| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1flimflamOct 18, 2008 7:23:36 | I was watching the movie Serenity the other day, and near the end of the movie there is a scene where Malcom Reynolds faces off against The Operative. He ends up "stunning" The Operative and dislocating his shoulders, preventing him from retailiating. Then, he goes into monologue (as one would expect ). And I was thinking, you'd never be able to pull something like this off in D&D because the players would always want to take advantage of their stunned opponent and just attack them, screw any monologue!4E seems to be very focused on combat, with little encouragement or focus on roleplay. Just look at the powers, 95% of them are combat related. So I had this idea the other day. Have an additional category for Roleplay Powers. Make it seperate so that you don't take anything away from players who want to pick combat-related powers. Here is an example of what I was thinking of.
|
| #2MalarkyOct 19, 2008 18:21:09 | I like it BUT its makeing roleplay a bit mechanical, and its similar to making a bloodied enemry surrender with intimidate... and i need to watch serinity again ... maybe you should be able to make people surrender with any social skill diplomacy or bluff maybe that would decreace intimerdates powers |
| #3Bobfred21Oct 19, 2008 18:59:22 | I don't see why you need mechanics for this. If one of my player wants to go on a little monalogue while his opponent is stunned I just let them, it's part of the fun, no need to make rules about it. |
| #4Crimson_ConcertoOct 19, 2008 19:09:33 | Speaking is a free action. :P So yeah, your idea is kind of unnecessary. Also, there's a reason that there are few mechanics for role-playing; it's just a bad idea in general. The game should not tell me or my group how to role play. We will role play the way we want to, and we don't need special mechanics to role play well. So go ahead and let your players engage their opponents in dramatic dialogue, but there's absolutely no need for it to exist mechanically or impact mechanics at all. |
| #5fragsieOct 20, 2008 11:11:03 | I agree that there should be no set mechanics that define RP, a group should RP to make the game fun rather than mechanical. But there are some players who find it difficult (or even get embaressd), and i have a couple of those in my group. To encourage Roleplay in my group i have implemented a reward system, whereby if a player does some amazing roleplay, or gives a heartfelt monologue, or bring up their characters history/background when it's relevant, I give them an RP token (a red poker chip!). They can use these chips one of two ways; Spend 1 chip for a +2 to attack or damage for one attack (only one token per round), or, exchange 5 tokens for an action point. This may, on the face of it, appear a bit powerful, but im pretty stingy with handing them out. I have noticed a big improvement in the groups efforts to roleplay. |
| #6mrparadigmOct 28, 2008 15:48:59 | Anybody ever play West End's TORG? They had a deck of plot device cards that could be brought into play, including the monologue card. It was fun, as long a the player kept talking, the enemy NPCs couldn't act. It made for a fun encounter. Example: My party and I were try to escape a group of Ninjas in a 1930s-era seaplane. The start up time on the plane was something like four minutes...we would have been toast. I dropped the Monologue card, and rampled on about how, as a 1940s pulp-hero sidekick, the only thing that had been going well for me in the present was finding out that you can get pre-mixed cherry coke in shatter-proof bottles (perfect for you utility belt, if you don't mind the fizz!) That game session was fourteen years ago, and I still laugh about it. ![]() |