Double-Mace - Downloaded from the Wizards Community, all coding removed by Solauren

Double-Mace

Post/Author/DateTime Post
#1
Sundracon
Dec 31, 2008 19:25:06 I have a fighter that wanted to use a quarterstaff. My proposal is that with the Staff Fighting feat, the quarterstaff also counts both ends as a mace to make it more viable for fighter powers.

This is something I convinced my GM to do and was wondering what everyone thought...
#2
Goober4473
Jan 01, 2009 2:40:09 I'd allow it.
#3
reginhild
Jan 02, 2009 11:13:07 I find the whole double ended weapon stuff fairly silly. In truth, you would be at more of a disadvantage trying to use a double ended weapon when fighting. I think they should possibly be reserved for use only with high combined strength and dexterity to still fit in the fantasy world theme. In any event, they should not be better in effect than weilding two separate weapons.
#4
nightwalker450
Jan 02, 2009 12:18:04 My group uses this exact same houserule, and actually I had designed the feat before the Staff Fighting feat came out.

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 Sundracon Dec 31, 2008 19:25:06	I have a fighter that wanted to use a quarterstaff. My proposal is that with the Staff Fighting feat, the quarterstaff also counts both ends as a mace to make it more viable for fighter powers. This is something I convinced my GM to do and was wondering what everyone thought...
#2 Goober4473 Jan 01, 2009 2:40:09	I'd allow it.
#3 reginhild Jan 02, 2009 11:13:07	I find the whole double ended weapon stuff fairly silly. In truth, you would be at more of a disadvantage trying to use a double ended weapon when fighting. I think they should possibly be reserved for use only with high combined strength and dexterity to still fit in the fantasy world theme. In any event, they should not be better in effect than weilding two separate weapons.
#4 nightwalker450 Jan 02, 2009 12:18:04	My group uses this exact same houserule, and actually I had designed the feat before the Staff Fighting feat came out.