| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombie_babiesOct 04, 2010 14:18:11 | Link Yeah, looks like we may actually see a few in a few years. 'Course they'll cost $100k, require a flight plan and major regulatory changes need to be made before they're even able to fly in more populated areas, but hell. Jetpacks, man. Jetpacks. |
| #2melloredOct 04, 2010 15:02:33 | They've exsisted for a good while. Good to see they've finally gone commercial though. |
| #3toastedamphibianOct 04, 2010 17:56:43 | How long till someone buys 4 or 5 of thoes UAV's and bolt them to a supercompact? |
| #4Robin_HoodlumOct 04, 2010 18:03:55 | Can you imagine the insurance cost for owning one of those? |
| #5toastedamphibianOct 04, 2010 19:27:20 | Can you imagine the insurance cost for owning one of those? They cost 100,000 a piece: I doubt the likes of you or I need to give much consideration to the ancilliary costs of ownership. |
| #6Robin_HoodlumOct 04, 2010 19:51:52 | Can you imagine the insurance cost for owning one of those? True, but the insurance must be monstrous... |
| #7zombie_babiesOct 05, 2010 8:47:40 | Meh, if some lady hears something that sounds like, oh I dunno, a jetpack hovering outside her window, she'll likely investigate. I just don't think something of this nature will be really conducive to peeping. |
| #8pluisjenOct 05, 2010 9:02:42 | ![]() Hell yes. This is going on my "I will never own this, but I'll still dream about it." list. |
| #9KlirshonOct 05, 2010 11:47:09 | Without a mechanism to silence/disrupt the sound waves from the engines, using a jetpack is inefficient as a close range reconnaissance device. Also your behaviour might become obvious when you're hovering in place near a window with your hand on your crotch. The humans below that notice you might report you to the local authorities whom may or may not have jetpacks of their own. |
| #10zombie_babiesOct 05, 2010 11:57:35 | I think some authorities are on the short list for this tech. Like, they get to buy it first. I'm not sure the hand on crotch issue would be an issue, though. I mean, if we can make jetpacks, I'm pretty sure we can come up with some sort of machine to make that activity hands free. Sure that would take some of the romance out of it, but that beats gettin' caught hands down. If ya wanna take that last part of that last statement there as a childish pun, by all means ... |
| #11Robin_HoodlumOct 05, 2010 16:47:47 | Meh, if some lady hears something that sounds like, oh I dunno, a jetpack hovering outside her window, she'll likely investigate. I just don't think something of this nature will be really conducive to peeping. Fixed that for ya! |
| #12EscherEnigmaOct 05, 2010 17:32:26 | I dunno... I think that, as a man, if I found someone playing peeping tom, I'd probably be a bit flattered. I'd still threaten them with a shotgun, but still, flattery where you can get it, ya know? |
| #13toastedamphibianOct 05, 2010 18:10:25 | I dunno... I think that, as a man, if I found someone playing peeping tom, I'd probably be a bit flattered. I'd still threaten them with a shotgun, but still, flattery where you can get it, ya know? Honestly,I would probably just assume they are casing my home in preparation for some burgling. Perhapes I just how a low estimation of my sex appeal, but I'm sure the idea that they just wanted to see me in the buff would never cross my mind. |
| #14homicidal_squirrelOct 06, 2010 0:43:54 | Can you imagine the insurance cost for owning one of those? They may not require insurance. Here in Florida motorcycle drivers/riders aren't required to have insurance. If you think about it, you are pretty likely to die in a motorcycle accident. I used to work as a Fire Rescue Dispatcher in Miami and every time we received a call that there was a motorcycle accident, the person would die. It was usually bad enough that after the body was taken by the rescue unit, I had to dispatch an engine to wash down the street. People tend to smear across the street when they crash on motorcycles, leaving behind a good amount of blood (and a lot of times body parts). I would imagine a crash in one of these jet packs would require of a special rescue unit equipped with a dust pan, broom, and a bucket to pick up whatever is left of the pilot. I dunno... I think that, as a man, if I found someone playing peeping tom, I'd probably be a bit flattered. I'd still threaten them with a shotgun, but still, flattery where you can get it, ya know? That's funny, someone wanting to see you naked hasn't crossed your mind, but a guy flying around in a $100,000.00 jet pack wanting to steal from you has? |
| #15pluisjenOct 06, 2010 1:42:06 | Isn't one of the reasons you get insurance to pay for the damage you do to others with your crash? Dead or not, there might still be someone else involved that could be seriously hurt, and it would kinda suck for him if you didn't have insurance. |
| #16homicidal_squirrelOct 06, 2010 2:26:46 | Isn't one of the reasons you get insurance to pay for the damage you do to others with your crash? Dead or not, there might still be someone else involved that could be seriously hurt, and it would kinda suck for him if you didn't have insurance. What are they going to do? Sue you? Good luck collecting from a dead person. |
| #17pluisjenOct 06, 2010 3:25:08 | Oh right. Sorry, I forgot people are egocentrical ****s for a moment. ![]() |
| #18homicidal_squirrelOct 06, 2010 6:37:57 | Oh right. Sorry, I forgot people are egocentrical ****s for a moment. I don't think the dead care either way. |
| #19pluisjenOct 06, 2010 9:29:26 | That's why you get insurance while you are still alive, so that even if you die, the person who'se life you just ruined, at least gets something to keep going. If you don't care about what happens to people after you die, you qualify as an egocentrical ****. |
| #20scypioOct 06, 2010 9:32:35 | Oh right. Sorry, I forgot people are egocentrical ****s for a moment. How could you ever forget? |
| #21homicidal_squirrelOct 06, 2010 9:48:30 | That's why you get insurance while you are still alive, so that even if you die, the person who'se life you just ruined, at least gets something to keep going. Such conviction... rawr... Seriously though, if you put yourself in a situation in which your personal safety is greatly diminished, chances are you don't care about ruining someone else's life. Sure, we can argue about whether it is right or wrong to ride a motorcycle without insurance. We can argue about how much of an egocentric **** a person who does so is. In the end, what will that achieve? Not much. You telling me that a person who does that is an egocentric **** is completely pointless... I drive a Nissan Sentra. Besides, my comment was aimed at RH's comment about insurance. If motorcycle drivers aren't required to have insurance, chances are the same reasoning may be used to not require insurance for jet pack pilots. |
| #22pluisjenOct 06, 2010 11:48:28 | How could you ever forget? I can be quite naïve. Seriously though, if you put yourself in a situation in which your personal safety is greatly diminished, chances are you don't care about ruining someone else's life. Sure, we can argue about whether it is right or wrong to ride a motorcycle without insurance. We can argue about how much of an egocentric **** a person who does so is. In the end, what will that achieve? Not much. You telling me that a person who does that is an egocentric **** is completely pointless... I drive a Nissan Sentra. Besides, my comment was aimed at RH's comment about insurance. If motorcycle drivers aren't required to have insurance, chances are the same reasoning may be used to not require insurance for jet pack pilots. It might achieve little. But they will still be egocentric ****. I wasn't calling you one. But if someone goes about not caring about the lives of other people, regardless of wether or not that person is reducing his/her personal safety, he/she is an egocentric ****. Also, I think it's stupid that a motor cycle rider doesn't need to be insured, but that's truly another discussion. (Also one that I don't think is true in Europe, or at least where I live) |
| #23homicidal_squirrelOct 06, 2010 12:13:59 | How could you ever forget? Just to be clear... are you calling me one this time or was that just a lapse in the manner in which you made your statement? |
| #24toastedamphibianOct 06, 2010 15:24:28 | I dunno... I think that, as a man, if I found someone playing peeping tom, I'd probably be a bit flattered. I'd still threaten them with a shotgun, but still, flattery where you can get it, ya know? Mabey I'm filthy rich. Mabey I was responding to EE who was speaking in the general case of a peeping Tom, and not the specific, hasn't yet ever been likely to happen, case of a jetpack peeping Tom. |
| #25toastedamphibianOct 06, 2010 15:28:50 | Just to be clear... are you calling me one this time or was that just a lapse in the manner in which you made your statement? I'm not seeing what there is to be confused about by the quoted text. He applied a lable to a broad yet specific group of people. Is he applying that label to you? If you fall in that group, then yes, else no. |
| #26pluisjenOct 06, 2010 16:21:52 | What toasted said. ![]() |
| #27homicidal_squirrelOct 06, 2010 17:12:05 |
Well... that depends on the day... |
| #28pluisjenOct 07, 2010 1:51:56 | Then, depending on what day it is, I may or may not be calling you an egocentric **** along with all these other people ![]() Then again I also call myself an **** sometimes so I guess it's not the end of the world or anything. Like Escher_Enigma said, I'm needlessly judgemental, and pretty harsh on people, including myself. |
| #29homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 12:20:15 | Then, depending on what day it is, I may or may not be calling you an egocentric **** along with all these other people That was being harsh? Don't worry about it... I don't take offense to what people say on online posts... it's pretty pointless. |
| #30pluisjenOct 07, 2010 14:12:24 | Not really harsh, more of a heads-up in case I really do get harsh or something. But smart to not take offense to people, it's a waste of time. |
| #31homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 14:32:13 | Not really harsh, more of a heads-up in case I really do get harsh or something. But smart to not take offense to people, it's a waste of time. Heh... yeah... it is a waste of time... but in any case... can we get back to the jet packs? I want one!!! |
| #32zombie_babiesOct 07, 2010 14:34:45 | Me too. They're expensive, sure, but they're also cheaper than most supercars. And somehow, amazingly enough, more practical. |
| #33EscherEnigmaOct 07, 2010 14:37:26 | Meh. I don't want a jet pack. I just want reasonably priced and available public transit. |
| #34zombie_babiesOct 07, 2010 14:46:08 | Blech. Me likey private transportation. |
| #35toastedamphibianOct 07, 2010 14:48:48 | Meh. I don't want a jet pack. I just want reasonably priced and available public transit. *begins working on business plan for jet pack taxi service* |
| #36homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 14:50:49 | Meh. I don't want a jet pack. I just want reasonably priced and available public transit. I'd like to see where you put the passenger... |
| #37zombie_babiesOct 07, 2010 14:53:15 | On the cabbie's tummy? Like a tandem parachute jump? |
| #38toastedamphibianOct 07, 2010 14:53:15 | Meh. I don't want a jet pack. I just want reasonably priced and available public transit. This really is not an appropriate place to request pictures of my crotch squirrel. |
| #39homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 15:10:25 | Meh. I don't want a jet pack. I just want reasonably priced and available public transit. So is it safe to assume it'll be an adults only ride? |
| #40toastedamphibianOct 07, 2010 15:18:54 | *adds optional 'pants present' package to business plan* Options appropriate for the whole family! |
| #41homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 15:22:15 | *adds optional 'pants present' package to business plan* Damn... a whole family hanging from there... that might hurt. any in-flight movies available? |
| #42toastedamphibianOct 07, 2010 15:26:40 | *adds optional 'pants present' package to business plan* I'm affraid that might exceed weight limits. Besides, we would mostly cater to drunk people who want to maintain their reputation. Leaving the bar in a taxi? Lame. Leaving the bar on a jetpack? Awesome. |
| #43homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 15:30:19 | *adds optional 'pants present' package to business plan* Yes, but leaving a bar on a jetpack while grabbing on to the driver's package... that may be worse for their reputation... |
| #44toastedamphibianOct 07, 2010 16:01:51 | Depends on the driver, don't it? |
| #45homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 16:08:46 | Depends on the driver, don't it? Hmmm... sure... you try to imagine what a female driver would have them grab on to. |
| #46toastedamphibianOct 07, 2010 16:13:47 | Depends on the driver, don't it? I don't really have time to do that right now, nor am I in an appropriate place. |
| #47homicidal_squirrelOct 07, 2010 16:29:16 | Depends on the driver, don't it? There's always time for that. There is also no inappropriate place for it. |