| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombiegleemaxApr 03, 2007 1:16:35 | After the apocalypse hits, how long do you figure till showers stop working? |
| #2hiryuuApr 03, 2007 2:31:06 | Two months if everything is still intact, assuming you're getting it from a treatment plant. If it's well water, you've got it as long as your pump is working. If it's a disaster, like, say, nuclear exchange/war/invasion, probably instantly. I know that's how it was in the hurricanes, and we didn't even get hit that bad. |
| #3zombiegleemaxApr 03, 2007 2:53:03 | Good god that sucks. I suppose hot water would be much sooner? ![]() |
| #4hiryuuApr 03, 2007 5:46:07 | Hot water will give out the same time the power will (which is about the same time the water will, if you're water's from the city; again, having a well is cool), unless you have some other method of heating the water. Some homes use the "black sheet" solar panel method for heating pools, and this could probably be used to create a sort of water heater with just a few pipe replacements, if it's not hooked up to the heater in the house already. Yeah... I've got apocalypse plans, in case I'm one of the 30% or something that survives. |
| #5HuscarlApr 03, 2007 9:32:38 | Water pressure comes from water towers. As long as there's water in the tower, you'll have pressure and can take a shower (or open any tap and get a drink of water). In any place that was quickly wiped out by whatever happened (there were few survivors scrounging for supplies, and no one absent mindedly left the top open), you could find a tower still holding water years later. The pumps that refill the tower would stop as soon as electricity fails, which will be very quickly with no one manning a coal-fired generating plant. Solar and wind power will be available for a very long time, though the equipment might need some maintenance if it's been untended. I don't know how long a hydroelectric plant would operate without management. That would be an interesting question. Water heaters would stop working as soon as the electricity failed, so you'd be taking cold showers right quick. Steve |
| #6backstabbistApr 03, 2007 10:04:12 | the problem with the Solar/Wind generators is that once the grid drops voltage, the solars will be unable to get usable power to users. The solars would be trying to power an entire grid by them selves, and at just 1-5% supply to the whole grid will spread the voltage soo low you cant use it. Sure, you may be able to detect 2 or 5 volts with a meter at the house outlet, but you cant use that. Consider that electricity usage is unlike water usage. There will be more things left ON that will make the grid a power vacuum, unfillable by the wee bit of solar/wind power.... just all the refrigerators that want to run the pump, all at once from the extended outage, in a city will crush the ability of solar Best bet is the solar plant will trip output breakers to disconnect from the grid, and some folks would have to isolate a small section of the grid that plant can power. |
| #7HuscarlApr 03, 2007 10:18:12 | But someone with sufficient knowledge of electrical systems could take wind generators off the city (or region) -wide grid and localize them to power just, say, a single, nearby building. A farm with its own wind generator would still have power. That's what I was talking about. Steve |
| #8backstabbistApr 03, 2007 10:34:37 | of course, folks like Amish Farms wont have to miss any showers if the city water goes down.... hand pump the well & fire the pipes. |
| #9kitsuneyashaApr 05, 2007 2:39:12 | I think the amish will be the ultimate survivers of the apoc x.x; Think about it....they already dont use things we use commonly, so they can adapt easier |
| #10zombiegleemaxApr 05, 2007 2:51:35 | In terms of producing their own food and caring for the land? Perhaps. In defending themselves? Not so sure there... |
| #11backstabbistApr 05, 2007 10:10:37 | "Cake Walk! We killed all the farmers & took all the food at that farm you sent us to Boss" What? So, you got all the food they grew this year... terrific. But Mongo, what are we going to eat next year? "Next year Mongo kill farmers & take.... oh. No farmers..... Mongo kill us all." Yes, in 16 months the few humans left on this plannet will die... nice going Mongo The problem is not taking from the Amish, it is surviving the Amish's friends & neighbors that are a gun toting redneck bunch of countryboys fed on Amish grain... Redneck Rampage II ![]() |
| #12HuscarlApr 05, 2007 10:18:36 | This is precisely why, after an apocalypse, everyone will just get along and violence will come to an end. Yeah, that's it. Steve |
| #13rusvalApr 05, 2007 14:38:04 | Awwwww! Where's the fun in that?! :P Of course, the idea of showers going off line after the Big Cablooie makes me glad I can't smell. |
| #14lord_gwydionApr 15, 2007 21:44:01 | Awwwww! Where's the fun in that?! :P Well, the people who don't realize there are other ways to get clean besides taking a shower probably aren't the best suited to post-apocalyptic lifestyles, so I doubt the smell problem would last that long. Natural selection and all that. :D Just because you can't take a shower doesn't mean you can't take a bath (and heat water over a campfire to take a warm bath!). |
| #15kitsuneyashaApr 15, 2007 23:54:57 | "No! The plumbing! We're all going to die of dehydration and smell real bad too!" "...we're near a river, Dave.." Sorry, couldnt help |
| #16backstabbistApr 16, 2007 0:03:52 | I cant remember what they are saying this time... Are we going to die from Spray Can Nuclear Winter, or CO2 Global Warming? Which movie do you chose: Day After Tomorrow, or Algore's Truth? ....wish they would pick one & stick to it. Kinda like them guys warning us not to eat eggs, then just 1 egg, then upto 3, then as many as we want cause they were completely wrong and there turn out to be 2 kinds of cholesterol. |
| #17HuscarlApr 16, 2007 10:23:44 | Well, the people who don't realize there are other ways to get clean besides taking a shower probably aren't the best suited to post-apocalyptic lifestyles, so I doubt the smell problem would last that long. Natural selection and all that. :D I suspect that people who haven't showered will be the least of your odor problems when two-thirds of the world's population suddenly drops dead. Steve |
| #18lord_gwydionApr 16, 2007 23:59:35 | I suspect that people who haven't showered will be the least of your odor problems when two-thirds of the world's population suddenly drops dead. Good point--unless it's nuclear winter. :D |
| #19zombiegleemaxApr 17, 2007 20:44:13 | If you expect to hop in the tub & turn the knob, it'll only last as long as the "city water" system AND either gas or electricity (whichever powers your water heater) remain active. Which is to say 'Not very long.' However, with a little bit of innovation: http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/links/link.jsp?id=0038016517266a&type=product&cmCat=search&returnPage=search-results1.jsp&QueryText=shower&N=4887&Ntk=Products&Ntx=mode+matchall&Nty=1&Ntt=shower&noImage=0 You can most likely find something similar in your local outdoor store. Or knock something together yourself. |
| #20backstabbistApr 17, 2007 20:49:03 | well, technically, most of us have somethng that both heats water & pumps water under the hood of our cars. Just fabricate a closed cycle tub and crank up the 2.2l 4cylinder Showermaster |
| #21aabApr 19, 2007 3:02:19 | i'd run out of gas too quick to shower very much. i don't think my 5.7L would be quite as efficient as some others.... |
| #22backstabbistApr 19, 2007 23:14:20 | you could get from Zero to Clean in 4.6seconds of course, you could plumb it to shower you as you drove, thereby conserving the gas for actual transportation use and showering as a parasitic activity of driving. |
| #23aabApr 20, 2007 0:20:59 | yeah, but i'd have to line the interior with plastic. then it would sit out in the sun so the next time i tried to go for a drive/shower i'd burn my bare bum. |
| #24backstabbistApr 20, 2007 9:39:39 | ahh but instead of lining it with plastic, line it with Solar Panels. Then you can put that bum burning sunlight to practical use: Save a bum and charge your MP3 Player |
| #25zombiegleemaxApr 27, 2007 13:07:33 | concerning showers, you could always do what i did when i was in the field. We got a jerry can, filled it with water, stand on top of a HMMV and pour water on the naked guy below you. yeah it pretty much sucks |
| #26HuscarlApr 27, 2007 13:45:53 | Here's one that's even worse. In WW2, in North Africa, when there was no other way to heat water for tea, British soldiers would drive a jeep or truck as fast as possible up and down a dune for a while, then drain water out of the radiator to brew tea. That had to be some rancid-tasting tea. Steve |
| #27aabApr 27, 2007 13:52:52 | at least coffee would get rid of that car taste a bit. tea?? damn.... |
| #28nodaishoApr 27, 2007 13:53:26 | Wow... that is some dedication to tea. Why not just leave a canteen out in the sun for a while? I have seen surplus canteens work to heat water up to 80-90 degrees, and that is just a summer day in the Rocky Mountains. I imagine the Africa desert heat would be a good bit more. |
| #29backstabbistApr 27, 2007 21:17:59 | getting back on topic... ok, getting somewhat in the neighborhood of the topic ;) Apartment buildings & the colapse of infrastructure: Just shut the water main off at the street, have the residents carry cans of water up the stairs, and siphon water into the cold faucet on the top floor. That will give a decent waterhead for pipe flow into the heater & shower on the 1st floor. As long as the propane truck keeps driving up & filling your back yard tank, you're golden. |
| #30HuscarlApr 30, 2007 11:15:40 | Most tall buildings have their own water tanks up on the top floors. That's the only way they can get water pressure. You could either devise a way to refill the tank (I wouldn't advise lugging water up 30 flights of stairs, but an electric pump could be run with a generator) or just keep moving from building to building as the tanks become drained. Many high-end office buildings also have showers in the executive washrooms or a small workout room with a shower. Steve |
| #31backstabbistApr 30, 2007 21:10:11 | I wouldn't advise lugging water up 30 flights of stairs, what, dont city folk give their kids chores? "Boy! Fetch that thar pail, and gather me up some showerin water." But Paw, were 21 stories up! "Dont sass me boy, or I'll have you fetch me a switch too." |
| #32zombiegleemaxApr 30, 2007 22:34:16 | We live in Idaho, so we are about as prepared as anyone for Apocalypse. We have a well, an electric water heater, a massive generator, supply stores, and (get ready to laugh) there is enough ammo in our garage to hold off a small military detachment (my dad's building a Gatling gun in there as we speak). The only thing that would make us more secure is if we had a bunker in the back yard. :D |
| #33kitsuneyashaMay 10, 2007 1:32:43 | Oh, i found out something. This works at least with standard toilets, so you dont need to go dig a outhouse in the backyard as long as you have a sufficent watersource , such as a stream nearby, qwhen the plumbing goes out. Your going to need a bucket or jug or something though. You get your bucket and go tot he river. get some water. then you just put that water in the back part of the toilet (no clue what its called, but it has a bit of the mechanics and has water in it) when that part has no water in it. You got the water in it and tahdah, you can flush again. lots of work,. but it works (kinda) Another idea of mine is this. you dig a outhouse-like hole; deep and a bit narrow. use it like a outhouse , but have a seat theing, as well as 2 slides of something that will close the hole to prevent smell but can be slided away to let the feces and urine in. Once you get to a certain capacity, dont try and clean it; instead, fill the hole back up with dirt (dont miz it up. try and have the dirt be a layer) and mark where the hole used to be. repeat, but on a different spot.the feces and urine, over time, should be safe buried unless you oput it by the water source. And sorry if this stuff is stupid and kinda obvious x.x; i aint the brightest bulb in the knife drawer |
| #34bladerockMay 10, 2007 16:28:08 | You get your bucket and go tot he river. get some water. then you just put that water in the back part of the toilet (no clue what its called, but it has a bit of the mechanics and has water in it) when that part has no water in it. You got the water in it and tahdah, you can flush again. lots of work,. but it works Actually, you can just pour the bucket directly into the bowl. It flushes itself... for some reason unknown to me. My parents used to do that all the time when the water went out. (we have a very unreliable water system here, but now we have a water storage whatchamacalit thing.) |
| #35HuscarlMay 10, 2007 16:37:02 | It's because the sewer drain acts as a siphon. Hard to explain in writing but incredibly, wonderfully simple in practice. The flush toilet is actually one of the most clever inventions in your house ... Steve |
| #36backstabbistMay 10, 2007 18:58:11 | brings up an interesting point- Many places have to use sewage pumps to keep the flow moving along. Could be the ability to manually operate a shower may be for naught if the drains back up because a pump 6 blocks over wont move the waste |
| #37HuscarlMay 10, 2007 19:11:46 | Well, you know (or maybe you don't) the standard joke about plumbers -- "All you need to know to be a plumber is that **** rolls downhill." Forget that simple truth at your peril. It's part of why New Orleans was such a mess in the days after Katrina. When your town lies below sea level, sewage must be pumped uphill to get rid of it. When the pumps break down, the sewage stalls, and when the sewers flood -- the sewage floats. Steve |
| #38thedude72Jun 06, 2007 19:48:05 | (my dad's building a Gatling gun in there as we speak) wow...just wow |
| #39i_am_some_guyJun 07, 2007 17:12:38 | interesting article hereDear Straight Dope: |
| #40zombiegleemaxJul 01, 2007 10:16:46 | I'd worry more about soap! |
| #41thedarklordJul 01, 2007 10:32:31 | As a Shotgun totin' Redneck, yes, we will kill you city folk long before we run out of food and water :D. |
| #42zombiegleemaxJul 01, 2007 10:34:51 | Springboarding off of my random soap post, would bleach become a valued commodity? |
| #43backstabbistJul 01, 2007 12:10:11 | moderate/low difficulty electolysis of salted water provides both chlorine gas & sodium hydroxide (spare hydrogen as byproduct), which then are bubbled to make bleach (wiki) pic of membrane chamber electrolysis cell making chlorine & sodium hydroxide so it would be easier to make than alcohol |
| #44thedarklordJul 01, 2007 20:00:10 | This reminds me of My personal Anthem :D. The preacher man says its the end of time and the Mississippi river shes a goin dry interest is up and the stock markets down and you only get mugged if you go downtown I live back in the woods you see my woman and the kids and the dogs and me I got a shotgun a rifle and a four wheel drive and a country boy can survive country folks can survive I can plow a field all day long I can catch catfish from dusk til dawn We make our own whiskey and our own smoke too ain't too many things these 'ol boys can't do we grow good 'ol tomatos and homemade wine and a country boy can survive country folks can survive Because you can't starve us out and you can't make us run cause we're them 'ol boys raised on a shotgun we say grace and we say ma'am if you ain't into that we don't give a damn We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the Rocky Mountains and the western skies and we can skin a buck and run a trotline and a country boy can survive country folks can survive I had a good friend in New York city he never called me by my name just hillbilly my grandpa taught me how to live off the land and his taught him to be a business man he used to send me pictures of the Broadway nights and I'd send him some homemade wine but he was killed by a man with a switchblade knife for forty-three dollars my friend lost his life I'd love to spit some beechnut in that dude's eyes and shoot him with my 'ol forty-five cause a country boy can survive country folks can survive Cause you can't starve us out and you can't make us run cause we're them 'ol boys raised on a shotgun we say grace and we say ma'am if you ain't into that we don't give a damn We're from North California and South Alabam and little towns all around this land and we can skin a buck and run a trot line and a country boy can survive country folks can survive country boy can survive -Hank Williams JR. A Country Boy can Survive And yes Dammit, I love Country Music ![]() |
| #45zombiegleemaxJul 01, 2007 20:15:01 | There's nothing wrong with country music |
| #46thedarklordJul 01, 2007 21:20:59 | There's nothing wrong with country music Nope, but apparently on these boards i'm in the severe minority ;). |
| #47zombiegleemaxJul 15, 2007 14:16:31 | Country music keeps one sane in the apocalypse |
| #48backstabbistJul 15, 2007 22:49:59 | Depends on which country we are talking about. Listening to stuff from some countries just grates on my ears Ted Nugent... he lives out in the country... that counts right? |
| #49zombiegleemaxAug 12, 2007 20:32:20 | Update: I stocked up on Lava, Dial and bleach. I'm set ![]() |
| #50kitsuneyashaAug 19, 2007 2:49:12 | yknow...if theres no showers to use... and theres still prisoners...... then what'll happen to the myth about dropping the soap in the showers? |
| #51zombiegleemaxAug 19, 2007 6:08:56 | Ha ha, only you could come up with that question :P |
| #52backstabbistAug 23, 2007 0:06:23 | Once we stop bringing food to the prisoners, the lack of showers at the prison wont be a problem within a week or two. |
| #53sepsisSep 05, 2007 15:15:30 | For those intrested in just how long our infrastructure would stay functioning after a global Apocalyspe may want to check out a new book titled, The World Without Us by Alan Weisman. Its a great read and will put a whole new perspective on survival after the collapse of Civilization. Needless to say in this dissertation he puts forth the fact that within days most of what we hold dear (power, sewage, etc.) would break down and cease to function. And lets just say after reading his chapter on New York City, I'd flee that place as fast as possible, for without constant daily maintenence nature would reclaim the island within a few months...with the subways being flooded within 2 to 3 days of the pumps coming to a stop. I suggest everyone give it a once over, it may put a damper on some long held PA beliefs (Roaches will not long outlast us it seems....they need us more then we need them), but it will help create a more "realistic" PA world for your Players. |
| #54i_am_some_guySep 05, 2007 16:40:36 | For those intrested in just how long our infrastructure would stay functioning after a global Apocalyspe may want to check out a new book titled, The World Without Us by Alan Weisman. Its a great read and will put a whole new perspective on survival after the collapse of Civilization. Awesome.... I just ordered this book. I recall at one point one of my players got ticked at me "Why is every damned toiled backed up and filthy?!?" The game took a de-railment into discussion of how long sewage would last with no power and no one to "tend" it.... Humans are inherently filthy and without sewage inhabited cities become disease infested cesspools. |
| #55RagitsuSep 15, 2007 7:45:27 | Humans are inherently filthy Are you sure? ![]() |
| #56i_am_some_guySep 17, 2007 11:15:30 | Are you sure? Eyup... Cholera killed untold and is trasmitted due to unsanitary conditions. Human waste is not healthy for humans and when humans lived in large groups there has to be a lot of effort put into removing that waste. If you look into history you'll see that quite many of the disasterous disease are due to squalid and unsanitary living conditions (Plague for one). Most folks live in areas where waste is taken care of. But if you travel to any poor country you can visit towns were human waste is still carried in troughs through the dirt roads of towns. I'd say that yes, due to the tendency of humans to live in large congregations and the susceptibility to disease born through either our own wastes or supported by filthy living conditions that qualifies humans as being inherently filthy. Now, when living in small numbers with enough territory between groups folks can live just fine. It’s the fact that we don’t anymore that creates the problem. |
| #57backstabbistSep 17, 2007 11:46:05 | well, technically, Cities/Comunities are unhealthy physiologically & psychologically The concentration of wastes & byproducts hurts the body, and what happened to folks put in the SuperDome for a few days? They went out of their minds Killing & Raping each other. You get more than 500 or 2000 folks together out in the countryside, and it is all downhill from there.... sanitation & crime problems. Fortunately, John Browning developed a couple of solutions to those problems. |
| #58nclancemanSep 17, 2007 22:04:43 | Fortunately, John Browning developed a couple of solutions to those problems. Eugene Stoner and Mikail Kalashnikov thought of better ones. Speaking of which, just how long would a home septic system last? Undoubtibly longer than city sewage, but how long? 10-20 years? Some scale i'm not thinking of? |
| #59backstabbistSep 18, 2007 1:21:42 | considering you CAN have a kid dive it with a bucket every other year.... till the concrete just falls apart, or till roots get in your leech pipes I dunno, but 20-40 sounds good to me, just a swag. |
| #60i_am_some_guySep 18, 2007 10:09:51 | home septic depends on how you get your water pressure and where you get it from. Let's say it's from a well. Does the well have positive pressure in it? Some parts of the country it does and the water works on it's own... but more often than not there is a pump that provides pressure. Pump needs power... no power, no pressure. However, the inspiring enigneer can slap together a nice solar collector with battery storage *just* to power the water pump. And, wala, running water in the house from a pump. How long does the septic tank last? How long do septic systems typically last before they fail? |
| #61i_am_some_guySep 18, 2007 10:12:41 | Eugene Stoner and Mikail Kalashnikov thought of better ones. Well, you can't beat the Browning. They came later and built on work already done, like all innovations -- the innovation tends to improve on the original. But, purists have a soft spot for the oringal... I still love the BAR.... |
| #62backstabbistSep 18, 2007 11:53:26 | "They came later and built on work already done" you mean like calling the latest AR variant/OptionPackage the M4 rather than m16B1? Load out your m16 sqaud: 4 Riflemen, m16a2 2 AutoRiflemen, m16a1 (Cmag) 2 Grenadier, m203 (m16a2) RTO, m16b1 (m4) 2 Leader, m16b1 / b2 superstubby (m4) |
| #63RagitsuSep 22, 2007 8:38:22 | Could human waste be used in the growth of crops as a form of manure? |
| #64backstabbistSep 22, 2007 12:02:48 | I would imagine so... at least to some degree... we do pretty much just put out what we take in, but I have no idea what the N numbers would look like. iirc, after coming out of the digester & settled/precip/filter, the solids were spread out in the sun for a bit then hauled off for fertilizer at the sewage treatment plant I did work at ... iirc |
| #65i_am_some_guySep 24, 2007 10:38:13 | Could human waste be used in the growth of crops as a form of manure? Yes it can. But, you have to be careful if the food isn't cleaned properly people will get sick. This is a problem acrosst he world where they use human waste as fertilizer instead of animal waste. |
| #66backstabbistSep 24, 2007 16:25:40 | I dont really think I would choose to wash food less intensely cause it is just animal waste rather than human waste.... I'm pretty much gonna consider Waste is Waste & I dont want it on my lunch. |
| #67joekapSep 30, 2007 13:56:31 | actually human waste must be "cleaned" so to speack before it is used as fertilizer. unless you want every one to get sick and die. human waste is a terrible source of nutrients for plant life that people are going to eat. |
| #68RagitsuSep 30, 2007 17:12:24 | Looks like those ranks in Survival paid off . |
| #69backstabbistOct 01, 2007 3:24:12 | as long as you know which crops have human fertilizer, and which crops dont, you can die a happy farmer when the Gangs kill you for your corn.... you have the last laugh. "Take all the corn you want, but I promissed the yummy bright Red & Yellow berries to that other gang leader" ![]() |
| #70RagitsuOct 01, 2007 3:26:41 | So, joekap, is the fact that human waste makes for poor fertilizer due to our diets, or is it something innately harmful just for it coming from a human? |
| #71joekapOct 03, 2007 20:06:22 | i believe its because of the bacteria we produce in our poooo |
| #72RagitsuOct 10, 2007 5:27:59 | Ah, then keeping around those three eyed cows was good for something after all :D . This topic makes me glad I live near a decently moving river. I wouldn't drink right out of it, but at least i'm smelling pine fresh when cutting down zombies with my Saiga... The unfortunate thing is that the highest concentration of undead is most likely along the river as well . |
| #73backstabbistOct 10, 2007 12:45:21 | Sounds exploitable: Put a lawnchair in front of a few treadmils by the river, sit in the lawnchair with a lemonaide & magazine while zombies walk the treadmill trying to get to you (stupid zombies ).Use treadmills to drive a pump to get water up the building for your shower Presto- alternate beast of burden heard animal: Zombie |
| #74RagitsuOct 20, 2007 18:22:55 | Wouldn't they stumble eventually and fall, then the rubber/material of the tread would start to wear away their faces? :embarrass |
| #75RagitsuOct 27, 2007 13:22:17 | Two months if everything is still intact, assuming you're getting it from a treatment plant. If it's well water, you've got it as long as your pump is working. Well then, the amount of "refreshment bonus to attacks" players can get is limited ![]() |
| #76RagitsuNov 08, 2007 23:13:28 | Saving this from deletion. |
| #77joekapNov 09, 2007 20:33:51 | yay what ever would we have done if another old and dead thread wasnt saved from deletion....woooooo!!! |
| #78RagitsuNov 09, 2007 20:55:32 | Threads never die...they just go to sleep. |
| #79sauragnmonNov 23, 2007 22:00:05 | Well, let us consider for a moment... realistically, if you have the apocalypse happening, then yes, urban water systems will likely be shut down, since we have the problem of the fact that the pipes are pressurized from main line pumping stations. On the other hand, more rural situations, fed from their own well, would likely retain their own supply, assuming they could configure a simple pump system. Likewise, in the aforementioned urban situation, you could likely take the urban water supply and draw your own water through it by means of installing a pump to generate suction pressure inside the urban line. From there, you find another means of heating the water, be it a boiler or other means, and you can still have your hot water. Note, also, that basic water filtration involves a simple boiling process. You could also go one step further and use your cold water line to distill your water, basically running a cold water inflow, through the cooling jacket on a distilling system, being cold until it reaches the boiler, where it is heated, the water running through the condenser pipe after that point and into a storage tank. From there, you could run it back to a secondary heating tank, and run a hot water storage there, and a second cold water storage right off the distilling system. It's rather complex, now that I think of it, but I just came up with it off the top of my head. The similar system I just mentioned could also be applied in the rural setting. It just involves a lot of means of finding a water storage setup, but generally that's the way you could get it to work. |
| #80backstabbistNov 24, 2007 1:17:00 | problem therein is that even one open faucet somewhere upstream will have you sucking air instead of water with a user-end suction pump. |
| #81RagitsuDec 04, 2007 8:37:27 | What's the best method of water sterilization attainable in the apocalypse anyhow? |
| #82backstabbistDec 05, 2007 2:15:59 | Sterilization is only half the problem. If you completely sterilize water by adding 3:1 chlorine bleach, you will certainly srterilize water that will kill you if you drink it. Along those lines is trying to sterilize radioactive water, or water with benzene or cyanide or any other nonliving toxin. destilling water, or even better is multiple extract distilation where you pull samples out at the various temps & times to get more finite limits of the desired vapor temp material (h20), is the best way to purify water. Benzene & bugs leave early or get left behind in the pot. As for radioacive water... hey, you wanna live forever? However, you will get seriously messed up drinking just distilled water for a while, so intentionaly re-contaminate it with your personal mix of salts & minerals for a few PPM.... gatorade style but to a much lessor extent.... like 1ml of gatorade to treat a quart of distilled to make it un-harmful BTW: Don't bother drinking blood when thirsty. You will use up more internal hydration to digest the blood than the liquid will replenish. You cant get blood from a turnip, but you can distill water from blood. Not a lot of return on that investment, so if you get thirsty you are gonna have to go majorly postal between refreshments. |
| #83joekapDec 05, 2007 16:51:58 | mmm mmm mmm blood flavored gatorade water...just what you need when adventuring the the apocalyptic waste land...;) |
| #84RagitsuDec 05, 2007 16:59:53 | BTW: Don't bother drinking blood when thirsty. You will use up more internal hydration to digest the blood than the liquid will replenish. I've heard that's part of the three things you don't want for hydration: blood, sea water and snow. |
| #85backstabbistDec 06, 2007 2:51:58 | Other than Yellow Snow, what is the word on not melting snow for drinking? Is it like the distilled water "mess your electrolytes up" problem? |
| #86RagitsuDec 06, 2007 3:22:46 | With the other methods for cleaning them... I'm sure if you desalinate sea-water, it's fine to drink.. I'm sure if you heat the snow to water, it's fine to drink. That isn't my point -> it's that you don't take these things fresh from the source for hydration But, i'm sure you knew that already. |
| #87backstabbistDec 07, 2007 1:41:02 | ok, what about eating unmelted snow is bad for hydration? Why cant I stop the car while driving thru a winter wonderland, fill up a cup with some cold white goodness, and enjoy a snowcone instead of a glass of water for hydrating me on my long drive with the heater on & radio blasting UncleTed, the motor city madman? |
| #88RagitsuDec 07, 2007 2:01:06 | The dangers of eating snow or ice deserves special attention. The amount of heat required to convert one ounce of snow or ice at 32 degrees F into one ounce of water at 32 degrees F is the same amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one ounce of water from room temperature to boiling. That is, heat is required just to convert Ice or snow to water without raising its temperature. If you eat ice or snow, the heat required to do this melting comes from your body. This. One good method i've heard of is, if possible, bottle up the snow and keep it closeby. Then move vigorously (jogging, for example). This should melt the snow and be a nice alternative if you can't somehow make a fire or another external heat source. |
| #89backstabbistDec 07, 2007 12:33:12 | oh good grief, that is why eating snow is bad for hypothermia, not why eating snow is bad for hydration. Try this math for the hypothermia freaks: Add 1/4 tsp sugar to the frozen 28g snow. Recalc the caloric P&L. Melt 28g frozen water: 28 x 80 = 2240 calories Raise that water to body temp: 28 x 37 = 1036 calories Your body must burn 3300 calories just break even. Sugar has 15 calories per teaspoon, 1/4 x 15 = 3.75calories...... ....sounds bad, until you realize that dietary scientists decided to not use the same calorie as the rest of the science world.... dietary "Calories" are actually what real science folks call KiloCalories, 1 Dietary Calorie = 1000 Real Calories. SO 1/4 teaspoon sugar has 3750 real calories, You spend 3300 to eat the snow, and gain 3750 of rapid burn fuel for your gut fires. But if you are out doing some spring skiing in shorts & T-shirts, eating snow for hydration wont be a problem if you are staying warm.... unless we start talking about electrolyte problems of pure H2O, but most americans dont have any shortage of salt in their diets ![]() |
| #90RagitsuDec 07, 2007 20:22:51 | Oh right, because it's okay to be hydrated when suffering other bad side effects? "Hey, good news, my thirst was slaked!" "Great!" "Unfortunately, i'm going to freeze to death" |
| #91backstabbistDec 08, 2007 3:28:31 | Well, If you are freezing to death, knowing you would have died of dehydration a few days after you freeze is of little importance. "If we dont find shelter, we wont make it thru the night!" What about finding a source of drinking water? "Ask me again in the morning." |
| #92bitter_thornDec 08, 2007 10:50:59 | ok, what about eating unmelted snow is bad for hydration? Got to love Uncle Ted ![]() |
| #93RagitsuDec 08, 2007 12:05:36 | That's why you live in places where it's not too cold or too hot. |
| #94roninzero141Dec 08, 2007 21:12:43 | I don't know about other places, but here in Oz (Australia) the wind has been used for ages to pump water up from the ground. If you can pump water up from underground aquifers, then you can pump it into a elevated tank just as easily. Gravity does the rest, presto a shower! Hot water, that's a little trickier. But if your not fussy this'll work fine. Also the same grav-feed system can give you fushing toilets. PS: all excrement (animal & human) should be composted before use as fertiliser, it's just safer that way. |
| #95backstabbistDec 09, 2007 9:29:01 | I get the feeling we have started to stray from the OP topic. ;) While there are many of us that dont have a problem with the big city folks losing their infastructure, all them telemarketers & store clerks that live in urbanian appartments will be in big trouble. We use technology & infastructure to have 1million people live on a patch of land that can support 70k, so there is no big mystery as to what will happen when we take the infastructure away. I say take the infastructure away, because no matter how much games & movies say so, you cant instantly take technology away... it is really really hard to prevent folks from finding out how a electric generator/altenator works in just a few years or decades.... just who is going around to all the local libraries & schools destroying all printed material? Anyway, city dwellers will be getting killed left & right if they stay in the city, shot for a bottle of water, and they will be dropping like flies if they try to survive in the wilderness.... too many years living in HIgh Density Feed Lots will do that to a species that mastered the wild long ago. |
| #96RagitsuDec 09, 2007 23:24:03 | They say true character is shown in darker times, and I can't think of many situations that's darker than the apocalypse. |
| #97roninzero141Dec 10, 2007 1:55:26 | Of course it depends on what you call "character"... |
| #98RagitsuDec 10, 2007 2:31:58 | Character I'd say 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the first 27 are good fits. |
| #99roninzero141Dec 10, 2007 17:15:45 | So, not a persons better nature coming out in a crisis, just their truest one. Okay. |
| #100backstabbistDec 11, 2007 3:18:13 | Nature vs Nurture Dark times dont have to bring out someones truest character. If the smoke alarm wakes up a person, do the gather importand documents or sentimental pictures to save them from the fire. A test of character for sure. Thinker or feeler, deeds & titles or Junior & Sissy on Granny's lap? Me, I fight the fire and leave tests of my sentimental mettle to greater moral dilemas. You see one apocalypse you've seen them all. Times are only dark if you let them be, and I aint letting no apoc ruin my afternoon. Agonizing over Dark Times is for other saps, I'll pop a flare & stay in the light times: The apocalypse is just another engineering challenge to overcome with applied science. Of course, if Dr Gordon Freeman taught us anything, many times the correct science to apply is the Crowbar upside their head. |
| #101RagitsuDec 11, 2007 3:48:17 | Concrete, meet cranium. Cranium, meet concrete. *crack* "Did it stop?" "I dunno, make an objective statement" |
| #102roninzero141Dec 13, 2007 17:46:40 | "And always look on the bright side of life!", backstabbist. |
| #103backstabbistDec 14, 2007 2:38:33 | Well, I just recognize the way many catastrophies can be handled by a heavy handed nuclear policy. Tsunami? Nuke the wave into humidity so it dont drown folks & break houses. Volcano? Nuke that sucker into vapors before the lava flows & burns folks. Global Warming? Heck, that's easy: Nuclear Winter ...uh, too much Nuclear Winter? Airburst Nuke some trees, the CO2 will globally warm us. Then just pop off a few KT of thermostat nukes each year to maintin the balance where we want it. Alien Invasion? Well, I gotta say I'm still going with the Nukes on this one too. An apocalypse is just theoreticly when folks stop us heros from nuking the problem away. I dont see how it can be called Dark Times, since everything will have a warm green glow. |
| #104roninzero141Dec 14, 2007 17:55:56 | No more drugs for this man! |
| #105RagitsuDec 26, 2007 22:58:26 | Yump |
| #106joekapJan 02, 2008 19:47:03 | DERPA DERPA MOhammed Jehad sherpa sherpa ..... |
| #107backstabbistJan 03, 2008 1:40:33 | Looks like we avoided it again. Two days into Y2K8, and the toilets still flush, heralding that Man still has reign over this blue marble. We can save all the nukes for some other day, the Y2K8 bug was a bust. |
| #108joekapJan 03, 2008 6:22:48 | damn and i had so much hope for that bug.....oh well i guesss i can unpack my bunker....again.... |
| #109RagitsuJan 03, 2008 8:24:09 | Unfortunately, all the racists are still around. |
| #110backstabbistJan 03, 2008 13:59:07 | Not all the Racists. In 2007 Nascar lost French, and Reno Air lost Hubler... Racing is dangerous, and not all racists live to retirement. |
| #111RagitsuJan 03, 2008 18:38:49 | You're confusing racer with racist: the former gets a rush behind the wheel or yoke of a vehicle, the latter gets a rush making illogical arguments. |
| #112backstabbistJan 03, 2008 19:20:28 | bahh, next your gonna say John Wayne wasnt a Shootist. |
| #113joekapJan 04, 2008 21:34:45 | yeah i mean duh....race...racist shoot shootist cmon..... also i hear that some people refer to racists as folks who have a problem with a particular race...but never have i heard of them being just starting random arguments...maybe your thinking argumentist.... yeah that must be it. |
| #114backstabbistJan 05, 2008 14:31:12 | isnt it odd that Shootists spend a lot of time being a shooter, yet Pacifists rarely get anything done as a pacifier.... they tend to get beat up or shot by Shootists. Which would just be morefold in the apoc with the lack of infrastructure that would normaly keep the shootists in check 10 Pacifists would make utopia, 9 Pacifists & 1 Warmonger would make slavery. |
| #115joekapJan 05, 2008 17:07:04 | actually it wouldnt be a warmonger that makes slavery it would be a slave-ist...come on man stick to the pattern...:D but yeah you got the Pacifists right they suck at pacifing...maybe they should be called non fightists...or but kicked-ist im not sure what that would be. |
| #116backstabbistJan 06, 2008 20:40:31 | Oh man, I cant believe I missed that one, how embarasing ![]() Probably the best Pacifist ever was the alien in I Come In Peace, he left a serious body count wherever he went.... which I guess maybe doesnt make him a good pacifist... bahh, close enough. |
| #117joekapJan 09, 2008 23:03:55 | hey he came in peace...or so he claimed....and he did pacifie folks....i hate jean cluade vandame |
| #118roninzero141Jan 18, 2008 23:51:44 | To believe in peace and that people should live without threat of violence is not wrong, to believe you'll be able to get away with it is! Those who would live in peace must always be under the protection of warriors, and the warriors must always serve the will of those they protect. |
| #119backstabbistJan 19, 2008 11:55:51 | but in the Apoc especially, there could be a military society that stays at peace mainly from AssuredDestruction of any that attack it... kinda Spartanesque. The army cook drives his army truck, that the army mechanic just fixed, over to the army farmer to get army supplies to feed the army accountants & army tailors. The Colonel Mayor would lead the parade celebrating the army teachers graduating another highschool classyear... that join the army & get assigned army jobs by PAC personel. All without a shot being fired. Totally militaristic & excessively armed society at peace with all neighbors... cause the neighbors are really afraid of that machinegun toting, uniformed populace, military city.... enjoyiong true peace without fear. ... and I bet they have showers in their Apoc infrastucture! ![]() |
| #120roninzero141Jan 19, 2008 16:55:44 | I don't see it lasting. Either they will have to go to war with a neighbour to expand their territory, or the people will eventually start asking why they all have to join the army. |
| #121backstabbistJan 27, 2008 2:47:59 | You dont have to join the Army, If you want to instead, they can give you a shotgun & a book of UCMJ to carry out into the wastelands: "Bring Law to those that have it not." |
| #122roninzero141Jan 27, 2008 17:42:05 | So you are talking about a military dictatorship. |
| #123backstabbistJan 28, 2008 0:41:56 | but... but... but... uh, the Colonel Mayor would have an "Open Door Policy", does that help any? And of course the Colonel would be subject to UCMJ & accountable to the Provosts. But we digress. These guys would have the showers not just running, but running to MilSpec. Personal Hygene while living at Peace with those around you.... provided & protected by threat of Heavy Artillery and CAS Overflight & TheBlackButton: a secret weapon so secret we cant even threaten you with what it does, but trust us, you dont want us to push it. |
| #124roninzero141Jan 28, 2008 16:13:08 | No, your "open door" policy doesn't make things any better. |
| #125backstabbistJan 29, 2008 0:40:45 | You just need to focus on the benefits. Like never again getting dragged to a store to listen to your girl say "Oh, these are cute" 500 times while comparing shoes. She just turns in her old boots to get a new pair issued. ![]() |
| #126roninzero141Jan 29, 2008 16:13:14 | Funny how I keep coming back to the "boot on my neck" problem. I can't seem to get away from the fact that living in a military dictatorship isn't a lot of fun... Unless you are working to bring it down! |
| #127backstabbistJan 30, 2008 1:54:54 | You are looking at it as one of the Dictatees, it is a hoot for the ones Dictating. Boots on Necks is bad when it not your boot. Solution? Join the Booters. "You there, what are you doing?" Baking biscuits, Sir "And why are you baking them?" Uh, cause I'm Baker 1st Class Rogers, and today I'm on BiscuitDuty, Sir "Ahhh, very good Robbins..." Rogers " Not bad Roberts, but they need more egg" Rogers... and Major, biscuits dont have eggs in them "Sgt Briggs, take down Rollins name for not enough egg in his muffins." Rog.... uh, thats two L's in Rollins, Sarge Major, it is true the showers dont work right in sector 7g? "What!? SubStandard Showers??? Not on my watch!! Sgt Briggs, get your neck stompin boots on, we have infrastructure to inspect in Sector 7G." Actually, they woulnt have NeckStompinBoots. UCMJ prevents Soldier on Soldier violence like that, and since the entire society would be military there would be nobody to stomp on..... again, looks like populace Peace attained by Superior Firepower & Mobility doctrine. |
| #128atanakarJan 30, 2008 6:00:57 | What a strange tread ... So Backstabbist if I follow your argument it was a hoot to be a Nazi, a hoot to work for Pinochet, etc, etc ... I think you may need a consultation not a shower ![]() |
| #129backstabbistJan 30, 2008 11:41:27 | Being Evil & Wrong doesnt mean you have to hate your job. Even HomerSimpson had fun working for >>Scorpio<< for a while. Schindlers List, there was a fat drunk nazi shooting a pile of burning bodies: Evil & Wrong, but he seemed to be having fun... obviously more fun than the guys he killed. IF a guy in Arizona walks around with a pair of 45s holstered, showing the world he is armed & not to be attacked, is he rong or evil for eating lunch with guns on? He is at peace with his surroundings, peace brought by being the most dangerous person in the store... well, except for the 2 other guys packin at that other table. Eveyone has guns & nobody is using them = Peace. The kind of peace that leads to maintaing showers even after the Apoc, because they can still spend time on maintanence due to the lack of attacks by folks afraid of them. Armys dont start wars, that is done by leaders mostly outside the army. SO the military society cannot start a war, yet will take on a Pattonesque or Spartan response to getting attacked.... then, when all forms of life of the attackers has been eliminated, and their soil & wells salted... and refugees routed... then we have the military society back home fixing the plumbing & baking biscuits at peace with the few neighbors they have left. Also keep in mind this society of Showering Military would be a great neighbor to have. Not only can the buy protection via trade, but they dont have to worry about getting attacked by the Peaceful-Psycho-Showerers So, in a gaming Post Apoc campaign, there very well could be a Military Society at peace. Armed & uniformed bakers, plumbers, groceryclerks, cops, librarians... uh, maybe cops wasnt the best example.;) |
| #130roninzero141Jan 31, 2008 1:57:50 | Let me put forward a question. What happens when someone doesn't want to be in the military, doesn't want to have some guy with three stripes telling him what to do all the time and just wants to be a human being!? Oh, that's right you already said. He can leave, and he takes his family with him... Including his doctor wife! Your only fully trained doctor! Oops! Here's another one. A young man doesn't want to be a soldier, you tell him "Fine, get out!". He leaves, taking your daughter (his lover) with him. Your wife is gonna be ******! Lastly, you say the military doesn't start wars, that's the civil authorities decission. So your military society has no one to tell it to make war, or not to!? |
| #131backstabbistJan 31, 2008 10:40:06 | What happens when someone doesn't want to be in the military, doesn't want to have some guy with three stripes telling him what to do all the time and just wants to be a human being!? oh yes, it is far better to have the Asst Mgr telling you what to do all the time for McMinimum wage. And far more fun to have a guy in a tie stopping by your cubicle giving you 3 days to work up a 2 week project. You gotta do what you gota do. If you dont want people telling you what to do, leave the plannet while you can. Type this report, shoot that target, bake this biscuit, drive slower than 75, flip more burgers.... folks will always be telling you what to do, get over it. Oh, that's right you already said. He can leave, and he takes his family with him... Including his doctor wife! Your only fully trained doctor! Not a good mix: 2-3 Brigades with 1 doctor. Imagine the waiting room. I didnt say this was a 5man militariy society... the statement that they have army farmers, bakers, army highschools, & a Colonel Mayor should have indicated the population in the thousands. Sure, in your example of a few puptents and 1 doctor, it would be bad to lose the doctor. But in that example, they will lose everyone the first time an army of more than 2 platoons attacks the god only knows how few folks you have in your 1 Doctor Society. But I fail to see why the army doctor would leave the army, due to not liking authority figures. You dont just get to be a doctor 3 weeks out of highschool, they wouldnt recruit doctors from the graduating class from their military med school, they sent army folks to specialized training . If there was some Med School with a graduating class, then the 1Doctor theory is out the window. A young man doesn't want to be a soldier, you tell him "Fine, get out!". He leaves, taking your daughter (his lover) with him. Your wife is gonna be ******! No daughter of mine would be dating a guy that would rather leave & live in the world of Apoc violence than be part of the Uniformed People At Peace. Besides, what part of baking biscuits does that guy hate so much? He would rather live in the wilds than teach highschool? Is it better to live in fear of the Apoc barbarians, than to be a plumber maintaining showers? But hey, if that guy doesnt want to be part of the Common Defense, that is fine, he can go out and be his own Solo Defense. Good luck, heres some ammo & water, have fun out there by your lonesome tryin to live at Peace.... but then where is he going to SHOWER! I really think it is not that there would be some guy that didnt want to be part of a military society in the Apoc, but that it is YOU that doesnt want to be part of the military in the current enviroment. Gotta remember, we are talking about a game, in the Apoc, not us here & now. All these questions about 'What if a guy doesnt want to be a cyber-mutant zombie nazi?' dont really flesh out the campaign of an apoc setting in regards to who has working showers & who dont. |
| #132roninzero141Jan 31, 2008 15:55:38 | Wow backstabbist, I never took you for a coward before, but clearly you're afraid to face my questions. |
| #133backstabbistFeb 01, 2008 2:33:43 | A) How could one have never considered a guy named Backstabbist a coward. Backstabbing is not real high on the Bravery Chart. B)"but clearly you're afraid to face my questions." Hmm, I did address 3 of the 4, I seemed to have not bothered with the one that I explained so thoroghly beforehand... But I'll paste the answer in to make it an official 4/4 of your points adressed: [INDENT] Lastly, you say the military doesn't start wars, that's the civil authorities decission. So your military society has no one to tell it to make war, or not to!? "Armys dont start wars, that is done by leaders mostly outside the army. SO the military society cannot start a war, yet will take on a Pattonesque or Spartan response to getting attacked.... then, when all forms of life of the attackers has been eliminated, and their soil & wells salted... and refugees routed... then we have the military society back home fixing the plumbing & baking biscuits at peace with the few neighbors they have left" Yes, they dont start wars... they finish wars others start, with extreme predjudice, & totally totally to the max (and beyond). Not often do I get to use the adjective form of the word 'Patton', but it works so well in this case. Since they are not signatories of the Gen/Hag they can use the good stuff.. like the 5militon 12ga Slug Nuke on exposed troops[/INDENT] C) I guess you missed the we are talking about a game part, and somehow want this to be personal in some way. Perhaps on other boards I might take the "coward" & "clearly you're afraid" bait, but we in Modern are more about getting along & playing the game than flaming each other. While I enjoyed exploring Apoc game Peaceful-Psycho-Showerer Military Society, it seems to have brought out the wrong type of response from some folks... so, unfortunately, I will put it in the closet to keep the board civil despite the enjoyment I find in its developement. |
| #134roninzero141Feb 01, 2008 7:36:56 | backstabbist, the point is that you wouldn't commit to saying how your military society (and its leaders) would deal with two very real problems. 1) The potential loss of a key member of personnel because of social inflexibility. Instead you chose to avoid the problem by saying "oh, we'd have more doctors that that." In a perfect world that would be a fine answer, but this is a game about an imperfect world. Maybe she's not a military doctor. Maybe she's a civilian who suddenly got told to put on a uniform by your "Colonel Mayor". The point is that she is leaving, and you don't (for the purposes of this question) have another fully trained (not one even close) doctor. What are you going to do? 2) This one is about handling a personal loss caused by the same social inflexibility. You are a high ranking member of the command structure, maybe even the "Colonel Mayor", and your daughter is in love with a man who is going to leave. Maybe he's an idealist who just doesn't believe you when you say you'll only attack in defence, and lets face it he might be right about that. The problem is he's going to leave, and she's going with him. What are you going to do? |
| #135backstabbistFeb 01, 2008 12:48:27 | Perhaps the solution could be taken from part of the problem. In an apoc of Mutants, Monsters, & Mages destroying infrastructure, a heavy magic society could use magical weather summoning to induce villagewide rain from 6:30 to 7:15 every morning. Each home would have a shower, but that would basicly be just a roofless magicly warm closet. Dont have to worry about the wet streets messing with the commute, because the summoned extra-planar rain would vanish at the end of the spell. If extraplanar junk & magic have messed up the world, use that same junk to fix parts of it ;) |
| #136Mr_RoseFeb 07, 2008 18:12:06 | Dunno what backstabbist would do but:1) The potential loss of a key member of personnel because of social inflexibility. Instead you chose to avoid the problem by saying "oh, we'd have more doctors that that." In a perfect world that would be a fine answer, but this is a game about an imperfect world. Maybe she's not a military doctor. Maybe she's a civilian who suddenly got told to put on a uniform by your "Colonel Mayor". The point is that she is leaving, and you don't (for the purposes of this question) have another fully trained (not one even close) doctor. Suck it up. Sure we lose a few peeps to something-or-other (I hear it's going around these days), but there's not much you can do to force a doctor to work. Other than , y'know, pointin' her in the direction of the sick people and saying "Fix!" loudly: You clearly underestimate your typical doctor's desire to actually do their job. Even in these mercenary times, most won't actually pass a sick person without trying to help if they think they can. Either way, if she leaves, that's one less mouth to feed. 2) This one is about handling a personal loss caused by the same social inflexibility. You are a high ranking member of the command structure, maybe even the "Colonel Mayor", and your daughter is in love with a man who is going to leave. Maybe he's an idealist who just doesn't believe you when you say you'll only attack in defence, and lets face it he might be right about that. The problem is he's going to leave, and she's going with him. Hand her a two-shot derringer in a garter holster and wish her good luck with the mutant zombies when her idealist beau tries to talk them out of eating her. And remind her that she's free to come back any time. Though I did once promise myself I'd disown as a changeling any child of mine that stupid; I must be getting soft in my old age. |
| #137roninzero141Feb 08, 2008 7:53:14 | While it's nice that Mr_Rose actually had the guts to give an answer, it's not exactlly a world shattering display of leadership. Failling to confront a problem (by letting people just leave) is as bad as over-reacting to it (by forcing them to stay). I've got two questions for Mr_Rose... 1) Will you be so cavalier when your own health is at stake? 2) Why do you assume an idealist will be unable to defend himself or others? |
| #138backstabbistFeb 08, 2008 11:34:08 | "While it's nice that Mr_Rose actually had the guts to give an answer" and Bamph! Ye Ole IgnoreList grows by one. Maybe in a few months I see if he grew up any and is ready to participate without personal attacks. Till then, Buh-By Ronin |
| #139roninzero141Feb 08, 2008 18:12:08 | Hey, prove me wrong, answer the questions. No one will be happier than me to see it happen. "While it's nice that Mr_Rose actually had the guts to give an answer" |
| #140Mr_RoseFeb 10, 2008 9:55:16 | 1) Will you be so cavalier when your own health is at stake? Huh. I rather assumed that since she was the "only" doctor, my health was already at stake. I presume you mean in some more immediate sense, such as a broken leg or whatnot? Anyway, like I said, forcing doctors to work by whatever means seldom indices their best work; plus if they're my only hope, they could easily get it into their head to say "f**k the Hippocratic oath!" and deliberately screw up. Plus the fact that, as I also pointed out, Doctors in the vicinity of sick people find it very hard to leave. The last resort would probably be making sure all the invalided were conspicuously lined up along her only way out of the compound. And I'm not going to say anything further on this until you demonstrate some sort of basic understanding of human psychology in your questions, rather than just picking at places you want there to be holes. 2) Why do you assume an idealist will be unable to defend himself or others? I didn't. I assumed that an idealist stupid enough to leave guaranteed safety in exchange for guaranteed death rather than actually work to promote his ideal was just plain stupid and therefore likely to think the blue mushrooms a tasty alternative to that nasty "meat" business or similar. Or if he actually isn't that stupid I'd put the goob on my ruling council in an advisory position. To "ensure that the leadership does not exceed its stated bounds" or some such. Nothing quite like an active opposition that continues un-repressed to convince the people of their leader's honesty. |
| #141roninzero141Feb 10, 2008 15:49:10 | And I'm not going to say anything further on this until you demonstrate some sort of basic understanding of human psychology in your questions, rather than just picking at places you want there to be holes. I understand human psychology quite well, and I think you might be over simplifying things a bit. The idea that a doctor can't simply walk away because of the Hippocratic oath doesn't take a number of things into account. Firstly the nature of the society she's leaving, it's basically a military dictatorship. Secondy she's leaving with her family, she's hardly likely to abandon them in favour of non-family. Or if he actually isn't that stupid I'd put the goob on my ruling council in an advisory position. To "ensure that the leadership does not exceed its stated bounds" or some such. Nothing quite like an active opposition that continues un-repressed to convince the people of their leader's honesty. Again you clearly don't like this guy, now what am I to make of that little bit of "human psychology"? Your leadership is a military chain of command, which is what he's against, he's hardly likely to join some toothless "council" you can just ignore. |
| #142Mr_RoseFeb 12, 2008 4:58:47 | OK, no more answers until you stop adding random extra conditionals because you've been outmanoeuvred. Also, a family is a socking giant lever to lean on. Which would make my job that much easier: "No worky doctorin'? No family feedin'." "And good luck with the barren wastes, 'cause you ain't takin' any of my guns or farmin' implements with you neither." As for Enlightenment Dude, who said the no attack except in self defence was a lie anyway? I may well be a harsh, unyielding bastard at the best of times but I am at least honest about it. I just tend to respond to idiots the same way a kitten responds to a half-dead mouse.... |
| #143roninzero141Feb 12, 2008 16:03:31 | Okay Mr_Rose, what "random extra conditionals" are you claiming I've added? She's not refusing her services. she and her family are leaving out of protest of the leadership and social system proposed by backstabbist. And now you're adding things, a "barren waste"? Are you seriously suggesting that this outpost is a green oasis in the middle of a desert? "Enlightenment Dude"! You have it in for this guy, and he's not even real. Lets put a little perspective on his situation, maybe that will help. The military society propsed by backstabbist has a lot of flaws, mostly because he doesn't take human nature into consideration. People arten't going to put up with being press ganged into service and toldhow to conduct their lives, basically it's fascism. Sure, at first it'll hold together, people like feeling safe, but these systems can't hold together without a real threat. Eventually the leadership is going to need to justify why they need all this militarism, and zombies wont do. |
| #144Mr_RoseFeb 14, 2008 14:37:51 | She's not refusing her services. she and her family are leaving out of protest of the leadership and social system proposed by backstabbist. Leaving and denying you her services is different from not leaving and denying you her services, from the point of view of accessing her services, how? And now you're adding things, a "barren waste"? Are you seriously suggesting that this outpost is a green oasis in the middle of a desert? So, what happened to the Apocalypse? Or did you forget what board you were posting on? Lets put a little perspective on his situation, maybe that will help. The military society propsed by backstabbist has a lot of flaws, mostly because he doesn't take human nature into consideration. People arten't going to put up with being press ganged into service and toldhow to conduct their lives, basically it's fascism. OK, you have clearly confused the system backstabbist proposed with some other system that you made up, because the details do not seem to match. However, let us speak to the one you think he proposed as that is clearly where your mind is right now: Enforced mandatory employment worked for approximately four thousand years in Egypt, 900 or more in Europe and it worked up until 1912 in China (about two thousand years). Heck, it still works to this very day in certain parts of the world. As for the "it's basically fascism" epithet: First, grow up. Second, you need to look up some world history; in most of the places where fascism or fascism-like systems were tried, the majority of the people welcomed it. Since you apparently think that fascism is synonymous with Nazism, I'll also point out that Hitler was elected by a popular majority. People love being told what to do - it frees them of all responsibility for their own actions and releases them from the obligation to think. Sure, at first it'll hold together, people like feeling safe, but these systems can't hold together without a real threat. Eventually the leadership is going to need to justify why they need all this militarism, and zombies wont do. Zombies really will do. FFS, have you seen what happens to "people" when the electricity goes away? Chaos, destruction and what amounts to feral behaviour after as little as twenty-four hours. Add the constant threat of being eaten on top of that and people certainly will accept whatever they get told to do "in the interests of public safety". Especially if you can just point over the wall and say "those zombies" when people start asking questions about who or what is going to eat them in their sleep. "Enlightenment Dude"! You have it in for this guy, and he's not even real. Do not ascribe to me motivations for which you have no evidence, especially when you have already shown that you are a shocking judge of human nature: You are bound to fail. |
| #145eadFeb 22, 2008 10:03:05 | Quote: I'll also point out that Hitler was elected by a popular majority. Even when the Jews were persecuted, the German citizens followed Hitler blindly to their doom. |
| #146backstabbistFeb 22, 2008 12:53:04 | Which could explain where the Apoc cyber-mutant zombie nazis came from.... a secret Project Phoenix<1> left burried deep under the rubble of a ww2 failure to conquer the world. Cause as we all know, nazis are like roaches(or zombies), you can never stomp them all out<2> , they always seem to keep popping back up in one way or another... even from beyond the grave By 'evolving' into a group that doesnt shower, they can take over the world by depriving humanity of the infrastructure that allows showering.... resulting in the demise of mankind & victory for the C-MZN <1> Akin to Operation Last Laugh, rise from the ashes <2> Reference material: 'The Last Stand' game |
| #147eadFeb 22, 2008 13:02:05 | By 'evolving' into a group that doesnt shower, they can take over the world by depriving humanity of the infrastructure that allows showering.... resulting in the demise of mankind & victory for the C-MZN I knew, that there was some smelling funny of the C-MZN. |
| #148crwydrynyMar 15, 2008 14:07:09 | humm.... just a question. why does everyone seam to think that a milatary dictatorship would turn out like the nazis. the way a dictatorship is run would largely depend on the people running it. if the dictator was some gun crazed expansonist war mongerer then yeah I'm sure they would end up going to war every other week but if on the other hand the leader is a peaceful guy that just wants to make sure his borders are well defended while everyone at home does what is needed to keep the hot water pumping and the streets free of crime then I don't see how it would cause a problem. just look at america, it is a democracy but it has been constantly at war with one person or another for over 50 years (korea, vietnam, cuba, afghafistan, iraq, kosovo, iraq again, afghfistan again) while places like cuba haven't been in direct conflict with anyone since castro and his band overthrew the corrupt former leader. i could go into the whole social-political explination about how difrent factors affect how diffrent forms of goverment develop ranging from out side infulances to corruption and oppression but I would be here all night just covering the basics |
| #149backstabbistMar 15, 2008 15:45:11 | What kind of goverment did Robotech have when they folded & were all alone? That didnt look too much like an military oppressive dictatorship, unless of course the series was actually SDF-1 propaganda, put forth by the Iron Fist Captain & the Bridge Bunnies of Doom, that crushed opposition speach & personal fredoms of the characters of the show. |
| #150gldn_drgnMar 15, 2008 19:26:42 | I just started reading this thread, and stopped around page three. I want to bring this back around to things that never seemed to be adressed. Connecting generators to your home electical circuit: The average person the first time will probably forget to disconnect them selves for the grid at all. Also in high rise buldings there is a limit to how high a pump will pump. I seem to remember 32' being the limit, something to do with the 32' per square in of air pressure. So most current high rises need several pumps to get that tank of the roof full. Generators need fuel you can talk about solar panels but they won't work at night, during cloudy days or if they are smow covered. The same is true about adding a water pump to your house. don't forget to close your water main. Who knows where there water main shut off is? Those city water reserviors stored on roofs and in large tanks, are still stored on top of a structure. So they are just as vulnerable to colapse as any other structure maybe even more so with 6lbs per gallon of weight. The ones on top of high rise buildings would be destroyed in a nuclear air burst so they aren't reliable, not to mention will they be rusting and maintained? There was several people praising the country life, saying they can plow and hunt. OK, how many years of seeds do you have stored for future planting. I would guess that they are planting large fields of oats, corn, barley etc... So where are they going to get a well rounded selection of vegetables from the seed store, nope; and how about meat. How about the fuel to run those tractors never mind threshers and bigger harvesting equipment. When your shot gun breaks, in a fire fight now what? Or there are just too many people coming at you. Many soldiers have died with empty mags, also with full ones too. Someone mentioned fishing for catfish all day. So a family of three will need how many catfish 2, 3? Some one along the coast cann do what island fisherman around the world have done go catch tuna, shark, whale, whatever; and feed their family for the week. Heating the water is really not that hard and probably the easiest part. Hot water expands. A still like contraption should make the water hot enough to rise and come out the shower head. Here in the suburban city. I could burn my dead neighbors furniture, his dead dog, and if I had to his or her corpse (for health reasons of course). With a little time I could burn his house. The sewage thing maybe an whole other problem. A cesspool will have to be drained and city sewer pipe is going to flood with out pumps. But a leachfield will work, also there have been people who dug their cess pools in the wrong place so the waste was contaminating the neighbors well water why not just do that deliberately, the neighbor will be dead anyway. I live in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, USA. In a quarter mile walk I can drop down 100' to sea level and then go ocean fishing for Cod, Blues, Stripers. I have 8 neighbors around me immediately for heat and hot water. I have heard of some very simple ways soldiers have adapted their environments during the last 100 years to gain some level of comfort luxury. Here is on from the motor pool. Take a 50 gallon drum mount it on it's side cut a door in one end add some heavy flat stone start a small fire near one end, now at the other end mount used motor oil with a screw valve to adjust the drip. Push the flat stones so the oil drip hits it splashes and atomizes then burns and don't forget the exhaust vent. |
| #151lonewolf_the_hunterApr 01, 2008 17:54:13 | I tihnk there is one important point that hasn't been more than touched on the talk about how long would the showers last and tricks people have found to get around a lack of nessisary items. How long would it matter? If the world is in the middle of an apocalypse then most daily rutines would soon be replased by the daily nessity of finding food, keeping warm, and finding drinkable water once the supply of water in home tanks ran out. Which is another factor in how long you could take showers. But, not all of are daily rutines would disapeer at once, many people would continue to do as many of the things in there pre-apocalypse rutine as they still could, which perhaps more than hygene would lead these people to shower away their drinking water |
| #152RagitsuApr 03, 2008 9:00:12 | I just started reading this thread, and stopped around page three. Thank you . |
| #153crwydrynyApr 05, 2008 17:03:59 | Gldn Drgn makes a few good points but there are also a few flaws in gldn drgn's statementsConnecting generators to your home electical circuit: The average person the first time will probably forget to disconnect them selves for the grid at all. Also in high rise buldings there is a limit to how high a pump will pump. I seem to remember 32' being the limit, something to do with the 32' per square in of air pressure. So most current high rises need several pumps to get that tank of the roof full. Generators need fuel you can talk about solar panels but they won't work at night, during cloudy days or if they are smow covered. any one with a simple understanding of electronics can do this but granted there are a lot of people these days who's understanding of electronics goes as far as "where's the phone book so I can call an electrition" hopefull come the end of the world they will be the first to die and stop wasting air and food that the rest of us need lol. next why would you want to pump water into a highrise building? why not just live on the ground floor? or just build a water tank on the roof and pipe rain water down to where you are planning to stay. personaly come the end of the world I would stick to a nice small building simply becuse it's more likely to get over looked by roving gangs and becuse it would be easier to maintain (you don't want the ceiling to fall on you becuse last week you decided to fix up the other end of the buliding and not the part you are currently in) as for generators needing fuel. well you can scrounge fuel out of cars but that will quickly run dry. most generators and electric motors for that matter can be easiely modified into wind turbines or even water turbines if you happen to be near a river, or with an old bike and some imagination you can get fit and heat up your water, run your radio and charge up the battries all at the same time. granted solar has it's limitations but why not use it to charge up a set of car battries for light and heat through those long winter nights. how any cars are there near you? how many of those cars have battries that either have charge or can be easiely recharged? heck most cars have a simple inbuild generator (that little motor conecting to the fan, it charges the battrey) There was several people praising the country life, saying they can plow and hunt. OK, how many years of seeds do you have stored for future planting. I would guess that they are planting large fields of oats, corn, barley etc... So where are they going to get a well rounded selection of vegetables from the seed store, nope; and how about meat. How about the fuel to run those tractors never mind threshers and bigger harvesting equipment. When your shot gun breaks, in a fire fight now what? Or there are just too many people coming at you. Many soldiers have died with empty mags, also with full ones too. what is wheat? or atleast what was it before it was transformed over years of selective breeding of the plant? it was common grass. that stuff that grows wild in the fields and that will spring up in the local park if it's not kept mowed short. all wheat is is grass sead, just bigger. and if you can't get enough grass seads to grind into flour, how about plantain seads? they're not as good as grass but they do make decient grain. don't forget after the end of the world you're not growing comercial crops you'll be growing survival food. a decient sized field can easiely produce enough grain to keep the average family in bread and cookies for months. and if you harvist by hand you don't really need to replant, infact all you'll have to do is drop a few seads while harvesting them and you'll have grain next year. as for vegitables, there are 100's of wild version of comercial fruits and vegitables in the wild. they may not be as big but they are just as edible. all apples found in the shops came from the humble crab apple just after 100s of years of selecting the apples that are a bit redder or a bit bigger and we have 100s of apples to chose from. same with strawberries, cabage, potatoes, parsnips and various other plants. infact there are tons of plants considered weeds by most people that are infact edible herbs and vegitables. who would know a wild parsnip if they saw one? who would know the diffrence between a wild parsnip and a comercial one if they saw it on their plate? just look at all the plants growing in the cracks of the pavement, on patches of waste land or around parks. there are hunddreds of eddible plants growing around us and it's easy to just pick a few for dinner and maybe store a few for planting next year. as for the farm machenery, did they need all that during the middle ages, the iron age or even the neolithic period. heck did they need all that 150 years ago? no. they used horse and hand pulled ploughs, they harvested crops by hand and planted them by hand. all the modern machenery is designed to allow the few small farms the ability to feed entire countries at the lowest cost possible. in an apocolyptic situation how many people will you be feeding with your crops? yourself, your family, survivors in your local comunity or the whole planet? you'll only need to produce the amount of food for the amount of people you'll be feeding. for example where I live is semi rural. i can take a 30 seccond walk behind my house and I'll be in a small patch of wasteland with enough grass seads, plantains, dandelions, blackberries, wimberries, wild strawberries and nuts to feed myself and those people in my street for a few weeks. take a further walk and there is a river full of trout and more wild berries, nuts, roots and herbs to feed my street for a year, not to mention the rabbits, rats, ferral cats, pidgions and other animals. less than ten minuets in another direction and i'll be on a mountain with a sheep and cow farm. by building a small pen and herbing the animals into it I can easily provide enough meat to feed everyone on steaks and lamb chops all year and still have enough left over for breeding next year or two. then there's wild berries on the mountain, and the park just before the end of town full of beach, pine, juniper and sweet chestnut trees. 20-30 minuets in another direction is another mountain filled with sheep, rabbits, foxes, pegions, phessant as well as various berries and nuts. less than an hour walk in another direction and there's a forest filled with crab apple trees, hazel nuts, beach nuts and sweet chest nuts, a nearby cow farm and plenty of wild animals for hunting. infact there's probably enough food in the area to keep my village and several nearby towns and villages fed for a while without putting too much strain on the local resources. The sewage thing maybe an whole other problem. A cesspool will have to be drained and city sewer pipe is going to flood with out pumps. But a leachfield will work, also there have been people who dug their cess pools in the wrong place so the waste was contaminating the neighbors well water why not just do that deliberately, the neighbor will be dead anyway. granted without management it will be a problem. but how long does it take human waste to decompose? not very long. infact if you treated it correctly you could easiely convert it into fuel for cooking or into fertilizer (if mixed with other materials to replace the missing minnerals) liquid waste can be filtered and distilled to form drinking water or disposed of away from anywhere it could cause a problem and in no time it will break down in the earth. after all urine is basically just ammonia which is used by plants to form nitrate compounds. don't forget if it's the end of teh world. then you're not going to be dealing wit 1000's of tons of human waste you'll be dealing with just a few kilos (depending on the size of the group) with less than 20 people a simple trench to dump the waste in and bury it will do. moving it every few weeks to a new location and it will have the added benifit of helping the soil once the bacteria get going at the buried waste. (that's why cemitaries have such green lawns) I could probably go on for hours but I've been told I tend to ramble a bit when it comes to survival (so sorry for the long post and all the typos I may have missed lol) |
| #154RagitsuApr 06, 2008 11:34:01 | for example where I live is semi rural. i can take a 30 seccond walk behind my house and I'll be in a small patch of wasteland with enough grass seads, plantains, dandelions, blackberries, wimberries, wild strawberries and nuts to feed myself and those people in my street for a few weeks. take a further walk and there is a river full of trout and more wild berries, nuts, roots and herbs to feed my street for a year, not to mention the rabbits, rats, ferral cats, pidgions and other animals. less than ten minuets in another direction and i'll be on a mountain with a sheep and cow farm. by building a small pen and herbing the animals into it I can easily provide enough meat to feed everyone on steaks and lamb chops all year and still have enough left over for breeding next year or two. then there's wild berries on the mountain, and the park just before the end of town full of beach, pine, juniper and sweet chestnut trees. 20-30 minuets in another direction is another mountain filled with sheep, rabbits, foxes, pegions, phessant as well as various berries and nuts. less than an hour walk in another direction and there's a forest filled with crab apple trees, hazel nuts, beach nuts and sweet chest nuts, a nearby cow farm and plenty of wild animals for hunting. infact there's probably enough food in the area to keep my village and several nearby towns and villages fed for a while without putting too much strain on the local resources. That's all well and good, but how versed are you in preservation techniques such as pickling, canning, smoking, curing, jamming and the like? ![]() How about testing the soil? While you could have something good for a while, the exact circumstances of the apocalypse could quickly render that area infertile or even inhospitable. Then taking some seed samples and devoting a kind of shelter, be it above or underground (betting on the former) to a full time garden in case you can't rely on the current areas anymore? |
| #155backstabbistApr 06, 2008 12:09:08 | That's all well and good, but how versed are you in preservation techniques such as pickling, canning, smoking, curing, jamming and the like? Its called Homebrewing. Liquid Grain, good for years. Even keeps your drinking supply from getting stale. From OatmealPorters to PearCicer & Meads, to fuiltsyrups with SG's approaching 1.5... balanced nutritian from a few bottles a day. Even without RonCo's help, I can make a plum turn into a prune, or a steak turn into Jerky if I'm close enough to an ocean. The underlieing question, to survive you have to be smarter than a dark ages guy, are you In or Out? Forageing is not hard. Alcohol Preservation, and Dehydration is not hard. Alternating current steam turbine electrical generation is not hard. HeadPressure gravity plumbing is not hard. |
| #156RagitsuApr 06, 2008 12:34:51 | The issue isn't difficulty, it's knowledge. Edit: After reading the topic again, all I have to say is: Godwin's Law much? |
| #157backstabbistApr 06, 2008 14:31:13 | and that Knowlege is what make some folks kings with plumbing, pneumatic BoltGuns, VanDeGraff DefenseFields, & breweries... while others sleep on wet cave floors begging for someone to feed them. Perfect setup for a Informative Democracy: Those that have the Knowlege get ballots, those without the Knowlege get to watch democracy in action. |
| #158crwydrynyApr 07, 2008 8:05:30 | That's all well and good, but how versed are you in preservation techniques such as pickling, canning, smoking, curing, jamming and the like? well I did study A-level chemistry and physics in school. I used to teach a small survival class and can make a full 3 course meal including cake for desert while in the middle of the woods and equiped with nothing more than a knife and my flint and steel but for the uninformed here are a few simple methods of preserving food 1) drying. can easiely be done by hanging food in the wind, or leaving on a hot rock in direct sunlight or next to a fire. not the best moethod but a quick and simple method to help preserve nuts, seads, fruit and non fatty meats (doesn't work too well with ducks, and I'm told sea birds) as a note grain was found in the pyramids in egypt dating back more than 3000 years and was still perfectly edible due to the dry conditions it was kept in (don't ask me who tried it to see it was still edible) 2) smoke drying simalar to the above but covers the food with a protective layer. it's dry so prevents mold and the protective smoke layer seals it from bacteria. 3) biltong known as jerky to all the yanks here. basically sun dried meat. 4) pemmican made from biltong (jerky) basically take equel amounts of biltong and rendered fat, shread and pound the meat while slowly melting the animal fat over a fire (do not allow to boil) pour the molten fat over the meat and pack in a waterproof container (plastic bag, leather wrap) it will keep a long time and is one of my favourates for long hikes. it contains almost everything the body needs (except vitimin C but you can add that through dehydrating lemon or orange juice) 4) pickling and salting salt is easy to get if your near the shore but harder to get if you're further inland. one method is to boil it out of certin plants or to make it if you have the chemicals available (hydrochloric acid and sodium) or you could just obtain it from rock salt (that pink stuff they put on roads to stop them getting icy) acids for pickling can be ottained from citrus fruits (actually most fruit have acidic juices just citrus have stronger concentration of acids) or you could just make ascetic acid (vinigar) by basically making wine then letting it go bad. you could also use alcohol but this would mean you'll need a lot of water and various minerals to replace the minerals that the alcohol destroys, not to mention an inpaired sense of judgement is not a good thing in a survival situation. How about testing the soil? While you could have something good for a while, the exact circumstances of the apocalypse could quickly render that area infertile or even inhospitable. testing the soil can easiely be done with a few household chemicals. even something as simple as red cabage juice. and beyond that there is always the simple method of hydroponics (you ever grow watercress on cottonwool in school?). just rig up a still and a well or water catcher to provide water. get some old pots and pans, polistyrine packageing ect, a few clean rags and you hand yourself the basics for a hydroponics bay without having to worry about toxins in the soil. with a bit of chemical know how you can adjust the nutrients in the water to feed the plants and keep everything growing. |
| #159backstabbistApr 07, 2008 13:39:28 | not to mention an inpaired sense of judgement is not a good thing in a survival situation Nonsense! Chemically induced impaired judgement & denial is an important aspect of Survival Morale. BigAl: Well, thats it, game over.... with the hellgate open its the end of the world. You know what that means? Jimmy: Apocalypse Party? BigAl: Sure, why not. You get the booze, I'll go tell everyone... uh, everyone still alive that is. Princess: I can now say just how much I have hated getting stuck with you guys. Jimmy: Hey, dont let the end of the world get to ya. Lighten up for cryin out loud. |
| #160RagitsuApr 07, 2008 14:40:37 | Speaking of showers in the apocalypse:![]() |
| #161backstabbistApr 07, 2008 15:30:57 | Obviously the guy that lives there aint married- where are the 350 little bottles, jars, & tubes of junk a woman litters all over the bathroom.... and you cant see it in the pic, but the toilet seat has been removed & stowed in a little cabinet down the hall. Try that when you're married!;) |
| #162crwydrynyApr 07, 2008 18:39:08 | Nonsense! lol well I guess diffrent people cope diffrent ways. though when the big bad guys come knocking for the month's "food tax" you could always give them the alcohol soaked stuff and watch them pass out drunk then take their guns. tie them up and use them as farm hands. or just use them to fertilize the fields mwahahahahaha and as for that bathroom Ragitsu, urghh... gah! don't tell me people actually design rooms like that *shudder* that bathroom is better decorated than my living room. then again I'm a simple guy who never understood the who fashion thing and the need to make everything fancy looking. heck I'd be to scaired to use that room for fear of ruining the expensive decor. all I can say is the owner of that bathroom has too much money (more proof he's not married and is most probably gay, due to not haveing a woman take all his money lol (just kidding about that last bit girls lol)) surely there is some sort of health and safty law against that much slippery marble in a room with that much water. and can someone tell me why anyone would need two sinks and both a bath and shower *crwydryny's brain go boom at the thought of that bathroom ![]() ![]() * |
| #163RagitsuApr 07, 2008 19:18:42 | I'm guessing it's for the guest's guests, but it's impractical if you have to go in and wash your hands when someone else is showering, for example. Enjoy it while you can - I doubt it'll last long unless you have plumbers and mechanics on hand and even then, looters are about (unless you invested in fortress like defenses as well) |
| #164backstabbistApr 07, 2008 19:46:58 | Refer to my Military Society to maintain order as well as showers. Looters are treated with Horse Medicine: Stealing: Shoot them. Robbery: Shoot them. Assault/Battery: ShockCollar Treason: Shoot them Whats left is a well mannered, polite, hostile, but good hygene society |
| #165crwydrynyApr 08, 2008 10:06:38 | Whats left is a well mannered, polite, hostile, but good hygene society or to put it another way 3 guys and a cat (everyone else having been shot for being too brutish greedy or just unhygenic |
| #166RagitsuApr 17, 2008 1:11:53 | Speaking of hygiene, what are some examples of clothing that's both rugged and easy to clean? I imagine spending time washing your garments isn't likely if you're far away from running water or areas of high precipitation. |
| #167nclancemanApr 23, 2008 22:17:21 | Speaking of hygiene, what are some examples of clothing that's both rugged and easy to clean? Denim? If you're not worried about set in stains, soap and a scrub brush goes a long way with denim clothing. |
| #168RagitsuApr 27, 2008 15:45:01 | Is denim easy to manufacture? ![]() Sure, there'll be stores still around for raiding, but at some point you might have to start producing things beyond the obvious necessities. |
| #169arsulonApr 29, 2008 11:24:27 | Forgive me if this has been mentioned already, but Post Apocalypse Hero, by Hero Games, has a great section on the number of weeks, months, and years it takes things to fall apart and change; everything from nuclear power plants shutting down due to lack of operator input to ammunition and gasoline becoming chemically inert. I think WOTC's book has more bang-for-the-buck, but the Hero book is worth having for the campaign settings and aforementioned "things fall apart" list. Here's the 411 on the book by the designer: http://www.herogames.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63171 |
| #170RagitsuMay 01, 2008 1:22:23 | Would you happen to know if it also projects how quickly society itself would change? |
| #171arsulonMay 01, 2008 1:38:13 | No, it doesn't really get into that; probably because social change is too dependant on the nature of the apocalypse and the amount of time elapsed since it happened. |
| #172Mr_RoseMay 04, 2008 5:07:43 | Is denim easy to manufacture? Denim is basically cross-woven cotton cloth. As long as you can get suitable fibres and a loom, it's easier to make (though slightly less durable) than leather. You just gotta know how. |
| #173RagitsuMay 04, 2008 19:45:29 | Then I guess that's an out for me: all I know is some basic carpentry, but not masonry, metal smithing, textiles, etc...:embarrass *goes to locate as much denim as possible* For anyone that's seen Fight Club, there's an interesting line by Tyler Durden that basically talks about how "you'll make clothes that last you your entire life", but I missed what exactly he was talking about. Anyone here know? |
| #174Mr_RoseMay 05, 2008 13:18:37 | He was talking about pre-industrial agrarian societies, or possibly even pre-agricultural hunter-gatherers making their own clothes from leather or whatnot and not buying designer junk off a peg then never wearing it. The one caveat is that your clothes only last a lifetime because your life is so damn short. He didn't actually mention this in the film though. |
| #175RagitsuMay 05, 2008 18:11:24 | An interesting point, Mr_Rose !I didn't even consider that. I mean, I knew that their activities were rebellious and constantly putting lives on the line, but the connection between a simpler lifestyle that was also more active (and therefore, reduced the lifespan) didn't fully hit home till now. |
| #176RagitsuNov 20, 2008 20:16:21 | Wiiiiiise fwom your gwaves! |
| #177deusexoneiroNov 20, 2008 21:25:32 | I just found this for the 1st time, and I'm impressed -- and a tiny bit spooked -- by the amount of thought put into it. I'm curious if that creativity can be channeled down a similiar stream, and so I'm asking for a contest, of sorts. Assume the following: 1) The apocalypse hits. EVERYBODY PANIC. (It's your choice of apoc, but it doesn't organically destroy the soil in your neighborhood/region/neck of the woods.) 2) You, and your 1-3 dozen closest friends survive; miraculously, everyone organizes to your superior wisdom. 3) You find, steal, or loot enough food for everyone to eat for a whole year -- you trip over a survivalist's empty bunker, or a grain silo, or something. What type of culture/tribe/community could rise from the wasteland? Think time-tables -- 10 years down the road, 50, 150. Think infrastructure & organization (or don't - write about a group of pseudo-Sioux). Use crunch! Use fluff! I'm building a setting (post-apoc PL ~7 d20 modern), but I've hit the wall. Desert raiders, archeological scavangers, and desperate farmers are well-worn cliches, and I need ideas that are new -- or, at least, new to me. Show me the world you see when you hear the words "post-apocalypse." I'm in yur forum, steelin yur thread... and that makes me a punk. sorry. look for "Post-Apoc Settings?" |
| #178RagitsuNov 20, 2008 22:06:27 | Yeah, isn't it funny that right after the apocalypse starts, deserts start appearing all over the place? :P |
| #179nclancemanNov 22, 2008 16:32:57 | That's one of the reasons I was disappointed that Fallout Tactics 2 got cancelled. It was supposed to be set in my neck of the woods and the 'villain' so to speak was an activated G.E.C.K. that got irradiated and started making mutated flora, retaking the wasteland. So, yeah. Killer kudzu taking over the South. Just like real life! |
| #180RagitsuDec 16, 2008 13:29:25 | Assume the following: The biggest problem around here is not the fertile fields, streams and forests, but the cold. Everyone would need to learn log cabin building right quick, or die of exposure. |
| #181nodaishoDec 16, 2008 14:09:32 | Short-term, you could probably find a cave, use tents to block the entrance from wind, and use those until you can get enough wood for a log cabin, and a place that is almost impossible to find to build it. Knowing what kind of clothes to pick would also help you survive the cold, don't wear cotton, wear lots of layers. |
| #182backstabbistDec 17, 2008 11:51:04 | Should be plenty of portable 4 wheel caves laying around to setup home in. Along with the modern pueblos: cargo container stacks |
| #183RagitsuDec 17, 2008 12:30:54 | Ah yes, living in the Midwest has it's advantages :D. |
| #184Mr_RoseDec 19, 2008 12:51:48 | Should be plenty of portable 4 wheel caves laying around to setup home in. Along with the modern pueblos: cargo container stacks The trouble with cargo container stacks is that they tend to proliferate near ports, and major ports are primary targets in most any sort of organised apocalypse ('organised' in the sense that it is initiated or entirely due to the actions of one or more sentient factions, be they aliens, evil androids from the future or just plain old morons with big red buttons) and so are likely to wind up destroyed or otherwise uninhabitable in such a circumstance. |
| #185RagitsuDec 19, 2008 13:01:34 | The trouble with cargo container stacks is that they tend to proliferate near ports, and major ports are primary targets in most any sort of organised apocalypse ('organised' in the sense that it is initiated or entirely due to the actions of one or more sentient factions, be they aliens, evil androids from the future or just plain old morons with big red buttons) and so are likely to wind up destroyed or otherwise uninhabitable in such a circumstance. Hm, what about railroads that are further inland? |
| #186drdrake17Dec 19, 2008 23:28:51 | That's an interesting idea, actually. In my mind, the vast majority of railroad tracks in this country sit on land that is (usually) underdeveloped, generally because... well, who honestly wants to live next to a loud, obnoxious railroad? On the other hand, because they're sitting on undeveloped land, the ability to start a little farm would be easier than if, say, you were in the suburbs of Los Angeles. Also, presumably any smaller water sources - ponds, small streams, whatever - would have a higher chance of being untouched, due (again) to the close proximity of nasty-ass railroads & the subsequent pollution from same (which would be less of a problem if they aren't running anymore). The problem is that, in my mind, cargo containers big (and solid) enough to act as shelter are only in areas of loading & unloading: namely, large urban centers - not the type of place you wanna start a farm post-Bomb. However, the possibility of a cargo-train simply being abandoned by the engineer, or knocked off the tracks, or (plot effect X), in the middle of the boonies isn't remote. Still, I'll trust in my little all-weather 2-person tent & thermal bedroll. You can live in that while you build your log cabin (or whatever). Oh yeah, regarding that fact that all Post-Apoc stories seem to take place in the damn Sierra Desert: I was talking to an ecology major I work with, and, apparently, Bombs knock around the local ecosystem like nobody's business: irradiating land, screwing up the soil's ability to retain water (and support plant life), and generally giving the area a prolonged dry spell. (<- Greatest run-on sentence evar.) Also, the theme of "Man Vs Nature" is much more impressive when you couldn't even eat grass if you wanted to. Back to the original point of this post: reliably warm water, called from the ether by the turn of a faucet, should be seen as a high point in the battle of Civilization against the Universe. Soaking in a pool of 80-degree H2O was the province of the elite, and the majority made due with streams. Getting a hot shower to work - reliably - post-Bomb would be an impressive feat, and a sign to the neighbors that You Are Badass. |
| #187RagitsuDec 20, 2008 0:46:31 | It also depends on the nature of the "bombs" and if where you live was considered worth bombing in the first place. |
| #188nodaishoDec 20, 2008 8:34:22 | This bit of the discussion reminds me of Jericho, you know, that show that was on NBC for a season, got canceled, and got uncanceled for another half season? In that, they had to remove a few inches of soil from farms after the fallout and rain reached them from Denver. In considering your post-apocalyptic retreat, be sure to consider the distance to the south-east you are of any nuclear reactors or population centers, that's the way the weather will take most of the radiation. Of course, if you have a map of how fallout would hit certain places, that is even better, but I doubt many people have that. edit: At least, south-east is where I see almost all of the weather fronts going, could just be around here. |
| #189RagitsuDec 20, 2008 19:23:46 | Why is that every time there is a movie about the world is coming to an end, people are packing up and moving away from their home. My question is "Where will they go to then?!" and "WHY?" |
| #190nodaishoDec 20, 2008 21:56:27 | Well, if you are in the city, it is probably going to go to hell quick. You want to find someplace remote that you can survive in for a while. Preferably with more people that you trust, and guns. Can't have too many guns, or too much ammo. |
| #191RagitsuDec 20, 2008 23:10:48 | I could understand that if it was a surgical-strike type apocalypse (bombs in the cities) but this even happens in "the world will literally END" movies as well. |
| #192nodaishoDec 21, 2008 15:18:32 | Maybe because it is more interesting than a bunch of people holing up? |
| #193RagitsuJan 01, 2009 12:50:11 | That poses an interesting question: assuming the "apocalypse" was going to happen and survival was feasible (with the will to survive needed), would you stay put or move away from your current location? |
| #194tema69Jan 01, 2009 15:06:02 | That really depends on the type of apoc... I'd stay in the neighbourhood, I guess, because I know the area. But I'd run out of supplies sometime, and I guess I'd be f*cked then. |
| #195AnimeSniperJan 01, 2009 15:37:20 | That really depends on the type of apoc... I'd stay in the neighbourhood, I guess, because I know the area. But I'd run out of supplies sometime, and I guess I'd be f*cked then. And don't t forget he classic 'Neighbors scoff at your preparedness' but when the world gets flushed they either plea for your stuff or outright try to kill you... Of course barring everyone burns the maps you can always find out where you need to go... |
| #196backstabbistMay 13, 2009 13:17:00 | oh, no.... dont even think about it I dont need all of you guys showing up wanting to be roomies |
| #197RagitsuMay 13, 2009 20:23:39 | Legendary thread. |
| #198RagitsuSep 18, 2009 11:37:33 | People love it when you lose, they love dirty laundry.
Wow, did Don Henley really prophesize the apocalypse? |
| #199backstabbistMar 12, 2010 23:56:30 | well, this thread could have survived the onesite conversion better |
| #200RagitsuMar 19, 2010 23:00:46 | backstabbist, are you referring to how the formatting has been screwed up? |
| #201backstabbistMar 19, 2010 23:27:44 | I saw a typo in an old post, when I tried to edit it, the post layout was completely scrambled |