| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1DanHMay 13, 2010 15:39:32 | The gold/more gold options in the bundles are 2200/2100 pgs 39-40. This is a P2 mod, shouldn't these be 6000/6500? Those are the rewards in Core 2-3, the only other non-special P2 mod available. Dan |
| #2gomeztooMay 14, 2010 2:37:52 | I accidentally put P1 gold amounts in the adventure. P2 gold should be 2200/3300 for low tier, 6000/6500 for high tier. I passed it to Pieter, hopefully it will be fixed in an update. Gomez |
| #3bgibbonsMay 14, 2010 10:58:03 | I accidentally put P1 gold amounts in the adventure. That isn't the only one that needs to be fixed. Unless new versions have been released when I wasn't looking, DALE2-1 also needs its 'more gold' amounts corrected, as does DRAG1-6 and IMPI1-6 |
| #4gomeztooMay 15, 2010 15:06:18 | more gold options for high tier should be: DALE2-1: 250 gp DRAG1-6: 500 gp IMPI1-6: 2100 gp |
| #5chadleyMay 17, 2010 11:23:44 | IMPI1-6: 2100 gp This doesn't seem like the right correction for IMPI1-6, to my quick reading. It looks like my copy of IMPI1-6 was printed with P2 template for Consumable plus Gold and More Gold both. Can you confirm that it should have the standard P1 Consumable plus Gold and More Gold options? Thanks! |
| #6Keith53May 17, 2010 17:10:50 | There should not have been any P2 adventures before the 2-1s, or something was messed up. Keith |
| #7gomeztooMay 18, 2010 7:51:35 | IMPI1-6: 2100 gp |
| #8chadleyMay 18, 2010 10:20:06 | I wasn't saying that the printed IMPI1-6 was correct, but rather that the error isn't constrained entirely to More Gold at high tier. The `Consumable plus Gold' option in IMPI1-6 is Potion of Vitality (cost 1000gp) plus 1100gp/2000gp. The `More Gold' option in IMPI1-6 is `2100gp/3000gp'. These all seem wrong. They should say (to follow the norms): `Potion of Vitality plus 300gp/1100gp', and `1300gp/2100gp', respectively. |
| #9gomeztooMay 18, 2010 13:48:59 | Ah I see. yes, that would be correct. |
| #10Madfox11May 24, 2010 3:38:37 | I started an errata thread here: community.wizards.com/lfr/go/thread/view... |