Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 calronmoonflower Jun 22, 2011 14:13:57	Article
#2 Escef Jun 22, 2011 14:21:25	Probably because they don't want to take flack from LGBT organizations. We all know that some of them would blow a fuse if someone discriminated against a cross-dresser. (Note that I don't have anything against the LGBT community, I just think some of their organizations are captained by people who will jump at any excuse to go on the offensive.)
#3 zombie_babies Jun 22, 2011 14:38:36	They should just friggin' make up a dress code already.  I mean, when you say we must obey the flight attendants and then leave all sorts of **** they can get on you about open for interpretation, this sort of thing is bound to happen.  Stew A doesn't like saggin' pants.  Stew B is cool with it.  Stew A demands the person pull up their pants under threat of being removed from the flight.  Stew B doesn't.  That's ... ****ing stupid.  If you're gonna give them that much power, define stuff pls.
#4 calronmoonflower Jun 22, 2011 14:44:28	Don't forget that boxer shorts are less reveling than panties, so the second person that was allowed to fly exposed way more than the one arrested for indecent exposure.
#5 EscherEnigma Jun 22, 2011 14:54:51	Hrm... arbitrary enforcemen of vaguely defined rules?  Why does that sound familiar?
#6 Maxperson Jun 22, 2011 14:55:37	Hrm... arbitrary enforcemen of vaguely defined rules?  Why does that sound familiar? lol  Very nice.
#7 zombie_babies Jun 22, 2011 15:10:30	Hrm... arbitrary enforcemen of vaguely defined rules?  Why does that sound familiar? Shhhhh!  They'll hear you, man!  I mean, do you reallGLEEMAX.  This post has been terminated.
#8 calronmoonflower Jun 22, 2011 15:10:38	Hrm... arbitrary enforcemen of vaguely defined rules?  Why does that sound familiar? Because I've been reading Atlas Shrugged.
#9 Escef Jun 22, 2011 15:14:54	Hrm... arbitrary enforcemen of vaguely defined rules?  Why does that sound familiar? Because I've been reading Atlas Shrugged. Ayn Rand, a professional at thinking crap that won't work will work. (Or at least she was until she died.)
#10 jetshield Jun 22, 2011 15:37:07	The man pictured above flew through the San Francisco airport six days before the saggy-pants incident with 20-year-old Deshon Marman. Perhaps this incident, and the complaints it caused, is what led to them asking saggy-pants-boy to adjust his attire.
#11 shiningwolf88 Jun 22, 2011 17:02:45	The man pictured above flew through the San Francisco airport six days before the saggy-pants incident with 20-year-old Deshon Marman. Perhaps this incident, and the complaints it caused, is what led to them asking saggy-pants-boy to adjust his attire. but that would make some degree of sense...
#12 bone_naga Jun 22, 2011 17:11:21	The man pictured above flew through the San Francisco airport six days before the saggy-pants incident with 20-year-old Deshon Marman. Perhaps this incident, and the complaints it caused, is what led to them asking saggy-pants-boy to adjust his attire. It's possible, but I doubt there is that much communication between employees, especially to the extent that the airline would change its policy within a matter of days without major media coverage pressuring it.
#13 draco1119 Jun 22, 2011 20:32:32	From linked article: “We don’t have a dress code policy,” U.S. Airways spokeswoman Valarie Wunder told the San Francisco Chronicle. “Obviously, if their private parts are exposed, that’s not appropriate. … So if they’re not exposing their private parts, they’re allowed to fly.” I notice the homicidal_squirrel hasn't posted yet.  Maybe because he was hell-bent on maintaining that they have a dress code?  Now can I play the race card?  Or just use the line "Only in San F__cisco..."
#14 bone_naga Jun 23, 2011 16:06:05	I would go with the last line personally.
#15 draco1119 Jun 23, 2011 17:39:57	Yeah... me, too.