Nezram the Transmuter, Nezram the World-Walker, Nezram the Lier?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

dan_vk

Jun 22, 2009 9:24:27
An entry in Lost Empires of Faerûn states that Nezram has recently (as of 1372 DR) ceased his planewalking. It goes on to explain that his return to Faerûn is due to rumors of the City of Shade, formerly Thultanthar, and Deep Imaskar. The Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide, however, states that he returned because of the planar trouble caused by the Spellplague. It goes on to describe how he wants to destroy the now-revealed Imaskari because he thinks they had a hand in causing the Spellplague which wiped away his beloved Mulhorand. It also states that Mulhorand was already gone when he returned, thus after the Spellplague.

Did the developers miss the Lost Empires of Faerûn entry and only use the entries in Serpent Kingdoms describing Nezram’s search for the sarrukh? Did Nezram return around 1370 DR but wants the date of his return kept secret for some reason? What do you think?
#2

markustay63

Jun 22, 2009 11:21:34
Yes; someone probably didn't research things enough.

Its fairly easy to tie them altogether - Nezram returns because certain 'alarms' he set into place have 'gone off'. He obviously built some contingency detection magics in-place in regards to Toril, in the event that any powerful, ancient magical empire returns (Netheril, Imaskar, the Sarrukh, etc..).

He returns because of the Netherease (Shade), discovers the Khaastas and their search for the Sarrukh, and then observes certain Imaskari that have been leaving Deep Imaskar... just before the world goes BOOM!

He naturally blames everything on the returning Imaskari, because not only did their return happen to fall-out just prior to the Spellplague, but it also greatly benefitted the Imaskari, because it wiped Mulhorand clean for them.

That... and he also discovered Azuth's staff (the one used to kill Mystra) was actually one of the missing Imaskarkana. ;)

So by the time the FRCG comes into play, he's been hankering for some Imaskari blood for a hundred years, and now everyone, included him, probably thinks thats the original reason why he retrurned in the first place... but we know it wasn't.

Even in the RW, the 'truths' known in one century become fiction in the next, and vice-versa.
#3

dan_vk

Jun 22, 2009 15:42:46
That is pretty close to how I want it for an upcoming game, especially regarding the Khaastas (I am adding the Couatls in too). Nezram is a central figure in the game (the “Elminster of the Azulduth” as a friend once said) so his motivations are of key importance to the plot. I am just wondering if there is any material written since Lost Empires of Faerûn I may have missed.

Regarding Azuth’s Old Staff, while it certainly looks like one of the lost Imaskarcana (that big ol’ Spirit Stone gem on top, the Donjon of Facets, sure looks like imperial regalia to me) is there anything to support that interpretation? I was under the impression he created it specifically to imprison Savras.
#4

sfdragon

Jun 22, 2009 16:57:00
nah its the imaskarcana, Azuth was originally a mortal leshay
#5

BadCatMan

Jun 22, 2009 20:55:57
Or is Markus just making up crap again? :p (re: Azuth's staff)

As can be expected, the FRCG entry is probably wrong. At my most charitable, I'd say that it's a 100 years later misinterpretation of events. After all, one could take 1358, the Time Of Troubles, as the beginning of one long series of similar catastrophes and events that one could easily lump together under the umbrella term 'Spellplague' (spit!). Take the spontaneous return of Shade as being a part of all that, and bingo, Nezram returns during the 'Spellplague'.

That he 'found' Mulhorand wiped away could just be figurative. Alternatively, he'd journeyed to Shade and Deep Imaskar to investigate (or reappeared in these lands), and by the time he journeyed back home, it was too late. (Teleportation magic kind of voids the long travel time, but magic has changed a few times since he left, and he might have lost the ability). Or maybe it happened when he popped out for eggs.
#6

Shemeska_the_Marauder

Jun 22, 2009 23:19:54
Yes; someone probably didn't research things enough.

This probably.
#7

dan_vk

Jun 22, 2009 23:45:30
nah its the imaskarcana, Azuth was originally a mortal leshay

I found some things I assume previous posters already know but were a surprise to me, so I will repeat them. There is a passage in Darkvision by Bruce R. Cordell involving a painting found in an Imaskari ruin in which seven leShay bearing magical tomes stand before Emperor Omanond (I really need to get around to reading that book). The entry for -4000 DR here directly mentions an alliance between the leShay and Imaskari. This makes perfect sense to me, considering planar magic is the specialty of both the leShay and the Imaskari.

However I do not know where the idea of Azuth being connected to Imaskar or the leShay comes from. As far as I know Azuth’s origin has never been expressly stated. The wording of Magic of Faerûn and Faiths and Pantheons suggests he was a mortal who achieved the title of first Magister by sifting the magical knowledge of fallen empires and was not an ancient power when he tried to rip divinity from Savras around the beginning of Dalereckoning. It is possible Azuth trapped Savras in one of the Imaskarcana which became his staff upon Savras’ release, but is there anything to support Azuth having been a leShay?
#8

sfdragon

Jun 23, 2009 3:55:21
well are Fey immortal or or just extremly longed lived.

It is also possible that the high one himself was from deep imaskar.

would still make him mortal.
#9

dan_vk

Jun 23, 2009 9:07:26
well are Fey immortal or or just extremly longed lived.

It is also possible that the high one himself was from deep imaskar.

would still make him mortal.

I understand this and to be honest I love the idea of mortal Azuth patiently amassing power in the shadows and waiting for empires to die so he can easily plunder their knowledge unmolested but is it written anywhere?
#10

quale1

Jun 23, 2009 9:22:44
no, he was human, Savras was the patient one
#11

dan_vk

Jun 23, 2009 9:44:36
no, he was human, Savras was the patient one

Savras was unequivocally a mortal human wizard from Halruaa before becoming a lesser diety (Magic of Faerûn).
#12

markustay63

Jun 23, 2009 11:41:35
Or is Markus just making up crap again? :p (re: Azuth's staff).

Aside from my very first statement (which Shemmy was nice-enough to repeat), everything I wrote was conjecture based on what the OP was trying to accomplish - sorry if anyone didn't 'get it'.

Thats all 'homebrew', except where it is based on the few canon bits I was trying to tie-together. Nowhere does it say that Azuth's staff is/was one of the Imaskarkana, but gods lie all the time, and we know that the Imaskari did indeed develop forms of 'anti-god' magic.. so you have to admit that was one helluvan idea. ;)

You could just as easilly say that Nezram is convinced that it was an Imaskarkana, in his 'madness' and obvious obssession against Imaskar. It doesn't have to actually be... it could be just a rumour that has taken on a life of it's own - consider it 'campaign fodder'.
#13

BadCatMan

Jun 23, 2009 19:56:08
It is a great idea. It would be quite neat if it was one of the Imaskarcana, especially as it seems to have the power to trap gods, and the Imaskari and the gods didn't get on so well...
#14

dan_vk

Jun 23, 2009 22:52:34
I assumed the material MarkusTay marked with a ;) was conjecture but I was hoping it was not, which is why I asked for source citations multiple times. I have always been of the opinion that the Imaskarcana were not tomes or statues, but items like the Spirit Stone atop Azuth's Old Staff. We got a bit off-topic talking about Azuth and his Big Stick of Doom, but thanks everyone for helping me piece together a sensible history for Nezram's past century.
#15

markustay63

Jun 23, 2009 23:18:09
I believe a total of three 'True' Imaskarkana have been detailed - two in LEoF, and one in Und, IIRC.

Only the third Imaskarkana in the Underdark looks like a tome - they are all artifact items (I assume the 'arcane know-how' is somehow imbedded within them).

A Staff with the power to trap and/or bind immensly powerful extra-planer entities is very much up the Imaskari's alley.
#16

old_sage

Jun 24, 2009 0:03:55
The First and Fifth Imaskarcana were detailed in Lost Empires of Faerûn, and the Third was covered in Underdark. The Seventh Imaskarcana is partially alluded to in the LEoF web enhancement:-

"... the Seventh Imaskarcana—a fabled artifact of ancient Imaskar that resembles a large, golden key—is an appropriate choice. The Seventh Imaskarcana holds the entire body of Imaskari knowledge about creating permanent extradimensional spaces, and it also has additional powers that are left to your discretion."
#17

lord_karsus

Jun 24, 2009 11:35:12
well are Fey immortal or or just extremly longed lived.

-leShay are immortal.
#18

markustay63

Jun 24, 2009 11:41:11
Fey that dwell solely on the Prime Material are very long-lived, but not immortal.

Fey that dwell in the Feywild (and perhaps elsewhere) are immortal.

Ergo, its fairly easy to come to the conclusion that the feywild itself somehow 'energizes' these beings, and when seperated from it, they lose some of their power and immortality. However, they would still be extremely long-lived compared to most mortal races, and it would take several generations of seperation before their longevity began to approach normal mortal standards.

Hence, the Elves. ;)
#19

lord_karsus

Jun 24, 2009 11:46:34
-It says right there in the ELH: They don't die from age or disease; they only die if they are killed. They're immortal. It makes no exception to where they are.
#20

quale1

Jun 24, 2009 13:50:05
With fey that's always vague, I'd say there's no rules with them, they address other creatures as ''mortals'' (like in Vance's books) tough.

Also elven attitude towards death is more like a journey. From one point of view all are immortal cause their spirits merge with gods.
#21

markustay63

Jun 24, 2009 22:16:41
-It says right there in the ELH: They don't die from age or disease; they only die if they are killed. They're immortal. It makes no exception to where they are.

I don't use that source... 'epic' anything turns my stomache.

Besides, you just proved to me it isn't worth reading. ;)

Anyhow, isn't that just pertaining to Le'Shay, and NOT Fey in general?
#22

lord_karsus

Jun 24, 2009 22:21:32
-Hey, you're the guy who likes to adhere to everything, as in every source, be it official, unofficial, and whatever in-between. Given that we were just talking about the leShay a couple of posts ago, though...
#23

sfdragon

Jun 25, 2009 4:42:39
so.... Azuth could of been a banished leshay like the queen of suldane.... in bg2 did or had done to irenicus and stripped him of his elven immortality.....

on the otherhand, ... imaskarian would have been easier to explain and believeable.
#24

lord_karsus

Jun 25, 2009 19:35:07
-The books say that he is/was a Human, so unless there's A LOT more to the story that WE'VE NEVER BEEN TOLD, it's almost an absolute that he is/was a Human.