| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1puggle_halfwineMar 29, 2009 10:10:46 | I'm sold on the idea of a wildshape-based, razorclaw shifter druid (a build I imagine will be kinda popular). The first in my barrage of questions fires thusly- can you speak in wildshape form? Edit: Secondly, can you remain permanently wildshaped? |
| #2Jay_Ibero_911Mar 29, 2009 17:25:28 | I'm sold on the idea of a wildshape-based, razorclaw shifter druid (a build I imagine will be kinda popular). The first in my barrage of questions fires thusly- can you speak in wildshape form? To answer your second question first, Wild Shape is an at will ability, and you remain in beast form until you spend the action to revert to humanoid form, so you can remain in beast form indefinately. As far as how practical this is is another matter. As far as speaking, there is nothing in the Wild Shape power or the polymorph keyword description that says you lose the ability to speak, so therefore by default you retain the ability to speak while wildshaped. |
| #3_Mithreinmaethor_Mar 29, 2009 18:47:44 | I'm sold on the idea of a wildshape-based, razorclaw shifter druid (a build I imagine will be kinda popular). The first in my barrage of questions fires thusly- can you speak in wildshape form? Unfortunately the Razorclaw Shifters racial power will do you no good in shifted form since it effects melee weapons only. But a Druid always in shifted form will be popular. I made a Longtooth Shifter Druid that stays in beast form all the time (their racial power will work in beast form unlike their Razorclaw cousins) |
| #4booleanMar 29, 2009 22:36:20 | Unfortunately the Razorclaw Shifters racial power will do you no good in shifted form since it effects melee weapons only. The racial power (bonus to speed, AC, and Ref) works fine. The Razorclaw specific feat is the part that doesn't work. |
| #5Dragon9Mar 30, 2009 7:45:13 | Just remember the wise words of Qui-gon Jinn: "Just because you can speak doesn't make you intelligent." ![]() |
| #6arvagorMar 30, 2009 13:42:29 | The racial power (bonus to speed, AC, and Ref) works fine. The Razorclaw specific feat is the part that doesn't work. Not to mention never being able to don magic items, nor being able to access your pack or wondrous items... |
| #7_Mithreinmaethor_Mar 30, 2009 19:46:58 | Not to mention never being able to don magic items, nor being able to access your pack or wondrous items... People have packs and wondrous items? |
| #8_Mithreinmaethor_Mar 30, 2009 19:47:44 | The racial power (bonus to speed, AC, and Ref) works fine. The Razorclaw specific feat is the part that doesn't work. Sorry yeah its the feat that is the problem. |
| #9redwulfeMar 31, 2009 2:01:46 | The racial power (bonus to speed, AC, and Ref) works fine. The Razorclaw specific feat is the part that doesn't work. I thought that any power that does not have the Beast Form Keyword can not be used in Beast Form? |
| #10Dragon9Mar 31, 2009 7:53:29 | EDIT: Never mind |
| #11SYBMar 31, 2009 11:56:16 | The pertinent phrase is "while in beast form, you can't use attack, utility, or feat powers that do not have the beast form keyword." Racial powers and magic item powers are not restricted by this phrase, unless they are listed as an attack power (I don't think any are, but the design space is open, so I'll leave the caveat). -SYB |
| #12Dragon9Mar 31, 2009 21:53:34 | Wow... don't know how I missed that. Hmmm... then the whole "your implemnt is usable in beast form" seems kind of pointless... well, i guess you can sustain implement powers while in beast form so i guess it could be usable for that. |
| #13telvin3dApr 01, 2009 0:22:18 | I think it is to cover any possible situation where a power could have both the beast and implement keyword. |
| #14KarmaInfernoApr 01, 2009 16:49:22 | Enjoy your talking animal tomfoolery. Back in LG I played one of the very few talking animal characters. (druid with a prestige class that let it talk while wildshaped) A pug dog walking up to a bar and ordering a beer is a riot, I tell ya. -karma |
| #15SYBApr 01, 2009 17:42:56 | Dragon, I think this is just a bad day for you, bud. From a quick read, every beast form attack power seems to have the implement keyword. It's okay. We all have bad days. Rest. Have a Dr. Pepper. It will all be better in the morning. -SYB |
| #16Dragon9Apr 01, 2009 21:44:17 | Guess I'll drink a bite to eat and build a druid. |
| #17bgibbonsApr 02, 2009 14:28:05 | To get back to the question as to whether you can speak in wildshape, I would expect that we will see judge variance until something comes out to indicate what was actually intended. My general thought would be that the fact that a polymorph effect changes your physical form carries with it some implications--if you're changed into a form that does not have the ability to perform some action, you can't perform it. If polymorphed into a rock, you can't move; if polymorphed into a tree, you can't talk. I think the fact that the polymorph keyword doesn't explicitly say you lose the ability to speak is a pretty thin reed to rely upon. As far as whether wild shape specifically allows speech, I suppose it depends on how expansively you want to read that the power "doesn't change your game statistics". For example, I would tend to think that if you wild shape into a wolf, you're going to get a bonus to your Bluff check to pretend to be a wolf (even though it's not called out, as with Disguise Self); if you wild shape into a snake, you're going to have a penalty to performing Thievery checks that require fine manipulation of objects. This is despite the fact that either of these could be considered changing your game statistics. Personally, when DMing, I would tend to allow speech while wildshaped--if changing into a bird doesn't give you the advantage of flight and changing into a fish doesn't give you the advantage of breathing underwater, I would think it unreasonable to give you the disadvantages of those physical forms. Should I be playing a druid and be denied the ability to talk, however, I don't think it's so clear that I could argue that the DM was obviously mistaken. -- Brian Gibbons. |
| #18amysrevengeApr 02, 2009 15:04:50 | Personally, when DMing, I would tend to allow speech while wildshaped--if changing into a bird doesn't give you the advantage of flight and changing into a fish doesn't give you the advantage of breathing underwater, I would think it unreasonable to give you the disadvantages of those physical forms. That's pretty much exactly what I'd do. But then I tend to be a "Yes" DM rather than a "No" DM. |
| #19arvagorApr 02, 2009 17:55:33 | Back in LG I played one of the very few talking animal characters. (druid with a prestige class that let it talk while wildshaped) Ah, the cheese that was Master of Many Forms... Must've been rare in your parts, 'cause it seemed like they were a dime a dozen round here... (until removed from LG) |
| #20Dragon9Apr 02, 2009 19:24:44 | You can always just shapeshift into a gnome. Then you could talk. They are, after all, monsters. ;) |