Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 jlok Mar 01, 2011 22:07:38	i tried a quick search of the forum, but I could not find any explanation for all the monsters w/o art for this expansion. for famine in far-go it was one monster, but now i am the proud owner of twenty something pogs without art on them really. does anyone know why this happened or if they are going to fix this? i like the game, but what the heck?
#2 miniaturegeek Mar 02, 2011 8:10:25	Yeah I was really dissappointed by that as well, couldn't they have just used previous art of other monsters, tweaked them a bit and used them?  I was highly discouraged by that.
#3 opskt Mar 06, 2011 13:03:04	So, the tokens in FiFG LoG are un-illustrated, like the tokens used for Encounters?
#4 KJordan Mar 06, 2011 14:28:32	So, the toekns in FiFG are un-illustrated, like the tokens used for Encounters?  Um, I'm gonna assume you meant Legion of Gold instead of Famine in Far-Go. . . many of the creatures do have tokens, but quite a few do not. In the cases where specific creature art is not provided, tokens with the outline of the creature type (essentially the size depictions on the bottom of the standard creature illustrations) are included. I like them better than Monster #1, Monster #2, etc. tokens from D&D Encounters, but they are definitely generic representations instead of monster specific representations. Kerry
#5 opskt Mar 06, 2011 19:25:40	So, the toekns in FiFG are un-illustrated, like the tokens used for Encounters?  Um, I'm gonna assume you meant Legion of Gold instead of Famine in Far-Go. . . many of the creatures do have tokens, but quite a few do not. In the cases where specific creature art is not provided, tokens with the outline of the creature type (essentially the size depictions on the bottom of the standard creature illustrations) are included. I like them better than Monster #1, Monster #2, etc. tokens from D&D Encounters, but they are definitely generic representations instead of monster specific representations. Kerry Err, yes.  And thank you for answering.
#6 strand0 Mar 07, 2011 3:37:15	Guess that just proves that there wont be anymore Gamma World, and they didn't plan on finishing on a high note either. Makes sense... they were just experimenting with several ideas. Alternate "complatable" setting. Card bases mechanic. Boxes. Smaller books. Mini-series game release.
#7 FlashbackJon Mar 07, 2011 13:18:50	The artist did roughly the same number of pieces for each book, with roughly the same number of creatures per piece.  That seems like a reasonable enough explanation for me.  In fact, from that perspective, one could consider all those monsters without art to simply be a bonus!
#8 Oraibi Mar 07, 2011 18:05:43	I think they finished on a high note. To be honest, the "generic" tokens are more useful.