Underdark January 2010 - a FR book?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

elsenrail

May 01, 2009 14:21:18
http://www.amazon.com/Underdark-4th-D-Supplement/dp/078695387X/

Isn't Underdark a term restricted for FR? In Eberron there's Khyber (don't know about other worlds).
#2

Stigger

May 01, 2009 14:26:20
Considering Drow of the Underdark, a FR specific title from 2e, became 'Core' in 3e, I don't see any reason why this book would be Realms specific when the term Underdark was made 'Core' last edition.
#3

krownhunter07

May 01, 2009 14:37:03
It's not FR. It is, however, usable in FR with a few modifications.
#4

Stigger

May 01, 2009 14:53:20
Useable in FR, or anywhere else for that matter, is kind of a given with 4e, no? :P ;)
#5

krownhunter07

May 01, 2009 15:23:48
It should be a given... but you never know...
#6

nightseer

May 01, 2009 15:30:03
Paizo stole the Darklands title for their version of the Underdark. :P So Wizards was left with that tired old horse called the Underdark.
#7

lord_karsus

May 01, 2009 17:40:30
-The term's just a catch-all, yes. Any setting that has that type of cave system and so on that doesn't have a specific term (like Eberron, apparently), it's just called 'The Underdark'. I have no problem with that, since I never really saw it as a Forgotten Realms-specific term anyway.
#8

markustay63

May 01, 2009 19:48:56
They tried to make Night Below the catch-all for every world's 'underworld', but it never really caught on, so now everyone gets FR's Underdark.

I've also heard the term "The Deep Realms" in regards to FR.

As for yet another book with Underdark in the title...

So much material on a region that is only used in about 10% of the campaigns (and thats being generous). In all honesty, out of the dozens of games I have run or played in, and the hundreds I was aware of (through four seperate LGS's), I have NEVER seen anyone actually adventure in the Underdark.

And yet, we have about twenty books on the subject - go figure.
#9

rauric

May 01, 2009 21:38:20
Paizo stole the Darklands title for their version of the Underdark. :P So Wizards was left with that tired old horse called the Underdark.

Underdark is cooler for the lands under the earth. Darklands sound like typical areas ruled by evil BBEG.
3Es Underdark sourcebook was THE book to get if you wanted to run a "under game" in your campaign world. It had many things that were not setting dependant and many cool places and ideas that Dms of any setting coul use.

We might have only three books since 2k on the subject though unless you count those horrible 3PP items.
#10

lord_karsus

May 01, 2009 23:04:31
And yet, we have about twenty books on the subject - go figure.

-To be fair, they often are about different Underdarks, or elements in theoretical Underdarks.
#11

Stigger

May 02, 2009 1:00:13
Maybe I'm going stupid, but 3PP? Not ringing a bell for some reason...
#12

nightseer

May 02, 2009 3:12:07
3rd Party Publishers. ;)
#13

Stigger

May 02, 2009 3:30:09
Ah, right, thanks... I wouldn't count those as D&D, much less FR books.
#14

rauric

May 02, 2009 7:10:18
Ouch (but I concur for the most part)!
#15

Bluenose

May 02, 2009 7:11:06
So much material on a region that is only used in about 10% of the campaigns (and thats being generous).

And yet, we have about twenty books on the subject - go figure.

Let's amend your statement a little.

So much material on a world that is only used in about 10% of the campaigns (and that's being generous).

And yet we have a lot more than twenty books about FR - go figure.
#16

lord_karsus

May 02, 2009 10:04:27
-Yeah, who needs information...
#17

Stigger

May 02, 2009 10:12:33
So very overrated...
#18

markustay63

May 02, 2009 14:34:32
Let's amend your statement a little.

So much material on a world that is only used in about 10% of the campaigns (and that's being generous).

And yet we have a lot more than twenty books about FR - go figure.

Actually, most of the games I have seen or played in since TSR bought the Realms from Ed have been FR games.

As for the others - the people who play in them are worthless and not worth talking to. :P

I hang-out with Intelligent people, and Intelligent people like to read. If you can't be bothered reading the sourcebooks... get a job with WotC.
#19

Belorin

May 03, 2009 5:17:36
I can't remember right now, but I do believe that the book will also cover the Feydark and the Shadowdark or what ever they're going to call it.

Bel