spelljammering dwarven citadel?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

ikki

Jun 03, 2008 2:40:41
http://www.amazon.com/Obsidian-Ridge-Citadels-Jess-Lebow/dp/0786947853/ref=pd_sim_b_title_1

Sure looks like one.
#2

morholdt

Jun 03, 2008 9:19:49
It looks like the city of Shade to me. What makes you think its a spell-jamming dwaven city?
#3

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 03, 2008 11:54:25
It looks like the city of Shade to me.

It's not.
#4

Stigger

Jun 03, 2008 13:24:10
Great, just what we need, yet another floating city filled with shadow stuff...
#5

ikki

Jun 03, 2008 15:20:08
since thats exactly how the dwarven citadels look. Dwarven face, and a fortress behind it, all on a otherwise unworked rock.
#6

lord_karsus

Jun 03, 2008 17:12:42
-Spelljammer is the proverbial red-headed stepchild of 3e. It kind of ackowledges Spelljammer every so often, but refuses to outright acknowledge, or give support to it.
#7

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 03, 2008 17:14:35
I haven't actually read the novel in question, yet, but I'm pretty certain, based on what I know of it, that it has nothing to do with either the City of Shade or spelljamming dwarves.
#8

ikki

Jun 03, 2008 17:21:31
-Spelljammer is the proverbial red-headed stepchild of 3e. It kind of ackowledges Spelljammer every so often, but refuses to outright acknowledge, or give support to it.

Hahah, so very true. We have seen, what.. a few racial updates.. hadooze and giff comes to mind. Oh yeah insectare and scro too :P
But as for actual spelljamming being supported, yeah.
#9

merrikcale

Jun 04, 2008 22:26:03
since thats exactly how the dwarven citadels look. Dwarven face, and a fortress behind it, all on a otherwise unworked rock.

are we sure thats a dwarven face
#10

Stigger

Jun 04, 2008 22:31:17
Looks more like a psychotic gnome to me...
#11

old_sage

Jun 05, 2008 8:15:36
-Spelljammer is the proverbial red-headed stepchild of 3e. It kind of ackowledges Spelljammer every so often, but refuses to outright acknowledge, or give support to it.

The entry for 623 DR in Grand History of the Realms acknowledges the actual existence of the 'Spelljammer' itself.
#12

lord_karsus

Jun 05, 2008 9:45:10
The entry for 623 DR in Grand History of the Realms acknowledges the actual existence of the 'Spelljammer' itself.

-As it would have to, as the Spelljammer itself is a part of Faerûnian lore, in regards to Queen Amlauril seeing it, the Nelanther Isles, and so on and so on. AGHotR is hardly the normal 3e supplement, however. The mention of the actual Spelljammer isn't exactly lending support to the concept of Spelljamming, either.
#13

markustay63

Jun 05, 2008 14:59:39
No, it is the Black Fortress from the Krull movie - the plot is nearly identical.

IMAGE(http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dreamworld/8663/krull/glaive.gif)

I always found it amusing that Netherease Enclaves resembled upside-down Dwarven Citadel-ships. Perhaps thats what lives on the underside, or maybe a lot of the enclaves didn't really hit the ground - they were transported to the Dawrven homeworld and recycled? :D
#14

lord_karsus

Jun 05, 2008 16:39:28
IMAGE(http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dreamworld/8663/krull/glaive.gif)

-That's a Neogi Spidership, or a really small Yuzhaan Vong Worldship, minus some of the 'decration'.
#15

Stigger

Jun 06, 2008 8:18:45
Looks like that weapon from Krull to me... which for its day did look pretty cool in commercials.
#16

old_sage

Jun 08, 2008 8:04:52
The mention of the actual Spelljammer isn't exactly lending support to the concept of Spelljamming, either.

Actually, it does. Brian once confirmed that the entry was a direct [and deliberate] spelljamming reference in 3e Realmslore. Additionally, it reinforces most of the vague spelljamming references that have been included previously in sources like Serpent Kingdoms for example.
#17

morholdt

Jun 08, 2008 9:37:45
Didn't the initial release on the spell-plague talk about how a veil was lifted from Selune showing cities on the moon? If so, that seems to indicate that spell-jamming is back.

That picture still looks all shadowy and Netherese to me, but I'll bow to those who know more about than myself. Hell, I've never so much as picked up one of those novels. I just read the gaming books.
#18

rauric

Jun 08, 2008 10:07:17
I think the face is the artist putting his spin on the castle and what it is all about. I think it is a floating castle that a wizard inhabits. The face represents the owners "prescence" throughout his home.
#19

lord_karsus

Jun 08, 2008 14:04:51
Actually, it does. Brian once confirmed that the entry was a direct [and deliberate] spelljamming reference in 3e Realmslore.

-Being as that, at any point, the Spelljammer could be retconned into an "Astral Ship", like something the Githyanki/Githzeri use, a special Skyship, like something used in Halruaa, or something else entirely this isn't exactly a direct Spellamming reference. Now, if it said "The Spelljammer, the legendary Spelljamming vessel", then it would be...
#20

lord_karsus

Jun 08, 2008 14:06:34
Didn't the initial release on the spell-plague talk about how a veil was lifted from Selune showing cities on the moon? If so, that seems to indicate that spell-jamming is back.

-Correct, those illusions are gone. That doesn't exactly indicate that Spelljamming is back, however. Just off the top of my head, it could theoretically be written that people go back and forth via portals. In this situation, there is nothing about Spelljamming.
#21

markustay63

Jun 08, 2008 16:03:16
Well, since it was never retconned out, and the official ruling is that EVERYTHING that was NOT over-written by new lore still exists, Spelljamming does indeed still exist in 3e.

The absence of evidence is NOT evidence, at least not in this case. :P

I have a feeling they will be drastically changing it in 4e, because I don't believe the Phlogiston exists anymore. It will probably become some form of 'Sailing between worlds' inter-planar travel, through the Astral or perhaps the Shadowfel - there are some demon-made ships that do something similar, so I suppose the concept will be rolled into that.
#22

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 08, 2008 16:03:58
I seriously doubt spelljamming is going to be emphasized in the 4E Realms (did Rich mention something to this effect?).
#23

lord_karsus

Jun 09, 2008 10:45:56
Well, since it was never retconned out, and the official ruling is that EVERYTHING that was NOT over-written by new lore still exists, Spelljamming does indeed still exist in 3e.

The absence of evidence is NOT evidence, at least not in this case. :P

-No one said that it doesn't exist currently. Pay attention! :P
#24

ikki

Jun 09, 2008 11:22:28
Anyways, back on spelljamming Dwarves.
Helms, with their current prices make no sense.. unless making 125k gp/ adventure is ok? (looted major helm)
Much better to take off 90%.

Which still leaves some fun maths: (see birthright)
Citadel 50GB
Forge 25GB
Recruiting 2 units of dwarven x-bow & 2 units of dwarven guard 16GB
-> 91GB

Running costs 4*2 = 8 GB for troops
But income.. 5GB (as per 100 smiths, see SJ box)*7 (700 at work) *3 (3 months in a season) =105GB

A nice profit of 97GB/season
Looks like Baruk-Azhik can build another.. with just the profits.
Another two the season after that.. double yet again.. pretty soon ill have hundreds, if not thousands.

Adding in portals at 50k, or 25 GB, and you can start linking the whole empire of citadels.


Funny what 3rd edition does to your mind, never once was getting a citadel a viable idea under 2nd edition, too many dwarves etc.. tough to calculate the finances.. whatnot.. Now with prices in the clear, a whole empire of spacedwarves suddenly looks viable ;)
Oh yeah.. lets have rams on the citadels. Just call them orc and spider -obliterators. And why not a few items of ironwall at will too, helps when you dont risk running out of metal to work ;)
While at it, link portals to various customers, just to ease the trade. A portal to some planet with a athmosphere would be nice too. I mean, we are keeping 800 dwarves on a 700tn ship. Or hell, lets double the crew.. Its not like we couldnt afford the extra troops. Only risk now is running out of dwarves by which to crew the ships :D
#25

markustay63

Jun 09, 2008 16:08:52
I seriously doubt spelljamming is going to be emphasized in the 4E Realms (did Rich mention something to this effect?).

However, they did take back their license for Spelljammer from whoever had it, which seemed weird at the time. Now, with their "one setting per year" plan, it seems pretty obvious they will use it at some point in time - along with RL, which they also took back, and DL, which they were going to take back, but gave Weiss an extension (realizing that it will be two years out, after they do Eberron?)

Looking back over the past three years, you can discern a definate pattern as to what their plans were.

Last night I was reading through Magic of Faerûn (got it for $12 new!), and I came across something that made me think they may have been preparing for an FR overhaul way before they even speculated about 4th edition. I think the Spellplague may have been on on the back burner, and when 4e rolled around they took it out and dusted it off - check out Nchaser's entry on pg. 11.

"The coming Doom"?

That was mentioned back in '01.
#26

lord_karsus

Jun 09, 2008 22:54:01
Funny what 3rd edition does to your mind...

-Turns it into a well-oiled thinking machine.

Last night I was reading through Magic of Faerûn (got it for $12 new!), and I came across something that made me think they may have been preparing for an FR overhaul way before they even speculated about 4th edition. I think the Spellplague may have been on on the back burner, and when 4e rolled around they took it out and dusted it off - check out Nchaser's entry on pg. 11.

"The coming Doom"?

That was mentioned back in '01.

-Eh, people have been proclaiming doom and gloom for how long now? The Fall of Myth Drannor was supposed to be a harbinger for the end...
#27

ikki

Jun 10, 2008 2:56:34
and then the innumerable world enders already prevented, someone researching a "disintergrate toril" -epic spell (just for magic science, then testing it, just once to see if it works,, oh it did), or the one that was building a army of golems, elminster dealt with that one. Mentioned offhand in some book...
Countless others.

Oh yeah.. and that sublich of larloch and its plan for world domination.. sending hundreds of lichies to conquer the world, once more -foiled.
#28

iakhovas

Jun 10, 2008 8:42:42
The entry in the Grand History for the Year of Nightsilver (623 DR) is a direct reference to *the* Spelljammer, not just any old spelljamming vessel. Sage is correct that this entry was a direct spelljamming reference (from the novel, The Radiant Dragon). Just as the dissolving of Leira's illusion covering the moon is a deliberate reference to spelljamming in the 4E realms. Rinonalyrna is also correct. Spelljamming is not going to be emphasized in the 4E Realms at all. I just like to toss in a passing reference once in a while for the fans of spelljamming (of which I am one!) for continuity sake.
Actually, it does. Brian once confirmed that the entry was a direct [and deliberate] spelljamming reference in 3e Realmslore. Additionally, it reinforces most of the vague spelljamming references that have been included previously in sources like Serpent Kingdoms for example.

Now, if it said "The Spelljammer, the legendary Spelljamming vessel", then it would be...

I seriously doubt spelljamming is going to be emphasized in the 4E Realms (did Rich mention something to this effect?).

#29

lord_karsus

Jun 10, 2008 9:37:25
The entry in the Grand History for the Year of Nightsilver (623 DR) is a direct reference to *the* Spelljammer, not just any old spelljamming vessel. Sage is correct that this entry was a direct spelljamming reference (from the novel, The Radiant Dragon). Just as the dissolving of Leira's illusion covering the moon is a deliberate reference to spelljamming in the 4E realms.

-Neither are references to Spelljamming: They are references to elements of Spelljammer, (The civilization on Selûne and the mention of Queen Amlauril seeing the Spelljammer) that have become Realmslore, but are not outright references to Spelljammer.

-Your intentions might have been there, I am sure, but one word (A new concept such as "Astraljamming", perhaps) suddenly changes those references from nods at Spelljammer to something else. Which is the point I was making. Just like in the FRCS how the legends of ships traveling in the "Sea of Night" can be altered and construed as something other than Spelljamming, so too can this.
#30

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 10, 2008 10:53:48
-Eh, people have been proclaiming doom and gloom for how long now?

I know, just look at how often it happens in the real world.
#31

lord_karsus

Jun 10, 2008 11:05:38
I know, just look at how often it happens in the real world.

-I don't want to say we have a track record, but...

799: The end is nigh!
899: The end is nigh!
999: The end is nigh!
1099: The end is nigh!
1199: The end is nigh!
1299: The end is nigh!
1399: The end is nigh!
1499: The end is nigh!
1599: The end is nigh!
1699: The end is nigh!
1799: The end is nigh!
1899: The end is nigh!
1999: The end is nigh!
#32

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 10, 2008 11:44:24
IIRC, The Skeptic's Dictionary website has a page about "End of the World" proclaimations (that of course, did not come true).
#33

iakhovas

Jun 10, 2008 14:23:35
Fair enough. I can see some form of astraljamming replacing the traditional method of spelljamming through the phlogiston. I'm still a big fan of the crystal spheres though.

-Your intentions might have been there, I am sure, but one word (A new concept such as "Astraljamming", perhaps) suddenly changes those references from nods at Spelljammer to something else. Which is the point I was making. Just like in the FRCS how the legends of ships traveling in the "Sea of Night" can be altered and construed as something other than Spelljamming, so too can this.

#34

lord_karsus

Jun 10, 2008 15:45:56
IIRC, The Skeptic's Dictionary website has a page about "End of the World" proclaimations (that of course, did not come true).

-The next date the world is supposed to end is 2012, or 2011, I believe. The end of the final Mayan cycle on their calendar. Let's keep our fingers crossed...or uncrossed...Or whatever it's supposed to be. ;)

Fair enough. I can see some form of astraljamming replacing the traditional method of spelljamming through the phlogiston. I'm still a big fan of the crystal spheres though.

-Spelljammer will always live in in my campaigns. My PCs recently got one.
#35

ikki

Jun 11, 2008 1:06:12
wintersolistice 2011, ie december 22-23 (iirc)
Anyway, that just starts the next cycle. Nothing at all indicating anything will be different from before. Well, aside from hysterics that is, but those are willing to grab any date..

And ofcourse, in the meantime various informed cult leaders milk the easily fooled for contributions. For some reason these religious leaders always need money (see zeitgeist).
As in fact, any religion accepting money, pretty much proves they are fake. Especially if they preach their THING is either allpowerful or deterministic, which means that watever was meant to be would happen anyway and we as mere mortals wont be able to change anything.
#36

lord_karsus

Jun 11, 2008 1:13:20
As in fact, any religion accepting money, pretty much proves they are fake.

-Not particularly. Everything and everything needs resources to survive. Individuals, with specific nutrients, organizations, with monetary funds...

Especially if they preach their THING is either allpowerful or deterministic, which means that watever was meant to be would happen anyway and we as mere mortals wont be able to change anything.

-That logic has holes large enough to sail the Titanic through. :P
#37

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 11, 2008 19:11:13
-The next date the world is supposed to end is 2012, or 2011, I believe. The end of the final Mayan cycle on their calendar. Let's keep our fingers crossed...or uncrossed...Or whatever it's supposed to be. ;)

Ah, the prophecy that came from people who couldn't predict the end of their own culture? Sure, I'll get on board with that.;)

For some strange reason people seem to like predicting the "end of the world." It makes sense that such behavior could be found in the Realms, too. I just don't like actually making such things come true, but that's just me.

-Spelljammer will always live in in my campaigns. My PCs recently got one.

I'm jealous.:P
#38

lord_karsus

Jun 11, 2008 22:26:57
Ah, the prophecy that came from people who couldn't predict the end of their own culture? Sure, I'll get on board with that.;)

-Woo hoo...The end is nigh, the end is nigh!!

I'm jealous.:P

-Would you like a Spelljammer? For you, I'll get a Spelljammer.
#39

merrikcale

Jun 12, 2008 8:58:39
--Would you like a Spelljammer? For you, I'll get a Spelljammer.

here we go again
#40

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 12, 2008 10:02:46
Heehee, I'd like that.:embarrass :D
#41

lord_karsus

Jun 12, 2008 11:06:38
-Hmm...I'm going to have to scrounge up a Spelljammer...I'll have it for you next time I see you.

-Is there any specific vessel you prefer?
#42

merrikcale

Jun 12, 2008 15:44:25
-Hmm...I'm going to have to scrounge up a Spelljammer...I'll have it for you next time I see you.

-Is there any specific vessel you prefer?

I gotta hand to you, LK, most guys would just bring flowers and chochlate
#43

lord_karsus

Jun 12, 2008 17:19:57
I gotta hand to you, LK, most guys would just bring flowers and chochlate

-Been there, done that...Now, a Spelljammer...That's not something you see everyday! :D
#44

merrikcale

Jun 12, 2008 18:02:32
-Been there, done that...Now, a Spelljammer...That's not something you see everyday! :D

Heck, I'd date ya
#45

lord_karsus

Jun 12, 2008 18:44:13
-You too!? Weren't you admonishing Magister_Kal for saying that same thing?
#46

merrikcale

Jun 12, 2008 20:05:48
-You too!? Weren't you admonishing Magister_Kal for saying that same thing?

um. yeah :embarrass
#47

lord_karsus

Jun 12, 2008 22:37:35
-That's alright. ;)
#48

merrikcale

Jun 13, 2008 17:50:42
Will Rhee be jealous?
#49

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 13, 2008 22:02:54
-Hmm...I'm going to have to scrounge up a Spelljammer...I'll have it for you next time I see you.

-Is there any specific vessel you prefer?

One with a sea creature motif.
#50

merrikcale

Jun 13, 2008 22:06:07
One with a sea creature motif.

nice.
#51

markustay63

Jun 13, 2008 22:48:05
-The next date the world is supposed to end is 2012, or 2011, I believe. The end of the final Mayan cycle on their calendar. Let's keep our fingers crossed...or uncrossed...Or whatever it's supposed to be. ;)

2012, and I'm hoping its accurate this time out.

What could be cooler then witnessing the Apocalypse? :D
#52

lord_karsus

Jun 13, 2008 23:22:50
One with a sea creature motif.

-Right. I'll have it for you next time I see you.

What could be cooler then witnessing the Apocalypse? :D

-Not witnessing the Apocalypse?
#53

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 13, 2008 23:32:40
-Right. I'll have it for you next time I see you.

Thank you!
#54

merrikcale

Jun 14, 2008 7:15:20
-Right. I'll have it for you next time I see you.

no need to ask 'cause he's a smooth operator, he's a smooth operator, smooth operator, smoooooth op-er-a-tor
#55

markustay63

Jun 14, 2008 8:16:21
Another one-hit wonder.

-Not witnessing the Apocalypse?

But I love Fireworks!

And besides, think of all the people (in those dates you mentioned) that looked forward too it and didn't get to see it - we're the lucky ones!

If you gotta go, you might as well go out in a big way. :D
#56

lord_karsus

Jun 14, 2008 13:06:05
But I love Fireworks!

And besides, think of all the people (in those dates you mentioned) that looked forward too it and didn't get to see it - we're the lucky ones!

If you gotta go, you might as well go out in a big way. :D

-Yeah, well, I'm kinda looking forward to not going out just this moment, you know?

-Anyway, back to Spelljammers...Is there anything left in that topic, or are we done?
#57

suin_bahhar_02

Jun 14, 2008 13:43:56
Once I would have loved to see a world go out out in an Apocalyps while I watch from a cabinwindow in an elven spelljammer, but nowadays I prefer earning wicked profits by smuggling arcane artifects (and playing with undead curbstomped kittens).
#58

lord_karsus

Jun 14, 2008 13:59:56
-That basically sums every odd tangent in a nutshell...
#59

markustay63

Jun 14, 2008 14:01:31
-Yeah, well, I'm kinda looking forward to not going out just this moment, you know?

better to go out in all your glory (like the Beatles or Marilyn Monroe) then grow old and decrepit in front of everyone (like the Rolling Stones or Delta Burke).

Like Neil Young said, "It's better to burn out, then fade away".

-Anyway, back to Spelljammers...Is there anything left in that topic, or are we done?

I thought the concept behind Spelljammers was great (stolen from the then #1 rated RPG Space: 1889), but I think a lot of the material produced for it was an example of TSR at their worst - silly, derivitive non-sensical lore that was just slapped together without rhyme or reason.

I'd have to say I liked Spelljamming, but hated Spelljammer, if that makes any sense. I use it, but WAY differently, and I hope that if WotC re-visits the setting, they do it the way I imagined it (like in the Elric novel - Sailor on the Seas of Fate). Flying from world to world throught he Astral (Arcane Space?) or the Shadow (Phlogiston?) would be very cool, ad would tie Planescape and Spelljammer together in a unique way.

Of course, neither of those settings will be exactly the same, but perhaps with the right team (the guys that did Beyond Countless Doorways?) we could actually get something that is more then the sum of its parts.

The existance of Planar travel in PS made SJ redundant and rather silly. If the two could be brought together, I think WotC could have a real winner there.

With a smattering of Ravenloft thrown in, of course - there's always a chance when cruising the Shadow Seas of coming out in the Plane of Horrors.
#60

lord_karsus

Jun 14, 2008 14:13:13
better to go out in all your glory (like the Beatles or Marilyn Monroe) then grow old and decrepit in front of everyone (like the Rolling Stones or Delta Burke).

-Don't know who Delta Burke is, but notice how the Stones are still out there, jamming? And, the Beatles hardly went out at the top of their game.

-Were it anything other than death, I'd agree. Hell, in the past, I would have agreed with you. After high school, when I began college, my dream in life was to be killed in the line of duty, doing something heroic. Circumstances in my life have changed such that I don't feel so nihilistic, so...

Like Neil Young said, "It's better to burn out, then fade away".

-Neil Young has also said plenty of questionable things, too. ;)

I'd have to say I liked Spelljamming, but hated Spelljammer, if that makes any sense.

-I understand, and agree. I like the concept behind Spelljamming, and a bunch of elements (IEN, Neogi, Crystal Spheres, some ship blueprints), but that's all. The way I've adapted it into my own game is simply stuff I've made up off the top of my head.
#61

ikki

Jun 15, 2008 3:46:23
heh.. it was a great system but a few terrible flaws:
1) helms, way too valuable. You dont want to add 125k in loot for every boarded and taken ship.. Unless players with 20million gp in cash are ok at level 12.
2) gravity planes.. like wtf.. I made down, stay down.
3) smokepowder guns.. why bother? Lousier than a nixies smallbow. Either quintuple damage or terror (damage*2 as will DC or run away?) and minimum double damage. And the price.. maybe everyone was supposed to have a dozen bombards, so they wouldnt drown in wealth from the helms?
4) gnomes
5) spelljamming left a spellslinger sitting in the corner, like a leatherheaded berk, no partcipation. Nada, zero.
#62

ikki

Jun 15, 2008 3:48:44
no need to ask 'cause he's a smooth operator, he's a smooth operator, smooth operator, smoooooth op-er-a-tor

http://youtube.com/watch?v=wVjJ0TQx2zE WITH music on. Without, dont bother ;)
#63

lord_karsus

Jun 15, 2008 7:44:57
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wVjJ0TQx2zE WITH music on. Without, dont bother ;)

-I'd be lying if I said I didn't have that song on my iPod.
#64

markustay63

Jun 15, 2008 8:59:27
So your the guy on that car commercial that has Michael Bolton set on his radio? :D

I try not to listen to music that is less then ten years old. :P
#65

lord_karsus

Jun 15, 2008 9:02:26
So your the guy on that car commercial that has Michael Bolton set on his radio? :D

-No.

I try not to listen to music that is less then ten years old. :P

-Meaning your collection goes back to '98. Hmm...Not a lot of good stuff, there. :P
#66

markustay63

Jun 15, 2008 9:44:01
'98 I consider 'newfangled' music. :D

Most of the stuff I listen to is from 60's, with some from the 70's and quite a bit from the 50's as well...

and I wasn't even born when that earlier stuff came out. :embarrass

I also got into a brief period of 'crooner music' love, when I first got my hands on Mob Hits...

For an entire year, I talked like a bad gangster-movie wannabe. :P

"You wanna piece a' me? Doowie look like a clown to yous? Shut yer trap"

and here's the kicker - I HATE Mob movies - I've only seen a single episode of Sopranos, and have never seen the Godfather in it's entirety.

I think it was after I saw Analyze This that made me a little crazy for awhile.
#67

lord_karsus

Jun 15, 2008 11:23:33
'98 I consider 'newfangled' music. :D

Most of the stuff I listen to is from 60's, with some from the 70's and quite a bit from the 50's as well...

and I wasn't even born when that earlier stuff came out. :embarrass

-Never mind. I read that wrong. I read it as your "collection" includes nothing made before 1998, not that it includes nothing made after 1998.
#68

merrikcale

Jun 16, 2008 11:57:26
there was a few decent song on the 80s. Some recent stuff is good
#69

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 17, 2008 19:28:14
- And, the Beatles hardly went out at the top of their game.

Whaddya MEAN they didn't?!
#70

merrikcale

Jun 17, 2008 19:53:49
Whaddya MEAN they didn't?!

Yeah, I have to agree with your lady LK. Abbey Road was a great album
#71

lord_karsus

Jun 17, 2008 23:38:54
-Well, what I meant by that was that the band broke up due to some bitter in-fighting (Lennon-McCartney, primarily), among other things, such as the emergence of George as a songwriter in his own right, and Ringo being Ringo. I wouldn't consider that kind of conduct "at the top of their game".
#72

Stigger

Jun 18, 2008 0:33:17
Feh, the was crap the whole time... as was everything ever produced by an band during that entire period of human history, unless it was Jazz, in which case it was probably at least tolerable. :P ;)
#73

lord_karsus

Jun 18, 2008 22:39:12
-Someone's in a bad mood...
#74

Stigger

Jun 19, 2008 0:23:31
Not me, I just hate that whole period of music... to use the word 'music' very loosely. :P ;)
#75

merrikcale

Jun 19, 2008 7:32:38
The Beatles rock, Stigger
#76

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 19, 2008 9:44:04
-Well, what I meant by that was that the band broke up due to some bitter in-fighting (Lennon-McCartney, primarily), among other things, such as the emergence of George as a songwriter in his own right, and Ringo being Ringo. I wouldn't consider that kind of conduct "at the top of their game".

Nah, I'm sure it was the Mario-parasite inside Ringo's drum.;) :P
#77

Stigger

Jun 19, 2008 12:26:09
The Beatles are the crap... which should be obvious to anyone with a sense of musical taste. Obviously some of us are lacking said taste... :P

:D
#78

lord_karsus

Jun 19, 2008 14:22:47
Not me, I just hate that whole period of music... to use the word 'music' very loosely. :P ;)

-But, it's agreed by music critics to have been one of the most important eras of musical development in Human history.

Nah, I'm sure it was the Mario-parasite inside Ringo's drum.;) :P

-Good point.
#79

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 19, 2008 15:09:35
By the way, I think the Beatles made some great music.
#80

lord_karsus

Jun 19, 2008 15:19:45
-Listening to Tomorrow Never Knows right now.
#81

Stigger

Jun 20, 2008 0:32:15
And I care what music critics think why? Oh, wait, I don't... :P ;)

As to saying that anything recent was 'one of the most important eras of musical development in human history' is hyperbole at its finest, and fairly reeks of a strong bias based on personal taste rather than true historical perspective. Its not had enough time to see if it truly withstands the test of time the way something like Baroque or Opera has. That would be true to just about any musical form 'invented' in the last century in my opinion.
#82

lord_karsus

Jun 20, 2008 9:32:16
And I care what music critics think why? Oh, wait, I don't... :P ;)

As to saying that anything recent was 'one of the most important eras of musical development in human history' is hyperbole at its finest, and fairly reeks of a strong bias based on personal taste rather than true historical perspective. Its not had enough time to see if it truly withstands the test of time the way something like Baroque or Opera has. That would be true to just about any musical form 'invented' in the last century in my opinion.

-Not particularly, no. Take into account the counterculture of the 1960s, the impact that the counterculture of the 1960s had on the era, and on today, and how much music influenced the counterculture of the 1960s. And then, of course, mix in the influences that music today draws from the songs and song writers of the era...
#83

Stigger

Jun 20, 2008 9:51:44
And all of those counterculture influences were very pale in comparison to the counterculture influences of the 20's in most respects, just that the 60's gets better press about it. The 60's never would have happened had it not been for the radical changes that the 20's brought about, which likely would have continued for a much longer time had the Great Depression not blasted it into relative obscurity. But obscurity has nothing to do with greatness or social impact.

Beyond that, there was very little of the music in the 60's that was not ultimately derivative from what had come before it. Evolutionary certainly, but very little that was really revolutionary (not including politically) as a musical concept. Refined perhaps, but not truly inventive.
#84

lord_karsus

Jun 20, 2008 10:38:12
-I didn't say that the counterculture of the '60s didn't have influences elsewhere. Everything has an influence somewhere. All that aside, that does not negate the impact such music has had on the world.

-Oh yeah. Spelljammers.
#85

Stigger

Jun 20, 2008 11:27:23
50's probably had more influence in terms of modern musical styles...

And yes, those damned spelljammers. I've been contemplating introducing that into my campaign, though not with giant dwarf/wizard heads riding out front.
#86

lord_karsus

Jun 21, 2008 0:59:18
50's probably had more influence in terms of modern musical styles...

-Much of which influenced the musical counterculture of the 1960s. Much of what went on in the 1960s went "against the grain" of what was established in the 1950s. I recently saw an excellent documentary on the internet: John Lennon's Jukebox. I recommend it.

And yes, those damned spelljammers. I've been contemplating introducing that into my campaign, though not with giant dwarf/wizard heads riding out front.

-Agreed, that's probably not the best way to go about it.

-In my own campaign, the PCs have a boat that doubles as a Spelljammer (or a Spelljammer that doubles as a boat?). It doesn't look..."wacky", it sails, it flies. Sweet and simple.
#87

markustay63

Jun 21, 2008 9:58:46
The 60's 'psychedelic' music and art gave us a LOT of our current fantasy concepts, not to mention all of the gawd-awful claymation monster movies.

The 60's gave us Roger Dean

Someone high-up at WotC was obviously a Yes fan

Now we have Yes album covers inserted into our Realms, some 40 years after the fact.

The 60's revolution is still going on, unfortuately, in some people's minds.

We also had the introduction and widespread use of the Electric Guitar in the 60's, which completely changed the sound of popular music, and music and culture are entwined together, so that in the end the culture itself is changed by the music it helped create.

The 'Free Thinking' inspired by the music of the era trickled down into other forms of media, so that JRR Tolkien became popular once again (refrences to his works are in many Led Zeppelin songs, amongst others), along with several TV series depicting Sci-Fi and Fantasy elements (Bewitched, I Dream of Genie, Star Trek, U.F.O., Lost in space, The Munsters, etc...)

I doubt Gygax would have came up with D&D, if he wasn't smokin' dope and listening to some psychedlic album with his buds.

Don't dis the 60's, kiddies... I was there. You owe it a lot. ;)
#88

lord_karsus

Jun 21, 2008 10:14:21
Don't dis the 60's, kiddies... I was there. You owe it a lot. ;)

-Sure, but you can claim to be there just like my mother can claim to be there: About three or four memories...;)
#89

markustay63

Jun 21, 2008 10:23:49
I went to school in the 60's, and my earliest memory is from when I lived in NYC - and moved from there when I was three.

I have an excellent memory. ;)
#90

lord_karsus

Jun 24, 2008 13:17:54
-Along with your high IQ, right?

:P :P :P
#91

markustay63

Jun 24, 2008 16:59:28
Both are facts - I swear on my children (and I don't do that lightly). I don't want to go into the IQ thing again, because it always causes problems (thats why I usually never mention it - I must of been having a 'senior moment' that day).

My earliest memory is being locked in a Graveyard at the end of my block (literally - a DEAD end) by my older brother. I distinctly remember him and his friends laughing at me, and it was starting to get dark and I was having a panic attack. I have no idea how old I was at that time, but I did move from Queens when I was three, and I confirmed YEARS LATER that my street did indeed have a cemetary at the end of it.

The IQ thing - I was tested when I was nine, and that was a LONG time ago. The tests have changed, and the 80's were VERY good (bad?) to me, so I would probably test VERY differently today. I was PURE nerd in the 70's, and quite a different person. My memory still blows people away, but its nothing like it used to be.

Anyway, about Spelljamming, music, and whatever...

If we talk about the 50's song Purple People Eater, we can give him stats and use him for the Spelljammer setting (its plenty silly enough to fit right in). In case you were all wondering where I pulled that one out of - that was my mandatory nod to the thread title. ;)

@Stigger - Chuck Mangione's Live at the Hollywood Bowl was the very first 'adult' album I ever bought, and Chase the Clouds Away is still one of my favorite pieces.

My wife's Uncle was ranked as the #2 Jazz Harmonica Player on Long Island, and we used to go to see him perform at least one weekend a month.

He never let the fact that there was only one other professional Jazz harmonica player on Long Island bother him either. :P
#92

naex

Jun 24, 2008 18:40:37
Ah, the prophecy that came from people who couldn't predict the end of their own culture? Sure, I'll get on board with that.;)

For some strange reason people seem to like predicting the "end of the world."

Actually they sort of did predict there own downfall... read the history of their calendar, it predicts a lot of the changes and events in history. Also the Hopi have the same date Dec of 2012.
And somewhere in one of the 4e core books, I saw a direct reference to ships on the astral sea.
#93

lord_karsus

Jun 24, 2008 19:06:57
-Just making fun of you, MT, that's all.

And somewhere in one of the 4e core books, I saw a direct reference to ships on the astral sea.

-And...a reference to the end of the world in December, 2012? Odd...

-But, about that. What did I say? I'm good.
#94

naex

Jun 24, 2008 19:39:09
-Just making fun of you, MT, that's all.



-And...a reference to the end of the world in December, 2012? Odd...

-But, about that. What did I say? I'm good.

actually I think this is their planned release date of 5e :D
#95

lord_karsus

Jun 24, 2008 19:48:21
-Four years? That's a bit early, isn't it? That might be 4.5, though.
#96

merrikcale

Jun 25, 2008 10:03:33
-Four years? That's a bit early, isn't it? That might be 4.5, though.

will they travel back in time 100 years?
#97

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 25, 2008 11:48:36
Actually they sort of did predict there own downfall... read the history of their calendar, it predicts a lot of the changes and events in history.

Such as?

Also the Hopi have the same date Dec of 2012.

So what?
#98

naex

Jun 25, 2008 12:04:57
They predicted such eras of turmoil as WW2 and the Flower Power movement of the 60's to name 2 events, many others, can't remember them all. Their calender was based on a series of cycles within cycles and at certain points events are supposed to occur. The 2012 date is really just a marking of the end of many cycles at one time, not so much the end of the world as a major time of change. As far as the Hopi using the same date... just an oddity that two different cultures came up with the same date. I don't know if it is really significant, but there it is.
#99

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 25, 2008 12:22:21
They predicted such eras of turmoil as WW2 and the Flower Power movement of the 60's to name 2 events, many others, can't remember them all.

Well, my answer to that is that those "prophecies" were most likely vaguely worded. It wouldn't be too hard to say they predicted certain events after the fact. With enough effort, you can make a bunch of vague statements mean almost anything.

Their calender was based on a series of cycles within cycles and at certain points events are supposed to occur. The 2012 date is really just a marking of the end of many cycles at one time, not so much the end of the world as a major time of change. As far as the Hopi using the same date... just an oddity that two different cultures came up with the same date. I don't know if it is really significant, but there it is.

I don't want to comment too much about this because I don't have all the facts about it (same goes for above, really). But never overlook the possibility of coincidence, or some other more mundane explanation.
#100

naex

Jun 25, 2008 12:34:30
I don't want to comment too much about this because I don't have all the facts about it (same goes for above, really). But never overlook the possibility of coincidence, or some other more mundane explanation.

I tend to agree, but more than a few instances are usually more than a coincidence, and it does not predict the end of the world, just a major change as several cycles of the world end and new ones begin. And when someone gives a specific date based on a very accurate (and very pre-Gregorian) calender, it doesn't hurt to at least consider it. Events in society seem to be building to a crescendo and while it may not amount to anything, it seems to be in the right time frame.
here is a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayan_calender
#101

rinonalyrna_fathomlin

Jun 25, 2008 12:48:14
I tend to agree, but more than a few instances are usually more than a coincidence, and it does not predict the end of the world, just a major change as several cycles of the world end and new ones begin. And when someone gives a specific date based on a very accurate (and very pre-Gregorian) calender, it doesn't hurt to at least consider it. Events in society seem to be building to a crescendo and while it may not amount to anything, it seems to be in the right time frame.

Meh, I've more or less said my piece about that.;)
#102

naex

Jun 25, 2008 13:15:00
Agreed, enough of the doom and gloom that will probably not happen.
#103

markustay63

Jun 25, 2008 13:19:42
The American Indians have a bunch of VERY good prophesies about the future, several of which bizzarly enough parallel similar predictions in the Bible (long before the Indians ever heard of the Bible).

The #1 coincidence is that "the Dead shall walk the Earth". Read the book The Hot Zone - it's non-fiction, and both Clive Barker and Steven King have said it was the most frightening thing they've ever read (and it's all true!)

I can go on and on - there is another prophecy about "the White man" arriving in American, some years before it happened and by a medicine man on the West Coast (3500 miles from where his prediction took place). That one's particularly intersting... it says that "the People" (persons with Indian blood) would take back their land eventually from 'the White Devils'.

Hispanic People are 90% Amerind, and by 2012, "persons of color" will out-number caucasions in this country.

Food for thought....
#104

markustay63

Jun 25, 2008 13:22:58
Agreed, enough of the doom and gloom that will probably not happen.

Sorry - you posted this before I replied - my bad.

I'll stop. :embarrass
#105

lord_karsus

Jun 25, 2008 13:25:22
-Spelljammers...
#106

naex

Jun 25, 2008 13:48:43
-Spelljammers...

Are you implying that we went a bit off topic?
#107

lord_karsus

Jun 25, 2008 13:53:52
-There is that possibility.
#108

naex

Jun 25, 2008 19:02:33
Ok then... Spelljamming was a great concept, except it doesn't work, especially after it was decided that the connection between the various worlds was through the shadow plane. I don't know what the planned link is now. Maybe, since the planes are more synced between the worlds, that you could use any plane that was shared by either world to cross? But it would far more effective to built a portal than to build and equip a ship with a spelljammer helm. Astral craft might be fun, but portals are still going to be the preferred method.
#109

lord_karsus

Jun 25, 2008 21:00:35
Ok then... Spelljamming was a great concept, except it doesn't work, especially after it was decided that the connection between the various worlds was through the shadow plane. I don't know what the planned link is now. Maybe, since the planes are more synced between the worlds, that you could use any plane that was shared by either world to cross? But it would far more effective to built a portal than to build and equip a ship with a spelljammer helm. Astral craft might be fun, but portals are still going to be the preferred method.

-Like I said at page 1, Astraljamming!

-If they wanted to be real "sneaky", they could really develop this process using a lot of the old Spelljammer stuff, of course adapting things here and there, and changing names and terms.
#110

wizo_unicorn

Jun 26, 2008 22:53:05
Please return discussion to the topic of the thread.

WizO_Unicorn