| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1homicidal_squirrelApr 23, 2012 15:56:00 | www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/04/23/russi... |
| #2homicidal_squirrelApr 23, 2012 17:09:14 | That is true. It's a very advanced method from what I hear. Still, comrade Ahab needs no help from silly Japanese. He will catch the mighty white whale!!! ![]() |
| #3jetshieldApr 23, 2012 18:17:33 | They should ask Japanese scientists to help them. They have developped a scientific method to know if the meat taste different. I don't think they need to ask. I'm sure Japanese research vessels are trying to find Iceberg as we speak. For purely scientific reasons of course. |
| #4grehnheweApr 23, 2012 18:22:23 | That is true. It's a very advanced method from what I hear. Still, comrade Ahab needs no help from silly Japanese. He will catch the mighty white whale!!! There will be a bronze statue erected in Red Square of a shirtless Putin throwing a harpoon. |
| #5Ragnar_LodbrokApr 23, 2012 19:44:01 | Orcas are't whales. While orcas are a variety of dolphin, all dolphins, porpoises, and whales are cetaceans, and both dolphins and porpoises are also classified as toothed whales. So orcas are whales, as are all other dolphins. |
| #6Ragnar_LodbrokApr 23, 2012 23:37:04 | Except that the tem "toothed whales" in the form inclusive of all varieties of dolphin is an actual classification, unlike "koala bear," which is outright inaccurate. I do tend to agree that Odontoceti and Mysticeti shouldn't be grouped as closely as they are due to the large amount of physical differences, but I don't make the classifications. Common usage of the term "whale" causes it to seem only to be the layman's term for cetaceans. Seeing as most people are laymen, I see no issue with using the term "whale" to refer to all cetaceans. Zoology and taxonomy are unfamiliar to most, so it becomes necessary to use familiar terms. |