinity.
#88

The_Silversword

Oct 02, 2010 14:37:33
Yeah theres other gods who werent mortals, at least not that we know of, I had a temporarty brain fart there. Lathander/Amau.. how ever you spell it I dont think was ever mortal, or Sune, Talos, Ghaunadaur may have been mortal at one time but was definitely not human, personally I think he/she/it is an aspect of Shar, why you may ask?, just because Shar's holy symbol from the Netheril box set looks alot like Ghaunadaurs, so there maybe some connection there? So yeah theres plenty of gods who, as far as we know, do not have mortal orgins. Of course many of them we dont know the origins of, Did Ao create them? Did they just pop out of nothingness? Were they created by the beliefs of mortals? Some, such as Tyr, came from other worlds for what ever reason. ANd what is a god any way? Are they just energy? or are they living beings with blood and organs and everything? 

sorry im starting to ramble, and getting off topic here, so back to Mystra, and her return. Does the Realms really need a Mystra? And what would happen when she does come back? Does that mean the Weave will be back as well? Would that alter the fundamentals of magic use in the Realms once again? 
#89

sfdragon

Oct 02, 2010 14:47:10
I do not think the weave will come back, but with Mystra back there will be a seated god of magic and will be able to remove the plaguechanged areas ..... although it would take a while for any populace to return to some of those areas, and imo they'd do better left as swamps and monster infested areas...
#90

JudgeDookie

Oct 02, 2010 17:12:08
Obviously, Wizards does not believe that a God/Goddess of magic is needed. Personally, with something so vital part of the game, I do. Yet, everyone has their own take on the subject, as has been so erroneously discussed around here for over a year now.

Regardless, to bring a patron of magic back would involve an RSE--which won't be happening until sales are needed.
#91

The_Silversword

Oct 02, 2010 17:23:30
Sales are needed!!! Sales are always needed, and they wouldnt necessarilly need an RSE to bring back Mystra, couldnt she just show up and be all like hey Im back! and then theres a big party! But yeah it probably wont happen like that, maybe we will have to wait for the 5e RSE for her to come back, but I dunno, from what I understand Ed has already brought her back in the Elminster Must Die novel, which I still need to read.

And what do you mean erroneously discussed? I mean as long as things are being discussed you know? How do you discuss something wrong any way?
#92

JudgeDookie

Oct 02, 2010 18:12:04
Yes, Wizards want sales. So they have decided to expand their materials for other worlds. Thats how their modus of operandi is currently working at this point: Release core books for all generes and see what the hell happens. Until they get through this first round, you'll be seeing jack for any real FR stuff.

I'll have to look further into this El' must be whacked crap, 'cause this is causing some serious confusion now. Thanks, you lil' butt monkey.

Anyway, the erroneous discussions I speak of are just that--nobody knows what the hell is right or wrong and simply has an opinion on the subject. Therefore, it is an erroneous topic. 

#93

Iluvrien

Oct 02, 2010 18:23:32
Anyway, the erroneous discussions I speak of are just that--nobody knows what the hell is right or wrong and simply has an opinion on the subject. Therefore, it is an erroneous topic.



Nope. Silversword has the right of it. It can't be erroneous by definition if nobody knows the right or wrong of it. It can be "speculative", it can even be wildly speculative or pointlessly speculative... but until an answer is known then any thread or discussion cannot be erroneous.

#94

Nai_Calus

Oct 02, 2010 19:07:00
Bah, we have Corellon, he does magic, who needs Mystra.
#95

sfdragon

Oct 02, 2010 19:38:24
No we have SElune mstress of moon magic.
#96

suin_bahhar_02

Oct 02, 2010 21:03:31
She and Shar could collide again to make the divine essence of magic anew.
#97

sfdragon

Oct 02, 2010 23:09:23
no thanks
#98

The_Silversword

Oct 03, 2010 1:06:56
Anyway, the erroneous discussions I speak of are just that--nobody knows what the hell is right or wrong and simply has an opinion on the subject. Therefore, it is an erroneous topic.



Nope. Silversword has the right of it. It can't be erroneous by definition if nobody knows the right or wrong of it. It can be "speculative", it can even be wildly speculative or pointlessly speculative... but until an answer is known then any thread or discussion cannot be erroneous.




You know, those have got to be some of my favorite discussions 'round here, the ones where there is no definite answer and we're all just speculating, like I think its Elminster or I think its the Srinshee. I like the kind of topics that make you think outside the box, instead of just going by years and years of Realmslore.
#99

The_Silversword

Oct 03, 2010 1:08:36
She and Shar could collide again to make the divine essence of magic anew.



Hmmmm, you maybe on to something there! Ive always considered Mystryl/Mystra to be Selune and Shar's love child.
#100

sfdragon

Oct 03, 2010 10:05:36
she was
#101

JudgeDookie

Oct 04, 2010 0:12:47

Nope. Silversword has the right of it. It can't be erroneous by definition if nobody knows the right or wrong of it. It can be "speculative", it can even be wildly speculative or pointlessly speculative... but until an answer is known then any thread or discussion cannot be erroneous.



Actually, I might call that an erroneous response, my man--because some might know. Especially, if Wizards have a backup plan if this silly experiment fails. And I fully believe that they have one in mind.

So I would say argue that my point is erroneous, but not that my point about erroneous sh*t being erroneous is not erroneous... and sh*t...?