| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1calronmoonflowerJun 15, 2011 16:47:13 | Article |
| #2Robin_HoodlumJun 15, 2011 16:55:17 | What the hell...?![]() Sickening... just... sickening.... |
| #3bone_nagaJun 15, 2011 16:55:17 | Well in the midst of budget concerns, over-crowded prisons, violent felons being accidently released from prison, and other such problems, it's good to see that the legislature is tackling the issues that are really important to their constituents. |
| #4Robin_HoodlumJun 15, 2011 16:55:40 | Well in the midst of budget concerns, over-crowded prisons, violent felons being accidently released from prison, and other such problems, it's good to see that the legislature is tackling the issues that are really important to their constituents. ![]() |
| #5draco1119Jun 15, 2011 17:34:45 | Well in the midst of budget concerns, over-crowded prisons, violent felons being accidently released from prison, and other such problems, it's good to see that the legislature is tackling the issues that are really important to their constituents. And don't forget the 100 or so state committees, sub-committes, and boards that are a complete waste of money. And air. |
| #6EscherEnigmaJun 15, 2011 19:49:50 | Of all the things I'm looking forward to about moving to California, the government isn't one of 'em. |
| #7draco1119Jun 15, 2011 19:57:49 | Of all the things I'm looking forward to about moving to California, the government isn't one of 'em. The state gov't is the second biggest reason I moved away from California. Cost of living was the first. I will always maintain that it's a great place to visit, but a horrible place to live for the poor and uneducated. Unless they can't speak English; then they'll be just fine, |
| #8MaxpersonJun 15, 2011 21:41:24 | Of all the things I'm looking forward to about moving to California, the government isn't one of 'em. You're coming to California? For God's sake, why? And what part? |
| #9EscherEnigmaJun 15, 2011 21:43:54 | For a job, and the edge of the Mojave desert. |
| #10draco1119Jun 16, 2011 12:43:07 | So government protecting workers is a bad thing? A) If fitted sheets were that good, they would already be in use, especially if, as the union says, the lack of them is increasing workers' comp claims. B) It's more a matter (for us) of California's bass-ackwards governmental priorities. They are running a $20B deficit that they can only "close" through accounting gimmicks, they can't afford to fund schools, they're cutting services, etc. while (as an example) still having ~100 redundant and/or useless boards, commitees, and sub-commitees. And that's just by the state's own admission. C) It's also a good illustration of the inordinate lobbying power unions hold over the government of the state of California. |
| #11EscefJun 16, 2011 12:56:59 | I don't see what harm this is doing to anyone. As for the lawmakers not focusing on other problems, if people only focused on one problem at a time, not only would you still get a half-assed stop-gap, you'd get one half-assed stop-gap instead of several half-assed stop-gaps for several problems. Believe it or not, they can pretend to fix several problems at once. |
| #12draco1119Jun 16, 2011 13:04:37 | Believe it or not, they can pretend to fix several problems at once. ![]() Alright, Optimus, you win. ![]() |
| #13EscefJun 16, 2011 13:09:00 | Did I inadvertently quote one of the newer Transformers series? |
| #14EscherEnigmaJun 16, 2011 13:22:46 | For me it's that legislating something like this is probably a ham-fisted way that'll end up causing problems in the long-run. If it's really a safety/health concern, it seems that they should have had OSHA or something institute the rule. But as a law... that means that even if something comes out later that's better, or later studies show something else, that they have to legislate a new change, not just have people that actually know what the frack is going on institute the change. It's that whole skipping steps on the chain of command/authority that really bothers me. |
| #15EscherEnigmaJun 16, 2011 13:45:04 | Not any more or less then a state legislature. |
| #16MaxpersonJun 16, 2011 13:46:34 | For a job, and the edge of the Mojave desert. Ahh, the land of wind and sand. Grats on the new job! |
| #17Cpt_MichaJun 16, 2011 13:49:53 | Maybe if I lived in a desert I wouldn't be so pale. *ponders this* It would also get me away from humid, piss poor air quality summers with mosquitos the size of small planes... |
| #18EscherEnigmaJun 16, 2011 13:52:53 | Maybe if I lived in a desert I wouldn't be so pale. ... you have seen pictures of me, right? If you don't tan where you're at, you'll just burn even more here. As for air quality... with those fires in Arizona we've been having a great haze over most of the state the last few weeks. It's so bad up in 'burque that you can hardly see the mountains from the river on some days. |
| #19Cpt_MichaJun 16, 2011 14:01:06 | True enough but you aren't as pale as I am. I just sorta get red, and then not pale. LOL It's not even enough of an inconveinence to call it a sunburn. |
| #20homicidal_squirrelJun 16, 2011 17:35:15 | For me it's that legislating something like this is probably a ham-fisted way that'll end up causing problems in the long-run. If it's really a safety/health concern, it seems that they should have had OSHA or something institute the rule. But as a law... that means that even if something comes out later that's better, or later studies show something else, that they have to legislate a new change, not just have people that actually know what the frack is going on institute the change. That is how they can justify their positions somehow don't they? |