Szass Tam

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

cnewby

Sep 21, 2008 12:16:10		Has it been stated in any previous adventure/novel/source book in the past as to where Tam keeps his phylactery? If so, is there any mention of the ridiculous amount of protection it must have?
#2

JudgeDookie

Sep 21, 2008 16:17:41 		No. Not that I recall.

And I image--as things go these days--that such a thing will be left up to the DM to decide.
#3

lord_karsus

Sep 21, 2008 20:43:14 		-Nope, nothing. It'd be counterproductive, if you were a Lich, to let everyone know where you phylactery is.
#4

lcghent

Sep 21, 2008 20:57:54 		I dont have any idea where he was hiding it, but I would imagine it might not even be safe for him to go after it these days. All those long lasting magic wards put in place before the Spellplague may not be working properly anymore.
#5

davesaunders

Oct 14, 2008 14:19:56 		I was planning on maybe using him in my own game and if I do I am going to say that Larlock has it. Thats why Szass Tam is so obedient to him.
#6

JudgeDookie

Oct 14, 2008 20:12:03
I was planning on maybe using him in my own game and if I do I am going to say that Larlock has it. Thats why Szass Tam is so obedient to him.

Is he still though?
#7

lord_karsus

Oct 14, 2008 20:44:04
I was planning on maybe using him in my own game and if I do I am going to say that Larlock has it. Thats why Szass Tam is so obedient to him.

-That's an interesting idea, actually.
#8

keveras

Oct 15, 2008 12:51:32
I was planning on maybe using him in my own game and if I do I am going to say that Larlock has it. Thats why Szass Tam is so obedient to him.

Indeed, that's an interesting idea. And that could be the reason why Larloch told him the secrets of Netheril, since he could virtually destroy Tam with but a thought.
#9

18DELTA

Oct 15, 2008 13:10:21
I was planning on maybe using him in my own game and if I do I am going to say that Larlock has it. Thats why Szass Tam is so obedient to him.

-Pure WIN! :D


18DELTA
#10

lord_karsus

Oct 15, 2008 13:35:07
Indeed, that's an interesting idea. And that could be the reason why Larloch told him the secrets of Netheril, since he could virtually destroy Tam with but a thought.

-Perhaps the two are/were some kind of strange lovers. Creepy, I know, but, I've been told by a friend that homosexual men, a lot of the kind of stuff that they are attracted to includes stuff like dominance, and power and...stuff.
#11

keveras

Oct 16, 2008 12:15:17
-Perhaps the two are/were some kind of strange lovers. Creepy, I know, but, I've been told by a friend that homosexual men, a lot of the kind of stuff that they are attracted to includes stuff like dominance, and power and...stuff.

Oh, really? Yeah, uhm, interesting :P
#12

lord_karsus

Oct 16, 2008 12:23:28 		-Hey, I prefaced it by "creepy". And, it is.
#13

keveras

Oct 16, 2008 13:02:26 		Yeah, yeah, all right then.
Anyway, maybe El was the third among them. I mean, the guy who has a 'special relationship' with Mystra must have something to do with her first and most powerful chosen. Anyway, probably I don't want to know.
#14

lord_karsus

Oct 16, 2008 13:03:23 		-At least Aumar the Undying isn't involved in any of this.
#15

keveras

Oct 16, 2008 13:08:30 		To this point it was funny, but now it's enough. Really, enough :D
#16

lord_karsus

Oct 16, 2008 13:10:15 		-Yeah...Gay Lich orgies are probably a topic left undiscussed.
#17

maulorn

Oct 16, 2008 13:11:49 		The definition of necrophillia is...

The sudden urge to pop open a cold one!

Really though...homosexual-necrophiliacs...It is brilliant!
#18

ody_saraph_of_karsus

Oct 16, 2008 14:35:35
-Yeah...Gay Lich orgies are probably a topic left undiscussed.

you started it....
#19

JudgeDookie

Oct 16, 2008 20:56:15 		Damn--WizO's are actually getting good. That's two back-n-forth's in one thread.