Hint: We do not dream. The Dream you experienced is a distortion of your own existance and is a consequence of the inevitable formation and use of black holes by morons. So tonight, say: "Randomize Quantum Interference Generator" to anyone you meet in the dream and see what happens.
...but other than that everything is okay?
Well I wasnt gonna worry you with it but We experince time as a consequence of Black hole exposure...
There is probability that all the oxygen atoms move to one side of the room that you are sitting in and you suffocate...
Now generally we note different probabilities but is it really worth thinking the long shots are going to happen...
You should also mention that if the energy in the universe in unstable then the LHC has the probability to cause a chain reaction destroying everything...
Also...micro blackholes
So they kicked the Supercollider to ON and are expecting black holes that wont destroy us all. Well the experiment has already failed because Black holes expand backward and forward through time from their point of origin thus creating change in possibility. For those of us who were living the quiet life...we can now look forward and back to the prospect of our own parents no longer being our parents when we wake up tomorrow.
Hint: We do not dream. The Dream you experienced is a distortion of your own existance and is a consequence of the inevitable formation and use of black holes by morons. So tonight, say: "Randomize Quantum Interference Generator" to anyone you meet in the dream and see what happens.
Dude, quit bogarting the good stuff!
Dude, quit bogarting the good stuff!
That's the good stuff?
No wonder I've never done any of that.
Well I wasnt gonna worry you with it but We experince time as a consequence of Black hole exposure...
And the problem being?...
Does this affect my lifestyle of ale and whoring in any way?
Turned on the what now?
Does this affect my lifestyle of ale and whoring in any way?
Only if you're doing at something approximating C.
So they kicked the Supercollider to ON and are expecting black holes that wont destroy us all. Well the experiment has already failed because Black holes expand backward and forward through time from their point of origin thus creating change in possibility. For those of us who were living the quiet life...we can now look forward and back to the prospect of our own parents no longer being our parents when we wake up tomorrow.
Hint: We do not dream. The Dream you experienced is a distortion of your own existance and is a consequence of the inevitable formation and use of black holes by morons. So tonight, say: "Randomize Quantum Interference Generator" to anyone you meet in the dream and see what happens.
im quite sure they have ideas of what to expect, and that the people investing the billions of dollars into this project have scientists, and professors that know more about the topic than the guy who slanders about it in the off-topic tavern. In the off chance they even form something with infinite gravity...it will likely vaporize due to its size. (so stephen hawkings theorizes.)
their goal is just to discover dark matter..which supposedly comprises of most of the mass of the universe...and it exists in a dimension that we dont exist in where the force of gravity plays a larger role.
but what do i know...i went to college for computer animation....i didnt go for 12 years of astrophysics. i trust they know what there doing more than internet article writers who only read 'A Brief History of Time'
...know more about the topic than the guy who slanders about it in the off-topic tavern. In the off chance they even form something with infinite gravity...it will likely vaporize due to its size. (so stephen hawkings theorizes.)...
Actually Hawking got it wrong...but dont let the assumption that 12 years of Astrophysics (the wrong teaching the wrong) is going to give them the answers sway you.
A black Hole is not "heavy" at the centre, it is orbited by debris that is in your terms "heavy" (heavy is just a change in the value of Pi). At the centre is a K-object (They thought a singularity was the point of destruction of everything-but a K-object is actually a point of change in possibility with debris of change providing the possibility for other possibility to interact with that change and go the same way) where the Universe Begins and Ends simultaneously (The Universe being debris of change in possibility-not what caused the change in possibility).
I spent three years examining everything I could find on string theory, and realized that if they were wrong and I was right there would be some set of rules by which everything worked that proved I was right.
The Debris Universe functions as a single object separated by change in possibility - that tells us that there are Black holes in our Universe making use of the Debris of possibility and the Debris of our Universe is tied to a Black hole outside the limits of our Universe. So it is about fluid dynamics at every level - but the fluid is change in possibility (K/0=d{K^n} [change in an infinite set to a new set related to the previous only at superposition]).
You want scary: Chess is a game played by one Player and black and white are the same pieces connected at superposition at a K-object.
Actually Hawking got it wrong...but dont let the assumption that 12 years of Astrophysics (the wrong teaching the wrong) is going to give them the answers sway you.
A black Hole is not "heavy" at the centre, it is orbited by debris that is in your terms "heavy" (heavy is just a change in the value of Pi). At the centre is a K-object (They thought a singularity was the point of destruction of everything-but a K-object is actually a point of change in possibility with debris of change providing the possibility for other possibility to interact with that change and go the same way) where the Universe Begins and Ends simultaneously (The Universe being debris of change in possibility-not what caused the change in possibility).
I spent three years examining everything I could find on string theory, and realized that if they were wrong and I was right there would be some set of rules by which everything worked that proved I was right.
The Debris Universe functions as a single object separated by change in possibility - that tells us that there are Black holes in our Universe making use of the Debris of possibility and the Debris of our Universe is tied to a Black hole outside the limits of our Universe. So it is about fluid dynamics at every level - but the fluid is change in possibility (K/0=d{K^n} [change in an infinite set to a new set related to the previous only at superposition]).
You want scary: Chess is a game played by one Player and black and white are the same pieces connected at superposition at a K-object.
you are pretty slick by my standards...i would love to more about string theory...i honestly only understand about 80% of what you were just talking about..so that makes me out of the loop (no pun)
if your bored can you explain the possibility aspect more? is it like another dimension, or another force, or energy?
I spent three years examining everything I could find on string theory, and realized that if they were wrong and I was right there would be some set of rules by which everything worked that proved I was right.
I've spent the last 28 years ignoring your theory, therefore my expertise > you.
I've spent the last 28 years ignoring your theory, therefore my expertise > you.
well the first time i read about string theory i thought it was so dumb i ignored it to.
but people thought it was dumb the world wasnt flat so whos to say huh?
their goal is just to discover dark matter.
Wasn't the point of the supercollider to confirm or deny the existence of Higgs boson?
you are pretty slick by my standards...i would love to more about string theory...i honestly only understand about 80% of what you were just talking about..so that makes me out of the loop (no pun)
if your bored can you explain the possibility aspect more? is it like another dimension, or another force, or energy?
I have to step in here...
Yellowdingo isn't talking about string theory. He's not even talking science. He's sprouting nonsense mixed in with a few choice scientific words, nothing more. He's started similar threads to this, and they're all lacking anything cohesive. A key give-away is that he used /0 in one of his equations.
I have a degree in astrophysics, which includes quantum physics and general relativity, and I can't make head nor tail of what he's talking about.
If you want to learn about string theory in more detail, you're better off reading Wikipedia or seeing if there are any good videos on YouTube.
Wasn't the point of the supercollider to confirm or deny the existence of Higgs boson?
It's doing both. Searching for the Higgs boson is probably the most important experiment, but they are going to use it to look for dark matter, too.
Incidentally, the black holes they'd create would dissolve almost instantaneously, assuming they even made them.
Obviously someone doesn't understand how black holes work.
No one knows how black holes work, at least at any level we can reasonably call complete knowledge.
No one knows how black holes work, at least at any level we can reasonably call complete knowledge.
heh heh i chuckled when i read that post also.....like he was the expert on black holes..lol
I have to step in here...
Yellowdingo isn't talking about string theory. He's not even talking science. He's sprouting nonsense mixed in with a few choice scientific words, nothing more. He's started similar threads to this, and they're all lacking anything cohesive. A key give-away is that he used /0 in one of his equations.
I have a degree in astrophysics, which includes quantum physics and general relativity, and I can't make head nor tail of what he's talking about.
If you want to learn about string theory in more detail, you're better off reading Wikipedia or seeing if there are any good videos on YouTube.
It's doing both. Searching for the Higgs boson is probably the most important experiment, but they are going to use it to look for dark matter, too.
Wow a degree in Astrophysics and you dont understand the solution A/0=NOTA.
THE SOLUTION TO DIVIDE BY ZERO.
A is a Group made up of every possibile number we know for which {1} is its primary.
A/0 is a disengagement from our nifty little Universe as defined by these numbers.
NOT A is an independant numberset unrelated to A{1} except by superposition.
SOLUTION: A/0=/A
{1}/0={XIANUMBER}
The Quantum Universe is limited to a given set of possibility. It must make do with these possibility. Change in Possibility which is what your little black hole will do is (K/0=d{K^n} [change in an infinite set to a new and otherwise unrelated set (related to the previous only at superposition to both sets).
So as I said: The Universe is Debris of Change, A Black Hole a moment of change (affecting change outward into the past and future), and time a consequence of continuous change.
And considering Evolution is dependant on a Linear direction of time model unrelated to the capacity of life to create time, I have no doubt as to the chaos and change in careers that is comming for the status quo of the Science community.
it is any object that has such gravity that its escape velocity is above c
that is, light cannot escape it.
and what is this idiocy of black holes going back in time?
its just strong gravity, not magic.
a black hole is pretty simple in concept.
it is any object that has such gravity that its escape velocity is above c
that is, light cannot escape it.
and what is this idiocy of black holes going back in time?
its just strong gravity, not magic.
Let me explain it again just for you: A Singularity is a point of change in possibility.It forms a given set of possibility (A) merges with its mirror possibility (/A). This merger occurs normally at superposition but now occurs in the universe becomming a superposition object (a K Object - undoubtably the Higgs Bosun if we are talking about the same thing) This K object has debris possibility in the universe left behind allowing other "possibility to merge with the K-object simply by addressing the debris possibility.
For you the Black hole is expanding outward from the point of origin eating the universe but it is simply being interacted with by possibility that makes up the Universe. When the K-object separates it does so into a new set of possiiblity and its mirror possibility.(B) & (/B).
As the black hole "expands" it does so outward through possibility. That Possibility is from your point of view both forward and backward through time.
No one knows how black holes work, at least at any level we can reasonably call complete knowledge.
Well, obviously our knowledge of black holes is incomplete, but we do know many important things about them. This is one of them.
Wow a degree in Astrophysics and you dont understand the solution A/0=NOTA.
THE SOLUTION TO DIVIDE BY ZERO.
A is a Group made up of every possibile number we know for which {1} is its primary.
If A is a group of every possible number, {1} is NOT the identity. It can't possibly be, with either an additive or a multiplicative operation. Think about it: you can't make 1/2 by adding {1}, nor can you make any number only by multiplication (irrationals).
You could have the group of integers with {0} as the additive identity, but of course that's not every possible number.
A/0 is a disengagement from our nifty little Universe as defined by these numbers.
NOT A is an independant numberset unrelated to A{1} except by superposition.
SOLUTION: A/0=/A
{1}/0={XIANUMBER}
What you're saying is that a number divided by zero is not a number, which is right. But that's not a solution.
The Quantum Universe is limited to a given set of possibility. It must make do with these possibility. Change in Possibility which is what your little black hole will do is (K/0=d{K^n} [change in an infinite set to a new and otherwise unrelated set (related to the previous only at superposition to both sets).
So as I said: The Universe is Debris of Change, A Black Hole a moment of change (affecting change outward into the past and future), and time a consequence of continuous change.
Ok, I have to admit never coming across possibility theory before, so I can't comment on this. I'm fairly positive it doesn't enter quantum theory or general relativity at any point, though, so its application to black holes is dubious.
I'll have to have a read up and come back to this.
A Singularity is a point of change in possibility.It forms a given set of possibility (A) merges with its mirror possibility (/A).
Can you provide some reasoning for these statements? If you could give a quick line of thought or mathematical derivation, that would clear a lot of things up.
The thing that makes least sense to me is that you seem to be describing possibility as some sort of fluid, or at least a physical thing rather than a measure of uncertainty.
Well, obviously our knowledge of black holes is incomplete, but we do know many important things about them.
Yeah, there's a lot we have yet to learn about black holes, but that fact tends to distract people away from the wealth of knowledge we do have.
and what is this idiocy of black holes going back in time?
its just strong gravity, not magic.
It's possible that the gravity from a black hole could be strong enough to warp space-time enough such that it creates a virtual wormhole. It's highly unlikely, but we don't know enough to disprove it.
Can you provide some reasoning for these statements? If you could give a quick line of thought or mathematical derivation, that would clear a lot of things up.
Don't hold your breath. Dingo latches onto theories that, by their very nature, cannot be quantified and warps them even further under the premise that it can't be disproved.
Just thought of a monkey-like thing flipping a switch off and on. Sort of like a rave strobe light. Maybe some funny noises too....
http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail45.html
So they kicked the Supercollider to ON and are expecting black holes that wont destroy us all. Well the experiment has already failed because Black holes expand backward and forward through time from their point of origin thus creating change in possibility. For those of us who were living the quiet life...we can now look forward and back to the prospect of our own parents no longer being our parents when we wake up tomorrow.
have to step in here...
Yellowdingo isn't talking about string theory. He's not even talking science. He's sprouting nonsense mixed in with a few choice scientific words, nothing more. He's started similar threads to this, and they're all lacking anything cohesive. A key give-away is that he used /0 in one of his equations.
I have a degree in astrophysics, which includes quantum physics and general relativity, and I can't make head nor tail of what he's talking about.
If you want to learn about string theory in more detail, you're better off reading Wikipedia or seeing if there are any good videos on YouTube.
I have to agree with ieattrollsforbreakfast. I have a Ph.D. in Solid State Physics and I'm at home with Quantum Physics, Group Theory, General Relativity and even Fluid dynamics. I must stress that Black Holes are not really so dangerous as they may be presented by the media. The gravity outside the Swarzschild Radius (let's take a non-rotatig black hole) is normal gravity decreasing as 1/R^2. So, to be sucked in, something must come quite close to the black hole. A common example would be what would happen to the Earth if the sun was suddenly compressed to form a Black Hole (our compression also stopped the rotation to keep things simpler). Well, the answer is that it's orbite would not change. The mass inside it's orbit did not change, so by Gauss Law (which is correct for every force in 1/R^2) the gravitationnal field felt by the Earth did not change.
We are talking about black holes with radii one million times smaller then the radius of a nucleus. Even if it does not evaporate as fast has we think, the probability of it devouring particles is so small it is neglible. They would be the analogue of neutrinos. They would not even feel the effect of the Earth and it's gravitationnal field. So, stop the paranoïa.
On a more general note, the reasonning of yellowdingo is more flawed then mentionned. It suffers the full width of the Causality Paradoxe. Which shows the invalidity of the premises or the logic.
If A is a group of every possible number, {1} is NOT the identity. It can't possibly be, with either an additive or a multiplicative operation. Think about it: you can't make 1/2 by adding {1}, nor can you make any number only by multiplication (irrationals).
You could have the group of integers with {0} as the additive identity, but of course that's not every possible number.
Perhaps it is simplistic
What you're saying is that a number divided by zero is not a number, which is right. But that's not a solution.
Sure it is a Solution. A{the numbers that define our reality} divided by zero becomes /A{numbers that define another reality and are only related to our numbers at superposition}. Perhaps {K^n} is to your liking when describing our Universe.
Ok, I have to admit never coming across possibility theory before, so I can't comment on this. I'm fairly positive it doesn't enter quantum theory or general relativity at any point, though, so its application to black holes is dubious.
I'll have to have a read up and come back to this.
Its String Theory taken beyond the basic assumption that the Universe is made up of little string loop that vibrate. Strings cluster together. Even an Idea can create possibility change that can build up its own gravity well of Debris of change in possibility. That is why the formation of Blackholes (and the creation of change in possibility) is something that only life can create. Annoyingly this invalidates Evolution which is dependant on reality being something Life cannot manipulate.
Can you provide some reasoning for these statements? If you could give a quick line of thought or mathematical derivation, that would clear a lot of things up.
That is the problem with stringtheory...maths is a limit that defines our own reality. Numbers as you point out have their limits.
The thing that makes least sense to me is that you seem to be describing possibility as some sort of fluid, or at least a physical thing rather than a measure of uncertainty.
Change in possibility is a fluid change defined by a limit of change in possibility (If you like it, possibility is a medium in which limits defined by our existance can be created). The Quantum Universe is built on that possibility.
Yeah, there's a lot we have yet to learn about black holes, but that fact tends to distract people away from the wealth of knowledge we do have.
The wealth of knowledge is wrong.
The wealth of knowledge is wrong.
I think you should review the way science works. Experiment is the only judge of what theory is right or wrong. Remember physics is not math, it is firmly anchored in reality by experimentation.
ieattrollsforbreakfast was referring to the theories supported by the experimental results. So they are not wrong yet.
Perhaps it is simplistic
That word has no meaning in this context. Read up on group theory and come back.
Sure it is a Solution. A{the numbers that define our reality} divided by zero becomes /A{numbers that define another reality and are only related to our numbers at superposition}. Perhaps {K^n} is to your liking when describing our Universe.
That's not what you're 'solution' shows, though. It shows A/0 is not a number, not that it's a number in another reality. And why would other realities have different numbers? It's not like 1, 2, 3 etc. wouldn't exist in another universe.
Its String Theory taken beyond the basic assumption that the Universe is made up of little string loop that vibrate. Strings cluster together. Even an Idea can create possibility change that can build up its own gravity well of Debris of change in possibility. That is why the formation of Blackholes (and the creation of change in possibility) is something that only life can create. Annoyingly this invalidates Evolution which is dependant on reality being something Life cannot manipulate.
No, its not. Possibility is a measure of uncertainty, and an alternative to probability. It has nothing at all to do with string theory, so you might want to rename that part of your fantasy.
That is the problem with stringtheory...maths is a limit that defines our own reality. Numbers as you point out have their limits.
"There is no proof for my ramblings because maths isn't good enough."
Gotcha.
The wealth of knowledge is wrong.
Prove it.
lol this is some crazy stuff in this thread...kinda like Ed Leedskalnin stuff.
This stuff about black holes is really interesting. Anyone know any books on the basics of the subject?
Wikipedia is your friend. Granted, there's bound to be some inaccuracies, but the wikipedia article on black holes is fascinating nonetheless.
I like cheese.
And the Monkey responds to the thread!
And the Monkey responds to the thread!
Well slap me in a fur coat and feed me bananas! Ook ook eek eek.
Sorry, but listening to a physics professor 15 years ago in class was bad enough.
Sorry, but listening to a physics professor 15 years ago in class was bad enough.
