| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Khelben7May 21, 2009 8:11:16 | Where's Ed Greenwood these days? I was surprised to see that his name wasn't on the new FR sourcebooks. -Khelben |
| #2iakhovasMay 21, 2009 9:31:05 | Where's Ed Greenwood these days? I was surprised to see that his name wasn't on the new FR sourcebooks. Check again. His name is on the cover of the new Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide! ![]() He is also writing a new monthly series of articles for D&D Insider which I believe start next month. |
| #3lord_karsusMay 21, 2009 13:01:41 | Where's Ed Greenwood these days? I was surprised to see that his name wasn't on the new FR sourcebooks. -He's a normal person, living a normal life. He can be reached for questioning and such HERE. |
| #4StiggerMay 21, 2009 13:57:35 | Name's on some new novels as well... Ed Greenwood Presents, or something like that. Struck me as kind of an odd thing to do since it didn't look like he did any writing on them, but its not like I pay much attention to the novels anyway. |
| #5Khelben7May 21, 2009 14:26:26 | Check again. His name is on the cover of the new Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide! My bad. I'll be looking forward to his articles. ![]() |
| #6zsychMay 21, 2009 14:38:19 | LK, I recall there was a compilation of Ed's questions and answers someplace. Do you know where that is? (not talking about the vast Candlekeep threads.. talking about something you can search in :P ) |
| #7lord_karsusMay 21, 2009 17:24:13 | -There are indexed and compiled lists of his responses from Candlekeep, found at Candlekeep, that can be searched using CTRL + F. I don't go to Candlekeep, though, so I don't know how updated it all is, or anything. HERE. |
| #8iakhovasMay 21, 2009 17:49:28 | Name's on some new novels as well... Ed Greenwood Presents, or something like that. Struck me as kind of an odd thing to do since it didn't look like he did any writing on them, but its not like I pay much attention to the novels anyway. The series is called "Ed Greenwood presents Waterdeep" because Ed wrote the 100 page story bible for Waterdeep which the novelists used as a basis for their writing. I used the same document when writing the Waterdeep chapter in the FRCG. It's my understanding that Ed also reviews each novel, serving as a continuity editor in some fashion, but Erik Scott de Bie or other author would know more about that than I. |
| #9StiggerMay 21, 2009 18:24:36 | Well, if I'm gonna believe that one, you should post a hundred pages or so of excepts for us to peruse, so we don't just have to take your word for it... ![]() :evillaugh :D |
| #10the_orconianMay 21, 2009 22:44:14 | Ed Greenwood is also producing material at this time for four other sattings, three his own (two of which are D20 game-settings, IIRC), and also work on Golarion - the rich and incredibly detailed world put-out by Paizo. FR appears to have lost some of it's luster. |
| #11Khelben7May 22, 2009 3:32:15 | FR appears to have lost some of it's luster. 'Cause Ed's missing.... ![]() |
| #12Khelben7May 22, 2009 3:33:16 | -There are indexed and compiled lists of his responses from Candlekeep, found at Candlekeep, that can be searched using CTRL + F. I don't go to Candlekeep, though, so I don't know how updated it all is, or anything. HERE. Last one is from march 08. Is this because the Compilation is behind? |
| #13drizztsmanchildMay 22, 2009 4:44:43 | No, He still answers questions over at Candlekeep Forums. And pretty recently (like yesterday) plus to let you know he was just released from the hospital (nothing serious according to the lovely. Lady THO.) If you have a question for Ed I would suggest posting it uover there Because he does answer them there![]() |
| #14lord_karsusMay 22, 2009 7:51:00 | -Like I said, I don't go there, I don't know. Inquire there, I guess. They'd know those things, not me. |
| #15nightseerMay 22, 2009 8:15:04 | I need to check Candlekeep out. I got a copy of Castlemourn and The Paizo Setting, so what is the 3rd setting he is working on? |
| #16drizztsmanchildMay 22, 2009 9:21:18 | Nightseer, IDK but it may be Falconfar(,?,) the two new novels that are out. But my advice is to go over to Candlekeep and look under "Chamber of Sages" Ed's forum is the first or second one. Trust me you'll be there awhile there's already 60 pages from this year alone plus a lot of other forums from years past as well. And some other authors in that forum. Like Elaine Cunningham etc.. To LK and the ORC's I hope this isn't stepping on anyones toes by recommending another Forum site other than WotC's. ![]() |
| #17StiggerMay 22, 2009 9:43:14 | Oh c'mon... LK's been known to act as Town Cryer for the Realmsvault here, so I doubt he'll be upset if you give CK a recommend. ;) |
| #18MattDrozMay 22, 2009 11:06:39 | -Like I said, I don't go there, I don't know. Inquire there, I guess. They'd know those things, not me. Come now, LK. Just because you haven't posted there since February doesn't mean you don't know anything about the site... |
| #19the_orconianMay 22, 2009 11:17:29 | I need to check Candlekeep out. Falconfar is his novel-setting, and he is working-on releasing another game-setting of his own called Embersea, which is way behind schedule because the man is so incredibly busy. |
| #20lord_karsusMay 22, 2009 14:15:49 | Come now, LK. Just because you haven't posted there since February doesn't mean you don't know anything about the site... -I never went there on any regular basis, I haven't been there in months, and I was never "in the loop". The questions that Khelben was asking, I can't answer. |
| #21nightseerMay 23, 2009 4:05:33 | I really enjoy Ed's non-realms novels. Falconfar was very good. So I knew about that. I didnt know about Embersea. So what is up with Embersea? Joined Candlekeep, good Night Lady Shar...that place is a Realmslore Feast! I just got lost over there using the search function. ![]() |
| #22markustay63May 24, 2009 10:44:08 | Ed cannot tell us what it is about yet (NDA's), but he has had some sort of deal with a publisher for about two year or so. The name of the publisher can be found over on Ed's thread at CK (I don't feel like diggin' it up). THO has told us a teensy-tiny bit - it is a massive chain of Islands, some of which are quite large, but most are small. It sounds to me like Earthsea, and it appears to be designed for nautically-based campaigning. Some at CK have theorized that Embersea is really Ed's Anchorome re-named, but we'll never know, because it would b imprudent of Ed to admit that (since Hasbro owns anything Ed has concerning his FR). So if it comes out, just ignore all the 'Returned Abeir' foolishness and insert Embersea to the west of Evermeet - its all good. ![]() |
| #23lord_karsusMay 26, 2009 21:09:16 | -He could take one of those portals that exist in his house to go to Faerûn, and then from there, take one of those portals that exist in Faerûn that return to Earth, but in an earlier point in time, to a time before he signed those agreements, and then...![]() ![]() |
| #24MattDrozMay 26, 2009 23:58:35 | Part 1 of a 4-part interview with Ed is up over on Kobold Quarterly. |
| #25lord_karsusMay 27, 2009 9:22:44 | -And, it's free. |
| #26erikscottdebie_dupMay 27, 2009 9:50:55 | Paging esdb . . . planar binding in progress . . . you are now being summoned to . . .The series is called "Ed Greenwood presents Waterdeep" because Ed wrote the 100 page story bible for Waterdeep which the novelists used as a basis for their writing. I used the same document when writing the Waterdeep chapter in the FRCG. It's my understanding that Ed also reviews each novel, serving as a continuity editor in some fashion, but Erik Scott de Bie or other author would know more about that than I. Ah yes! Ed was indeed one of the two editors for every book in this series (6 announced thus far--maybe there will be more). We receive both his comments and our WotC editor's comments. Ed and I in particular traded a number of emails about such delightful subjects as swearing, magic, and broth--I mean festhalls. ![]() Well, if I'm gonna believe that one, you should post a hundred pages or so of excepts for us to peruse, so we don't just have to take your word for it... I'm sure Iakhovas would love to do that (as would I), but unfortunately that particular document is clad in a fearsome NDA and must remain anonymous . . . though the novels and sourcebooks use it very extensively. I personally thought the FRCG did a good job with adapting Ed's 100ish pages on Waterdeep into a short, concise summary. (Well done!) For now, I can only recommend checking out the Ed Presents Waterdeep novels (each one of which has sample chapters for your reading pleasure) to garner what tidbits you can get there. Steve's Blackstaff Tower appears to have been written alongside Ed's compilation of the bible, so it is spot on, and Mistshore does extremely well in adapting the bits Ed put in about that area (it's left pretty broad, and Jaleigh really hit one out of the park with her delve, IMO). My Downshadow just came out last month, and Rosemary's City of the Dead is due out in a week or two . . . (and trust me, it's going to be awesome!) 'Cause Ed's missing.... I think that's clearly, demonstrably *not* the case (for all the reasons noted above: how he wrote half the FRCG, led the charge on six novels, is producing a monthly article series, and continues to churn out the Realmslore over at CK), but I can see how things are confusing. You'd think he'd be listed first on the FRCG, but it seems they went with alphabetical, so . . . On the upside, that means my name will usually be first on sourcebooks I help write . . . assuming I can avoid my arch-alphabetical-nemesis Bruce Cordell. ![]() (j/k BC--lotsa love!) So if it comes out, just ignore all the 'Returned Abeir' foolishness and insert Embersea to the west of Evermeet - its all good. Not to pick on MT or anything, but I just wanted to point out the inherent irony of this, considering Ed was the author of the entire Returned Abeir section in the FRCG. (And it shows.) Cheers |
| #27StiggerMay 27, 2009 16:39:05 | Hey, don't remind him of that NDA, we might get him to forget it and have him sneak it to us in his tweets. :P :D |
| #28markustay63May 27, 2009 22:03:41 | Not to pick on MT or anything, but I just wanted to point out the inherent irony of this, considering Ed was the author of the entire Returned Abeir section in the FRCG. (And it shows.) Well, like so many others who have read the FRCG and don't plan on using the 4e setting, I will admit it was certainly the most entertaining and 'Realmsish' portion of the book. What I meant was the whole concept of Returned Abeir (and the Abeir vs Toril thing) - I just find the 'duel world' thing so... inappropriate... for the Realms. I have no problem with Ed's writing - its the subject matter I find objectionable. And to prove my point - the Returned Abeir Map was the ONLY 4e map I have done... because I wanted people to take more of an interest in it (despite my own personal feelings on the matter). |
| #29Dark_Wizard_02May 29, 2009 22:59:37 | How big is Returned Abeir relative to Faerun? |
| #30Khelben7May 30, 2009 2:28:01 | The series is called "Ed Greenwood presents Waterdeep" because Ed wrote the 100 page story bible for Waterdeep which the novelists used as a basis for their writing. Where can I find the 100 pages? ![]() |
| #31lord_karsusMay 30, 2009 10:10:29 | How big is Returned Abeir relative to Faerun? -It's smaller than Maztica was, I know that much. Where can I find the 100 pages? -At Ed Greenwood's house, for one place. That's isn't 'public knowledge', though. |
| #32markustay63May 30, 2009 12:42:06 | Well, Ed's convelesing ATM, so if we get Rinon and Therise to sneak into his bedroom and tickle him, we could probably grab those hundred pages and run! :D How big is Returned Abeir relative to Faerun? Well, I did a mock-up for some folks who wanted to use it without losing Maztica, and also making it more convenient for Faerûnians to access. The alternate Laerakond Placement (made primarilly with 3e in mind). Note that although that is FAR from anything official, the sizes are exact; ergo, you can see exaclty the relative sizes of both landmasses. Evermeet, on the other hand, is a wee bit bigger then it should be... Not sure now why I did that... ![]() Nimbral also grew by about the same amount (its size is correct, relative to Evermeet only). Looking at the map right now, I'd say both those Island increased by about 15-20%. Anyhow, the size relationship between Faerûn and Laerakond is accurate. |
| #33redglacierMay 30, 2009 13:05:44 | How big is Returned Abeir relative to Faerun? This map of an alternate Laerakond placement is probably to scale, given the care Markus puts into making his maps. Edit: Darn, beat to the punch by the man himself. Neat! ![]() |
| #34Dark_Wizard_02May 30, 2009 18:28:26 | Thanks MarkusTay and RedGlacier. It seemed smallish even from the map of Returned Abeir alone. It's barely bigger than two average regions of Faerun. So Laerakond replaced Maztica, which wasn't the entire continent to the west anyway, more like a large region itself. What of "Katashaka," the African style continent to the south of Maztica, or "Anchorome" to the north? Laerakond doesn't nearly have the land mass to cover those areas. So are they still there or are we staring at open ocean where those continents once sat? |
| #35markustay63May 30, 2009 23:52:26 | This is what it should look like now. Ignore the weird terrain in Katashaka - that was just some stuff I roughed-in awhile back to get some layout idea. Note that not only is all of Katashaka and Anchorome intact, but a piece of Maztica (Lopango) is as well. Brian James had yet-another layout - according to the FRCG, its supposed to be off the coast of Evermeet, making it much further north. More 4eFR contradictions - it appears no-one designing the new setting had any cluee about geography. If anything, they should have made Returned Abeir at least a third bigger then it is. As it stands, it's not really much more then a very large island (and Toril has at least three islands bigger then it). |
| #36Dark_Wizard_02May 31, 2009 0:33:02 | Thanks a bunch MT. That gives a good feel for where Laerakond is and how everything looks as a whole. It does 'neatly' (and I do use the term loosely) fit in where Maztica was. This really doesn't explain why they couldn't just overlay Abeir over Maztica like they did all the other land substitutes. Oddly enough Tymanther is from Laerakond. I just though we'd get more Abeiran variety. |
| #37markustay63May 31, 2009 7:06:33 | Are you sure about that? ![]() I know Tymanther was part of Abeir, but not Returned Abeir (more confusion). If Tymanther came from Laerakond, then where was it? Shouldn't there be an empty spot, or a place where something Faerûnian was 'swapped-in'? That would make very little sense if it came from the same continent as the other stuff. ![]() |
| #38lord_karsusMay 31, 2009 10:04:04 | I know Tymanther was part of Abeir, but not Returned Abeir (more confusion). -Technically, it would be. If "Returned Abeir" is called "Returned Abeir" because it is a part of "Abeir" that has returned, and Tymanther was a part of "Abeir" that has since returned, it too would be "Returned Abeir". In a roundabout way, of course. |
| #39markustay63May 31, 2009 14:07:54 | Which is why not including a real name for 'Returned Abeir' in the FRCG was just bad design. Then again, the whole 'twin world' thing was poor design. The same exact thing could have been done simply by saying places on Toril were swapped with other worlds, and each region could have had different origins, and Maztica could have gotten an overhaul without all the 'musical continents' going on. But we've beaten this dead horse into sub-atomic particles already... |
| #40Dark_Wizard_02May 31, 2009 14:57:18 | I'm not absolutely sure since my source is the Forgotten Realms Wiki, a secondary source at best. http://forgottenrealms.wikia.com/wiki/Returned_Abeir I used it to get a quick summary of Returned Abeir. The paragraph on Skelkor notes this: "Some two hundred years before the Spellplague, a rebel group of dragonborn managed to seize a portion of western Skelkor and hold it until the plague ripped their kingdom of Tymanchebar from Abeir and literally dropped it on Unther in Toril. The survivors founded the kingdom of Tymanther. Tymanchebar occupied a portion of what is now the Dragon Sea." On MT's improved map of Laerakond, there is a bit of land on the western coast of Skelkor named Fallen Tymanchebar. Everything seems like it fits. The FRCG has the actual info. I don't have access to that book at this time. |
| #41markustay63May 31, 2009 15:04:09 | Old Age will do that. I've already forgotten all the research I did for that map. :embarrass |
| #42nightseerMay 31, 2009 20:27:51 | Heck, slap Castlemourn down in the Realms too. :evillaugh ![]() |
| #43Dark_Wizard_02May 31, 2009 21:12:00 | Yeah, it was designed to be a drop in sub-setting. Did Ed every say what would be a good place for Castlemorn in the Realms? With the whole Abeir thing, it's not inconceivable that pieces from elsewhere were transported in. |
| #44lord_karsusMay 31, 2009 22:02:35 | "Some two hundred years before the Spellplague, a rebel group of dragonborn managed to seize a portion of western Skelkor and hold it until the plague ripped their kingdom of Tymanchebar from Abeir and literally dropped it on Unther in Toril. The survivors founded the kingdom of Tymanther. Tymanchebar occupied a portion of what is now the Dragon Sea." -Yeah, so it's still "returning" from "Abeir". -But, yeah, like MT said: Whatever. |
| #45old_sageJun 06, 2009 9:51:18 | Yeah, it was designed to be a drop in sub-setting. For legal reasons, CASTLEMOURN and the Realms will always be presented as completely separate settings. As anyone who’s talked with Ed knows, Ed has always linked multiple worlds with gates [D&D 3e “portals”], and there’s no reason any DM can’t do the same thing. Did Ed every say what would be a good place for Castlemorn in the Realms? Sort of. From THO:- "Ed has in the past said Castlemourn could be used as "another continent" in the Realms, for those who want to do so, but it's changed from his non-game-system-or-edition-specific, pure-lore game setting into a d20 setting. However, any DM can still use it with the Realms. As Ed's quote in the press release alludes, it has the same essential "magic" as the Realms: it feels like a real, living place." ... "The physical setting of Castlemourn is geographically isolated: a long coastal band of countries hemmed in on three sides by mountain ranges. On the fourth side, those ranges arc out into the sea to form a string of islands that shelter a bay. Treacherous shoals, currents, and mists imperil sailing “along the coast” off the map (and the only feature known to be “out there” in one direction is a fell city of wizards. So this could be placed on any temperate-clime seacoast, and MIGHT (if a DM wished to do so) be put “on the other side of the globe” that holds Faerûn, in one of the seven continents Ed placed there (WotC published far different ones in the FR Atlas without Ed’s approval). It also works as a self-contained, standalone setting." |
| #46nightseerJun 06, 2009 16:22:26 | Here is some great pre-plague stuff. If you want to use it. Straight from the current Ed scroll at candlekeep. ;) Originally posted by The Hooded One |