| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombie_babiesFeb 01, 2013 15:19:59 | Link |
| #2Hipster_DogFeb 01, 2013 15:50:33 | By your emotional reaction it seems you hate pretty girls. |
| #3zombie_babiesFeb 01, 2013 16:09:00 | ![]() I just hate people that have all sorts of an easy life and then whine about it. She didn't think even a little bit about the fact that there's millions of people who have the same problems she does - with none of the advantages. |
| #4Hipster_DogFeb 01, 2013 16:17:12 | I understand what you are saying, but that would mean that people with problems in the US, for example, shouldn't be complaining cause they have it way better than say people in Nigeria. |
| #5EscherEnigmaFeb 01, 2013 16:27:43 | Kinda with the dog here. There's always someone that's worse off, so either everyone should shut their mouth and not complain, or everyone gets to complain. Sides, it's a human interest article. It exists solely because people want to know what people like her think and feel. The consumers are at least as much to blame for pointless articles like that as the people being interviewed for them. Or you got something against people making a living? |
| #6xladyfayreFeb 01, 2013 17:49:04 | True. Someone always has it worse. That doesn't mean you can't complain about whatever bothers you. |
| #7draco1119Feb 01, 2013 18:31:54 | Surprisingly enough, I agree with EE & the "ironic" canine. It would seem that the Mayans were only off by about five weeks. ![]() |
| #8EruditeApeFeb 01, 2013 20:00:41 |
![]() Kinda with the dog here. There's always someone that's worse off, so either everyone should shut their mouth and not complain, or everyone gets to complain. There's a difference between "can" and "should." |
| #9EscherEnigmaFeb 02, 2013 11:47:55 | There's a difference between "can" and "should." Sure there is. But there's also a difference between "should", "shouldn't" and "no judgement/value neutral". |
| #10Robin_HoodlumFeb 03, 2013 8:36:51 |
![]() |
| #11Robin_HoodlumFeb 03, 2013 8:39:31 |
Why? What shallow, insecure, doltish riff-raff would care what some celebrity meathead thinks about... anything? The people what care about that crap are more puke-inducing than the actual celebrities what think they are more important than the "masses". |
| #12KlirshonFeb 03, 2013 10:07:28 | What shallow, insecure, doltish riff-raff would care what some celebrity meathead thinks about... anything? The kind that would purchase a supermarket tabloid and similar magazines because of the articles about celebrities. |
| #13xladyfayreFeb 03, 2013 10:45:01 | Lol, I love reading magazines like People, Glamor and Cosmopolitan. |
| #14EscherEnigmaFeb 03, 2013 12:45:58 | Why? At it's core, it's the same reason I have a couple of bookcases of fiction ranging from hard core Sci-Fi (hello Asimov!) to action-packed urban fantasy (hello Harrison!)1. It's escapism. Whether you find your escape by reading about real people that sound more interesting then yourself, fake people that sound more interesting then yourself, board games, going out and getting blind drunk, etc., it's all the same pursuit. Why be so judgemental? "If it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg" and all that jazz. ________ 1And that's not counting all the digital books I've gotten on my kindle in the last year. Seriously, that thing is good (bad?) for my reading habit. |
| #15Robin_HoodlumFeb 03, 2013 14:17:28 | Why? Because it promotes doltishness and sends false messages. But I get your point. |
| #16draco1119Feb 03, 2013 14:30:12 | Except it's not little. Think about it: people whose entire job consists of how they look are going to be insecure about how they look. Haven't you ever heard of "job security"? She doesn't have it. What if she gets in a car wreck tomorrow, and bashes her face on the windshield? You or I would (eventually) be able to go back to work with facial scarring; she wouldn't. In her case, worrying about how she looks isn't "shallow", it's worrying about her job. Y'know what I mean, Verne? |
| #17Ragnar_LodbrokFeb 03, 2013 15:41:49 | Why? It's RH. Judgementalness is his thing. ![]() |
| #18EruditeApeFeb 04, 2013 5:33:07 | It's RH. Judgementalness is his thing. Wait, you've seen RH's thing? Is there something you want to tell us? Not that there's anything wrong with that. |
| #19zombie_babiesFeb 05, 2013 12:57:55 | Except it's not little. Think about it: people whose entire job consists of how they look are going to be insecure about how they look. Haven't you ever heard of "job security"? She doesn't have it. What if she gets in a car wreck tomorrow, and bashes her face on the windshield? You or I would (eventually) be able to go back to work with facial scarring; she wouldn't. In her case, worrying about how she looks isn't "shallow", it's worrying about her job. Y'know what I mean, Verne? Insurance. Srsly, dawg. Odds are if she were disfigured in an accident she'd make more money than she does right now. Ever hear of Lloyd's? Point is, she's financially secure in a way most of us aren't and it's all cuz she's pretty. |