| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1october_darknessNov 18, 2010 18:47:20 | I'm not going to name anyone here, but can't we have an infraction system where a repeated offender would eventually get their IP banned? It seems to me that someone/ some persons create outrageous arguments simply for the sake of arguing. |
| #2toastedamphibianNov 18, 2010 18:57:20 | I'm not going to name anyone here, but can't we have an infraction system where a repeated offender would eventually get their IP banned? It seems to me that someone/ some persons create outrageous arguments simply for the sake of arguing. ![]() It's like you don't love me anymore! ![]() |
| #3EscherEnigmaNov 18, 2010 23:35:27 | I'm not going to name anyone here, but can't we have an infraction system where a repeated offender would eventually get their IP banned? It seems to me that someone/ some persons create outrageous arguments simply for the sake of arguing. Nope. This is a corporate-owned forum. It is, essentially, a dictatorship. We the people have zero power. |
| #4sallaNov 18, 2010 23:45:53 | However, we have a Block User function. It's better than nothing. |
| #5MechaliburNov 19, 2010 0:11:45 | It is a power too great to be in the hands of the posters. |
| #6pluisjenNov 19, 2010 3:01:43 | People are way too dumb for a democracy like that. But if you don't like users, you can always report them. The ORCs will ban anyone that's really doing something wrong. |
| #7zombie_babiesNov 19, 2010 10:04:03 | Yup. Plus aren't there potentially sticky issues with IP bans? Like people posting from different machines or, worse, from public machines. I dunno. All I know is we'll never be allowed to do that cuz it will be abused. Not maybe, most assuredly. With the stalking/harassment I and some others I know have experienced, I just can't advocate allowing posters here that sort of power. |
| #8pluisjenNov 19, 2010 10:09:51 | IP bans keep out various people you didn't want to ban and nobody that you did want to ban. They're a piece of cake to evade for anyone who really wants to evade them. Welcome to the internet, where there's no way to keep the trolls out. The downside to anonimity ![]() |
| #9boraxeNov 19, 2010 10:40:22 | I'm not going to name anyone here, but can't we have an infraction system where a repeated offender would eventually get their IP banned? There is, it's called the Report function. If someone is disruptive then report them. If it happens enough they will get banned. If they return and continue to cause trouble they can get an IP ban. The other option is the Ignore function. Just turn off anyone you don't want to deal with. If everyone dislikes someone so much they all do it the net result is essentially the same, though there is nothing stopping them making a new account. They might even call it "Son of _____" or something, just to rub your nose in it. |
| #10SomeoneNov 19, 2010 11:51:04 | And there's always the caveat that if such a system existed, it could be used on you. Imagine how disruptive a bloc of jerks could be by vote banning people simply because they have however many votes it would take to kick them. |
| #11PennarinNov 21, 2010 12:05:18 | The banning process works on banning the username, and perhaps (I'm not sure on this) the original IP used. So the process is a powerful tool for control only because people don't like losing their usernames. If the guy is attached to it, plus all that comes with it - prize icons, numbers of posts, date joined - then he'll cool down rather than lose his username and start from scratch. |
| #12pigknightNov 21, 2010 12:16:41 | I'm too piggly to not be pigknight. |
| #13ADHadhNov 21, 2010 14:55:05 | I'm too piggly to not be pigknight. You could be Le Chevalier de Porc. Or Das Schweinritter. |
| #14MechaPilotNov 21, 2010 16:56:01 | And there's always the caveat that if such a system existed, it could be used on you. Imagine how disruptive a bloc of jerks could be by vote banning people simply because they have however many votes it would take to kick them. Or even one jerk with multiple accounts. |
| #15Robin_HoodlumNov 21, 2010 21:46:33 | I just find it fascinating that when some people, but not all, see someone saying stuff they do not like, they jump on the censorship wagon pretty fast. Usually these are people who cannot debate in a respectful way. Speaking solely for myself... It's not so much what you say as it is the manner in which you say it... Wait... No. It is what you say... And you think you are the only one that disagrees with me?! Either way... *shrug* |
| #16wizo_bethannaNov 21, 2010 22:35:57 | This thread has been edited and disruptive content has been removed. Please continue this conversation in a polite fashion that stays within the guidelines of the Wizards Online Code of Conduct. Debates can be constructive and fun if they are conducted with posts that are not personal in nature. Thanks! |
| #17evilleknightNov 21, 2010 23:20:46 | /0\ II / \ Oh my head, I'm so freakin wasted! |
| #18Mad_JackNov 22, 2010 0:55:05 | |
| #19jesse.two.coinsNov 22, 2010 6:37:35 | ummm he posted this cuz goldo said something to him...I doubt anyone would vote goldo out...even RH I think. |
| #20PennarinNov 23, 2010 1:12:53 | Ok ok, this is the internet, so can someone please tell me who this is about? Pwretty please? PM is your friend. |
| #21toastedamphibianNov 23, 2010 5:16:40 | ... Has nothing to do with your inability to carry a conversation that makes any sense at all. Surely not that. |
| #22jesse.two.coinsNov 23, 2010 6:28:57 | his conversations make sense but his arguements sometimes don't :p |
| #23Robin_HoodlumNov 23, 2010 7:16:19 | his conversations sometimes make sense but his arguements never do:p Fixed! |
| #24jesse.two.coinsNov 23, 2010 7:20:37 | his conversations sometimes make waffles but his arguements eat them :p |
| #25EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2010 10:36:27 | But you already knew that didn't you, Pennarin, if that is your real name. Dude, check post counts and join dates before throwing out accusations. |
| #26ADHadhNov 23, 2010 10:43:23 | There are at least two people I'd like to ban... yeah, I'll better shut up. |
| #27jesse.two.coinsNov 23, 2010 11:34:02 | /wonders if people want me banned ![]() |
| #28ADHadhNov 23, 2010 14:53:24 | But you already knew that didn't you, Pennarin, if that is your real name. Your jokes tend to not be funny. |
| #29zombie_babiesNov 23, 2010 15:34:44 | But if it isn't funny, is it a joke? |
| #30pluisjenNov 23, 2010 15:39:33 | I know plenty of people who are a joke, and most of them aren't funny at all. |
| #31EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2010 15:46:52 | And people do not have a sense of humor. Correct. I do not. It was surgically removed at birth. They were trying to cut the umbilical cord, and instead severed my sense of humor. While they were able to cut the cord on the second try, there was nothing they could do to reattach my sense of humor. And so I am doomed to live the life of a humorless man. I even have a costume. It involves a turtleneck and a serious demeanor. Edit: stupid cold fingers aren't cooperating with me typing right now. |
| #32PennarinNov 23, 2010 15:57:21 | The joke is hard to identify as such, just so you realize. |
| #33zombie_babiesNov 23, 2010 15:58:13 | I know plenty of people who are a joke, and most of them aren't funny at all. Good point. ;) Edit: stupid cold fingers aren't cooperating with me typing right now. I hate it when that happens. Er ... to me, anyway. ![]() |
| #34pluisjenNov 23, 2010 16:07:34 | The most obvious interpretation is actually "you must be a regular user hiding himself by using a secondary forum account". I must admit that was my first thought as well. |
| #35EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2010 16:17:39 | Yeah, sounded like an accusation of puppeteering to me. |
| #36Robin_HoodlumNov 24, 2010 8:14:32 | I know plenty of people who are a joke, and most of them aren't funny at all. ![]() Agreed. |
| #37Robin_HoodlumNov 24, 2010 8:15:32 | And people do not have a sense of humor. Now this is funny! |
| #38Robin_HoodlumNov 24, 2010 8:16:44 | Yeah, sounded like an accusation of puppeteering to me. It was. But now he is trying to back-peddle and claim he was just "joking". *shrug* typical goldo, so I am not surprised. |
| #39zombie_babiesNov 24, 2010 9:42:17 | It is all in the intention. I am not even sure how we get this debate from me saying to a guy who uses in a forum the name of a Athasian Dragon King if it is his real name. Oh there was no debate from me. I just felt like tossin' the question out there for funsies. |
| #40toastedamphibianNov 26, 2010 14:56:06 | It is all in the intention. I am not even sure how we get this debate from me saying to a guy who uses in a forum the name of a Athasian Dragon King if it is his real name. Like... on a line, connected by a hook? Like some sort of typical fishing thing you would keep with tackle, whatever that junk is? Whats that word I'm looking for ...? |
| #41EscherEnigmaNov 26, 2010 15:00:11 | Bobber? |
| #42toastedamphibianNov 26, 2010 15:01:05 | Bobber? Mabey. |
| #43ADHadhNov 27, 2010 7:08:48 | Sound the alarm, we have fishermen here. |
| #44jesse.two.coinsNov 29, 2010 7:12:28 | Bobber? uhhh I might be missing the sarcasm but trolling? trolling in fishing is when your chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it then you drag it along with you? |
| #45pluisjenNov 29, 2010 7:49:04 | Yes. Yes you did miss it. |
| #46toastedamphibianNov 29, 2010 14:46:47 | uhhh I might be missing the sarcasm but trolling? trolling in fishing on the internet is when your chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it then you drag it along with you? Fixed. Uhhh ... I might be missing the sarcasm, but trolling? Trolling in fishing on the internet is when your chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it. Then you drag it along with you. More Fixed |
| #47ADHadhNov 30, 2010 4:57:45 | Uhhh ... I might be missing the sarcasm, but trolling? Trolling in fishing on the internet is when you're chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it. Then you drag it along with you. Even more Fixed. All this talk of fishing is making me think about Christmas Eve. |
| #48jesse.two.coinsNov 30, 2010 6:29:51 | get off my grammar! lol ![]() |
| #49boraxeNov 30, 2010 10:03:29 | Spellchecker is your friend. How can spellchecker be his friend when they've clearly never even met one another? |
| #50jesse.two.coinsNov 30, 2010 11:39:06 | Spellchecker is your friend. true :D |
| #51toastedamphibianNov 30, 2010 17:17:35 | Spellchecker is your friend. What are you implying about Jesus?! |
| #52EscherEnigmaNov 30, 2010 17:20:25 | Did someone just imply that Jesus consorted with witches? |
| #53ak1287Nov 30, 2010 17:25:30 | I VOTE TO BAN JESUS |
| #54toastedamphibianNov 30, 2010 17:27:24 | Jesus is already banned, same as Budda and Vishnu. |
| #55toastedamphibianNov 30, 2010 17:28:40 | Did someone just imply that Jesus consorted with witches? Jesus loves witches! [I'm gonna get banned, arn't I? ] |
| #56Mad_JackNov 30, 2010 19:13:30 | Jesus hates all of you... He would have told you that himself, but they deleted his latest sockpuppet account. |
| #57jesse.two.coinsDec 01, 2010 11:52:57 |
I'm jewish lmao jesus= nice guy but ehhh :p |
| #58Robin_HoodlumDec 01, 2010 13:20:00 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. And I'm sure it disappoints Him to know some of you are being so callous and careless with His name. It's ok though, He will forgive you if you but ask... |
| #59EscherEnigmaDec 01, 2010 14:36:47 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. Clearly we're listening to different preachers. |
| #60boraxeDec 01, 2010 14:50:58 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. ![]() |
| #61adun_irvingDec 01, 2010 14:54:59 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ...I would have kept laughing if this wasn't, sadly, true. |
| #62Robin_HoodlumDec 01, 2010 15:04:00 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. Perhaps. Not that I know, but I do not believe Jesus loves you any less just because of your sexual preference. Maybe not what "traditional" Christianity believes, but it is what I believe. Am I wrong? Who knows. But I'll be sure to ask Jesus when I see Him... not that I am in a hurry to see Him... |
| #63ak1287Dec 01, 2010 17:02:55 | I'm jewish lmao jesus= nice guy but ehhh :p Now if you were Roman.... |
| #64toastedamphibianDec 01, 2010 17:08:30 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! (?) |
| #65WolfLordBranDec 01, 2010 17:11:46 | I'm jewish lmao jesus= nice guy but ehhh :p ![]() What if you're descended from Romans? Should I be worrying for my immortal soul even more? |
| #66homicidal_squirrelDec 01, 2010 18:07:37 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! I see what you did there. |
| #67ak1287Dec 01, 2010 21:17:05 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! html_removed ![]() |
| #68SomeoneDec 02, 2010 0:38:10 | What if you're descended from Romans? Should I be worrying for my immortal soul even more? Nah, Jupiter's got your back. |
| #69jesse.two.coinsDec 02, 2010 6:40:55 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! that made me laugh, that was pretty good. |
| #70WolfLordBranDec 02, 2010 16:31:34 | What if you're descended from Romans? Should I be worrying for my immortal soul even more? *considers Jupiter/Zeus's track record for a moment* I don't think I'm comfortable with that... ![]() |
| #82toastedamphibianNov 26, 2010 15:01:05 | Bobber? Mabey. |
| #83ADHadhNov 27, 2010 7:08:48 | Sound the alarm, we have fishermen here. |
| #84jesse.two.coinsNov 29, 2010 7:12:28 | Bobber? uhhh I might be missing the sarcasm but trolling? trolling in fishing is when your chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it then you drag it along with you? |
| #85pluisjenNov 29, 2010 7:49:04 | Yes. Yes you did miss it. |
| #86toastedamphibianNov 29, 2010 14:46:47 | uhhh I might be missing the sarcasm but trolling? trolling in fishing on the internet is when your chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it then you drag it along with you? Fixed. Uhhh ... I might be missing the sarcasm, but trolling? Trolling in fishing on the internet is when your chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it. Then you drag it along with you. More Fixed |
| #87ADHadhNov 30, 2010 4:57:45 | Uhhh ... I might be missing the sarcasm, but trolling? Trolling in fishing on the internet is when you're chugging along baiting and waiting for something to grab it. Then you drag it along with you. Even more Fixed. All this talk of fishing is making me think about Christmas Eve. |
| #88jesse.two.coinsNov 30, 2010 6:29:51 | get off my grammar! lol ![]() |
| #89boraxeNov 30, 2010 10:03:29 | Spellchecker is your friend. How can spellchecker be his friend when they've clearly never even met one another? |
| #90jesse.two.coinsNov 30, 2010 11:39:06 | Spellchecker is your friend. true :D |
| #91toastedamphibianNov 30, 2010 17:17:35 | Spellchecker is your friend. What are you implying about Jesus?! |
| #92EscherEnigmaNov 30, 2010 17:20:25 | Did someone just imply that Jesus consorted with witches? |
| #93ak1287Nov 30, 2010 17:25:30 | I VOTE TO BAN JESUS |
| #94toastedamphibianNov 30, 2010 17:27:24 | Jesus is already banned, same as Budda and Vishnu. |
| #95toastedamphibianNov 30, 2010 17:28:40 | Did someone just imply that Jesus consorted with witches? Jesus loves witches! [I'm gonna get banned, arn't I? ] |
| #96Mad_JackNov 30, 2010 19:13:30 | Jesus hates all of you... He would have told you that himself, but they deleted his latest sockpuppet account. |
| #97jesse.two.coinsDec 01, 2010 11:52:57 |
I'm jewish lmao jesus= nice guy but ehhh :p |
| #98Robin_HoodlumDec 01, 2010 13:20:00 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. And I'm sure it disappoints Him to know some of you are being so callous and careless with His name. It's ok though, He will forgive you if you but ask... |
| #99EscherEnigmaDec 01, 2010 14:36:47 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. Clearly we're listening to different preachers. |
| #100boraxeDec 01, 2010 14:50:58 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. ![]() |
| #101adun_irvingDec 01, 2010 14:54:59 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ...I would have kept laughing if this wasn't, sadly, true. |
| #102Robin_HoodlumDec 01, 2010 15:04:00 | Actually, Jesus loves us all. Perhaps. Not that I know, but I do not believe Jesus loves you any less just because of your sexual preference. Maybe not what "traditional" Christianity believes, but it is what I believe. Am I wrong? Who knows. But I'll be sure to ask Jesus when I see Him... not that I am in a hurry to see Him... |
| #103ak1287Dec 01, 2010 17:02:55 | I'm jewish lmao jesus= nice guy but ehhh :p Now if you were Roman.... |
| #104toastedamphibianDec 01, 2010 17:08:30 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! (?) |
| #105WolfLordBranDec 01, 2010 17:11:46 | I'm jewish lmao jesus= nice guy but ehhh :p ![]() What if you're descended from Romans? Should I be worrying for my immortal soul even more? |
| #106homicidal_squirrelDec 01, 2010 18:07:37 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! I see what you did there. |
| #107ak1287Dec 01, 2010 21:17:05 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! html_removed ![]() |
| #108SomeoneDec 02, 2010 0:38:10 | What if you're descended from Romans? Should I be worrying for my immortal soul even more? Nah, Jupiter's got your back. |
| #109jesse.two.coinsDec 02, 2010 6:40:55 | ... you pay more on your phone bill! that made me laugh, that was pretty good. |
| #110WolfLordBranDec 02, 2010 16:31:34 | What if you're descended from Romans? Should I be worrying for my immortal soul even more? *considers Jupiter/Zeus's track record for a moment* I don't think I'm comfortable with that... ![]() |