Ben Affleck is Batman

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Cluless_Rat

Aug 22, 2013 22:09:53
****!
#2

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 22, 2013 22:32:00
Crap...
 
#3

zombie_babies

Aug 23, 2013 11:40:14
  Epic. Phail.
#4

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 23, 2013 12:14:11
I think it would have been better if they got a black actor to play Batman.


Side note: My phone autocorrects Batman to Bachmann. You think there is something there?
#5

zombie_babies

Aug 23, 2013 12:41:47
Well they're both insane, right?

EDIT: And I don't wanna think about all the rending of teeth and gnashing of garments what would happen if they cast a black dood as Batman.
#6

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 23, 2013 14:29:55
Yes, they both are insane.

I think Denzel would make an awesome Batman.
#7

Hipster_Dog

Aug 23, 2013 14:59:17
Yes, they both are insane. I think Denzel would make an awesome Batman.


Now your just saying silly things. You might has well say Will Smith or a black face Tom Hanks.
#8

pigknight

Aug 23, 2013 17:01:27
I think it'll be fine.
#9

bone_naga

Aug 24, 2013 1:17:53
Yes, they both are insane. I think Denzel would make an awesome Batman.


Now your just saying silly things. You might has well say Will Smith or a black face Tom Hanks.


Now that is silly. Why would you do a black face Tom Hanks if you can do a white face Denzel?
#10

Qmark

Aug 24, 2013 1:19:18
Yes, they both are insane. I think Denzel would make an awesome Batman.


Now your just saying silly things. You might has well say Will Smith or a black face Tom Hanks.

No, that's Wayne Brady.

#11

thewok

Aug 24, 2013 1:23:10
We said the same stuff about Michael keaton back in the 80s.  "Mr. Mom is Batman?"  "Really?  Beetlejuice?"  And he gave us my favorite Batman portrayal to date.

I'll give Affleck the benefit of the doubt.  He's surprised me in the past.
#12

Hipster_Dog

Aug 24, 2013 1:45:29
Yes, they both are insane. I think Denzel would make an awesome Batman.


Now your just saying silly things. You might has well say Will Smith or a black face Tom Hanks.


Now that is silly. Why would you do a black face Tom Hanks if you can do a white face Denzel?


It is about talentless hacks playing a black Batman, duh!
#13

Hipster_Dog

Aug 24, 2013 1:46:09
We said the same stuff about Michael keaton back in the 80s.  "Mr. Mom is Batman?"  "Really?  Beetlejuice?"  And he gave us my favorite Batman portrayal to date.

I'll give Affleck the benefit of the doubt.  He's surprised me in the past.


Why not gono while you're at it? It might surprise us!


 
#14

EscherEnigma

Aug 24, 2013 2:51:24
Meh.  Like I said before, with the Batman costume and the voice affection everyone seems to like it barely matters who plays Batman.  Hell, the stuntman is probably more important then whoever gets billed on the poster.
#15

Hipster_Dog

Aug 24, 2013 12:50:58
Meh.  Like I said before, with the Batman costume and the voice affection everyone seems to like it barely matters who plays Batman.  Hell, the stuntman is probably more important then whoever gets billed on the poster.


The actor matters when it comes to playing Bruce Wayne. Do we want Giggli Wayne?
#16

evildupe

Aug 24, 2013 13:48:24
We said the same stuff about Michael keaton back in the 80s.  "Mr. Mom is Batman?"  "Really?  Beetlejuice?"  And he gave us my favorite Batman portrayal to date. I'll give Affleck the benefit of the doubt.  He's surprised me in the past.


I'll give him a chance, but I will never forget, no matter how much I try, his horrible Daredevil movie. Ugh. And is it just me, or is this new Batman just a bit too much, too soon. I mean, there are going to be some really high expecations after the recent trilogy. With Superman versus Batman, whatever happens, I can't help but feel like I'm going to be disappointed.
#17

TruenamerX

Aug 24, 2013 15:31:20
#18

Pontiac

Aug 24, 2013 20:16:32




:THUMBSUP:
#19

CorranHornIsAwesome

Aug 24, 2013 20:42:07




:THUMBSUP:

Pshh. Like anyone gives a crap about those brown people. Ask Hoodsie, he certainly dosen't.
#20

EscherEnigma

Aug 24, 2013 21:19:52
The actor matters when it comes to playing Bruce Wayne. Do we want Giggli Wayne?


It's Batman playing a part in a Superman movie.  Bruce Wayne probably won't be showing up.

#21

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 24, 2013 23:40:37
The actor matters when it comes to playing Bruce Wayne. Do we want Giggli Wayne?


It's Batman playing a part in a Superman movie.  Bruce Wayne probably won't be showing up.



That's possible, but I'm betting Bruce Wayne will get a part. Then there is the whole thing about Afleck being much Taller than Cavill. Superman just ins't going to be very impossing when standing next to a giant Batman.
#22

Hipster_Dog

Aug 25, 2013 0:36:35
The actor matters when it comes to playing Bruce Wayne. Do we want Giggli Wayne?


It's Batman playing a part in a Superman movie.  Bruce Wayne probably won't be showing up.



He will. Affleck will make sure that his maskless face his showned for at least 10 minutes during the film. It will be in the contract.
#23

DoctorBadWolf

Aug 25, 2013 11:13:30
The actor matters when it comes to playing Bruce Wayne. Do we want Giggli Wayne?


It's Batman playing a part in a Superman movie.  Bruce Wayne probably won't be showing up.



That's possible, but I'm betting Bruce Wayne will get a part. Then there is the whole thing about Afleck being much Taller than Cavill. Superman just ins't going to be very impossing when standing next to a giant Batman.



It's not that hard to make people look taller or shorter than they are.


@thread: He'll probably be better than the mediocre crap that was the Bale "growling demon bear" Batman.
#24

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 25, 2013 11:28:46
It's not that hard to make people look taller or shorter than they are.

Afleck is a bigger star than Cavill. I don't see him letting them do that.
#25

Hipster_Dog

Aug 25, 2013 12:25:37
Maybe he should be taller. Batman is supposed to beat Superman. 
#26

DoctorBadWolf

Aug 25, 2013 13:10:58
It's not that hard to make people look taller or shorter than they are.

Afleck is a bigger star than Cavill. I don't see him letting them do that.



lol wut.



#27

CorranHornIsAwesome

Aug 25, 2013 13:31:11
Maybe he should be taller. Batman is supposed to beat Superman. 

But part of his victory over Spuerman is meant to emphasise that brain beats brawn. Superman should be more physically imposing.
#28

Hipster_Dog

Aug 25, 2013 14:54:30
Maybe he should be taller. Batman is supposed to beat Superman. 

But part of his victory over Spuerman is meant to emphasise that brain beats brawn. Superman should be more physically imposing.


He doesn't need to, since we all know he is the strongest. The only reason why Batman beats him is because Superman refuses to be super and a lot of BS and deus ex machinas. 

This is how it should happen:



 
#29

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 25, 2013 15:06:57
It's not that hard to make people look taller or shorter than they are.

Afleck is a bigger star than Cavill. I don't see him letting them do that.



lol wut.





You can deny it all you want, but it's the truth. A sad truth, but the truth. 
#30

CorranHornIsAwesome

Aug 25, 2013 16:11:40
Still, Afleck is washed up; Cavill is a rising star.
#31

The_Silversword

Aug 25, 2013 16:31:11
I could see it working if, and only if, they got Matt Damon to play Robin.
#32

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 25, 2013 16:56:42
Still, Afleck is washed up; Cavill is a rising star.

While Cavil may be a "rising star," he still has a long way to go before he can get Afleck shortened on screen. So Batman will still be taller than Superman.

#33

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 25, 2013 17:00:06
I could see it working if, and only if, they got Matt Damon to play Robin.

Here you go.



 
#34

CorranHornIsAwesome

Aug 25, 2013 17:45:17
Still, Afleck is washed up; Cavill is a rising star.

While Cavil may be a "rising star," he still has a long way to go before he can get Afleck shortened on screen. So Batman will still be taller than Superman.


True enough, I guess.
#35

Hipster_Dog

Aug 25, 2013 18:17:40
Still, Afleck is washed up; Cavill is a rising star.


Pfffft. Based on what? His acting? In the Superman flick most of his acting is him scream "Nooooooo!" four or five times. 
#36

CorranHornIsAwesome

Aug 25, 2013 18:18:39
Still, Afleck is washed up; Cavill is a rising star.


Pfffft. Based on what? His acting? In the Superman flick most of his acting is him scream "Nooooooo!" four or five times. 


Like you need to act well to be a star. I could provide a whole slideshow of examples here, but the bes tone is in the name of the thread.
#37

Hipster_Dog

Aug 25, 2013 18:29:03
Still, Afleck is washed up; Cavill is a rising star.


Pfffft. Based on what? His acting? In the Superman flick most of his acting is him scream "Nooooooo!" four or five times. 


Like you need to act well to be a star. I could provide a whole slideshow of examples here, but the bes tone is in the name of the thread.


And they'll all end up in the pr0n industry as they should.
#38

CorranHornIsAwesome

Aug 25, 2013 19:15:02
You want to see Afleck ****ing? I was going to say eww, but then I remembered who his wife is...
#39

EscherEnigma

Aug 25, 2013 20:59:51
This is a Batman/Superman thread.  If he was [censored]ing anyone, it would be Cavill.  And they would do it in costume.
#40

The_Silversword

Aug 25, 2013 21:07:11
I could see it working if, and only if, they got Matt Damon to play Robin.

Here you go.



 


That works, but on second thought, if theyre going more of Dark Knight Returns, they should go with an older actor, Adam West isnt really doing anything now is he?
#41

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 25, 2013 21:09:38
I could see it working if, and only if, they got Matt Damon to play Robin.

Here you go.



 


That works, but on second thought, if theyre going more of Dark Knight Returns, they should go with an older actor, Adam West isnt really doing anything now is he?


#42

Hipster_Dog

Aug 25, 2013 21:15:30
This is a Batman/Superman thread.  If he was [censored]ing anyone, it would be Cavill.  And they would do it in costume.


Who is doing what to whom?
#43

The_Silversword

Aug 25, 2013 23:42:08
I could see it working if, and only if, they got Matt Damon to play Robin.

Here you go.



 


That works, but on second thought, if theyre going more of Dark Knight Returns, they should go with an older actor, Adam West isnt really doing anything now is he?




So i take that as a "no, Adam West isnt really doing anything now"
#44

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 26, 2013 0:02:11
I could see it working if, and only if, they got Matt Damon to play Robin.

Here you go.



 


That works, but on second thought, if theyre going more of Dark Knight Returns, they should go with an older actor, Adam West isnt really doing anything now is he?




So i take that as a "no, Adam West isnt really doing anything now"

It seems he is the announcer of some show called FanAddicts.

#45

Hipster_Dog

Aug 26, 2013 0:14:48
Billy from Walla Walla?

 
#46

zombie_babies

Aug 26, 2013 8:18:12
Adam West is on Family Guy a lot.  He's a funny cat.  And yes, he'd do a better Batman than Affleck ... although Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms.
#47

DoctorBadWolf

Aug 26, 2013 15:56:26
It's not that hard to make people look taller or shorter than they are.

Afleck is a bigger star than Cavill. I don't see him letting them do that.



lol wut.





I can say it all I want, but it's nonsense. Funny nonsense, but nonsense. 



I fixed it for you.
#48

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 26, 2013 16:00:36
You have to troll better than that to get a rise around here. Now tell us about how great Dr who is.
#49

zombie_babies

Aug 26, 2013 16:06:54
Tee hee.
#50

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 26, 2013 16:18:38
#51

lion_share

Aug 26, 2013 17:35:31
I kind of like Ben Afffleck. I think this will be good.
#52

CorranHornIsAwesome

Aug 26, 2013 17:41:11
#53

Mad_Jack

Aug 26, 2013 21:11:11
This is one of my personal sexual fantasies.  If he was [censored]ing anyone, it would be Cavill.  And they would do it in costume.


 

#54

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 26, 2013 21:50:48
I could see it working if, and only if, they got Matt Damon to play Robin.

Here you go.



 


Ahhh....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

#55

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 26, 2013 21:52:28
I kind of like Ben Afffleck. I think this will be good.


#56

EscherEnigma

Aug 26, 2013 23:27:28
This is one of my personal sexual fantasies.  If he was [censored]ing anyone, it would be Cavill.  And they would do it in costume.


 



I believe the word for this moment is "pshaw".

Your lack of research in this "take down" shows.
#57

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 27, 2013 11:35:10
#58

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 27, 2013 11:35:46
#59

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 27, 2013 17:09:32


#60

Mad_Jack

Aug 27, 2013 20:50:54

 Although I do think Affleck could pull off the apropriate level of intensity, I just don't think he has the right level of physical presence, the oomph, to really physically portray the character. He's too subtle. I mean, in nearly all of his various portrayals over the years (well, outside of the tv series, lol), the one constant is that Batman is absolutely crap-your-pants menacing when he wants to be, and I just don't see Affleck having the physical presence to pull that off. Not because of his size or physical attributes, but because he lacks that magnetism that the others had. Keaton pulled it off because you could tell that the guy was just off in some way (plus the fact that that one played up the comedy of it). Even Clooney displayed both his usual charisma and the sort of near-sociopathic pragmatism that lets a guy consider dispassionately breaking someone's arm or hanging them off a bridge as just another option to consider, even when all they want is for someone to pass the salt. But each of them in their own way brought something large to the character...

 Affleck, I just don't see in what way he'd make the character large.

#61

SeeDarkly_X

Jan 25, 2014 13:42:42

Personally I have no problem with Affleck specifically. But I don't believe he's suited for this at all and I welcome being wrong about that.

Part of the problem with this is an expectation that because he's become "Oscar-worthy" in the eyes of the industry, he is uniquely or specially qualified for the role. It speaks volumes to the "we're doing business" mentality of DC because it doesn't take into account that his "Oscar-worthiness" is derived from dramatic roles and films of an entirely different genre.
Personally, when I watched his Oscar-winning Argo with my wife, we were BORED! We weren't particularly sympathetic with the strife of characters who essentially drank and smoked in fear for their lives through the majority of the film and were underwhelmed at the "suspense" of their climactic boarding of a plane.
IF this is an example of the dull characterization we can expect from Affleck... well to paraphrase the potentially only interesting thing about that film, "Argo **** it!" Man of Steel already has a bad rep for its tone... how could what Affleck's shown us improve on that?

We can be surprised, and I would be HAPPY to be... (in the 80's we were surprised by Keaton. In recent years we were surprised by Ledger.) But that doesn't change that this stinks of executive number crunching and public relations more than it feels like a decision made to create a story and cast it with any conviction that it could stand on its own with out the supposed Box Office Draw of "superstars." Consider the fact that they couldn't even make Cavill a superstar with the opening salvo of (what they initially had NO INTENTION of being) the Cinematic DC Universe.
At least we know DC doesn't fear rebooting anything... so that probably won't take too long.
But then there's the other side of the coin:
It'll likely be "just good enough" in the same way most of the X-men films have been, and perhaps Man of Steel was. It'll make them money, though not likely what they had in mind. It'll heighten their "brand visibility," even if only in a "all press is good press even when it's bad" way. But how much it will satisfy us is HIGHLY questionable at this point. Even with Wonder Woman added to mix. (And word is the Amazons will be a Kryptonian off-shoot race?!?)
In any case continuing to make "business" decisions in place of "creatively inspired" decisions is the core of why DC is failing us... not even just in this instance.
(Arrow, for the most part, has been a rare exception.)
Anyway... this type of thing always gets me going.
TL:DR?
 I'll simplify my whole outlook about DC:
Make Mine Marvel. :shrug: