| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Master_VegaAug 28, 2009 0:56:50 | So I read the TOU before hitting the "I accept" button, imagine that. :P Is it just me or is it reworded, and a lot clearer/harsher about User Content? It gets the same message as before across, but it seems to kind of pound it into the dirt (which I guess is smart of them to do).. Maybe it's just that I haven't read the terms of use in awhile. I dunno. Either way, it certainly doesn't encourage houserules. :/ Anyone else notice this, or am I remembering wrong? |
| #2lokiareAug 28, 2009 1:00:23 | So what now they can continue to persecute posters that post negative comments about WotC and their products, only they actually will be following the ToU? |
| #3RagitsuAug 28, 2009 1:13:19 |
|
| #4Master_VegaAug 28, 2009 1:15:12 | Lokiare - I was commenting on the: "all ur posts are belong to us" clause. Ragitsu - You need fiber, lots of fiber. |
| #5trappedsliderAug 28, 2009 1:31:56 | its always been like that since gleemax |
| #6Master_VegaAug 28, 2009 2:01:51 | The same writing and everything? I know it's been "all ur posts are belong to us" ever since Gleemax, but I could have sworn the writing was a little less... well... strict. |
| #7atanakarAug 28, 2009 9:28:37 | The same writing and everything? I know it's been "all ur posts are belong to us" ever since Gleemax, but I could have sworn the writing was a little less... well... strict. Nope... Same wording. Again, as I have said before, the TOU is to protect themselves against gazilions law suits. Without the TOU this community couldn't exist. |
| #8atanakarAug 28, 2009 9:30:20 |
@slidder : could you somehow reduce, condense your signature until they give us back signature controls. |
| #9atanakarAug 28, 2009 9:36:11 | So what now they can continue to persecute posters that post negative comments about WotC and their products, only they actually will be following the ToU? Not new at all. Don't be silly, they won't sew you if you criticise them. Reread the TOU carefully. |
| #10trappedsliderAug 28, 2009 14:29:59 |
it is condensesd.....it missing about half |
| #11atanakarAug 28, 2009 14:32:29 |
OMG ... LOL |
| #12finalascentAug 28, 2009 15:11:29 | How do I edit my signature? |
| #13atanakarAug 28, 2009 15:13:06 |
Look at the top left of the forum for the bleu word «preferences». Just under your avatar picture. |
| #14finalascentAug 28, 2009 18:27:16 | Thanks. |
| #15dbayAug 29, 2009 1:28:01 | I tried reading the TOU and couldn't make heads or tails of it- is my display pic going to have wizards goons breaking down my door? I swiped it off of 8BT, and it is a modified sprite from squaresoft... god knows who the copyright belongs to. Sorry to derail a little. |
| #16RagitsuAug 29, 2009 1:48:25 |
They'll have to ID my picture before I go kicking and screaming |
| #17finalascentAug 29, 2009 15:13:49 |
It seems to me to be Venus Wars. ![]() |
| #18RagitsuAug 29, 2009 17:32:49 |
Nope |
| #19finalascentAug 29, 2009 17:43:45 | I suppose it could be Spike Speigel, Cowboy Bebop. It wasn't my first guess, because I couldn't see his face very well. |
| #20RagitsuAug 29, 2009 17:48:56 |
It isn't him either.
Though, both characters are daredevils. |
| #21finalascentAug 29, 2009 20:01:55 |
Akira I was thinking his face was more round, but I guess not. |
| #22RagitsuAug 29, 2009 20:06:09 |
Sorry, wrong again |