Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 homicidal_squirrel Jan 05, 2012 16:09:53	www.nydailynews.com/news/national/denver...
#2 Mr_Miscellany Jan 05, 2012 17:17:06	They didn't go into specifics on the damage, but I imagine any piercings she might have would have made things worse.
#3 homicidal_squirrel Jan 05, 2012 22:41:38	Sounds like a fun gall. We have an "art walk" down here where a bunch of art galleries open up at night and serve wine. You get to walk around from gallery to gallery checking out the art and buying suff (if you want) while getting drunk. This girl would be a fun person to bring along.
#4 pluisjen Jan 06, 2012 1:40:47	I doubt she's made the painting look much worse. It looks terrible either way
#5 Klirshon Jan 06, 2012 2:34:37	It is an abstract painting, of course it looks aesthetically unpleasing. Abstract painters and those that enjoy their paintings are, what you humans call, "emo".
#6 zombie_babies Jan 06, 2012 8:39:36	Her lawyer will be able to get her out of this with ease.  See, what she was doing was also art.  Performance art.  So, she's safe.
#7 ADHadh Jan 07, 2012 6:23:48	That pretty much describes every art critic I've met.
#8 draco1119 Jan 07, 2012 17:41:20	It is an abstract painting, of course it looks aesthetically unpleasing. Abstract painters and those that enjoy their paintings are, what you humans call, "emo". Emo is just an excuse for boys to act like ****.
#9 ADHadh Jan 07, 2012 17:46:39	I don't agree that abstract art has to be aesthetically unpleasing. I find art of Piet Mondrian very pleasant to look at.