| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1The_SilverswordOct 25, 2009 9:11:25 | I just took this test. I was a little suprised by the results. I think it would be interesting to see what everyone else comes out as. This was brought up in another thread (actually 2) but i didnt want to turn them into a what class are you thread so i just made a new thread. So take the test and post your results. Im sure many of you have already taken it, but try it again. And answer honestly! No cheating! This is what I got:
I like the make you explode part! |
| #2LordManshoonOct 25, 2009 9:56:30 | I just took the test. Got Rogue, which is awesome, since it's my favorite class (though I took the test legitimately, mind you). It's now resting in my sig with my Blue/Green orientation. |
| #3DiffanOct 25, 2009 13:30:48 | |
| #4suin_bahhar_02Oct 25, 2009 15:58:47 | *Emerges from concealment*
I'v always favored rangers, regarless of edition |
| #5Nai_CalusOct 25, 2009 21:13:34 | As noted before, Swordmage. Sometimes I get Bard. It's a really lousy test though, where the answers are blindingly obvious. I refuse to use either banner because the art for both classes is so ****. That hideous Genasi chick(Would it have freaking killed them to use an Eladrin) and that stupidly ugly Tiefling bimbo are both god-awful. |
| #6The_SilverswordOct 25, 2009 21:34:54 |
Party Pooper! I didnt think the answers were that blindingly obvious. It would be pretty easy to take the test and give answers to steer towards the class you want, which is why i said no cheating! I was kinda hopin for swordmage myself, but i just answered the questions honestly and came out Artificer which suprised me I had alot of fighter answers and mage answers so i thought for sure it would be Swordmage. Im a little surprised that Lord Manshoon is a Rogue? I thought for sure hed be a Wizard! Who knew! But anyway we got a good adventuring party goin on so far. An Artificer, Paladin, Rogue, Ranger, Swordmage. Were gonna kick some A$$! And no duplicates yet. Thats cool. So whos gonna be tested next? |
| #7LordManshoonOct 25, 2009 21:37:04 | Im a little surprised that Lord Manshoon is a Rogue? I thought for sure hed be a Wizard! Who knew! My Rogue aspect took the test. Wizard aspect was too busy reading a tome at the time. |
| #818DELTAOct 25, 2009 22:18:20 | I got warlock. Its in my sig. Funny I was playing a Hellfire Warlock named Brimstone awhile back. |
| #9nightseerOct 26, 2009 0:23:54 | Well I'll be...Avenger of Shar. Sounds nice, very nice.
|
| #10sauntayaOct 26, 2009 0:34:05 |
I do prefer classes that are hybreds in themselves, ranger, paladin, etc. This makes sense. |
| #11Doombringer_of_HoarOct 26, 2009 4:33:10 |
Avenger seems to be very popular. Avenger of Hoar. I like it. I thought I would come out as a Cleric. But Avenger of Hoar does have a nice ring to it. I may have to change my screen name. |
| #12The_SilverswordOct 26, 2009 8:10:26 | Indeed. 3 Avengers in a row? What are the odds? Quick some one else do it, and stay away from avengers. Just like your typical D&D group, no one wants to be the Cleric. |
| #13ShiftkittyOct 26, 2009 14:25:51 |
Dang! Last time I took this test I came out as a rogue! I wonder what changed? |
| #14straploknightOct 26, 2009 21:47:44 |
Cool, this or ranger feel aobut right for me. |
| #15The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 1:05:57 | ok so know we got two Rangers and two Rogues. Im guessing one of you is a bow Ranger. And Avenger is still the more popular class, who would of guessed? Next... |
| #16sfdragonOct 27, 2009 1:25:51 |
|
| #17The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 1:31:49 | Wow! so now we got three Rogues Rangers! 3 avengers, 2 Rogues, a Paladin, Swordmage, Warlock and an Artificer. I think thats everybody so far.
|
| #18sfdragonOct 27, 2009 2:08:11 | what two classes
I still say its fixed |
| #19The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 2:18:11 | Did you answer with the same exact answers both times? |
| #20sfdragonOct 27, 2009 2:19:33 | no
|
| #21The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 2:22:12 | Well then I dont think its fixed. They do change up the questions everytime you take it though, so taking it again you might end up with a different result. Maybe you should try it again, and use best 2 out of three or something? I think its more fun if you just answer the questions honestly, as you would answer them, not as your character would or what ever, and dont worry about what class you want to have. So ok Fine sfdragon, Ill put you down as Ranger, even though i have my suspicions that you cheated! |
| #22sfdragonOct 27, 2009 2:50:51 | its fixed. when I got to a point, it axed me ranged or melee. I pick melee it sends me to rogue. I dont do petty banditry. I dont tend to use alot of ranged weapons.( though Ive started to carry a light crossbow as well as a long bow) |
| #23The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 3:00:50 |
Ahhh, yeah i got down to a 2 question one too, Im not sure what my other choice would of led to. Thats like a bonus question, I guess you were too close to ranger and rogue for it to be able to determine which you were, so you got one last question to settle it. So I guess in a sense youre a Hybrid class. They should add those in there, It would be cool if they update this test and put in the PHB3 classes and the Assassin. |
| #24NolwelenOct 27, 2009 5:59:31 | That's odd. I thought more people would have got Wizard as test result. The answers are all anyways boringly obvious as to which classes they relate. |
| #25The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 6:22:30 |
Alright we got our Wizard!!! Yes the answers can be obvious and you could easily steer it to get the class you want, but i think alot of people mix it up, like I picked a lot of fighter type answers and wizard type answers and ended up with Artificer. |
| #26The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 7:38:12 | Another wizard? and still no Cleric, what is it with Clerics any way? Everyone seems bummed if they got to be the Cleric like "Awww man i was Cleric last time!" Still I guess were good, Artificers have healing infusions. So we now have 3 Rangers, 3 Avengers, 2 Rogues, 2 Wizards a Paladin, Swordmage, Warlock and an Artificer.
|
| #27IluvrienOct 27, 2009 7:52:42 | Ooohh. New class!
|
| #28NolwelenOct 27, 2009 7:58:37 |
Hey, Clerics are my second favorite class. Why? Well, because they are a hybrid-class onto themselfs and that's cool. If you wanna play a character that holds his/her ground in melee and as a magic-user Cleric is a great choice, since the class's magic supports your melee efforts, in addition you can stand back and launch some really devastating spells. I love to be the playmaker, to fill all the gaps and keep my party going, to heal them, to be the first and the last line of defense. Clerics are the heart and soul of their parties. I guess thats why few claim to volunteer all the time to be the party's Cleric. It's quite a commitment and responsability to be Team Captain. |
| #29The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 8:20:01 |
I agree. Im just saying most people seem to stay away from the Cleric. I like em, and Ive played many a Cleric, because I chose to not cause I was forced to. It seems most people think they just heal people and thats it. But theyve always had a decent to hit bonus, and in 4e they got lots of real nice offensive powers. And cool we now have a Druid in the party! |
| #30NolwelenOct 27, 2009 8:31:26 | I guess what I said about Clerics proves true for all leader classes and look how many leaders we got thus far. Just one, and an Artificer's role identity doesn't seem to be as obvious as the Cleric's, at least not to me. Of all the leader classes Clerics have it the hardest to stray a little away from their role I believe, since its such a strongly themed class. Just to RP a Cleric is sometimes a little burdening due to the theme that threatens to overshine the person's personality. |
| #31ShiftkittyOct 27, 2009 8:38:52 | I found it interesting that I was relegated to Ranger, because while I like nature, I really don't give a whit about the environment. I don't go out of my way to pollute, but I'm not making any special trips to the recyclers with carefully sorted garbage, and those compact flourescent lights suck. IRL, I think I'm more of a fighter or rogue, but I pick my fights carefully. I won't go toe-to-toe if fighting from a distance will give me a better chance at victory, and it's far better to get your opponent to defeat himself. I also recognize that sometimes the best way to deal with people is not to deal with them at all. I don't know. Maybe the questions pegged me as a hunter. |
| #32wrecanOct 27, 2009 8:42:47 |
Which makes sense, since I'm a DM through and through, and Warlord is the most Dmish of the classes. |
| #33The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 8:45:05 |
I didnt even notice that. I thougt Artificers were strikers, or perhaps controlers. Kool so I gues im the Leader!
Damn I just had to go and say something! Ok you can be the Leader. I think Warlords are more Leadery than Artificers Any way.
Well i think Ranger fits you then, I see them as a sort of fighter/rogue hybrid. Especialy in 4e. |
| #34NolwelenOct 27, 2009 8:48:33 |
Ok, second leader. |
| #35StiggerOct 27, 2009 11:06:20 |
An idea I find horrifying to be honest... maybe they're more palatable in 4e though. Certainly not the 3e version, couldn't stand them... |
| #36emblasochistOct 27, 2009 11:12:41 |
It took 15 seconds to take the test FOR the barbarian result. |
| #37emblasochistOct 27, 2009 11:31:20 |
Cleric again took about 30 seconds to try for. Problem is, I really could be any one of the classes. I'm all for trying every possible approach to problems. Tried for a sorcerer after that... Got wizard instead. But, 2 out of 3 I tried for ain't too shabby. |
| #38NolwelenOct 27, 2009 14:20:12 |
My favorite striker would be Rogue. I love to frustrate my enemies before I massacre them. :D |
| #39gomeztooOct 27, 2009 15:00:07 | I had actuayl expected bard, but I can live with this career... |
| #40pamelaOct 27, 2009 16:00:03 |
Not really that big a surprise... |
| #41Dougan_AxehammerOct 27, 2009 19:55:06 |
Kind of interesting since my most common race/class combination is dwarven cleric |
| #42Mr_MiscellanyOct 27, 2009 20:07:50 |
I figured I'd be a cleric for sure. Oh well, Bard is fun too! |
| #43Nai_CalusOct 27, 2009 22:00:50 | I like clerics. Three of the PCs I've made(Two of whom I haven't ever gotten to play) that I like best are clerics: Isri Arellan, CG 'drow'(He uses high elf stats) cleric of Corellon Larethian. Nice guy, but has little patience for foolishness or beaurocracy and gets snippy around them. Danien Kesar, CN human cleric of Olidammara. Smarmy, seedy, drunk half the time, a womanizer, a (bad) petty thief and an all around jerk. CHA was his dumpstat, turning undead is for people who actually care. Kerazt Vareth, CN drow cleric of Vhaeraun, with evil tendencies. Prone to overblown, ridiculous plans for the simplest of things, as likely to gut you like a fish as look at you, though he might help you out instead, convinced that drow are the best, pissy that surface elves get accepted unquestioningly while he has to work his ass off to get even the slighest acceptance for his community of surface-dwelling drow. |
| #44The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 23:07:38 |
Hey thats cheating! you cant be two classes! I think its more interesting if you take it just once and see what you come up with, instead of playing around with it to get the class you want. (lookin at you sfdragon) but you had Barabarian first so I'm putting you down for that, and I dont think anyones got Barbarian yet so that works, although Barbarian/Cleric is an interesting combo, but if I let you have 2 classes then everybody else will want 2 classes. So we've had alot of people come in since I checked last, we're gettin a good sized adventuring group goin on now. Look out Shades here we come! so as it stands now we have: 3 Rangers, 3 Avengers, 2 Rogues, 2 Wizards, 2 Warlocks, 2 Paladins a Cleric, Bard, Druid, Barbarian, Warlord, Shaman, Swordmage, and an Artificer. |
| #45sfdragonOct 27, 2009 23:10:59 | just make him a barbarian/cleric hybrid then..... |
| #46The_SilverswordOct 27, 2009 23:19:18 |
Then everbody would want to be a hybrid, and that would make it even more difficult to keep track of. |
| #47sfdragonOct 27, 2009 23:55:39 | kay barb(wire)arian it is then for him then, or he takes it again and takes thata one |
| #48sauntayaOct 27, 2009 23:58:25 |
to those who like clerics SORRY. Of cource no one wants a cleric in 4e !SUCKS!. their power has been significantly reduced. They are pathetic at melee/range and a shaman (guardian) can heal more than a cleric. And don't even mention turning undead. OMG way powered down. 3e clerics have the most options and when built right can do massive damage and healing. 2e were pretty good too. |
| #49sallaOct 28, 2009 0:00:39 |
In other words, 4e clerics are balanced. |
| #50sfdragonOct 28, 2009 0:02:05 | you know I used to dislike the invoker, but now I think its better than the cleric.
regardless the party still needs a healer. that said, no party ever needs a leader like that. the paladin can do that job, just as well. but my ranger can lead through the wilderness. (edit: o n a side note, I've past 2100 posts) |
| #51Fox_ReeveheartOct 28, 2009 0:04:46 | Hmm, though i've done this before, i'll repeat what I am. Mine said i'm a Warden :D Anyways, something about clerics still keeps me from playing one... don't know what it is... I wouldn't play one in 3-3.5 and I still won't now... |
| #52sauntayaOct 28, 2009 0:05:33 | To Stigger: Warlock An idea I find horrifying to be honest... maybe they're more palatable in 4e though. Certainly not the 3e version, couldn't stand them...
|
| #53sauntayaOct 28, 2009 0:11:29 |
I dissagree. the cleric is actually a hindrance in the group I'm playing. The person playing a cleric is good at it too. I've recently started playing a shaman and took the multi-class feat for cleric. I was origionally DM the campaine but cleric (my GF) took over so I could play a character. She still plays the cleric as an important NPC. And another cleric the battle cleric usually misses and gets hurt alot too. I find the cleric to be underpowered even with the new stuff from divine power.. though it is a significant increase. I'm no fan of the cleric either, in any eddition and only played one of the sun/healing domains. |
| #54sfdragonOct 28, 2009 0:27:35 | I just took it again to see what this particular class said on it.
so noted. |
| #55The_SilverswordOct 28, 2009 2:48:03 | The Cleric debate rages on! They do seem less focused on healing in 4e, dependin on what build you go with. I think theyre still pretty kick a$$ regardless what edition youre talkin about. The last time my group got together to game, I ended up throwing a Shade at the party, The Cleric of the group really saved the day with those Radiant powers, If it wasnt for the Cleric I dont think the party would of made it, granted that a situational thing there but i think alot of the classes work like that, some are better than others depending what the situation is.
And we're supposed to just take your word for it? Fine I'll let it slide this one time. I just hope more people dont start sayin oh it said im a (insert favorite class here). I want to see the little picture and quote with it too. I guess I could just mess around with it until I get all the classes, but seeing what everyone else comes up as is far more fun and interesting. |
| #56Nai_CalusOct 28, 2009 4:18:38 | The Swordmage banner is retarded because it uses that stupid-ass Genasi woman who's uglier than Shar's crotch hair, and then the quote is about training 'under the leaves of Myth Drannor', which: lawl elves training a Genasi no; and lawl Myth Drannor is the name of the city not the ****ing forest. There's forest in it, sure, but that'd still be Cormanthyr. |
| #57sfdragonOct 28, 2009 4:25:43 | tell me about it, the gensai girl.... hate the hair change. good thing we can use still use use the previous edition hair..
so I take it you got swordmage? or did you take it Nai? |
| #5818DELTAOct 28, 2009 7:03:40 |
This time! |
| #59NolwelenOct 28, 2009 9:57:08 |
A womanizer without charisma?! How is that going to work out? |
| #60LordManshoonOct 28, 2009 15:37:49 | Now I'm tempted to do one with my eyes closed (this should be interesting). |
| #61Nai_CalusOct 28, 2009 16:24:40 |
Well, the idea is pretty much that it doesn't. :P Danien is one of those guys. You know, the ones who think they're god's gift to women, but are in fact actually just obnoxious. |
| #62Mr_MiscellanyOct 28, 2009 18:05:57 | Confidence is often a good substitute for raw charisma. I'd wager a confident priest, drunkard though he may be, could seem attractive and even quite powerful to others who burry themselves in their cups. |
| #63NolwelenOct 28, 2009 18:38:48 |
AHA LOL, I see where this might have led. :D Cool idea anyway!
Hmm, through which attribute gets "confidence" expressed from your point of view? Wisdom? I never looked at it this way but it sounds interesting. For me "confidence" translates into "force of personality" which would be charisma driven. With charisma I didn't necessarily mean "charm". |
| #64Mr_MiscellanyOct 28, 2009 23:43:28 | Hmm, through which attribute gets "confidence" expressed from your point of view? Wisdom? I never looked at it this way but it sounds interesting. For me "confidence" translates into "force of personality" which would be charisma driven. With charisma I didn't necessarily mean "charm". Good question. For me confidence is something that has always had a split-personality (for me) as far as character attributes are concerned. I agree in that force of personality could easily be translated into the charisma attribute, because mighty Paladins, clerics and great warlords would draw upon such to lead and rally great armies against impossible foes. On the other hand, there are also characters of all classes who don't have great charisma scores but are willing to do things that other non-adventurers are not. Such characters are often fearless (synonymous with foolhardy and careless; we're talking adventurers after all ) and dedicated to a cause or set of ideals and so become noteworthy for their actions, which leads others to want to follow them or at least take head of their words and ideas. It's tricky because the game mechanics are there to simulate and streamline "real life", whereas good roleplayers and a willing DM can use the mechanics as a guideline but still let players move past them by delving deeply into social roleplaying opposite a large host of NPCs of all types. In the later scenario, it could easily be the lowly fighter with an 8 charisma (and not his majestic high-charisma Paladin, Cleric and/or Warlord companions) who commands the attention and loyalty of the city guard and its watch captains, because it was the fighter who grew up with and was conscripted along with many of the local villagers that form the city guard's ranks, who fought with them to defend the city from marauding orcs and worse in the past, who only recently joined the adventuring group he's a part of now and has since always urged his adventuring companions to "let the watch take these ruffians we've captured and administer the local lord's justice" because he retains an open loyalty to his former comrades in arms. The fighter's simple loyalty, then, commands more respect from a large group than a high charisma score on another character would earn. I like this later style of play, because it encourages players to see past their ability scores and to learn to work with their "lesser in certain abilities" companions to get things accomplished during play. My apologies for the long post, but I like this sort of topic. |
| #65sauntayaOct 29, 2009 16:15:33 |
This I aggree with. It's dependent on the situation. But my shaman is a far better healer than the cleric. This is all I'm saying. And I won't bring it up anymore since this is not a place to debate clerics LOL. And for those of you who keep taking it over. Why? I say have fun with what cha got. |
| #66The_SilverswordOct 29, 2009 16:52:24 |
You can bring it up again if you wish, things ussually get off topic fairly fast around here, and it is a class discussion so its not too far off topic. And as for people taking the test over again, I know! cheaters! I didnt yell at Delta though cause I wanted to see the Swordmage banner anyway and the guy who said he got Swordmage refused to post it (I dont think shes that bad lookin). And any way Delta did keep to his origianl Warlock choice. |
| #67sfdragonOct 29, 2009 16:53:08 | so how much of what class so far anyway?? |
| #68The_SilverswordOct 29, 2009 16:57:10 |
So far I believe its: 3 Rangers, 3 Avengers, 2 Rogues, 2 Wizards, 2 Warlocks, 2 Paladins a Cleric, Bard, Druid, Barbarian, Warlord, Shaman, Swordmage, Warden and an Artificer. |
| #69sfdragonOct 29, 2009 17:01:14 |
11 strikers think this adventuring company likes to srike fast and hit hard.... |
| #70The_SilverswordOct 29, 2009 17:17:36 |
Hells Yeah!! thats the way to do it! |
| #71darth_k-travaOct 29, 2009 19:51:48 | That's the best way to handle things!! Another Avenger here. |
| #72sfdragonOct 29, 2009 20:49:18 | 12 strikers then???
and yeah it is the best way to deal with things, strike fast and strike hard. |
| #73NolwelenOct 29, 2009 22:20:27 |
Well perhaps you don't socialize with the same kind of human beings as I do. One of my realizations I had during my life thus far is, that in fact confidence is completely unrelated to success. I have met a lot of people which had a tremendous amount of confidence into their unpresent abilities. On the other hand I learned to know a lot of people with many great traits and abilities with absolutely no confidence.
Well I might misunderstand you, but from what you are writting I got the impression that you are actually speaking about "courage". In the game mechanics being couragous or valorous gets expressed through the wisdom attribute what I deem to be fitting. I believe this isn't the same as confidence. Being confident lets you show up strong in a social encounter where no real dangers have to be overcome, if you have to muster "courage" to approach a woman for instance, you loose, even if you are able to muster a lot. It just will be perceived that you are afraid, why else would you need to muster up courage? And since there is no real reason to be afraid you will be rebuffed. On the other hand if there is a real thread and you do manage to act toward neutralizing the danger, others will not only not care if you have been afraid no, on the contrary they will even hold you in higher esteem if they recognized that you had been afraid but acted anyway. |
| #74The_SilverswordOct 30, 2009 0:38:18 |
4 Avengers! Avenger once again takes the lead as the most popular class. |
| #75darth_k-travaOct 30, 2009 18:40:12 |
By the tenets of 3e Torm, that's how one does it vs. evil. |
| #76sfdragonOct 30, 2009 19:42:47 | and by the tenets of selune and mieliki... its best done swiftly and quietly..... |
| #77TAFENERDNov 02, 2009 2:14:42 |
mine don't know how this happened |
| #78sfdragonNov 02, 2009 3:33:27 | 5 defenders now? |
| #79The_SilverswordNov 02, 2009 7:37:22 | Yup So we now got: 4 Avengers, 3 Rangers, 2 Rogues, 2 Swordmages, 2 Wizards, 2 Warlocks, 2 Paladins a Cleric, Bard, Druid, Barbarian, Warlord, Shaman, Warden and an Artificer. mine I hear ya, I was suprised on my result as well, I guess the test is not as blindingly obvious as some would have us believe |
| #80lord_raziereNov 02, 2009 9:37:44 |
huh, always thought myself more of a sorcerer type, oh well. |
| #81MownNov 02, 2009 9:45:38 | I followed the sidebars and ended up here. Know nothing about D&D in general, but I was bored. I ended up as a Druid. Maybe it's similar to my WoW shaman. No idea. |
| #82The_SilverswordNov 02, 2009 10:22:52 |
You Know nothing of D&D in general? Its only been around for like 35 years! The game is simple, Its like a Movie, and the Dungeon Master is like the director, the players are all characters, but they dont have scripts so ussualy they dont know whats going on. The DM sets the scene and the players decide what their characters are doing, You roll dice and add any bonuses you have to the roll to determine success or failure on various tasks such as combat, looking for traps, picking up chicks and/or guys at the bar or what have you. Im not real familiar with WoW, so Im not sure how Shamans are in it. Druids are all about nature and balance, in 4th edition D&D they focus more on shapeshifting into animals. |
| #83MownNov 02, 2009 11:15:30 | Well, I know it's a RPG. I think it's one of those pen and paper stuff-things. Meh. And the WoW shaman is more spiritual. Getting attuned with the Spirits of certain elements, etc. Although there's a Druid class in there aswell, who seems to fit your description. Shapeshifting etc. |
| #84The_SilverswordNov 02, 2009 11:25:31 |
Yup one of those pen and paper stuff-things. I have alot of friends who are into WoW and other MMO games. They constantly try to get me into it but i prefer the old pen and paper style. I call it real life D&D, even though were not dressing up and everything, I just feel more of a camaraderie when were all in the same room playing some D&D, nothing against online games, just my own preference. |
| #85sfdragonNov 02, 2009 17:29:17 | 4 Avengers, 3 Rangers, 2 Rogues, 2 Swordmages, 3 Wizards, 2 Warlocks, 2 Paladins a Cleric, Bard,
12 strikers
|
| #86ellorinNov 02, 2009 17:33:55 |
|
| #87sfdragonNov 02, 2009 20:16:51 | 4 Avengers, 3 Rangers, 2 Rogues, 2 Swordmages, 3 Wizards, 2 Warlocks, 2 Paladins a Cleric,2 Bard,
12 strikers |
| #88sauntayaNov 02, 2009 23:05:22 | Ok I took the test. What was the point? What are you trying to accomplish here. I read something about a party of adventurers. Was this just to see what would come up? |
| #89sfdragonNov 03, 2009 0:11:15 | Silversword is looking for an adventuring company to assualt the city of shade' supply line to sembia
he has to destroy them, so its the ecomony |
| #90The_SilverswordNov 03, 2009 2:43:06 |
I was just curious what everyone else would come out as, It came up in another thread but i didnt want to turn that thread into a what class are you thread so this one was born. Also discussions have sprung up about classes and whether or not clerics suck. So its a just for fun sort of thread. As for the remarks to an adventuring party im just saying we got a good mix of results and we would make a hell of an adventuring party. |
| #91The_SilverswordNov 03, 2009 2:44:15 |
I thought we agreed we wouldnt say that? Now no one will want to sign up! |
| #92sfdragonNov 03, 2009 3:29:53 | the agreement was not to mention directly assualting the city of shade.... all I said was their supply line.... |
| #93Doombringer_of_HoarNov 03, 2009 4:09:57 | Take down the Princes of Shade? By Almighty Hoar! I'm all for that. |
| #9418DELTANov 03, 2009 8:49:28 | You guys better pack a lunch... |
| #95StiggerNov 03, 2009 9:16:48 | And maybe a snack or two... |
| #9618DELTANov 03, 2009 9:20:23 | ...or three, and let us know how it goes for ya... |
| #97The_SilverswordNov 03, 2009 14:51:57 | What!? Are our Warlocks bailing on us? |
| #98sfdragonNov 03, 2009 15:18:30 | we only had two to begin with |
| #99LordManshoonNov 03, 2009 16:00:07 | *glances at Stigger and Delta* You two don't want to join in? Hell, I'm only sending my grunts to serve as cannon fodder, but at least I'm contributing. Do neither of you have minions of your own? Stigger, you live in California. Aren't there an abundance of hippies which can be sent to their deaths? |
| #100pamelaNov 03, 2009 16:03:53 | No! Leave the hippies alone! Use beach bimbos and celebrities who resort to reality tv! |
| #101LordManshoonNov 03, 2009 16:17:22 |
Hippies are the center vanguard. Bimbos and worthless celebs (i.e. most of them) can take the right and left flanks. That is, if Stigger wishes to see Netheril defeated... |
| #102The_SilverswordNov 03, 2009 16:31:13 | Well at least I have some support here. Im not too sure about the hippies though, I dont see them being effective fighters, but still, we tell them its a peace march or a rally or something, and they would make excellent cover. |
| #103LordManshoonNov 03, 2009 16:33:02 |
I figure they'd have levels in Druid or Shaman, myself (maybe Warden). And they're cannon fodder; as long as they distract the Shadovar and allow you to sneak in undetected, their deaths will not be in vain. |
| #104windmanNov 03, 2009 23:09:02 |
|
| #105StiggerNov 04, 2009 0:43:18 | Netheril was over before it even began, it just isn't smart enough to realize it yet. As to reinforcements, you can have all the hippies you like, it'll take that much more strain off of the younger generations if they aren't around to suck up even more resources than they already have from the rest of us... obviously I'm not a big booster of geriatric care or medicine... Hells, take whoever you want really, I don't care either way. Just leave me a note of their names so I can mark them off my list of people I need to end at some point. |
| #106Fox_ReeveheartNov 04, 2009 0:52:26 |
Let me reiterate, this is not the first "What class are you?" thread on these forums? I've taken this test two times maybe about a month a part and got the same answer both times after answering truthfully (go ahead and look for those other threads, you should find me there somewhere in one of them). I even had the result of my warden as my sig pic. But then wotc temporarily took down pics in sigs, I just haven't brought him back since on my signature. |
| #107StiggerNov 04, 2009 1:06:35 | Meh, just swat him with a rolled up newspaper when he gets annoying... I know I do. |
| #108BluenoseNov 04, 2009 8:52:53 |
Not entirely unexpected, given the type of characters I've always preferred to play. |
| #109The_SilverswordNov 04, 2009 12:43:18 |
Hey Hey I believe you! I got you down as a Warden. Put the rolled up newspaper down. And rock on we got another Barbarian and Warlord. Kick A$$!!! So we now stand at : 4 Avengers, 3 Rangers, 3 Wizards 2 Barbarians, 2 Rogues, 2 Swordmages, , 2 Warlords, 2 Warlocks, 2 Paladins, 2 Bards, 2 Druids a Cleric, Shaman, Warden and an Artificer. |
| #110KnoNov 04, 2009 15:49:46 | Atrifisher i've no class |
| #111lord_raziereNov 04, 2009 17:56:39 | I tried it again.
this time it was Sorcerer, like I wanted it to be. |
| #112addle-cove-anarchistNov 06, 2009 9:13:57 | barbar |
| #113The_SilverswordNov 06, 2009 16:19:48 |
Im confused. Are you an Artifisher or are you goin with no class? No class? would that make you a minion?
Hey! thats cheating! Now everyone will want to Multi-Class.
And yes! We are well on our way to getting a barbaric horde! |
| #114sfdragonNov 06, 2009 19:41:59 | and how much of the main group do we have now including the minions?? |
| #115The_SilverswordNov 06, 2009 20:55:22 | Well we have at least 3 that arent directly assaulting the City of Shade er I mean the supply line but are supplying Minions. So we have everybody else and possibly another Artificer, and minions, lots of minions. |
| #116Doombringer_of_HoarNov 09, 2009 3:15:15 | I took it again too, ended up with the same thing, go figure. |
| #117merrikcaleNov 10, 2009 14:05:23 | I am shaman |
| #118The_SilverswordNov 10, 2009 18:11:30 |
Yes! Another Healer. |
| #119sfdragonNov 10, 2009 18:45:41 | thats two shamans now right?? |
| #120The_SilverswordNov 10, 2009 20:27:43 | Yup So we now stand at : 4 Avengers, 3 Rangers, 3 Wizards 3 Barbarians, 2 Rogues, 2 Swordmages, 2 Warlords, 2 Warlocks, 2 Paladins, 2 Bards, 2 Druids, 2 Shamans, a Cleric, Warden, Artificer and an Artifisher. |
| #121SmartPaladinMar 03, 2010 3:27:56 | No brainer.
|
| #122The_SilverswordMar 03, 2010 4:33:40 | Holy $@*#! The Hand of Hoar has returned! |
| #123Doombringer_of_HoarMar 03, 2010 6:29:42 | Did somebody say Hoar? |
| #124SmartPaladinMar 03, 2010 22:11:56 |
What can I say, I missed everyone. It warms my heart to see more interest in Hoar. |
| #12518DELTAMar 07, 2010 0:19:35 | Now I am a Wizard!![]() |