Boston Herald tries to connect campus shooter's crime to Dungeons & Dragons.

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

mattstaggs

Feb 16, 2010 12:02:05
This is both lazy and irresponsible reporting, especially from a newspaper of record like the Boston Herald
Reporter Laurel J. Smart makes an extremely tenuous case for connecting violent behavior - in this case that of accused campus shooter Amy Bishop - to Dungeons & Dragons.
 
Excerpt:

Accused campus killer Amy Bishop was a devotee of Dungeons & Dragons - just like Michael “Mucko” McDermott, the lone gunman behind the devastating workplace killings at Edgewater Technology in Wakefield in 2000.

The reporter also goes on to call gaming an "egghead escape," which in my mind is a not-so-subtle anti-intellectual jab.

If you're interested in emailing the editors, you can reach them via letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com. I sent one this morning. I'd urge you to be polite and pleasant, if you do so. They don't need any more anti-gamer ammunition.
#2

modern_iconoclast

Feb 16, 2010 12:13:19
"Devotee" ?

I'm just glad they didn't mention his mental health problems, that would have shocked all the mentally ill if they had put the blame on that.

#3

meshon

Feb 16, 2010 12:34:16
Yes, the language used in this article is pretty biased. Usually when police "seize" something it's something that is illegal, or at the very least, dangerous. Generally not something related to imagination and creativity. Can you imagine how silly it would sound to read "Police seized watercolor paint and artist's brushes from the killer's apartment."

And is D&D just a "fantasy role-playing board game"? I thought writers were supposed to do research?

Unfortunately the article is syndicated, so it should be popping up in a few places. Where were the big articles when gamers raised over $170,000 for Doctors Without Borders?

cheers,
Meshon
#4

zombie_babies

Feb 16, 2010 12:36:36
Yeah, I find the fact that police did sieze D&D books as part of their investigation to be more disconcerting than this stupid article - not that it isn't disturbing in its own right.  I took a look at some of the comments and the few I saw should give ya'all some hope.  Nobody seems convinced D&D is the problem.  Most do, however, seem convinced that the article is a hunk of crap.
#5

aheadley92

Feb 16, 2010 12:40:25
 I am a journalism student and not once have I been told that in my profession I need to make up reasons for an event. News is news, reporting is not another outlet for pundits and opinions. I like John Ruch's comment.

I took this exerpt from the comments section.
"My name is John Ruch. I freelanced for the Herald for years, during which I played D&D regularly, as I still do.
This article is the exact type of hateful, incompetent, fraudulent, lazy and incorrect "reporting" that convinced me to stop associating myself with the Herald.
So, obviously, playing D&D not only turns people into murderers; it also turns people into fools who let their name appear in a paper alongside those of integrity-free morons. Oh, the horror."
#6

Cpt_Micha

Feb 16, 2010 12:41:34
is this newspaper hooked up with Faux News by any chance?

Seriously. That's how badly this is written.
#7

hayabusa

Feb 16, 2010 13:10:32
ama
is this newspaper hooked up with Faux News by any chance?

Seriously. That's how badly this is written.



It used to be owned by Murdoch.  Not anymore, though.
#8

Cpt_Micha

Feb 16, 2010 14:06:16
What did they get rid of them because they weren't good enough at being News? *ZING*
#9

Pinnacle

Feb 16, 2010 14:35:13
"'They even acted this crap out,' the source said."
Cry
This is an actual news article?  How very professional.

Did the writer run out of things to say about her and DnD?  That must be why it switched to rambling about a completely different murderer halfway through.
#10

mattstaggs

Feb 16, 2010 15:01:38
And is D&D just a "fantasy role-playing board game"? I thought writers were supposed to do research?



It's funny: there were so many other offensive things about this article that I didn't even notice this particularly egregious error.

Bravo, sir. Good catch.
#11

mattstaggs

Feb 16, 2010 15:02:52
Yeah, I find the fact that police did sieze D&D books as part of their investigation to be more disconcerting than this stupid article - not that it isn't disturbing in its own right.  I took a look at some of the comments and the few I saw should give ya'all some hope.  Nobody seems convinced D&D is the problem.  Most do, however, seem convinced that the article is a hunk of crap.

I've been sending spreading word of this article far and wide via Twitter and Facebook. Most of my pals are gamers, writers and other wordy people. Wouldn't be surprised at all to see many of those comments coming from them!
#12

zombie_babies

Feb 16, 2010 15:05:43
I've been sending spreading word of this article far and wide via Twitter and Facebook. Most of my pals are gamers, writers and other wordy people. Wouldn't be surprised at all to see many of those comments coming from them!



It's possible.  We D&D players do like to murd ... I mean, talk.  Yeah, talk. 
#13

lhockee

Feb 16, 2010 15:09:55
If the psychosis already exists before someone plays a game of imagination {PnP/Whatever}, then the psychosis is only going to be nurtured by that mental flaw when playing a game that includes violence as a main-stream theme; not induced because of it. Why is that so hard for all these "experts" to figure out? Epic Fail.
#14

Pinnacle

Feb 16, 2010 15:11:58
And is D&D just a "fantasy role-playing board game"? I thought writers were supposed to do research?



It's funny: there were so many other offensive things about this article that I didn't even notice this particularly egregious error.

Bravo, sir. Good catch.


Reminds me of how in "Dark Dungeons" the writer clearly has no idea how the game is played.
#15

Klirshon

Feb 16, 2010 19:53:56
If the psychosis already exists before someone plays a game of imagination {PnP/Whatever}, then the psychosis is only going to be nurtured by that mental flaw when playing a game that includes violence as a main-stream theme; not induced because of it. Why is that so hard for all these "experts" to figure out? Epic Fail.



This is America we're conversing about, we have to find something else to pawn our failures onto... It is forbidden to blame ourselves for our own actions.
#16

ViolenceJack

Feb 16, 2010 21:48:19
If the psychosis already exists before someone plays a game of imagination {PnP/Whatever}, then the psychosis is only going to be nurtured by that mental flaw when playing a game that includes violence as a main-stream theme; not induced because of it. Why is that so hard for all these "experts" to figure out? Epic Fail.



This is America we're conversing about, we have to find something else to pawn our failures onto... It is forbidden to blame ourselves for our own actions.


I wish I could say that Canada was better about that, but the only difference is that in Canada they'd be blaming the government.
#17

odinfellhammer

Feb 16, 2010 23:25:50
what? Have we gone back to the eighties? Haven't we even evolved  over the past 30 yrs with any understanding?????? Next thing we will be burning books. What ignorance!!!!!!!
#18

Ragnar_Lodbrok

Feb 16, 2010 23:54:16


They're wrong. D&D doesn't make people violent: stupid bull**** like this does.
#19

EscherEnigma

Feb 17, 2010 0:25:39
what? Have we gone back to the eighties? Haven't we even evolved  over the past 30 yrs with any understanding?????? Next thing we will be burning books. What ignorance!!!!!!!


I can provide links to book burnings in the US of A within the last decade, if you like.
#20

pbn

Feb 17, 2010 0:31:44
I can provide links to book burnings in the US of A within the last decade, if you like.


You beat me to it
#21

toastedamphibian

Feb 17, 2010 0:34:28
"Police seized two Dungeons & Dragons books from McDermott’s Haverhill apartment..."

!!
So.... the police are going to seize my books if I commit a crime? What the hell. Books are now seizable assets? I only figured cops would seize a book if it held records of a crime (like illegal accounting, fond diary entries, or happy time scrapbooking) or was used in a crime (like beating someone with it).
#22

Webster

Feb 17, 2010 2:45:35
Huh. And all this time I keep talling people the Game Police won't take your books away if you're playing D&D "wrong".

And how does a fan of D&D have only 2 books?
#23

dragom

Feb 17, 2010 2:51:09
Huh. And all this time I keep talling people the Game Police won't take your books away if you're playing D&D "wrong".

And how does a fan of D&D have only 2 books?


I don't think you can play the game properly with just two...  Maybe he sponged off everyone else during games?


PS: I so knew this was going to happen after the Wisconsin thing

#24

toastedamphibian

Feb 17, 2010 3:52:39
Huh. And all this time I keep talling people the Game Police won't take your books away if you're playing D&D "wrong".

And how does a fan of D&D have only 2 books?



Mabey the detective just wanted a free copy of Adventurer's Vault 2 and Primal Power to complete his/her collection.
#25

dragom

Feb 17, 2010 3:58:10
 

Mabey the detective just wanted a free copy of Adventurer's Vault 2 and Primal Power to complete his/her collection.


Interesting...  Maybe I should become an officer too so I too can seize a new TV and a couple libraries...


Though if he snagged two books out of a larger collection of a guy who's been playing since the 80's, it would be the Red and Blue books for E-bay turn around.

#26

Klirshon

Feb 17, 2010 7:48:57
Perhaps this journalist is doing her job... at being a shill. Anyone know if Chick Publications is the one paying for her opinions?
#27

boraxe

Feb 17, 2010 8:21:14
A little research turns up that the woman who wrote this is apparently 50 years old, making her 14 in 1974 the year D&D was released. Nothing would make me happier than to learn she is actually a D&D player who wrote this article as a lark, a nod to old-school anti-D&D paranoia.

Sadly, I do not think this is the case. It seems the Amy Bishop case is her current bread and butter, the focus of all her recent articles. Since no new info on the case has come to life yet she is forced to delve deeply into unfounded speculation to keep her name on the page and cash in her wallet.

Pu simply, she is a shameless hack.
#28

odinfellhammer

Feb 17, 2010 8:33:56
But, This type of journalism creates a whisper down the lane affect where people alter the story and eventually becomes urban legend. This story puts a stigma on D&D with just hearsay.
#29

Klirshon

Feb 17, 2010 8:41:02
So it's a tabloid then?
#30

boraxe

Feb 17, 2010 8:47:32
So it's a tabloid then?


It's not a tabloid, but this is tabloid journalism.
#31

Klirshon

Feb 17, 2010 8:53:13

Toe"may"toe, toe"mah"toe... close enough for me.

#32

zombie_babies

Feb 17, 2010 9:15:02
Aaarghh! Too ... many ... toes ...
#33

mattstaggs

Feb 17, 2010 9:16:01
My friend Annalee Newitz at IO9.com took up the mantle and wrote a great piece of criticism on Laurel J. Sweet's D&D piece. It's definitely worth a read. Newitz is one smart cookie, and a great writer.
#34

zombie_babies

Feb 17, 2010 9:24:12
My friend Annalee Newitz at IO9.com took up the mantle and wrote a great piece of criticism on Laurel J. Smart's D&D piece. It's definitely worth a read. Newitz is one smart cookie, and a great writer.



I dunno.  There was ample speculation in this piece as well.  Sure, she covered her butt, but it was still speculation.  I happen to think she's on the right track, but it's no kind of proof.  Still, she should be commended for digging much, much deeper than her counterpart at the Herald. 

It's the same type of article, just done better. 
#35

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 10:15:32
Can's I be a D&D murderer as wells? I know how mine for fish and stick hilt of sword into crotch!
#36

EscherEnigma

Feb 17, 2010 10:19:55
I know how mine for fish and stick hilt of sword into crotch!


You kids and your innuendo.
#37

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 10:29:02
I wish I still was a kid... no bills, no job {though I don't have one anyway at the moment}, no pressure, and all you ever had to fear was getting cooties from girls. I wish I was at least a decade younger; even being a teen would be less of a hassle.
#38

pbn

Feb 17, 2010 14:04:35
Aaarghh! Too ... many ... toes ...


I thought you were past that ;)
#39

dragom

Feb 17, 2010 14:08:42
Being in the position of a teen without actually having the mentality of a teen would be nice,  having both really sucks.
#40

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 14:09:50

Point.

I'll stick with being in my mid-twenties.

#41

zombie_babies

Feb 17, 2010 14:10:59
I thought you were past that ;)



So did I ... so did I ...
#42

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 14:12:53
Z_B!
#43

zombie_babies

Feb 17, 2010 14:14:48
You're damned lucky that pic didn't work, buddy. 
#44

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 14:19:56
Want me to make it too?

I can do that!

thefreshxpress.com/freshxp/wp-content/up...

www.dribbleglass.com/Toes/toes-34.jpg

goodmusicncoolstuff.files.wordpress.com/...

I enjoy helping people.
#45

zombie_babies

Feb 17, 2010 14:20:57
I r not clicking.
#46

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 14:22:05

I r sad now.

#47

zombie_babies

Feb 17, 2010 14:26:31
Yay?  Yes.  Yes, definitely yay. 
#48

EscherEnigma

Feb 17, 2010 14:26:35
I r not clicking.


Eh.  They're just pics of really bad toes and toe-nails.  I think one of them may have been diseased.  The pictures of brown recluse bites are worse.
#49

zombie_babies

Feb 17, 2010 14:29:03
Eh.  They're just pics of really bad toes and toe-nails.  I think one of them may have been diseased.  The pictures of brown recluse bites are worse.



I figured as much, but in order to continue this persona properly, I needed to act as though I was totally opposed to viewing toes of any sort.  Behavior to fit the schtick, you know.  I'm quite committed to the parts I choose to play - when and if I choose to play them.  Or maybe I should just be committed.  Yeah, probably that.  Anyhoo, the 4th wall has been broken and this character is now dead.  Toe away, peeples.  Toe away.
#50

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 14:32:12
Yay!

farm2.static.flickr.com/1149/593666168_4...
#51

EscherEnigma

Feb 17, 2010 14:34:47
Yay!

farm2.static.flickr.com/1149/593666168_4...


hehe.  Ok, *those* are cute.
#52

lhockee

Feb 17, 2010 14:36:27