Ah, Mississippi, where they kick you off the football team for supporting breast cancer research.

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

EscherEnigma

Nov 11, 2010 11:56:32
[true story].

You'd think after that whole mess with Constance McMillen last school year that Mississippi schools would try to stay off the bad press radar for a while, but there ya have it.
#2

scypio

Nov 11, 2010 12:11:16
Not suprising. If you're not going to follow the coach's instruction and alter your uniform, then you put yourself at risk for getting kicked off the team. Its stupid, but not only are schools run by Nazi's, but sport teams (especially football) are also run by Nazi's.

I remember Jake Plummer was fined heavily each game that he wrote Pat Tillman's number on his cleets (or some other part of his uniform). Combine that with the kid suspended from school because of his haircut and you can see how this situation is doubly "bad" to the authorities.

The real question is why does the student require football participation to graduate? Did he substitute it for his gym requirement or something? If so, he should be aware of the potential consequences before his "protest".

But I agree that schools and football teams go overboard with the whole Nazi-ism.
#3

ADHadh

Nov 11, 2010 12:38:59
Not suprising. If you're not going to follow the coach's instruction and alter your uniform, then you put yourself at risk for getting kicked off the team. Its stupid, but not only are schools run by Nazi's, but sport teams (especially football) are also run by Nazi's.

I remember Jake Plummer was fined heavily each game that he wrote Pat Tillman's number on his cleets (or some other part of his uniform). Combine that with the kid suspended from school because of his haircut and you can see how this situation is doubly "bad" to the authorities.

The real question is why does the student require football participation to graduate? Did he substitute it for his gym requirement or something? If so, he should be aware of the potential consequences before his "protest".

But I agree that schools and football teams go overboard with the whole Nazi-ism.


Godwin'd in 2! :D

Yeah, that was probably some arguing between the two that led to kicking out. Coaches don't like insubordination.
It was mentioned though that the coach ridiculed him for those shoes. Did he deemed them "unmalny"? What's manlier than caring about boobies?
#4

Escef

Nov 11, 2010 14:33:50
Not suprising. If you're not going to follow the coach's instruction and alter your uniform, then you put yourself at risk for getting kicked off the team.



Well, if you read the article, the coach never had any issue with cleat colors until this kid wore pink. Most likely he started in with words like a British slang term for cigarette, or perhaps he refereed to him or the shoes as the word for the human Genus.

As far as the kid getting academic credit to play football, I think it is wrong to do that, unless it is used as a substitute for Phys. Ed. credits. But we all know that there are a lot of schools that will boost athletes grades so they can stay on their teams and graduate.
#5

scypio

Nov 12, 2010 7:33:57
High school coaches are almost always the problem. First, they're coaches so they have delusions of grandeur. Secondly, they're probably teachers, so that doubles their need for power and control. Add in the fact that its a Southern school concerning football and its pretty bad.

But I guess its a necessary evil. If people (includes parents and athletes, in addition to coaches) weren't so crazy, then we probably wouldn't have the NFL.
#6

zombie_babies

Nov 12, 2010 8:31:13
Heh, yes the behavior that sometimes amounts to abuse in High School football spurs the kids onto a greater stage - college - where they learn the value of a high dollar contract while also learning how those big checks make it easy to keep the ol' mouth shut so they can keep playing, that 'education' is overrated, money is king, everybody is a lying crook and nobody cares about you except you cuz they only care about how much money you earn them.  Learn you're a product now so that when you're bought and sold in the NFL it all seems natural.  And there?  There you'll be able to put all of your learning to good use, be far more free compared to those early days and, most importantly of all, be a source of entertainment for me.  So yes, carry on ye high school football coaches.  Abuse young men into adulthood so that they may carry on the finest tradition in the land - entertaining me.
#7

scypio

Nov 12, 2010 9:22:37

They are all choosing to make sacrafices for football. If they don't like it, they don't have to take those millions of dollars (NFL), free education/room/board (NCAA), or whatever. Honestly, the high school level is probably the worse because they don't get anything except a (horrible) chance at of making it to the next level.

And this is not to say that the NCAA rules are fair. They are not. But they do it willingly and get a good deal many times.

#8

zombie_babies

Nov 12, 2010 9:44:03
Oh I agree.  It's just a ****ed up system is all.  A very, very old school thing that probably won't be permitted to continue all that much longer.  The road of toughening up through purposefully administered adversity is one that's surely soon to be closed.  Mostly, of course, because there are those that don't understand it and don't understand that the people that do travel that road do so voluntarily.
#9

EscherEnigma

Nov 12, 2010 14:31:07
[link]

Seriously, what the **** is wrong with Mississippi?
#10

Mad_Jack

Nov 12, 2010 23:30:41
[link]

Seriously, what the **** is wrong with Mississippi?




 I think the basic problem with Mississippi is that it's inhabited by people.

#11

EscherEnigma

Nov 13, 2010 0:28:22
Huh.  Story disappeared off the site for some reason.  Here's [Buzz Feed's copy of the video, no article].

Snippet of the original article
Show
After a Fellowship of Christian Students meeting, four girls and a boy surrounded her. "They started talking about me like I was a man, and like, stuff like that. That I shouldn't be in this world. And my name was a boy name," she said. Foster described how these people attacked her. "I was kicked in the rib. I was kicked in the leg. I was hit in the face. I was sat on top of and my face was jammed into the floor. I was thrown onto the cafeteria table. I was thrown in between the seats." Her mother, Meggan Foster, is appalled at the whole ordeal. "She was sitting in a chair. Her glasses were broken. She had been crying. She had a bloody tissue in her hand from her nose bleeding," Foster said. She said that a surveillance camera caught the whole thing, but that the principal could not give her a copy because it involves other students.
#12

Escef

Nov 13, 2010 2:20:12
Greatest democraty, **** yeah!


And what, pray tell, does democracy have to do with it?
#13

Mechalibur

Nov 13, 2010 11:02:15
Okay, I think we reached the point where there isn't a single person *not* aware of breast cancer. Let's wear brown for prostate cancer or something. More people have that than breast cancer and there's like 1/7th of the funding for it...

Yes, I'm bitter. But at least I'm not in Mississippi.
#14

Someone

Nov 13, 2010 11:59:51
Wouldn't a brown ribbon be more suited towards colon cancer awareness?
#15

Escef

Nov 13, 2010 21:43:19
Wouldn't a brown ribbon be more suited towards colon cancer awareness?



Someone beat me to it! Literally Someone!
#16

zombie_babies

Nov 15, 2010 9:47:56
Okay, I think we reached the point where there isn't a single person *not* aware of breast cancer. Let's wear brown for prostate cancer or something. More people have that than breast cancer and there's like 1/7th of the funding for it...

Yes, I'm bitter. But at least I'm not in Mississippi.



Why not both?  Maybe a combo ribbon.  But seriously?  Breasts (even male) are far and away prettier than a prostate.  ;)
#17

boraxe

Nov 15, 2010 12:05:48
Breasts (even male) are far and away prettier than a prostate.  ;)


I've never seen a prostate so I'll take your word on it, though I'm admittedly curious how you know what they look like…
#18

ADHadh

Nov 15, 2010 12:07:33
Breasts (even male) are far and away prettier than a prostate.  ;)


I've never seen a prostate so I'll take your word on it, though I'm admittedly curious how you know what they look like…


Google with safe search off? ;)
#19

zombie_babies

Nov 15, 2010 12:32:02

Well, there's a couple ways to know.  One is that I've seen pictures - mostly illustrations - from my days back in school.  Another is that I've seen enough internal organs thanks to my hobby as a hunter to know that quite literally none of them are attractive in the least.  Combine that with my frequent viewings of breasts - both male (mine) and female - and I'm pretty confident that my comment was correct.  Damn, that was one hell of a waste of time. 

#20

Escef

Nov 15, 2010 12:42:26
I think ZB's just got a thing for moobs.
#21

jesse.two.coins

Nov 15, 2010 12:47:33
I think ZB's just got a thing for moobs.



who doesn't ? ;)
#22

zombie_babies

Nov 15, 2010 13:37:42
who doesn't ? ;)



Egg-zaktically.

You've never seen the movie Leolo, by Jean-Claude Lauzon. Let's just say the kid has some fun with a piece of liver.



And that's fine for the kid.  Me?  Yeah, I prefer boobs to liver every time.  ;)